KOAH

.@RepTedLieu: "Donald Trump is in the Epstein files thousands & thousands of times. In those files, there's highly disturbing allegations of Donald Trump raping children, of Donald Trump threatening to kill children."

How many more babies around the world need to die or barely make it from under rubble because of the psychosis of Zionism? This demon needs to be dealt with once and for all. It is impossible for humanity to coexist with this evil. Impossible

Pete Hegseth wasn’t removed from the DC National Guard by accident. A Major General is now warning that his rhetoric and actions are putting him on a path toward war crimes—and he lays out exactly why.

When is America going to recognize this abuse and demand it to stop? What about the poor people living in tents in Gaza? What about the invasion of Lebanon? If America denounces attacks against Israel, why can’t America denounce Israeli attacks against innocent people? Terrorism goes both ways.

Show us what Israel is in one sentence:

Terrifying revelation. A reporter points out that Trump's "5-day pause" in the war is the exact amount of time it takes for thousands of US Marines to arrive in the region. He also used the announcement to manipulate the stock market. Absolute chaos and deception.

BREAKING: Just five minutes before Trump's announcement to halt the attacks on Iran, massive trades reportedly hit the market. In one move, $1.5 billion in S&P 500 (ES) futures was bought while $192 million in oil (CL) futures was sold. These orders were 4–6x larger than anything else at the time. The trader seemingly made huge gains. Unusual.

Trump is in the middle of a nervous breakdown. Vance knows it. The Military knows it. The Cabinet knows it. The media knows it. The public knows it. Remove him you fools.

The most expensive warship the US Navy has ever deployed, 1 of only 2 available for the largest US military campaign since Barack Obama’s escalation of the Afghan War 17 years ago…everyone remember how that went…is out of service for over a year because someone left too much lint in a dryer or because the crew would rather light a fire, on the same ship they are on, rather than continue taking part in the war…either explanation is a trumpet call of US military decline and superficiality. What’s startling as a former Marine, having been deployed on a Navy ship, is the question I don’t see being asked: How did that fire get out of control and burn so long? Damage control is one of the fundamental and existential tasks of any crew on any ship, let alone a warship. The ships are designed around damage control, damage control is a determinant of crew size, and a ship’s crew trains constantly for it. So, what happened on the Ford to allow burning pairs of skivies to take the $15 billion carrier out of the war and send her to the yards for at least a year? Of course, if the maintenance estimate is a year, double it, and triple the costs. I think two things are important here: -this fire and the inability to control it are another example, and there are multitudes of these examples, of poor design, construction, functionality and serviceability of American warships (same can be said of many aircraft and ground vehicles). I imagine the investigation will find that survivability and damage control were sacrificed for cost and space, while sexier, more expensive and unproven technologies were preferred over legacy design, construction and systems. The stories of the Ford’s maintenance problems on its first deployment, and this deployment, especially its overflowing heads (toilets), were widely reported. -Damage control, particularly fire fighting, is more about personnel than anything else. The extended deployment of the Ford, again 8 other carriers were unavailable, forcing the exhausted crew and ship to conduct these operations half a world away when the ship should have been heading home, may have led to command and crew dysfunction due to exhaustion, morale and complacency. It may also signal a Navy that fails to do the fundamental well, whether aboard individual ships, in fleets or out of training. This isn’t the first concern we’ve seen with naval leadership, command and crew performance. In the past decade, multiple ships have run aground or into other ships, and in 2020, the Bonhomme Richard, with a $5 billion replacement cost, burnt down to the water line after a sailor started a fire. She was subsequently decommissioned. The dangers here are greater than the risk the Iranians are going to start attacking our ships with catapults and barges full of flaming loads of laundry. This shows weakness across the board for the Navy with regards to ship design and construction, leadership and command, and manning and training. Issues of an under-resourced and over extended fleet are expressing themselves during war - exactly as should be expected. As this war continues, we’ll see more examples of these failures, accidents, and losses, and they won’t be limited to the Navy. One of several reasons the longer this war continues the more it goes in in Iran’s favor. Yet, there is likely a think tank conference or a congressional briefing this week in DC advocating war with China… 19fortyfive.com/2026/03/u-s-na…

The culture that Iran will see to its grave

BREAKING Spain’s MP Ione Belarra: “If we do not stop Israel in time, it will do to the whole world what it has already done to the Palestinians.”

