Jeff
264 posts

Jeff
@jeffborack
To save the world from population collapse, I built a dating app that uses AI to help you find your perfect partner. Link below.
Brooklyn Katılım Haziran 2013
101 Takip Edilen95 Takipçiler

@jeffborack They definitely are going to need to show off 14.3 and have it be Legitimately incredible. I still genuinely think that it would have to be probably the biggest single jump in software that we've ever seen from FSD or they're going to be in a bad position
English

I'm hoping that if my hypothesis is correct that they thought 14.2 would be good enough for unsupervised at scale but it wasn't, I'm hoping the delay between 14.2 and 14.3 is them just training the shit out of 14.3..
Getting it even better than it would have been just so it's ready and aligned with the cybercab.
Elon Musk@elonmusk
@DBurkland @pbeisel It’s in testing right now. Wide release in a few weeks.
English

@JonnyRoot_ Yea the NHL needs a Hammurabi's code. If you injure someone on a dirty play like that, you're suspended until that player is medically cleared to play again.
English

@rohanvarma Here's an idea: If codex tries to fix a bug by adding code, and the fix doesn't work, before moving onto the next idea and adding more code, it should consider removing the changes that didn't work.
English

The faulty assumption you make is this: The liability risk is massive. Law firms currently have to pay for this insurance. Their incident rate is calculated by the insurance company and reflected in the cost of insurance. If models have higher incident rates than lawyers, their insurance costs will be higher. But what if their incident rate is lower. What if it's only a tiny fraction of the incident rate of human lawyers? Then the insurance rate is actually lower and human lawyers are at a disadvantage, economically, to algos. And every day, the algos get better. The humans don't.
English

You guys don’t get it yet.
Everyone keeps saying AI is going to replace lawyers.
I don’t think people understand how this actually plays out.
Let’s say you use AI to draft a contract.
The contract misses something important. A year later it costs you two million dollars.
What do you do?
Right now, you sue your lawyer.
In the AI world, you’d sue the AI company.
Two things can happen.
Option 1: The AI company has liability for legal advice.
If that’s the case, every AI company will immediately stop letting consumers use AI for real legal work. The liability risk is massive.
Option 2: The AI company has no liability because of disclaimers.
If that happens, every state bar in the country will say consumers are being exposed to unregulated legal advice and call it the unauthorized practice of law.
And they’ll shut it down that way.
Either path leads to the same outcome.
Consumer AI will be limited to generic “Wikipedia-style” legal information and LegalZoom level document prep.
But the real AI tools?
Those will live inside law firms.
Lawyers will use them to move faster, analyze more data, and run way more matters at once.
The M&A lawyer doing 5 deals at a time will do 50.
Trial lawyers will run far more cases simultaneously.
The idea that AI replaces lawyers probably dies.
The more likely outcome is that AI supercharges the best lawyers and makes the profession even more profitable than ever.
Wall Street Mav@WallStreetMav
BREAKING: Lawyers are trying to protect their jobs from Ai. A proposed New York law would ban AI from answering questions related to medicine, law, dentistry, nursing, psychology, social work, engineering, & more. It is being pushed by the lawyer lobbyists, they included other groups to get more support.
English

what if they had cut 100%?
zerohedge@zerohedge
*BLOCK SHARES JUMP 18% ON PLAN TO CUT OVER 40% OF WORKFORCE
English

Peter Thiel just told Silicon Valley it’s automating away its own cognitive moat.
Nobody there is paying attention.
Thiel: “It is striking to me how bad Silicon Valley is at talking about these sorts of things.”
The industry is either arguing over 20% improvements in the next transformer model or jumping straight to simulation theory.
They’re missing the massive real-world shift happening right in the middle.
Thiel: “My intuition would be it’s going to be quite the opposite, where it seems much worse for the math people than the word people.”
For decades, Silicon Valley worshipped quantitative intelligence. Math and coding were the ultimate safety nets.
Thiel: “Within three to five years, the AI models will be able to solve all the US Math Olympiad problems.”
Once a machine instantly solves the hardest math problems on earth, the economic value of being a human calculator doesn’t just decline.
It disappears.
And the historical irony is brutal.
The societal bias toward math over verbal ability started during the French Revolution. Not because math was more valuable. Because verbal ability ran in aristocratic families, and math was elevated as the great equalizer to break nepotism.
A 200-year-old political accident became the foundation of Silicon Valley’s entire hiring philosophy.
AI is about to snap it back.
The people who built the models that can now outperform them mathematically spent their careers optimizing for the wrong skill.
The future belongs to the word people.
The engineers didn’t see it coming because they were too busy calculating.
English

