lilan

3K posts

lilan banner
lilan

lilan

@lilaneth

web3 Katılım Mayıs 2021
2.1K Takip Edilen337 Takipçiler
lilan retweetledi
CM
CM@cmdefi·
Morpho创始人: 1. 机构需求不会消失 2. 资金池借贷形式已经失去信任,隔离借贷会是主流 我认为对于机构来说,他们喜欢隔离借贷由2点支持,首先他们能够赚钱,而在aave模型中他们很难获利,第二他们对风险控制要求很高,资金池模型会让他们被动承担风险,且依赖DAO的决策,这太不可控了。 很明显, 机构需要上链,需要一定的去中心化,但更需要的是自主可控,这天然适应隔离市场和Curator模式。 但资金池借贷也会存在,它适用于强共识资产组成的抵押品市场,应当谨慎接纳新的抵押品,风险控制高于一切。
Paul Frambot 🦋@PaulFrambot

Spent the last week calling the largest institutions to get their read on the DeFi situation. Key takeaways: 1- Institutional interest isn't going away, for a simple reason: distributors aren't going away. Massive AUM, payments, and loans are coming onchain. Every fintech wants to move fully onchain. As an institution, you don't have a choice. 2- That said, they've completely lost trust in pool/hub models. Institutions and distributors want control: over the code, over the risk, over the compliance. With the flexibility to isolate what they want, while plugging into the global network of liquidity that's compatible with them. The promise of an open financial system is too big to fail: not because of ideology, but because it's going to create an immense amount of value for everybody involved.

中文
9
8
50
14.7K
lilan retweetledi
BITWU.ETH 🔆
BITWU.ETH 🔆@Bitwux·
⚡ Aave @aave 刚刚发布了rsETH恢复方案,响应速度很快!大致总结了一下,有以下几个举措: 1)DeFi United 已经拿到足够 ETH 承诺,用来恢复 rsETH 的完整 backing。 后续会把 ETH 分批转换成 rsETH,再转入受影响的 bridge lockbox,让 rsETH 重新回到正常兑付状态。 2)Aave 要通过治理提案,来定向清理攻击者的仓位。 清理方式比较特殊:会临时调整 rsETH o预言机价格,触发八个头寸(Ethereum Core + Arbitrum)的受控清算; 清算后拿回 13,000 ETH 等值 rsETH 抵押至 DeFi United 多签,然后去 Kelp 正常赎回 ETH,抵消坏账。 Compound 上的攻击者仓位也会被类似处理,预计 Compound 这边可以回收大约 16,776 ETH 价值的资金。 清算后恢复预言机和配置,无永久协议变更。 3)在恢复完成前,Ethereum Core、Arbitrum、Base、Mantle、Linea 上的 WETH 和 rsETH 储备会继续冻结。 总体来说,Aave 这次还是挺负责的,方案设计确保 rsETH 全额支撑 + 坏账清零,基本可以达到 0 社会化损失。 这必然会成为 DeFi 历史上社区团结的一个里程碑事件了!
Aave@aave

x.com/i/article/2048…

中文
18
14
105
27.6K
lilan retweetledi
Ron
Ron@Ron521520·
AAVE发起了一个捐款行动,可以顺手去捐1U,赌个预期 捐款网址:defiunited.world
Ron tweet media
Sam Mason de Caires@sammdec

While the team and partners finalize other commitments, me, @mark_is_here, @lochieaxon, @alexvanderzon and others spun up a dashboard to track contributions. Someone also donated defiunited.eth for those wanting to contribute. Really inspiring to see the community come together on DeFi United. defiunited.world

中文
54
42
185
126K
lilan retweetledi
CryptoMaid加密女仆お嬢様 .edge🦭
看样子马斯克是打算把这个帖子打造成,推特第一神帖子。我也来助力一下。总结一下文章内容。 如果你没有到达理想位置是因为 1.你还没有那个能力 2.你不是真的想去 3.你害怕真的去行动 要想到达那个位置: 1.你需要有与之匹配的思想境界 2.你需要有足够的智力 如何让今天做出改变? 1.反愿景:每天早上思考为什么不想过现在的生活 2.白天通过闹铃,做阶段性反省 3.晚上反思并制定计划 4.将生活变成一款游戏,包含反愿景(失败结局)、愿景(通关奖励)、一年目标、一个月项目、每日杠杆和限制条件。
DAN KOE@thedankoe

