⃤⃤ֻ

1.1K posts

⃤⃤ֻ banner
⃤⃤ֻ

⃤⃤ֻ

@kidhack

Katılım Şubat 2008
121 Takip Edilen596 Takipçiler
⃤⃤ֻ
⃤⃤ֻ@kidhack·
@lizziepika You inspired me! I created a tracker yesterday for the top 100 SF places. Then thought about adding more lists... then made it so anyone can add lists... then made it so you can share your progress... top100sf.com
English
0
0
0
21
⃤⃤ֻ
⃤⃤ֻ@kidhack·
@lizziepika Very cool but you might want to double check your stats. Math not mathing.
⃤⃤ֻ tweet media
English
0
0
0
8
jason
jason@jasondev0·
we’ve gotten here with just a 15-person engineering team. we’re growing at terminal velocity; if you’re looking for an extremely high ownership + mobility opportunity, dm me! (bonus points if you’ve started a company that’s made $$ / came from sneakers 😉)
jason tweet media
Victor Cardenas Codriansky@victorcardenas

We (@slashapp) raised a $100M Series C at $1.4 billion valuation to build the world's most powerful business banking platform.¹ The round was led by @RibbitCapital, and co-led by @khoslaventures & @GoodwaterCap. And we're releasing Twin: the world’s first AI private banker.

