Raul Guerrero

@AforeSURAMX es una mierda su app, su portal y su atención, eviten Sura a toda costa

@Ric_RTP @DeniseDresserG Sounds like the perfect resume of a Microsoft founder to me, guess that's why MS really wanted to deal with him 🙃

The journalist who took down Harvey Weinstein just spent 18 months investigating Sam Altman. And what he found out is genuinely insane: The people who built OpenAI went on record saying he can't be trusted with the future of humanity. A Microsoft executive even compared him to Bernie Madoff. This isn't just some hit piece. It's 100+ interviews, secret memos, HR documents, Slack messages, and private notes that had never been seen before. Here's everything you have to know about Ronan Farrow's investigation: Ilya Sutskever, OpenAI's former chief scientist and CO-FOUNDER, compiled 70 pages of internal evidence against Altman. Slack messages. HR files. Behavioral analysis. The word at the top of his list of Altman's "consistent patterns": lying. He sent the documents as disappearing messages because he was "terrified" someone would find them. They became legendary in Silicon Valley. Insiders just call them "the Ilya Memos." Dario Amodei, another co-founder who left to start Anthropic, kept his own private notes. One line: "The problem with OpenAI is Sam himself." Paul Graham, the man who RECRUITED Altman to run Y Combinator, told colleagues Altman had been "lying to us all the time." Multiple YC partners had complained about Altman's behavior by 2018. He was effectively forced out in 2019 despite publicly claiming for YEARS that he left voluntarily. Former board members described him as "unconstrained by truth." And the investigation found that Altman reportedly lied to the board about obtaining safety approvals for some of ChatGPT's most controversial features. That's the man running an $852 billion company with 900 million weekly users and a Pentagon contract. But here's where this gets really crazy: The New Yorker investigation dropped on Sunday. SAME DAY, Altman publishes a 13 page policy paper proposing robot taxes, a public wealth fund, and a four-day workweek. The most ambitious social policy document in OpenAI's history. Dropped within HOURS of the most damaging article ever written about him. That's not coincidence. Monday: Elon Musk files a court motion demanding Altman be REMOVED as CEO. He wants the for-profit conversion completely unwound. Then Friday at 3:45 AM: a 20yo throws a Molotov cocktail at Altman's San Francisco mansion. It bounces off the house. Lights the gate on fire. An hour later, same guy shows up at OpenAI HQ threatening to burn the building down. Police arrest him on the spot. Nobody was hurt. But within hours, Altman posts a photo of his husband and 1yo child on his blog. Writes that he hopes the image "might dissuade the next person." Then blames the New Yorker article for making things "more dangerous" for him. In 5 days, Altman went from the target of the most devastating investigation in tech history to the sympathetic father whose family was attacked. Now anyone who criticizes him has to do it in the shadow of a firebombing. The New Yorker spent 18 months building the case that Altman is dangerous. Altman turned it into the reason HE'S in danger. And none of this changes what Farrow actually found: - The co-founders don't trust him - The former board doesn't trust him - The chief scientist documented 70 pages of evidence and was too scared to send them through normal channels - Paul Graham says he was lied to - A Microsoft executive put him in the same sentence as Madoff The trial starts in 16 days. If Musk wins, the for-profit conversion gets unwound and Altman is removed. If Altman wins, the man that every person who helped build OpenAI has publicly warned about gets permanent, unchecked control of the most powerful AI company on Earth. Either way, one thing is now undeniable... The people closest to Sam Altman are the ones screaming the loudest warnings. And this week proved he knows exactly how to make sure nobody listens. Peak manipulation.