NY Times has essentially confirmed that Israel played a role in stimulating the violent regime change riots that left around 3000 dead in Iran this January 8 and 9, but which were marketed in the West as pro-democracy protests. It was well understood by the Mossad that those riots would help stimulate military action by Trump. Israeli intel merely needed to convince the feeble-minded president that a wave of decapitation strikes would unleash a massive upheaval to immediately topple the Islamic Republic. The January riots were presented to Trump as a preview of what was to come. Western media, including the NY Times and The Guardian, played a central role in legitimizing Israel's deception by falsely characterizing the violent regime change riots as mere protests, massively inflating the death toll and covering up the fact that many were murdered by the Israel-backed rioters themselves The whole of Western media and the Western human rights industrial complex deliberately misrepresented the real character of those riots. But now that the war they helped to instigate is going badly for the US and Israel, that same media is now free to reveal a few kernels of truth.

I’m trying to avoid posting for Lent, but I want to be clear about my position, as it seems we may be on the brink of decisions of historic consequence: The US & Israel were the ones who launched a sneak attack against Iran. Trump himself compared it to the attack on Pearl Harbor. We opened the war with an attack that killed nearly 200 little girls at school. If the Japanese had done that at Pearl Harbor, it would still be on page one of every history book recounting the attack to this day. To then punish the civilian population of Iran by destroying power and water infrastructure, which can only be intended to cause mass civilian suffering and death, simply because they have not capitulated, is a war crime of the highest order. Soldiers, sailors, and airmen are under no obligation to follow such an order, and shame on any officer who orders them to do so.

@jacksonhinklle This is AI

@jacksonhinklle @LegitTargets

🚨🇨🇳BREAKING: China's Victor Gao says "China, being a WW2 victor nation, has absolute full right to strike at Japan to prevent the rise of Japanese militarism or new Japanese fascism. Period."

The most definitive White House statement purporting to justify the Israel-US war on Iran was its March 2, 2026 statement entitled "The Iranian Regime's Decades of Terrorism against American Citizens". whitehouse.gov/articles/2026/… After a brief editorial opening, the article lists 44 incidents with a total of 992 US deaths. The source of the data wasn't given. Where did it come from? Unlike the Iraq war or the Russia collusion allegation, the reporting didn't come from an intelligence assessment, flawed or otherwise. It turns out that the list was plagiarized by the White House from a June 19, 2025 list (fdd.org/analysis/2025/…) prepared by a former AIPAC employee (Tzvi Kahn) for a think tank (FDD) founded "to provide education to enhance Israel's image in North America". The think tank's original identity was "EMET (Hebrew for 'truth')". The June 19, 2025 publication was literally on the eve of the first US bombing of Iran on June 21, 2025. In this thread, I'll compare each and every item in the White House statement to the corresponding item in the original list by the former AIPAC employee. The list is virtually identical. Any slight changes are always in the change of ratcheting up the underlying allegation.

I saw this at the Financial Times. British establishment journalists have been indoctrinated—starting young at elite private schools—with the views needed to oversee the propaganda system Many have literally never had an independent thought. What they do is spout received wisdom So when someone probes one of their ideas it falls apart because they’ve learnt it by rote - there has been no conscious processing of information. They believe something, but don’t know why. They’ve just heard some authority say it The top echelons of British journalism industry are, consequently, some of the most unimpressive people on the planet. Anyone capable of independent thought - and critical analysis outside the confines of establishment shibboleths - is filtered out very early

Economist Editor-in-Chief: Clearly you and I agree, and we’ve both been critical of the Israeli government. Tucker Carlson: Well, I’ve been critical of the Israeli government. The Economist: I’ve been plenty critical. Tucker Carlson: What do you think of what happened in Gaza?

This girl trained her birds to play dead when she goes “phew.” The last one had to make sure it was serious first.