Jacob Firek

479 posts

Jacob Firek

Jacob Firek

@jt_developer

blockchain dev @ether_fi

nyc Katılım Nisan 2025
294 Takip Edilen301 Takipçiler
Jacob Firek
Jacob Firek@jt_developer·
@bubbleboi best way to express this trade is to go long on hyperliquid
English
0
0
0
14
bubble boi
bubble boi@bubbleboi·
Buying the SpaceX IPO hand over fist. We are going to get to see this transition play out over the next 4-5 years beautifully.
English
15
4
150
11K
bubble boi
bubble boi@bubbleboi·
People underestimate xAI at their own peril. They’re the real wild card in the AI race, and the bigger picture reveals an actual strategy to not just leapfrog the competition but to become the only winner in AI. It’s eerily similar to the playbook John D. Rockefeller ran with Standard Oil. If you look at the funding picture today OpenAI just raised $122B (that they’re lighting on fire) and Anthropic has raised ~$72B in its entire lifetime. xAI in comparison has raised meaningfully less than either. But xAI somehow already has the most compute online right now, and the capital structure is about to flip that’s going to turn them into one of the largest free cash flow machines in history. SpaceX filed its S-1 last week targeting a ~$75B raise at a 1.72 trillion valuation and although most of that is going to go to Starlink and Starship, the detail many are missing is that xAI now sits inside a public-company balance sheet with access to huge institutional debt markets that pure AI labs don’t have. OpenAI and Anthropic have to keep selling equity to fund compute while xAI can issue investment-grade paper against Starlink’s $4.4B in operating income, giving it a dramatically lower effective cost of capital which is critical in this gold rush to expand compute infrastructure and capture market share. If you then look closer at the Colossus deal with Anthropic xAI gets ~$40B to rent out their old infrastructure which allows them to monetize a depreciating asset at a higher rate than they were getting from internal use, as well as control a competitor’s inference economics, and recycles the cash into Colossus 2. This is a Rockefeller move no doubt. What many don’t understand is that Standard Oil didn’t just refine oil. It owned the rail rebates which in turn made their competitors pay them every time they shipped a barrel. Rockefeller’s rivals literally funded the monopoly’s expansion and similar to today with a severely supply constrained compute market anyone with cheap power right now can pull such a move (Colossus taping into the Natural Gas pipeline was another genius move for many other reasons). This matters a lot more than people think right now because we are still in the blitzkrieg part of the AI build out but as we shift from training to inference, compute capacity will directly equal revenue capacity. The pre-training benchmark game the AI labs are playing right now is hitting marginal returns. The customer-serving game is just starting, and whoever has the most power online and the best economics wins it. When you factor in the SpaceX IPO, public debt access, $40B of incoming Anthropic revenue (and many more deals to be announced soon I believe) as well as the first operational gigawatt cluster with Colossus 2 we are going to see a sea change in the industry. Power, uptime, and compute access will be all that matters. If I am right I expect consolidation with the big AI labs and AI services. The recent mergers & buyouts with SpaceX are just the start.
bubble boi tweet media
English
50
42
649
87.7K
Jacob Firek
Jacob Firek@jt_developer·
poetic hyperliquid is the best way to express this app.hyperliquid.xyz/trade/xyz:SPCX
bubble boi@bubbleboi

People underestimate xAI at their own peril. They’re the real wild card in the AI race, and the bigger picture reveals an actual strategy to not just leapfrog the competition but to become the only winner in AI. It’s eerily similar to the playbook John D. Rockefeller ran with Standard Oil. If you look at the funding picture today OpenAI just raised $122B (that they’re lighting on fire) and Anthropic has raised ~$72B in its entire lifetime. xAI in comparison has raised meaningfully less than either. But xAI somehow already has the most compute online right now, and the capital structure is about to flip that’s going to turn them into one of the largest free cash flow machines in history. SpaceX filed its S-1 last week targeting a ~$75B raise at a 1.72 trillion valuation and although most of that is going to go to Starlink and Starship, the detail many are missing is that xAI now sits inside a public-company balance sheet with access to huge institutional debt markets that pure AI labs don’t have. OpenAI and Anthropic have to keep selling equity to fund compute while xAI can issue investment-grade paper against Starlink’s $4.4B in operating income, giving it a dramatically lower effective cost of capital which is critical in this gold rush to expand compute infrastructure and capture market share. If you then look closer at the Colossus deal with Anthropic xAI gets ~$40B to rent out their old infrastructure which allows them to monetize a depreciating asset at a higher rate than they were getting from internal use, as well as control a competitor’s inference economics, and recycles the cash into Colossus 2. This is a Rockefeller move no doubt. What many don’t understand is that Standard Oil didn’t just refine oil. It owned the rail rebates which in turn made their competitors pay them every time they shipped a barrel. Rockefeller’s rivals literally funded the monopoly’s expansion and similar to today with a severely supply constrained compute market anyone with cheap power right now can pull such a move (Colossus taping into the Natural Gas pipeline was another genius move for many other reasons). This matters a lot more than people think right now because we are still in the blitzkrieg part of the AI build out but as we shift from training to inference, compute capacity will directly equal revenue capacity. The pre-training benchmark game the AI labs are playing right now is hitting marginal returns. The customer-serving game is just starting, and whoever has the most power online and the best economics wins it. When you factor in the SpaceX IPO, public debt access, $40B of incoming Anthropic revenue (and many more deals to be announced soon I believe) as well as the first operational gigawatt cluster with Colossus 2 we are going to see a sea change in the industry. Power, uptime, and compute access will be all that matters. If I am right I expect consolidation with the big AI labs and AI services. The recent mergers & buyouts with SpaceX are just the start.