x.com/i/article/2010…

中文
23
21
156
75.8K
lilan retweetledi
Observe
Observe@obsrvgmi·
🚨 Update on @Aave's Internal "Civil War" Situation Aave is at a "Break it or Make it" moment. Whatever happens next won't just define the future of crypto's largest bank, it'll also set a precedent for the entire industry. What changed since yesterday 👇 – Voting went live today – Stani voted against (nay) with ~333k (~33% of total voting power so far) – @Marczeller voted abstain, as publicly stated – Major CT voices like @DefiIgnas also chose abstain Current scoreboard: – 62.76% against Aave DAO (Nay) – ~33.18% abstain – Only ~4.06% in favor (Yea) Translation: the DAO is almost certainly losing. If this passes against the DAO, things can get messy. Possible outcomes 👇 A. Scenario 1: Aave DAO forks the frontend and runs independently. This lets the DAO route surplus fees to the treasury, but it comes with massive responsibility around security, updates, maintenance, infrastructure, and ops. It also splits the user base (and trust?) overnight. B. Scenario 2: A full-blown legal tussle between Aave DAO and Aave Labs, potentially in Wyoming, exactly as @tulipking predicted. C. Scenario 3: Nothing happens. The DAO accepts the result and moves on, since it doesn't own the brand, IP, socials, GitHub, npm, naming rights, etc. Also, many won't want a long, public DAO vs. Labs war anyway. A prolonged standoff risks bleeding revenue and weakening the ecosystem further. But, every scenario creates a crack between Aave Labs and Aave DAO. And that's dangerous. Because Aave didn't survive multiple cycles alone. Service providers like @chaoslabs LlamaRisk, BGD Labs, TokenLogic, and @Aavechan are a huge reason Aave not only grew, but also stayed dominant through multiple cycles. For Aave to remain the dominant player, DAO alignment isn't optional, it's existential. And this conflict has to be resolved or decisively settled. Until then, everything is uncertain and the market is already reacting. AAVE is down ~18% in 7 days, despite the SEC officially ending its investigation on Dec 17. But if we zoom out, this vote answers something bigger: 1. Token vs. equity 2. Governance as 'utility' 3. Who actually owns a protocol? This industry has argued about this for years. Aave is about to give us the answer, whether it wants to or not.
Observe tweet mediaObserve tweet media
Observe@obsrvgmi

🚨 @aave is having a full blown civil war And it might be the biggest governance fight defi has ever seen. Heres a clean breakdown 👇 Aave has two sides: – Aave labs → a centralised entity founded by stani – Aave dao → token holders who govern the protocol Now heres what happening, Dec 4, 2025: Aave labs announces a partnership with @CoWSwap to improve swap pricing + mev protection on the aave interface. Dec 11, 2025: A popular delegate, @DeFi_EzR3aL drops onchain analysis stating that swap fees from the new cow swap contract are being routed to a private wallet controlled by aave labs. Not the dao. Translation: DAO revenue just got quietly cut off. Dec 12, 2025: Marc zeller (largest delegate, aave chan initiative) calls it stealth privatization. Claims ~$10m per year that should go to the dao is gone. Dec 16, 2025: Things go nuclear ☢️ A. Proposal called “poison pill” by Tulip King. The demands: – Seize all aave ip, code, and brand – Force aave labs to become a dao owned subsidiary – Claw back all past revenue earned using the aave brand B. Then comes proposal #2 — “brand seizure” by former cto of aave labs @eboadom, – Move trademarks, domains, socials to the dao immediately. Logic: If dao pays for dev + marketing then dao should own the brand, domains, socials. Aave Labs / Stani’s defense: – This (cowswap thing) was never a fee switch. – Frontend revenue was a surplus labs donated voluntarily. – Aave labs is a private company. – DAO owns the contracts, not the website. – Labs pays for hosting, security, and frontend engineers. Now the plot twist, amid all this chaos, Aave labs opens a snapshot vote on dec 23👇 Proposal: Give aave token (aave dao) holders explicit control over brand assets, domains, socials, naming rights, github, npm, everything. (baed on @eboadom's proposal) Except… The author of the proposal @eboadom says he never approved it. He claims it was rushed to vote with his name on it while discussion was still active. Calls it “disgraceful.” Urges people to abstain. @Marczeller says the proposal was rushed during holidays, with fresh delegations gaining voting power. Zoom out. This isn’t about cow swap. This isn’t about one wallet. This is the unresolved question of defi: Who actually owns a protocol? The code? The frontend? Or the brand? Aave is about to set a precedent. And everyone is watching.

