Kshitiz

214 posts

Kshitiz banner
Kshitiz

Kshitiz

@kshitizh

Building @ypal_security | Founding Engineer / Product & Security @Security_Pal

KTM-MPLS-SF-NYC Katılım Mayıs 2013
199 Takip Edilen461 Takipçiler
Kshitiz
Kshitiz@kshitizh·
@eve_silb the death of duo arc is wild because most marketing teams would've killed the idea in the deck review. takes real conviction to ship something that weird. nice breakdown.
English
1
0
2
24
Kshitiz
Kshitiz@kshitizh·
great launch, but the “we ARE your stack” pitch only covers identity + device + HR controls, call it 1/3 of SOC 2. CC3 risk assessment, CC7 system ops, CC8 change mgmt, CC9 BCP — all live in your product, not your HRIS. and even the controls Rippling automates still need a human to defend the design to an auditor. this is exactly why we’re building @ypal_security . evidence collection is the easy part.
Matt MacInnis@stanine

Today, we launched @Rippling Automated Compliance, starting with SOC 2. We have a unique advantage here: we aren't telling you how to fix your stack, because we ARE your stack. device management, identity and access management, HR, performance management...

English
0
1
11
763
Kshitiz retweetledi
Pukar C. Hamal 🏔🗽 🌁
the wonderful students at the Nepali Student Association at @Stanford are hosting a great event this Wednesday do join if you can!
Pukar C. Hamal 🏔🗽 🌁 tweet media
English
3
5
28
1.4K
Kshitiz
Kshitiz@kshitizh·
Here's what I'm noticing as we build @ypal_security : Every compliance platform launched "agents" this quarter. Vanta, Drata, Sprinto the category is converging on "autonomous compliance." But the controls that actually need to pass an audit aren't evenly distributed in difficulty. The easy 70%: CC6, CC8, A1 — really do feel automatable. Click through, evidence is clean, verdict is clear. The hard 30%: CC1.2 board oversight, CC3.3 fraud risk, CC4.1 monitoring of your own controls require judgment no agent has yet. And those are exactly the ones auditors probe at audit time. So we did the asymmetric thing. We use AI heavily underneath. MCPs pull evidence from your stack live. Drift detection runs daily. Cross-system reconciliation joins HR rosters against access lists. The bookkeeping is mostly done. Then a calibrated human vCISO, same one for the entire engagement, does the judgment work auditors actually probe. When your auditor pushes back on a control, the person who picks up the phone wrote the reasoning not some AI slop. That's the shape compliance work wants.
Kshitiz tweet media
English
0
0
9
176
Kshitiz
Kshitiz@kshitizh·
got cooked by @garrytan's GStack today. told me i'm top 10%, then said the other 90% is vibes, batch pressure, and weekly dinners with billion-dollar founders. sorry Garry, gonna have to pass, building @ypal_security is the batch pressure rn gstack is super cool btw
Kshitiz tweet media
English
2
0
8
247
Kshitiz
Kshitiz@kshitizh·
Your SOC 2 report says you do vendor risk management. It doesn't list the 40+ AI tools your engineers OAuth'd into Google Workspace this quarter. Third-party risk stopped being about your big SaaS vendors. It's every "Continue with Google" button on the internet.
English
0
0
7
168
Kshitiz
Kshitiz@kshitizh·
Vercel's breach didn't start at Vercel. It started at Context AI , a third-party AI tool one of their employees had OAuth'd into Google Workspace. Context AI got popped. Attackers pivoted through the OAuth app into the employee's Workspace, then into Vercel. OAuth is the new lateral movement.
English
1
1
12
418
Kshitiz retweetledi
Pukar C. Hamal 🏔🗽 🌁
I will be speaking at @Harvard and @MIT this weekend about why Nepal is the perfect destination for advanced compute clusters given: 1️⃣ The geographic proximity to rising inference demand from 3.5 Billion people in APAC, IndoPacific and MENA and $35 Trillion+ in regional GDP! 2️⃣ Plentiful low-cost and efficient hydropower for energy and cooling! 3️⃣ Access to a rapidly up-skilling and diligent labor pool! There has never been a bigger, better win-win-win scenario in history!! Win for Nepal🇳🇵 Win for the United States 🇺🇸 Win for the World 🌏 The United States AI stack will lead to the biggest peace 🕊️ dividend in history! #siliconPeaks #USA #Nepal #PaxSilica #AI #Compute #Peace #Energy #Hydro #techNepal #security #gdp #developmentEconomics #NVIDIA #chips cc @SwarnimWagle
Pukar C. Hamal 🏔🗽 🌁 tweet media
Pukar C. Hamal 🏔🗽 🌁@pchamal

