Keli Rabon

🚨 EXCLUSIVE: Terryl Farnsworth — the man who controlled A/V at the UVU event 9/10 — posted a public Facebook video in 2011 of himself, his brother Tyler Farnsworth (who just announced his run for AZ State Rep!), & friends acting out SHOOTING each other in "Summer of 09." It's unsettling. Terryl is the same guy who, within seconds of Charlie Kirk going down, stood on the rocks filming a selfie, saying, "They shot Charlie. He's dead. God help him," instead of calling 911. And then -- he removed the SD cards.🤨 Watch for yourself. Make this make sense; I can't. 🧵👇

@Tenacdino @LemmeReact I laid out the full 8 month timeline — every primary source, every receipt, every contradiction. 23 minutes. No filler. ▶️ youtube.com/watch?v=2af23_…

Then college chapter members started walking out: ▪️ March 16 — Arkansas dissolves @Tenacdino ▪️ April 10 — Mason Lemme leaves TX State chapter @LemmeReact ▪️ April 22 — Caroline Mattox resigns UGA When believers leave a faith-driven movement, that's a massive signal.

The grieving widow promised America a "battle cry." Less than a month later, the pastor closest to the family said this on a podcast: "Erika's gonna be a widow for a few years before the Lord takes her home." I put the whole timeline together. 🧵

Interesting, will Erika adopt this failed Utah Bachelorette’s tactic next? ‘Don’t analyze me if you’re not a therapist!’ Bc if she does… I’ve got plentyyyy of clips of her & Charlie giving relationship advice, life coaching, and spiritual guidance! 😜🩷🫶

Erika's Exit - Live Recap Reactions Q&A x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

@TheLFLounge I totally thought I retweeted this when @BeforeKong posted it. Made my day. Beyond clever.

Instant classic

@jordanhenshawhq Thanks for sharing! See yall then! 🙌

Yippee! @KeliRabon youtu.be/2af23_gfB3A?si…

Tell me something we don’t already know… 🤦🏼‍♀️

@jordanhenshawhq @BlakeBednarz Awww thanks! It's my specialty 😊

@BlakeBednarz @KeliRabon makes me a better person 😊

Debate Me Spaces: Charlie Kirk is Still Alive, CMM x.com/i/spaces/1dKrP…

@jordanhenshawhq You should record all of this for a behind the scenes podcast diary, Jordan! Incredible work. We are so proud of you for your dedication.

The whole thing needs to go on in 3 minutes. And come off in 5 seconds. If this part needs to be swapped, that must take 5 minutes. Charlie must be able to roll down a hill and it still works. No leaks. The rig must able to sit in a closet for 10 days and still work. The details matter now. That's why @KeliRabon convinced me to scrub today. If the blood is too slow, that's not good enough. If the pendant doesn't shoot in exactly the right direction, it's a fail. We're in the endgame now. The next test only happens when the technology is ready. This is where I'm at now: ----------- Inner Critic (IC): Why are there 2 battery packs? Me: Because 1 may not be able to handle the load of the pump and the solenoid at the same time. IC: Well have you done a test that demonstrates that it will fail under that load? Me: No... IC: Then delete the 2nd battery. If it then fails, now you have a good reason to add it back in. But right now you have a dumb reason for adding it. Why did you scrub today? Me: Because the blood bladder was leaking. IC: Why didn't you realize that at 6am? Me: Because I have ADHD. IC: ADHD walked into your house at 6am today, chained you to the bed, and told you you couldn't see if your blood bladder works? Me: No... IC: What part or process would have told you your blood bladder wouldn't work so that you could have fixed it at 7am and not scrubbed at 5pm? Me: I'm afraid to put it on until the last minute because it might leak all over me. IC: So what you're telling me is that at 6am this morning, you knew your blood bladder doesn't work? And you didn't do anything about it until 5pm? Me: Yeah. IC: Why can't you fill the blood bladder and throw it on the ground and stomp on it and expect it to not leak? Me: Because the top is open and when it squeezes, it comes out the top. IC: Why didn't it leak in the last test? Me: Because I tapped it from the bottom, not the top. IC: Well why didn't you do that this time? Me: Because I'm using a sump pump now, not an external pump. So it has its outlet in the top, and it also needs electrical. IC: Why can't you seal the bag and tap it in the top for those? Me: Because I don't have time to unhook the electrical right now, because we're at T-00:40 and I haven't packed up to leave yet. IC: Why does it take so long to unhook the electrical to the pump? Me: Because it's hardwired to a board that's incased in tape. IC: Why is it incased in tape? Me: To give it structure. IC: What test have you performed that indicates it will fail without "to give it structure"? Me: None. IC: How many times have you scrubbed because "it didn't have structure"? Me: None. IC: So delete the tape, make it easier to repair it, and focus on the shit that you keep scrubbing for. Forget the imaginary problems that haven't actually caused scrubs. If you've scrubbed because of it, it must be real. Otherwise, it must not be that important.