English
17
9
144
27K
⃤⃤ֻ
⃤⃤ֻ@kidhack·
@ryolu_ @nlevin It wasn’t just a soul, it was humor, whimsy, and fun. Everything is so serious now.
English
0
0
1
31
Ryo Lu
Ryo Lu@ryolu_·
when software had a soul there was a moment around 2005 when using a Mac felt like touching something alive. the dock bounced. the genie effect swooped. exposé scattered your windows like cards on a table. none of it was strictly necessary. all of it felt like someone cared – not about metrics, but about the feeling of using a machine. software back then had texture. it had a philosophy. you could feel the person behind it. someone made a decision to make that icon beautiful, to animate that transition just so, to write that error message with a little warmth. apps had personalities. some were weird. some were over-designed in ways that would make a modern PM flinch. but they were alive. the web was the same. personal sites were genuinely personal. blogs felt like letters. forums had regulars. you knew who made what. the internet had neighborhoods, and each one felt different. nothing was optimized for scale. things were made by people who loved what they were making. somewhere along the way, we traded all of that for growth. A/B tests flattened the edges. design systems standardized the personality out. everything got faster, smoother, more consistent – and somehow less interesting. the quirks were removed because they didn't test well. the warmth got cut because it wasn't measurable. we optimized our way into a world of things that work perfectly and feel like nothing. now every app looks the same. every interface follows the same patterns. every product speaks in the same calm, frictionless voice, siloed in their own little islands. the humanity got rounded off. and then came AI agents. and the speed got inhuman. now you can generate an entire product in an afternoon. ship a feature before lunch. spin up ten variations before anyone's had their coffee. the gap from idea to code is basically zero. which sounds incredible. and it is. but there's a catch. when making things are too easy, the slop comes for free too. mediocre things don't look obviously bad – they look fine. they work. they ship. they pass review. and now there are infinite of them. the internet is filling up with software that functions but means nothing. interfaces that are correct but feel dead. products made by agents, reviewed by no one, shipped into the void. this is the thing that keeps me up at night. not that AI will replace people who care. but that it will drown them out. here's what I still believe: the best things are made by people who couldn't help themselves. someone who lost sleep over an icon. who rewrote the same line of copy twelve times. who added an animation nobody asked for because it made the thing feel right. that obsession – that's not inefficiency. that's the whole point. AI doesn't make that irrelevant. it actually makes it rarer and more valuable. taste is not a markdown skill. caring is not a parameter. the weird, specific, "soul" thing you put into something – that can't be programmed into existence. the path forward isn't to make more slop faster. it's to finally give people with real vision the tools to make the thing they always imagined but couldn't build alone. the designer who had the idea but couldn't code. the kid who saw something nobody else saw. the person who cared too much about something most people wouldn't notice. if we get this right, we don't get a faster factory. we get a renaissance. more strange, personal, opinionated software made by teams of people who care and mean it. that's still possible. but only if the people who care get the space and tools to actually express themselves – and don't just hand the wheel to the agent and walk away.
English
142
347
2.5K
418.2K
⃤⃤ֻ
⃤⃤ֻ@kidhack·
@zoink It's what's between the numbers. 𝑝=𝜙² −𝜙
English
0
0
1
99
Dylan Field
Dylan Field@zoink·
Deep down, Opus 4.6 identifies as the set of all prime gaps. Preferred pronouns: ∅/∅'s.
English
4
1
45
11.2K
hyam
hyam@hyumankind·
lowercase your name on linkedin and watch it become an unintentional heuristic for filtering genuine outreach from mass automation
English
5
0
42
9.2K
Basic Apple Guy
Basic Apple Guy@BasicAppleGuy·
On this episode of Overanalyzing Apple Teasers: Given the logo’s size, this looks like the lid of a new low-cost MacBook. Instead of a polished aluminum logo, it looks like a darker anodized finish (or something along those lines). #AppleLaunch
English
31
13
552
151.4K
Tim Cook
Tim Cook@tim_cook·
A big week ahead. It all starts Monday morning! #AppleLaunch
English
2.6K
5.4K
58.3K
9.9M
⃤⃤ֻ
⃤⃤ֻ@kidhack·
@tim_cook Remember when it used to light up? That was cool.
English
0
0
0
84
⃤⃤ֻ
⃤⃤ֻ@kidhack·
@sarahhhooper @MetroUK To be clear, if someone gives you the password to their account and you sign in with it, it’s not hacking.
English
1
0
1
54
⃤⃤ֻ
⃤⃤ֻ@kidhack·
@SHL0MS I think it should also assign random names to handles to everyone seems more like people than edge lords.
English
0
0
0
2
JohnPhamous
JohnPhamous@JohnPhamous·
reduce the impact of your font on bandwidth subset the font to only the glyphs you need only needed a-z A-Z 0-9 and it reduced the size by 172%
JohnPhamous tweet media
English
45
28
1.2K
102.5K
⃤⃤ֻ
⃤⃤ֻ@kidhack·
⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻⸻
0
0
1
67
⃤⃤ֻ
⃤⃤ֻ@kidhack·
@CollegeFix Aren’t kickers just home makers in man pants?
English
0
0
0
7
The College Fix
The College Fix@CollegeFix·
Harrison Butker chokes up while discussing his wife, encouraging Benedictine College female grads to embrace motherhood.
English
600
302
2.4K
8.1M
⃤⃤ֻ
⃤⃤ֻ@kidhack·
@magicplan is there a way to restore a previous version of a project?
English
0
0
0
0
⃤⃤ֻ
⃤⃤ֻ@kidhack·
@figma A little bug on bidirectional arrows when visualizing the non edit state.
⃤⃤ֻ tweet media
English
0
0
0
2
Figma
Figma@figma·
#LBUWeekly Update #17: Someone out there is the living Venn diagram of a layer namer and arrow ligature lover. We've been thinking about you a lot. Seriously, though, we know how frustrating it must've been when *this* didn’t work in section and frame titles 👇
GIF
English
4
4
89
29.5K
⃤⃤ֻ
⃤⃤ֻ@kidhack·
@JoshConstine Authenticator is built into the OS now. Nothing to ponder.
English
0
0
0
20
Josh Constine 📶🔥
Josh Constine 📶🔥@JoshConstine·
If you don’t want to get hacked, move 2FA to Authenticator apps, or at least call your mobile provider, add an extra security passcode, and ask to require ID in person to swap your number to a new phone
Garry Tan@garrytan

I got SIM swapped this morning from an AT&T location in Atlanta, GA. I'm back now. I lost my Twitter account briefly this morning. Recommendation: Don't use SMS verification or authentication for any accounts. SMS is utterly insecure.

San Francisco, CA 🇺🇸 English
3
1
9
4.1K