English
84
90
641
140.6K
lilan retweetledi
區塊先生 🐡 ⚠️ (rock #58)
關注 ETH 有用的工具 項目staking 狀況 - defiwars.xyz 以太存量 - strategicethreserve.xyz PoS 狀況 - ultrasound.money L2 狀況 - l2beat.com 穩定幣 狀況 - stablecoins.wtf 各鏈 狀況 - artemisanalytics.com DeFi 狀況 - defillama.com Rollup 狀況 - rollup.wtf 代幣解鎖 - tokenomist.ai 鏈上數據 - intel.arkm.com 研報 - asxn.xyz DEX Perp 狀況 - perpetualpulse.xyz/Perpetual-Puls… #區塊鏈工具 還有什麼好用工具歡迎留言介紹+抽100U !
中文
44
276
711
81.2K
lilan retweetledi
SlowMist
SlowMist@SlowMist_Team·
🚨 Ethereum's Pectra upgrade (EIP-7702) is live — a major leap forward, but new functionality brings new risks. Here’s what users, wallet providers, developers, and exchanges should watch out for: 🧠 🛡️ For Users: ✅Private key protection should always be a priority. ✅Be aware that the same contract address on different chains may not always have the same contract code. ✅Understand the details of the delegated target before proceeding. 🔍 For Wallet providers: ✅Check if the chain of the delegation matches the current network. ✅Warn users about the risks of delegations signed with a chainID of 0 that could be replayed across different chains. ✅Display the target contract when users sign delegations to reduce the risk of phishing attacks. 🧑‍💻 For Developers: ✅Ensure permission checks are performed during wallet initialization (e.g., via ecrecover to verify the signing address). ✅Follow the Namespace Formula proposed in ERC-7201 to mitigate storage conflicts. ✅Don't assume that tx.origin will always be an EOA, using msg.sender == tx.origin as a defense against reentrancy attacks will no longer be effective. ✅Ensure that the target contract for the user’s delegation implements the necessary callback functions to ensure compatibility with mainstream tokens. 🏦 For CEXs: ✅Run trace checks on deposits to mitigate the risk of fake deposits from smart contracts. 📚 Full best practices & in-depth analysis: slowmist.medium.com/in-depth-discu…
SlowMist@SlowMist_Team

#Ethereum is about to undergo the #Pectra upgrade, which is undoubtedly a significant update. Numerous important Ethereum Improvement Proposals (EIPs) will be introduced through this opportunity. 💡Among them, EIP-7702 brings a transformative change to Ethereum’s EOAs. This proposal blurs the boundary between EOAs and CAs and serves as a crucial step toward native account abstraction following EIP-4337. It introduces a new interaction model to the Ethereum ecosystem. ✍️With Pectra already on testnet and mainnet deployment approaching, our latest analysis covers: 🔹EIP-7702's technical mechanics 🔹Opportunities & challenges 🔹Practical guides for different participants 🔗Dive deeper here: slowmist.medium.com/in-depth-discu…