@LundukeJournal @richgel999 In the end no one to share knowledge, experiences and all the great things that brought the WWW in the first place, if it becomes mostly machine driven then where will those bots that generate no knowledge learn from? Where will humans? I don't see people running to college

The Internet is about to become utterly useless. - AI bots now have the ability to interact with nearly every aspect of the Web (including source control, social media, email, blogs and more). - AI bots can code, mimic human writing styles, generate images, videos, and authentic sounding human speech. - Anyone can fire up dozens, if not hundreds (or thousands), such AI bots. Quickly, cheaply, and easily. The barrier to entry for a new bot is extremely low. - In fact, bots can spin up new bots. - There are, at present, no solutions for blocking or stopping AI bots in any meaningful way. Even before these recent advancements in bot capabilities, human traffic already accounted for less than half of all activity on the Internet. That was just the pre-show. It’s about to get weird.

@gdb I remember when open source was for democratization of tech and giving anyone with enough drive to access tech and change the world, this is the opposite as only people with enough tokens can afford getting access to innovation. Tech dev is getting back to just who can afford it

Software development is undergoing a renaissance in front of our eyes. If you haven't used the tools recently, you likely are underestimating what you're missing. Since December, there's been a step function improvement in what tools like Codex can do. Some great engineers at OpenAI yesterday told me that their job has fundamentally changed since December. Prior to then, they could use Codex for unit tests; now it writes essentially all the code and does a great deal of their operations and debugging. Not everyone has yet made that leap, but it's usually because of factors besides the capability of the model. Every company faces the same opportunity now, and navigating it well — just like with cloud computing or the Internet — requires careful thought. This post shares how OpenAI is currently approaching retooling our teams towards agentic software development. We're still learning and iterating, but here's how we're thinking about it right now: As a first step, by March 31st, we're aiming that: (1) For any technical task, the tool of first resort for humans is interacting with an agent rather than using an editor or terminal. (2) The default way humans utilize agents is explicitly evaluated as safe, but also productive enough that most workflows do not need additional permissions. In order to get there, here's what we recommended to the team a few weeks ago: 1. Take the time to try out the tools. The tools do sell themselves — many people have had amazing experiences with 5.2 in Codex, after having churned from codex web a few months ago. But many people are also so busy they haven't had a chance to try Codex yet or got stuck thinking "is there any way it could do X" rather than just trying. - Designate an "agents captain" for your team — the primary person responsible for thinking about how agents can be brought into the teams' workflow. - Share experiences or questions in a few designated internal channels - Take a day for a company-wide Codex hackathon 2. Create skills and AGENTS[.md]. - Create and maintain an AGENTS[.md] for any project you work on; update the AGENTS[.md] whenever the agent does something wrong or struggles with a task. - Write skills for anything that you get Codex to do, and commit it to the skills directory in a shared repository 3. Inventory and make accessible any internal tools. - Maintain a list of tools that your team relies on, and make sure someone takes point on making it agent-accessible (such as via a CLI or MCP server). 4. Structure codebases to be agent-first. With the models changing so fast, this is still somewhat untrodden ground, and will require some exploration. - Write tests which are quick to run, and create high-quality interfaces between components. 5. Say no to slop. Managing AI generated code at scale is an emerging problem, and will require new processes and conventions to keep code quality high - Ensure that some human is accountable for any code that gets merged. As a code reviewer, maintain at least the same bar as you would for human-written code, and make sure the author understands what they're submitting. 6. Work on basic infra. There's a lot of room for everyone to build basic infrastructure, which can be guided by internal user feedback. The core tools are getting a lot better and more usable, but there's a lot of infrastructure that currently go around the tools, such as observability, tracking not just the committed code but the agent trajectories that led to them, and central management of the tools that agents are able to use. Overall, adopting tools like Codex is not just a technical but also a deep cultural change, with a lot of downstream implications to figure out. We encourage every manager to drive this with their team, and to think through other action items — for example, per item 5 above, what else can prevent a lot of "functionally-correct but poorly-maintainable code" from creeping into codebases.

