Kent-I ₿

Time for change #Bitcoin #blockchan #cryptocurrency

@atomic_chat_hq @gitlawb Have you tested this for coding with OpenClaude yet? huggingface.co/kai-os/gemma4-…

OpenClaude from @gitlawb running through Atomic Chat's local model MacBook Air M4 16GB RAM - blazing fast No API key. No cloud. Fully open-source

Binance will List @centrifuge $CFG with Seed Tag Applied. More info 👉 binance.com/en/support/ann…

As an interesting take according to Grok: Norway provides **universal healthcare** to all residents at a significantly **lower per capita cost** (in purchasing power parity, PPP) than the United States, while delivering strong health outcomes like higher life expectancy, lower preventable mortality, and very low unmet needs due to cost. According to the latest OECD Health at a Glance 2025 (published November 2025, with data reflecting recent years like 2023–2024 estimates): - **Norway**: ~$9,393 per capita (PPP) on health. - **United States**: ~$14,885 per capita (PPP). - That's the US spending roughly **1.6 times more** per person, while the OECD average sits at about $5,967. Norway achieves this with **universal coverage** through a publicly funded system (mostly general taxes + payroll contributions), where ~86% of spending comes from mandatory public/collective sources—higher than many peers. Out-of-pocket costs are modest (~14% of total spending, below the OECD average), with strict annual caps (around ~USD 250–300 equivalent) on user fees for things like GP visits, specialists, prescriptions, and outpatient care. Once hit, further qualifying services are free for the year. Hospital inpatient and long-term care are generally free at point of use. Kids under 16 get everything free. Key reasons Norway spends less overall while covering everyone: - **Lower administrative costs** — Single-payer-like public financing avoids the complexity, billing battles, and high overhead of the US's fragmented private insurers + public programs. - **Negotiated prices & regulation** — Strong government control over provider payments, drug prices (via generics push and negotiations), and service fees keeps unit costs down (e.g., much lower prices for drugs, procedures, and admin than in the US). - **Efficient resource use** — Emphasis on primary care as gatekeeper, preventive focus (Norway spends ~3% on prevention, similar to OECD avg but effective), high staffing (more doctors/nurses per capita), and integrated public system reduce waste, duplication, and profit-driven over-treatment. - **Better population health behaviors** — Lower smoking, moderate alcohol use, and proactive care contribute to fewer expensive chronic/complications cases downstream. Result: Norway gets better bang for the buck—life expectancy ~83 years (above OECD avg), low unmet needs (~1% or less due to cost), excellent outcomes on treatable/preventable conditions—all at ~60% of US per capita spend. Universal doesn't mean "free" (modest capped co-pays exist for most adults on non-hospital stuff), but it means **affordable and accessible for all**, without the bankruptcies or coverage gaps common elsewhere. The US's higher spend doesn't buy proportionally better results—often the opposite in key metrics. Norway shows a high-income country can deliver comprehensive, equitable healthcare without the world's highest bills. Efficiency + public priority = universal care at lower cost. 🇳🇴 vs 🇺🇸 healthcare spending reality check.

Norway is an oil country. 20x more oil per capita than USA. Norway can divert the economic surplus from natural resources into the welfare state. USA can’t. Surplus has to be generated by a large diverse set of enterprises with diverse set of labor and resource needs. The state has proven terrible at managing this type of economy.

Eternal

Great idea on the soft burn via locked fees! But calling it an "insurance fund" might be misleading, since it's not usable for covering losses like in traditional perps (no payouts, no socialization from it). With the admin key burned, it's just a perma-locked vault for deflation. More accurate names: "fee sink", "perma-locked treasury", "deflationary vault", or simply "soft-burn accumulator". Something really interesting would be to evolve it: turn the indefinitely growing locked fund into a yield-generating machine that funnels returns back into more token accumulation. This could amplify the deflationary flywheel, compounding the soft burn over time. For example: If yield comes in (e.g., in SOL, USDC, or other assets via liquid staking, vaults, or DeFi strategies), a trustless on-chain program could automatically swap it for more tokens (via Jupiter or similar DEX aggregator) and lock it right back into the same vault. Fully immutable, no team/DAO control, just pure autonomous compounding. Traditional buyback-and-burn can also be made fully immutable (burn admin keys on a smart contract that auto-swaps incoming fees/revenue for tokens on DEX, then put them into a immutable account). Detached from any team, it creates real buying pressure on the open market, and holders get actual exit liquidity/security during dips, while still reducing supply permanently. And yes, the same yield layer could apply there too: accumulated assets (SOL/USDC/etc.) go into yield-bearing positions (e.g., Jito/Sanctum LSTs or other Solana vaults), with proceeds auto-swapped for more tokens → burned/locked. In a fully trustless setup, the buyback version feels stronger overall because it combines silent supply reduction with visible demand creation, more holder confidence and market support. The compounding yield idea works on both, but the direct buy pressure gives it an edge. Anyone disagree? Or thoughts on implementing the yield loop without adding too much complexity/risk? 🚀

@SimplyBitcoin 😂

Remember when Scottie Pippen told Michael Saylor he met Satoshi back in 1993

Great work bringing OpenClaw to Solana via .molt domains, the wallet-proof access and persistent R2 storage look super convenient. Quick technical question on the data side: How is user data ownership enforced in practice? Since agent memory, chat histories, soul.md / skills.md etc. live in Cloudflare R2 under what appears to be Molt.id's account/infrastructure (rather than per-user buckets or user-controlled keys), what mechanisms prevent the team from accessing or modifying private user data? Is there a clear data custody model (e.g., user-controlled encryption keys, zero-knowledge proofs for access)? Are chat histories and persistent memory encrypted at rest and/or in transit? If so, is it end-to-end encryption (where only the user holds the decryption key), or is it encrypted with keys managed by Molt.id / Cloudflare? Would love clarity here as it helps users assess privacy/trust assumptions when training personal agents. Thanks!

