Libby Purves
20.7K posts
Libby Purves
@lib_thinks
12 forgotten novels,journalism, formerly Times theatre critic - now https://t.co/EAMYaTlinA. R4 presenter & loyalist 40+yrs, thrown out 2017



We are a parent-led volunteer group advocating for safe and effective healthcare for our trans-identified children. @AmnestyUK, on the other hand, is responsible for publishing misinformation about paediatric gender medicine that undermines the ability to protect this vulnerable patient demographic. Amnesty UK claim that puberty blockers alleviate gender dysphoria, when there is no robust evidence to support that statement. Amnesty UK claim that puberty blockers "allow more time to make important decisions", when in fact there are grounds to suspect that these drugs might have a "locking in" effect on the child's identity development. Indeed, Dr Cass described this possibility as a "critically important" unanswered question in relation to puberty suppression. Amnesty UK describe puberty blockers as "a reversible intervention", but in reality the long-term impacts on cognition, bone health and psychosocial development are unknown. Amnesty UK talk about "bodily autonomy" and seem to have forgotten that children need to be protected from decisions that they lack the developmental maturity to comprehend, including risking their future sexual function and fertility. Healthcare does not operate on a customer-knows-best policy, and particularly not when the patients are minors. Despite having no grounding in child development, paediatric gender medicine or mental health, Amnesty UK campaign for legal self-ID for minors of any age, using the example of a 12 year old who believes that "some of my body parts are wrong to how I feel" and with no lower age limit on legal sex change. Parents in our group believe that everyone should have safe and effective healthcare, and that patients with a trans identity should be no exception. We will continue holding to account the professionals responsible for our children's welfare, but our task is undoubtedly made harder by repeated misrepresentation of what we do. Sources for Amnesty statements: libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/amnesty-… amnesty.org.uk/knowledge-hub/…
The shocking and deeply misogynistic comments made by @aberdeenuni employee Heather Herbert following the brutal murder of Ann Widdecombe are utterly reprehensible. Publicly hoping that a woman who dedicated her life to public service suffered ‘an extremely painful death’ is not only vile and hurtful, it is dangerous. This post has a worrying violent tone that risks normalising hatred and could encourage further violence against women in public life. Ann Widdecombe was not the first politician to lose her life in such tragic circumstances and careless, hateful comments like these only fuel more division, toxicity, and harm in our society. Aberdeen University must take strong and decisive action against this employee to uphold basic standards of decency, respect and institutional values. Anything less would signal tolerance for this kind of extremism within their ranks. Prospective students and their parents should seriously reconsider applying to or attending Aberdeen University until it demonstrates it will maintain proper standards. Alumni: please pause all donations in the meantime; your money should not support an institution that harbours or excuses this behaviour. I call on local political representatives to act: MSPs @LiamKerrMSP, @DLumsden_MP and Reform UK Scotland leader @Malcolm_Offord, plus Scottish Conservative leader @RussellFindlay1 please raise this issue urgently in Parliament on behalf of Ann Widdecombe’s family and all the women she stood up for. This cannot be ignored. Words have consequences. Hateful rhetoric like this must have them too. pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/705965…

I hope Adam apologises and retracts these vile remarks immediately. A colleague has been murdered, and this is how he chooses to speak about her? Awful, twisted and utterly without decency. His team has just called asking me to appear on his show. I won’t. And unless he apologises, I don’t think anyone else should either. 👇🏽

Here is Roger Ebert's first paragraph of his review for "The Mummy" and it is why he was the greatest film critic to ever live


I remember hearing the thud as that bus blew up: trying (and failing) to contact my partner by phone; the desperate posters families put up by Kings Cross to see if anyone had spotted their lost loved ones. Also brought out the worst of institutions:


If you’re a woman (the old fashioned sort who don’t have a penis) do you feel happy going to a pub by yourself for a drink? Have you ever had any issues sat in a pub having a quiet drink by yourself? I ask because I think many women are too nervous to go by themselves because they think they’ll be treated as looking for a bloke, but I think that they won’t and it’s in their mind. But then again, I’m a bloke so would genuinely like to hear.

🇬🇧 THEY TOLD YOU A STORY. 🇬🇧 Colonisers. Slavers. Oppressors. And you were supposed to feel ashamed. Not for what you done... But for WHO YOU ARE. 🇬🇧 So we tested it. Britain wrote everything down, so we opened the books. 📖 Turns out fewer than 1 man in 10 could vote in the year Britain banned the slave trade. No woman could. Your ancestors could hang for stealing a sheep, get shipped across the world for petty theft, or go down a mine at 8 years old. In Manchester, the average age of death in a labouring family was 17. They weren't running the slave trade. They were underneath it too. Which is what makes what happened next worth knowing. In 1772 an enslaved man named James Somerset walked free from an English court, because English law couldn't hold a slave. In 1791, 300,000 families just stopped buying slave sugar. No march, no riot, just a decision made at 300,000 kitchen tables. In 1792, 519 petitions carrying 390,000 names hit Parliament, most signed by people who couldn't vote themselves. In 1807, Britain banned the trade. Then the slave owners sent Britain a bill for the 800,000 people they still held. 💷 £20 million. About 40% of the entire government budget at the time. The Treasury says it wasn't paid off until 2015. So if your family paid British tax before then, they helped buy 800,000 people their freedom. From 1808 the Royal Navy spent 60 years hunting slave ships at sea: 1,600 stopped, 150,000 people freed, and 1,600 British sailors dead, mostly of disease, buried thousands of miles from home. ⚓ In 1816 they ended two centuries of Barbary corsairs enslaving Europeans. In 1896 a war that lasted 38 minutes ended slavery in Zanzibar. 🇹🇿 Almost every country on Earth outlaws slavery today. That fight was paid for largely at British expense, by British hands.🇬🇧 So why haven't you heard any of this? Because within living memory, someone rewrote the story. You got taught the crime. Not the cure. The powerful exploited the world. They exploited their own people first. It was those people who ended slavery. 🇬🇧 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ History got rewritten once, in living memory, by no one who was ever named or held to account. We are ordinary people doing what ordinary people have always done. Opening the books. Refusing to look away. This is how we fight back. Fact by fact. Story by story. Name by name. We are the home of British heroes. There is a place for you in it. If you can afford to support what we do: proudofus.co.uk/support Be part of us. ☝️🇬🇧 Be Proud Of Us. 🙏🇬🇧




