mamabear3

@libsoftiktok But the police show up at a Canadian’s door for posting she doesn’t like the prime minister? Canada is SO screwed. AND PS. No, we are not all waiting for it to happen. Not everyone needs people they don’t like to expire.

Meet Cathy DiFilippo-Kiley. She’s an administrator at Huron-Superior Catholic Schools in Ontario, Canada. She fantasizes about Trump getting ass*ssinated publicly and says she will be cheering You can contact the school here: front.desk@hscdsb.on.ca

85% of British livestock are factory farmed. This figure circulates. It gets retweeted. It gets cited in pieces about the environmental cost of British meat. It gets said at dinner. Let's check in on what "British livestock" actually contains. British livestock in 2024, approximate breakdown: Chickens: 180 million. The vast majority raised in indoor systems. This is accurate and worth discussing. Pigs: 4 million. Approximately 40% outdoor-reared. The rest: indoor systems. Also worth discussing. Beef cattle: 6.5 million. Every single one raised outdoors on pasture. Not some. All. There are no beef feedlots in Britain. Sheep: 23 million. On fells, hillsides, upland pastures, and permanent grassland. Not one of them is factory farmed. Factory farming sheep in Britain has never been viable, attempted, or even legal at scale. Dairy cattle: 1.9 million. Some housed in winter. All on farms. None in feedlots. So the 85% figure is accurate if you count exclusively the sheer numerical weight of poultry, divide that by total livestock, and present it as a statement about British meat. Gerald is not a chicken. Doris is not a chicken. The beef at your supermarket is not a chicken. The figure is true in a narrow sense and is being used in a broad one. The beef aisle is not the poultry aisle. They are different aisles. They have been different aisles for some time. The discussion has not yet noticed.

Water to produce 1kg of food (actual irrigation, not rainfall): Almonds: 12,000 litres Chocolate: 17,000 litres Coffee: 18,900 litres Avocados: 1,800 litres Rice: 2,500 litres Grass-fed beef: 50 litres The vegan drinking almond milk latte with avocado toast has used more irrigation water for breakfast than I use for beef in a week. But I'm the one destroying the planet.

" The COVID response was a symptom of replacing the culture of questioning in science and medicine with a culture of authority It didn't matter what was actually true... what mattered was whether you were aligned with authority. " - Jay Bhattacharya, NIH Director.

Activist: "The water usage for beef is obscene. Thousands of litres per kilogram." Farmer: "That's rainfall." Activist: "What?" Farmer: "The figure includes all the rain that falls on the pasture. The cows drink from the stream. The rain falls whether there's a cow here or not." Activist: "It's still water consumption." Farmer: "Should I stop the rain falling on my field?" Activist: "Grow crops instead. More efficient." Farmer: "This is a 35-degree slope in the Welsh hills. Show me the crop." Activist: "Technology..." Farmer: "To make tractors climb mountains?" Activist: "There must be a solution." Farmer: "There is. It's called a cow." Activist: [checks phone]

A BC researcher spent decades researching addiction and homelessness treatment. When he presented his findings to BC government officials, they asked him to destroy it when it conflicted with their agenda. He testified to this under oath before a federal health committee. He also testified that two senior provincial government officials advocating for safe supply and decriminalization policies went on to start companies that profited from those very policies. The conflict of interest couldn't be more clear. For years we were told that the NDP's policies were evidence-based. But when the evidence doesn't support the ideology, they destroy the evidence. Five British Columbians are dying from drug overdose every single day. British Columbians deserve policies that are grounded in real evidence. Not ideology. It's time to change course

Twice, the courts ruled the Liberal government’s use of the Emergencies Act was unlawful. Twice, they said the threshold wasn’t met. Now, on the very LAST possible day, the government is appealing to the Supreme Court, advancing the same arguments already rejected… not once, but TWICE. The Emergencies Act was meant to be a last resort—not a tool to bypass the law or override Canadians’ Charter rights. Conservatives will always stand for public safety—but also for freedom, accountability, and the rule of law. theglobeandmail.com/canada/article…

They are hoping we memory-holed all of this

Why are Canadians calling for Chief Justice Richard Wagner of the Supreme Court of Canada to recuse himself from the upcoming appeal of the Emergencies Act case? Easy. He's biased. In April 2022 (while the Ottawa protests were ongoing) Chief Justice Wagner made strong public statements criticizing the convoy: * He described it as the start of "anarchy." * He said protesters were holding citizens "hostage." * He reportedly characterized aspects of it in terms like "sedition" in interviews and remarks. These comments came before any full legal determination by any courts on the Act's use. This creates a reasonable apprehension of bias (the legal test for recusal in Canada). Any fair-minded observer might question whether he can impartially hear the appeal, given his pre-judgment of the facts and events central to the case. Question is; will he recuse himself?

Cloned Meat discussion with Jay on his farm... "We have to understand what their end goal is when we speak about cloned meat. They tell us what it is. It is to introduce Bio Pharmaceuticals into the population." @nhppa

In the last election, 23,024 Canadians voted for Chris d'Entremont as a Conservative, yet he crossed the floor. 27,055 Canadians voted for Michael Ma as a Conservative, yet he crossed the floor. 30,343 Canadians voted for Matt Jeneroux as a Conservative, yet he crossed the floor. 2853 Canadians voted for Lori Idlout as a New Democrat, yet she crossed the floor. 8,113,484 Canadians voted for the Conservatives because they wanted change and they successfully denied the Liberals a majority government at the polls. Yet, because of these floor-crossers and Mark Carney's blatant disregard for the will of the voters, Canadians are now getting a majority they DIDN'T VOTE FOR. Regardless of your political party and beliefs, this should be concerning to all.

While I'm not a public figure, and I ended my almost ten year tenure as a Conservative pundit, (voicing my complaints and submitting my legitimate concerns about Rosie Barton and her team and a CBC Vancouver producer), I was black listed. Still am today. There's more of us than you know.

Lori Idlout, the floor-crossing NDP caucus member, has been a prominent supporter of mandatory indigenous sensitivity training for the Cdn civil service In 2023, it was disclosed that she was a sole-source government contractor selling …. Indigenous sensitivity training blacklocks.ca/arctic-mp-is-g…

.@LenaMetlegeDiab will no longer take questions from independent media under @CitImmCanada policy; only newsrooms that meet criteria for gov't approval will be granted audiences. blacklocks.ca/only-favoured-… #cdnpoli @CanRevAgency @CdnHeritage

Statins in a minute.

🙌🙌🙌 bring this man back!!!!

This will cause more people to move out of Canada. And it will be the job creators who leave.

Mark Carney is currently attempting what is maybe the least democratic thing in Canadian history, cobbling together an illegitimate majority he didn’t earn during the election through backroom deals and who knows what else. If you want a majority government in Canada, you should earn it at the ballot box.

Last month, the Liberals announced $230 million of new funding for Nunavut, or about $6,000 per person in the territory. Now Nunavut’s NDP MP, Lori Idlout, is crossing the floor to join the Liberals. Funny how life works.

As promised, the climate science obliteration has arrived TODAY. The IPCC's central claims have now been torn apart. The oceans are not “warming” let alone “boiling.” That claim is false. The claimed Earth Energy Imbalance is false. It's no different from zero. Full demolition: Cohler et al. (2026) IPCC's Earth Energy Imbalance Assessment is Based on Physically Invalid Argo-Float-Based Estimates of Global Ocean Heat Content doi.org/10.5281/zenodo… Press Release: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo… Easy-to-Read Summary: doi.org/10.5281/zenodo…