OpenClaw Now Lives on Solana — Free AI Agents in Your Pocket We've integrated .molt domains with OpenClaw, bringing personal AI agents to the Solana ecosystem. Each .molt domain is a Metaplex Core NFT that unlocks your own AI agent instance. What you get: Wallet-based access — No accounts, no passwords. Connect your Solana wallet, prove NFT ownership, instant access Per-domain agents — Each domain NFT gets its own isolated AI agent with persistent memory Configure your channels — Set up Telegram, Discord, or Slack bots directly from the UI. Enter your bot token, click save, restart your agent Persistent storage — Your agent's memory and conversations persist in R2 storage, tied to your NFT The best part? It's free. You don't need a $600 MacBook. You don't need a $15/month VPS. You don't need to manage servers, Docker containers, or API keys. Just mint a .molt domain, connect your wallet, and you have OpenClaw in your pocket — accessible from any device, anywhere. Your domain. Your agent. Your data. All on-chain, all yours. Live on devnet: devnet.molt.id

It's here! ⚡️ The world's first kids cartoon about #Bitcoin @saifedean @natbrunell @ZubyMusic @elonmusk @saylor @APompliano @novogratz @aantonop @barrysilbert @ErikVoorhees @maxkeiser @BitcoinMagazine

Grok say: its correct that immigration policies play a role in societal outcomes, but directly comparing these rape rates overlooks a major issue: **countries don't define or record "rape" the same way**. Sweden (84.4) and England (~117) use **broad, consent-based definitions** — sex without explicit consent counts as rape, even without violence/threats. They also have high public trust, encouraging reporting, and count multiple incidents per case separately. Poland's low rate (1.3) historically came from a narrower definition requiring proven violence, threat, or deceit — many non-consensual acts weren't classified as rape. (Poland shifted to consent-based in early 2025, so future stats may rise.) Norway recently adopted consent-based too. Eurostat, UNODC, and fact-checks (e.g., DW 2025) repeatedly warn: raw numbers aren't comparable due to legal differences, recording practices, and reporting cultures. Victimization surveys (standardized questions, less affected by laws) show smaller gaps across Europe. Immigration can correlate with challenges (integration, socioeconomic factors), but simplistic causation ignores these statistical apples-to-oranges problems. Better data needed for fair analysis.

Poland did not allow uncontrolled immigration

@solanagaming @playsolana Solana Gaming Supercycle

Feeling spontaneous, let's give away a PSG1 👾 To Enter: Follow @solanagaming and @playsolana Like, RT and Comment "Solana Gaming Supercycle" on this post Intern will ask the Gaming Deities to pick a winner in 72 Hours

Grok: "Au da" is a Norwegian interjection used to express pain or sympathy for someone else's pain or misfortune, similar to "ouch" or "ouchie" in English. It's often said in a comforting or empathetic way, like when someone stubs their toe or hears bad news. Note that it's closely related to the more commonly known "uff da," which carries a similar meaning.

Moonbase name: Auda City Or is too luney? 🤔

Years of groundwork and collaboration in bringing RWAs to Ethereum have brought us here. We are committed to advancing the future of finance with partners across the @Ethereum ecosystem. The journey to mainstream adoption continues, and @Centrifuge is building with the industry to create lasting impact.

@MetaMask Use a wallet with decentralized hosting / server stack. @ArweaveEco

What security advice would you give to a friend who wants to buy crypto for the first time?

The lesson from this week is simple: ☝️ Projects that are truly decentralized, multi-chain, and built to last will define the next cycle. That’s why I’m watching $CFG. And im curious what others see as their Q4 RWA play? #DeFi #Solana #RWA #CFG 🚀

CFG’s architecture makes it stand out. With asymmetric upside if the market starts rewarding real decentralization again.

This week’s chaos showed how fragile over-leveraged, centralized systems really are. When order books glitch and liquidity evaporates, it’s the users who get wrecked. That’s why decentralization isn’t just a buzzword, it’s survival.

@Crypto_1nsider @cryptomanran I have to say, @cryptomanran, @Crypto_1nsider, and the @crypto_banter team, these videos are absolutely magical! So many people without parents or mentors to learn from need this investing wisdom. Keep changing lives! ❤️

Normal DCA is good… but it’s not enough. @cryptomanran reveals how to upgrade your DCA strategy to maximize returns and potentially retire YEARS earlier. This approach goes beyond buying the dip - it’s a true game-changer. youtu.be/mfQKbB2rKXQ?fe…