Nepal should be part of Pax Silica. I am hopeful our GREAT US Ambassador to India, The Honorable Sergio Gor @USAmbIndia is able to invite Nepal onto the efforts here. It will bring lasting peace and stability to the region and it will ensure billions of people in the IndoPacific and APAC region have access to the best models and AI infrastructure. Long the USA 🇺🇸 🚀🇳🇵Nepal Partnership! cc The Honorable @jacobhelberg @UnderSecE who has done incredible work on this front 🙏. state.gov/pax-silica

English
4
8
52
4.8K
Kshitiz
Kshitiz@kshitizh·
@PordonChris @PordonChris you nailed it, especially the USING part. Everyone assumes compliance only hits builders. But the AI Act puts obligations on deployers too. Your sales team running AI on prospect data? That's in scope.
English
0
0
2
52
Kshitiz
Kshitiz@kshitizh·
@RealNickLink Yep. And the gap between "knew it was coming" and "suddenly in every enterprise RFP" is going to be shorter than people think.
English
0
0
0
19
Nick Link
Nick Link@RealNickLink·
@kshitizh That's actually crazy. Well, we all knew it was coming eventually!
English
1
0
1
25
Kshitiz
Kshitiz@kshitizh·
ISO 42001 is becoming the SOC 2 of AI. Most AI-first founders have never heard of it. They will by Q4.
English
2
0
16
595
Kshitiz
Kshitiz@kshitizh·
@eve_silb If you sell B2B, prospects and customers are starting to ask for it in security reviews. Still early, but I'm seeing it show up in enterprise vendor questionnaires next to SOC 2. Worth getting ahead of.
English
0
0
1
22
Vance Lever
Vance Lever@LeverCRO·
@garrytan Vibe-coded our SOC 2 compliance dashboard in February. Just in time for our audit on March 3rd. The auditor asked to see the underlying controls. I explained the controls were also vibe-coded. Our VP of Legal called it "not how audits work." She no longer works here.
English
1
0
0
42
Kshitiz
Kshitiz@kshitizh·
There's a real grain of truth here, a lot of compliance tools sell complexity because that's their business model. But SOC 2 done lean actually forces good hygiene: least-privilege access, real incident response plans, vendor risk reviews. The problem isn't the framework, it's the industry built around making it feel like you need a 6-month project and $150K to get there. You don't.
English
0
0
0
5
Triode
Triode@Triode_in_situ·
@loftwah SOC 2 from my experience has nothing to do with security and everything to do with enriching companies that conduct audits.
English
1
0
2
21
Loftwah
Loftwah@loftwah·
A lot of people get caught up in complexity around SOC 2 and what is actually required. I was involved in an audit and getting an organisation compliant before and I put these notes together on what ACTUALLY matters. gist.github.com/loftwah/181ecb…
English
3
0
5
234
Kshitiz
Kshitiz@kshitizh·
Great breakdown. Having gone through this with multiple startups, the biggest unlock is realizing SOC 2 readiness is 80% "things you should already be doing" (access controls, incident response, change management) and 20% documentation proving you do them. Most founders overcomplicate it because the audit industry has an incentive to make it feel harder than it is.
English
1
0
1
15