@EthanHe_42 I really hope web/x search pricing comes down for API users. That one search would have cost $5.50.
English

@DudespostingWs I better not hear that it's a clawdbot sailing while he sleeps.
English

One of my all time greatest gaming memories was playing in the WoW open beta with my roommates. We managed to get up to about level 8 when they announced the servers would be shutting down, and decided to run as far into the world as we could. As we were sprinting through Stranglethorn Vale, the first time ever seeing it, velociraptors were jumping out of the bushes and one-shotting us. Unbelievable.
English

The last "modern" game I ever played was World of Warcraft, from 2004 to 2010, the end of Wrath of the Lich King.
I know there were MMORPGs before (and after), but when the original World of Warcraft launched in 2004, it felt closer to "perfection" than any game before or since. Nothing has changed that feeling to this day. What changed was the game itself after the death of Arthas in Wrath of the Lich King.
The original WoW felt so vast, so open, and so alive - it’s hard to put into words. There was no min-maxing yet, no speedruns, no parsing records, no gear score requirements. If you were really "pro," you connected with friends or guildies via Ventrilo. There was no WeakAuras, no threat meters, no Questie guiding you.
You quickly learned that even the most expensive vendor gear was trash compared to quest rewards. You had to walk from Elwynn Forest to the Redridge Mountains - and if you dared peek across the river into Duskwood, the spiders there would one-shot you (I’m sure we all did that). The first time you equipped a green item! The first time you swapped it for a blue! And the envy of seeing someone with purple gear, omg!
Saving up for a mount and the catharsis when you could finally afford one! The first time you entered the Deadmines, the foolish solo attempt on Hogger only to realize instantly it was a death sentence, stepping into Alterac Valley battlegrounds and being in awe of its size, wiping on Ragnaros again and again before finally killing him, and the sheer joy of celebrating together with your guild.
The excitement and awe of entering Naxxramas for the first time, struggling to down Patchwerk, the teamwork, the slow progress, seeing Sapphiron dead on the frozen ground and being moments away from Kel’Thuzad… so close!
It truly felt like a massive world - not just in size, but in stories. The announcement of The Burning Crusade and the Dark Portal appearing in the Blasted Lands; you couldn’t wait to walk through it. Then the ultimate climax when Wrath of the Lich King launched, eventually facing the most badass character in gaming history: Arthas.
World of Warcraft was magic. Until it wasn’t. Just like Blizzard was once the greatest game studio of all - until they weren’t. Warcraft used to be tough, glorious and epic... now it's pink Disney fluff.
Nothing has recaptured that feeling from 2004 to 2010. I wonder if anything ever will again.
I sometimes watch the trailer of the original WoW. It still hits close to the (gamer) heart…
English

@Scobleizer @levelsio Talking is faster, but typing produces a more thoughtful, elegant response.
English

@levelsio I type way faster than you do and, sorry, voice is way faster than me.
English

I never do voice, I tried for a few days and it's too unnatural to me to talk to my computer
Especially considering there's people near me like gf or if I'm in a cafe etc
Voice coding is just too weird for me, and I think I can type faster than I talk
Niz@nizbuilds
@levelsio Do you voice prompt or type? From the typos I see, I think you type. Have you tried voice?
English

@alexoakdev I definitely experienced this, even after turning the thinking all the way down and then moving to haiku as a last ditch effort. The $20 codex plan feels like Claude from 2 months ago in terms of token consumption, and my first month was free.
English