English
0
0
1
149
Jacob Firek
Jacob Firek@jt_developer·
It’s a shame this water isn’t being used to cool some nivida blackwells rn
Jacob Firek tweet media
English
0
0
1
55
Jacob Firek
Jacob Firek@jt_developer·
@KyleSamani Reasoning by analogy actively leads to the wrong conclusion
English
0
0
13
514
Kyle Samani
Kyle Samani@KyleSamani·
Liking my EOY prediction If Solana can compete with Binance on spot BTC, it can compete with Binance on perp BTC too x.com/kylesamani/sta…
Sam Schubert@minnus

The best place to trade $BTC is starting to be @solana. In Jupiter cbBTC-USDC $5k to $20k fills, both buyer and seller medians have recently moved below zero, meaning users are getting outright price improvement versus the pre-fill Binance reference before even counting Binance fees. The improvement also coincides with prop AMM share picking up. The next question is when does price discovery start to move onchain?

English
31
8
156
69.8K
Jacob Firek
Jacob Firek@jt_developer·
hey, could anyone help me get in touch with @KyleSamani? Trying to get paid out here
Jacob Firek tweet mediaJacob Firek tweet mediaJacob Firek tweet media
English
59
14
646
95.1K
Max Resnick
Max Resnick@MaxResnick·
Never seen hyperliquid this scared before
English
33
7
131
13.1K
Midnight Capital
Midnight Capital@Midnight_Captl·
Dario did wayyyy too many TPUs, and wayyyy too few Blackwell racks huh
Midnight Capital tweet media
English
28
5
245
190.2K
Jacob Firek
Jacob Firek@jt_developer·
@DaveHsu This doesn’t rug HK though? They’ve already made off with the ETH borrowed from aave
English
1
0
1
34
Jacob Firek
Jacob Firek@jt_developer·
@dcposch stripe didn't get native USDC for the stablecoin chain?
English
0
0
1
136
DC
DC@dcposch·
Tempo's built-in stablecoin exchange is elegant. Check it out below
English
15
11
154
25.2K
0xRoger | Defi Strategist
0xRoger | Defi Strategist@OG_RogerTennis·
Can we get SPYon or SPYx as collateral on @ether_fi so we can use our cards in borrow mode against that collateral? I know BTC and ETH are must haves, but long term borrowing against tokenized stocks is infinitely larger market @MikeSilagadze @phtevenstrong thoughts?
English
6
0
19
2.7K
Jacob Firek
Jacob Firek@jt_developer·
@skewga_capital sorry skewga but I don't read articles that don't mention hyperliquid
Jacob Firek tweet media
English
1
0
1
37
lito
lito@litocoen·
apparently redotpay is doing $300m/month in volume and i have never met a single person using their card
lito tweet media
English
58
3
173
36.5K
Jacob Firek
Jacob Firek@jt_developer·
@fiege_max Whats the difference between deployers operating markets via precompile calls on hyperEVM vs signing messages for hyperCore? Functionality seems to be the same thing
English
1
0
2
156
max.hl
max.hl@fiege_max·
HyperEVM for outcome market deployment and resolution HyperCore for outcome token trading Do you get it yet?
Yaugourt.hl@Yaugourt

Yesterday I posted about HIP4 being the first HIP to use HyperEVM. Full research → liquidterminal.xyz/hip4/home HIP4 has no official documentation. No verified source. No ABI. So we reverse-engineered the contract from bytecode and calldata on testnet. What we mapped: → Full reconstructed ABI (selectors, signatures, access control) → Every event (DepositReceived, Claimed, ContestCreated, ContestFinalized, MerkleRootPublished) → All revert strings mined from bytecode → Storage layout (owner, mappings, initialization flags) → Complete contest lifecycle: createContest → deposit → publishMerkleRoot → claim → sweepUnclaimed → Bridge architecture L1↔EVM (asset index formula, outcome token mapping) → Real decoded testnet transactions → JS + Python code examples Some findings: - Pre-deployed at genesis, not a standard deployment - renounceOwnership always reverts, admin is permanent by design - Merkle-based claims, 0.9% platform fee on reward pool - Three market types: custom, priceBinary, recurring liquidterminal.xyz/hip4/home Testnet only. This is v1, early test from the team, raw design, and some things might be off. Nothing is final. If you spot errors or have insights, feedback is very much appreciated. Hyperliquid.

English
14
13
136
23.4K
Jon Charbonneau 🇺🇸
Jon Charbonneau 🇺🇸@jon_charb·
Kalshi just raised >$1bn @$22bn HYPE is nearly identical (adjusted MCAP is ~$22.4bn) Which would you rather own here (inclusive of liquidity consideration)
English
18
2
56
10.6K
Jacob Firek
Jacob Firek@jt_developer·
@iandebode When hyperCore deployment? Whoever deploys there and becomes the go to for spot equities on hyperliquid wins
English
0
0
1
330
Ian De Bode
Ian De Bode@iandebode·
Another day, another ATH. We broke some records today with Ondo Global Markets. Over $120M in mint/redeem volume was processed by mid-session. Much of that activity happened before the opening bell. $90M of QQQ was processed onchain in pre-market hours, generating nearly 162,000 attestations, about 40x higher than average. Looks like retail wants tokenized equities, provided by Ondo.
English
20
22
185
14.8K