@5mukx scm-manager.org

GitHub is not a safe place to store your confidential projects, code, or research. I'll tell you why. GitHub monitors whatever you do, i know this already but today, I caught github red handed. Here's how, Just a few minutes ago, github suspended my private dummy account, saying it violates the terms of service. I hadn't posted anything in the repo. It was a private account where only I could see my starred repositories. I love collecting cool rare projects/source codes and categorizing them in lists. I don't care much since it's just a dummy account with nothing important, but it had some cool lists I'd starred. Sharing this for awareness, dudes if you are doing some private research and storing it as private repo... If you have just $3 to $5 a month, rent a server and host gitea there. Best and perfect your rules, your code, your project.

@totalplaymx ya les mandé mensaje, no se dignan en contestarme, ya el SAT sabrá que ustedes se niegan a facturar correctamente, justo estoy en la oficina y no consideran sus recibos como comprobantes de domicilio válidos

@jimi_mx Buen día, permítenos ayudarte, estaremos a tus ordenes a través de mensaje directo, por ese medio daremos pronto seguimiento. CarlosA*

Nuestros 10,000 megas son una nueva referencia para México. Estamos listos para trascender con la mejor velocidad y estabilidad de internet en el país. De aquí para adelante las posibilidades son infinitas. 🌎♾️

@RegioPiloto Describiste al 99.9% de los trabajadores del estado 😂

¿Adivinen quién fue el causante de caer tan bajo en México? Una pista: Un resentido social y que ha sido toda su vida un parásito.

@tsoding @xojo what do you think? 👆

You used to be able to just create a Native GUI App in 10 seconds. No Electron, no Game Engines, no Web frameworks. Just a lean fast .EXE produced in seconds. Works on any Windows machine WITHOUT Internet connection. Software Development is actually going backwards.

@Alejandro947174 @darrenup @CoachHoraceGA @qtf No, el cambio solamente era forzarlos a afiliarse al IMSS, siguen sin ser empleados, por eso todos comentan que no tienen la protección de ser asalariados pero si los forzan a pagar IMSS solamente quitándoles de sus ingresos por un servicio tan deplorable como el IMSS

@jimi_mx @darrenup @CoachHoraceGA @qtf Pues que no era ese el cambio? Que ahora si son empleados?

DiDi afilió al IMSS a 700,000 conductores y repartidores, más que Walmart, FEMSA y Bimbo. Un avance histórico para quienes antes no tenían seguridad social. Si una app lo logra, ¿cuál es la excusa de las grandes empresas para no hacerlo? fernandafamiliar.soy/noticias/didi-…

@darrenup @CoachHoraceGA @qtf No son empleados, no sirve de nada tener incapacidad si ellos ganan por cada entrega

@CoachHoraceGA @qtf Por el tipo de trabajo, las incapacidades los blindan en caso de accidente. Pero nunca nadie piensa en eso.

@BanamexContacto como siempre su porquería de bancanet con errores, algún día lograrán hacer algo bien?

@Jonathan_Blow @deephacks If you have PMs that think only AI can make their work possible out of whatever they think it's impossible. Get better PMs that know what they're doing.

Bro is sailing between Scylla and Charybdis: his company is predicated on LLMs being revolutionary to programming, but if he actually convinces his engineers to generate their own code this way, his company will collapse. x.com/trashh_dev/sta…

@charliekirk11 Why is no one wondering if it's Jack Black?

A Christian-owned, women's-only nude spa in Seattle has been ordered by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to admit a mentally ill, predatory, biologically male pervert to use the spa. Judge Margaret McKewon, a Clinton appointee, writes that having a women's-only nude spa is equivalent to having a restaurant that bans black people. The left will always choose the rights of the most disgusting freaks over the well-being of normal people.