@MissIndepe3t2 @triggersmarthq LOL! Preston the Pekingese & Paco the Shihtzu 🐶🐶

@KeliRabon @triggersmarthq Jester 🤣 I choked on my saliva when u came back with the costume 😂

📢🚨 Tyler Robinson Court Updates Outstanding Motions Defense: - We will be prepared for showing cause and compel discovery, waiting on supplemental info, close preliminary hearing Prosecution: - Notice to submit without argument, seal exhibits, find the use of hearsay unconstitutional

@MissIndepe3t2 @triggersmarthq Hahahaha Preston the bailiff (or jester in this Kangaroo Court!)

@triggersmarthq I love love love it when you and @KeliRabon are on together. Simply put, no drama no 💩 talking about anyone character. We have doggies in costumes n all 😁🔥💥🫶🏻 So relaxing

@NWDisorder1111 Man oh man, I knew somethin was off about that dude!

If you've seen the guy crying on the cruise ship ... He also played his role in the "COVID" scamdemic. They need a larger pool of crisis actors.

@BuzzPatterson @jordanhenshawhq @tryandproveit

Watch the Navy Blue Angels choreographing their air show performance. It’s that precise! Absolutely zero wiggle room involved in performing these maneuvers. Crazy.

@realchasegeiser @realchasegeiser Gov Hot Wheels 🛞 @dezzie_rezzie

@VigilantVenison @EcologicalCrime @Soxxy85 @knubeltierli @jordanhenshawhq @Freqazoid26 @ZebBoykin @ksanders68 @GenghisKhanShow It’s a sign! My sons wanted fried chicken for “my” Mother’s Day dinner. 🍗😂

@EcologicalCrime @Soxxy85 @knubeltierli @jordanhenshawhq @Freqazoid26 @ZebBoykin @ksanders68 @GenghisKhanShow @KeliRabon I meant KirkFactChecker (KFC)

@Freqazoid26 @ZebBoykin @ksanders68 TDOA is a well-known and well-established method for forensic acoustic analysis. However, it relies on time-synchronized microphones. It also relies on differentiating the supersonic crack from the muzzle blast. Audio Freq’s method for time-synchronizing unlinked microphones is not established. I examined his report on his method and found it to be highly erroneous. It depends on visual indicators that cannot reliably indicate a time of impact to a useful degree of precision. Furthermore, his method of using time difference of arrival between a phone’s left and right microphone is fully his own invention and does not appear to be rooted in any understanding of the phone’s audio processing algorithms. These algorithms are known to introduce significant unexpected anomalies between left and right microphones. Finally, Audio Freq’s echo analysis method is also not based on any existing method. In my opinion, Audio Freq must demonstrate that he—not someone else—can use his methods and sub-methods to accurately predict the location and orientation of a known rifle shot. I have done that with my method. I expect all others to as well. Otherwise, it is impossible for anyone to know who is right and who is wrong. We need test cases. It is the only way to verify that someone actually knows what they are doing. What I hear time and time again is, “Why do all the audio analysis people always come to completely different conclusions?” This is a misconception. There is in fact remarkable agreement among those who have performed audio analysis on this case. But only those using the correct method, the crack-thump method. Myself, @AlgeistNydream , 2 other physicists, @MichaKobs , and Rob Maher all use crack-thump method and all agree the shot came most likely came from the Losee Center roof. Why then so much disagreement? Because all the disagreement is coming from those who use the wrong method, the TDOA method. I am not aware of any 2 people using TDOA who agree. @troofevades , Audio Freq, and I think ClydeMax all use TDOA and all come to completely different conclusions. So, eliminate those using TDOA and everyone agrees. Why can’t we use TDOA? Because we do not have time-synced microphones. I have heard it said many times that I must be a fed because I support the federal theory on the shooter’s location. This is nonsense because I currently seem to be the top promoter of the faked death theory. I believe a rifle was fired from the Losee Center roof into either the pond behind the Hall of Flags or into the van parked in the tunnel. The more detailed crack-thump analysis places it in the van. Just because I agree with the State on one thing does not mean I agree with them on all things. I don’t. Audio Freq’s claim that this would have been heard a certain way has not been demonstrated. So it is not an evidenced critique. My crack-thump “guess and check” method is habitually criticized for bias. The idea is that you have to plug in your own presuppositions into it, and you can get it to say you are right no matter what. The method consists of a guess as to the rifle location/orientation/bullet type, time values taken from the audio recordings (time delays between supersonic crack and the muzzle blast), and time values produced by a mathematical and/or 3D reconstruction of the acoustic event. We then compare the measured values to the predicted values to assess how close the guess was. So yes, it is a guess and check method, but I am only able to manipulate rifle settings during the procedure. The measured values are permanent and the predicted values are generated automatically based on my rifle settings. If I guess the correct rifle settings, the predicted values will match the measured values perfectly. With the software I developed live on air, I can test thousands of different guesses per minute. This dramatically reduces any bias. I consistently find that the Losee Center shooting position is by far—and by an overwhelming amount—the best way to reduce the difference between the predicted and measured values. Therefore, the method indicates the shot most likely came from there. Have I demonstrated my method can accurately predict the position of a known rifle? Yes. I did that with @Unzapped’s test fire data from his field. I can prove my method actually works.

@stopthee @TheLFLounge Charlie’s Phone/computer

@KeliRabon @TheLFLounge Take what?