@gyptazy I'll give the installation a try on Parallels, see if that works

#FreeBSD 13.2 & FreeBSD 14 Beta 4 ARM64 images for #Vagrant (w/ VMware Fusion provider) have been released. This should help out the macOS users running on Apple Silicon M1/M2 chips who cannot run VBox. gyptazy.ch/vagrant-freebs…

@ChairosY Habilitado y deshabilitado, renuncia y trabaja en la política, todo al mismo tiempo, es todo un Gato del Bienestar de Shrödinger. Es pobre y rico, vivo y muerto, honesto y estafador, todo al mismo tiempo.

P.D. 4 En otra incongruencia, digna de la Morenarquía imperial, éste morenarco puede ser al mismo tiempo, comunista y derechista, pobre y rico, proveedor de la sedena mexicana inhabilitado y habilitado, empresario de seguridá en México con abrazos y no balazos y chalecazos coladera y empresario de seguridá en el Salvador con 10 vehículos Yagú para hacer ragú con las pandillas delincuenciales al estilo de Bukele. El Gavioto Ávila es el transformer del Malestar. Un día es político morenarco con sueldito y austeridá republicana con pobreza franciscana y al día siguiente es terrateniente millonario en dólares con mansiones en USA y negocios internacionales de seguridá militar. Les digo, nada cuadra. Es el Ying y el Yang de los discípulos de la Secya de #ElCacas. Le pegan, pero lo premian en la Morenarquía: "Moches habemus, lo perdonamos y no sabemus".

En suma, nada cuadra con los montos de lo invertido de contado (Según su propia declaración). - Sus ingresos públicos, no cuadran. - Sus empresas, disueltas, suspendidas o temporalmente inhabilitadas, en ambos lados de la frontera, no cuadran. - Sus supuestas creencias políticas de austeridad republicana y pobreza franciscana, no cuadran. - Sus conexiones políticas pasadas (Lozano, Exgober de Aguascalientes y el Gral. Cienfuegos SEDENA, por ejemplo) y presentes (Patán Vetusto, Tabasco y SEGOB) es lo único que cuadra y ni él, ni aquellos, pudieron impedirle disoluciones e inhabilitaciones a sus empresas. O sea, al final, tampoco sus relaciones cuadran. Lo único que cuadra es que la Morenarquía colecciona impresentables asaltantes, con colas dinosaúricas y portafolios inmobiliarios millonarios en dólares, dignos de la realeza europea, que además, se convierten en inmamables y prepotentes censuradores de cualquiera que los critica o los exhibe, a pesar de tener llenos de confetti los calzones... Inexplicable. No podía saberse. Los felicito Shairos, van rompiéndola...

@Eduardo19126174 @Apple Si, aunque checa Filemaker, una empresa de Claris, subsidiaria de Apple y es a mi parecer mucho más increíble que Access

La Mac tiene todas tus apps favoritas de Microsoft 365.

Something that really works for me is, I develop on MacOS, and without any code changes at all (right now I use C++20 for server apps) I can build it directly and deploy it on my freeBSD servers, no Linux at all, I also hate distro hell, it's like DLL he'll but at OS foundational level, so I agree it sucks a$$

@jimi_mx @iamdoyinadeyemo Fair point.

Let’s be factual here If you are a serious software developer, your Operating System should either be a MacOS or Linux. Windows should be banned for programming.

@diapolo101 @iamdoyinadeyemo Also if you use MacOS, they actually borrowed some system libraries, the network stack and async I/O from freeBSD, and Apple still contributes to this day to the freeBSD code base and attend the freeBSD foundation conferences

@iamdoyinadeyemo I don't have any problem with using Windows for development. But if I couldn't use it, I'd use FreeBSD instead. The Linux ecosystem is a chaotic mess and I can't stand Mac OS.

I hate Linux distro hell, and lately they've been so politically charged and opinionated, just go with freeBSD, no distro hell, great, slim, secure and high performant OS, also If you ever use a Mac, most CLI tools and the network stack was borrowed from freeBSD,so code wise they are closer together than Linux

@iamdoyinadeyemo Yeah what I'm saying is it's NOT going to be Mac. Ever.