English
7
31
93
77.8K
lilan retweetledi
Cos(余弦)😶‍🌫️
🔥EIP-7702 的使用在活跃了,这些 Delegated Address 要挺住,你们(钓鱼等团伙例外)的智能合约代码出问题,用户就惨了...
Cos(余弦)😶‍🌫️ tweet mediaCos(余弦)😶‍🌫️ tweet mediaCos(余弦)😶‍🌫️ tweet mediaCos(余弦)😶‍🌫️ tweet media
中文
15
11
82
40.5K
lilan retweetledi
Flaunch
Flaunch@flaunchgg·
WTF IS FLAUNCH? 👇
English
111
129
808
283.2K
lilan retweetledi
詹姆斯叉 | JamesX
詹姆斯叉 | JamesX@0xJamesXXX·
介绍一下昨天Base生态大火的最新MEME币Launch平台 @flaunchgg 以及总结一下生态现在的头部资产👇 一句话介绍:基于Uniswap V4的部分手续费会自动回购代币的meme 币 Fair Launch 平台。 展开讲一下几个核心Feature: 1⃣内盘价格一致 每个币launch之后,有限时30分钟的内盘买入时间,不同于PumpFun内盘采用的Bonding Curve模式,Flaunch的参与内盘的用户的价格会保持一致 (30k 市值)。 但是这个阶段的交易手续费,官方文档并没有明确说明。 (cc @0xnobi ) 2⃣ Dev可以自行设定代币手续费收益分成比例 代币在流动性部署到Uniswap之后,交易会产生源源不断的交易手续费收入,代币的发行者可以在一开始就设定这个手续费的分成比例。给Community的分成会被自动用于代币回购。 3⃣ 分享给Community的交易手续费会被用来自动回购代币,这一部分通过 @Uniswap 最新上线的V4 来完成。 交易手续费每积累到0.1E 会被自动执行Buyback 功能, 但这个功能其实不是真正意义上的代币回购,而是通过Uniswap V4 的hook合约,把这0.1ETH添加到现在Spot价格下方的流动性Pin中,作为代币的价格支撑。 所以其本身并不会直接影响代币价格,但是会在代币价格下跌时,提供额外的购买力支撑。 4⃣ Memestream -- 给Dev的手续费收益确权NFT 这个就像一个额外添加一层的 LP NFT,后期DEV可以把这个代币的手续费收益权借着这个NFT的载体,转出或者售卖给其它个人、DAO或者社区。 不过个人感觉这个功能意义不大,就是锦上添花的额外功能。 昨天 @flaunchgg 上线后,在很快的时间内获得了 @jessepollak@base 官方账号 以及 @Optimism 官方账号的 背书和支持。 可以看出团队在圈子内依靠之前的积累,还是有不少核心资源的支持,而且安全性也有一定的保证。 最后借 @0xLuo 总结的生态龙头代币情况: 1. 平台币:FLAY 0xF1A7000000950C7ad8Aff13118Bb7aB561A448ee 2. 官方认证的吉祥物:FLNCHY 0x1c93d155bd388241f9ab5df500d69eb529ce9583 3. 创始人@0xnobi亲自发的:NOBI (Jesse买了) 0x88fbb146bb61be687301eda2a5d3326be3227a60 4. ARENA 创始人 @mehranhydary 发的 milady概念:LAIN (Jesse买了) 0x09ecca7f51e8d083a74e198276f6ee2c030b34fc
詹姆斯叉 | JamesX tweet media詹姆斯叉 | JamesX tweet media
中文
18
33
88
25.2K
lilan retweetledi
陈剑Jason
陈剑Jason@jason_chen998·
sosovalue是每天都会打开一次的几个信源平台之一,也被誉为是链上彭博社,最开始只是在ETF通过后每天用它看一下流入流出情况,后面产品做的越来越丰富,包括实时资讯、细分板块异动等内容,但在此之前不论做的多好工具类产品的宿命就是收个会员费,而sosovalue却通过发币+指数基金的方式打破了工具类产品的想象力天花板。 @SoSoValueCrypto的指数基金是建立在其自己所开发的一个链上现货指数协议SSI,它可以多个链的多个资产按照不同的权重进行打包后铸造为对应的指数代币,在性质上与大家熟悉的各个多资产ETF和灰度基金之类的差不多,区别在于sosovalue的协议是一个开放的平台,在委员会审核并质押足够数量的 $SOSO 代币后就可以发行自己的链上指数基金,在币种选择上也有一系列的要求,包括币种的市值、流动性等最低要求以外,最重要的是对应币种必须得到币安的Ceffu 或者 Cobo 的支持,因为作为现货指数基金,用户在链上购买后,协议必须也要购买基金包含的对等数量Token并进行托管,从而确保锚定安全性,就像是BTC ETF需要将实际购买的BTC托管在Coinbase一样。 目前sosovalue总共发行了四支指数基金,分别是MAG7.ssi、MEME.ssi、DEFI.ssi 和 USSI,其中MAG7相当于是大盘指数,总共包含BTC、ETH、XRP、SOL、BNB、DOGE、ADA这7个币种,选币的标准是抗风险、共识高、流动性充足,并且每个月会进行一次审核决定是否剔除或纳入新的币种,这支基金的主要目标就是在求稳的前提下能够跑赢比特币,如下图所示目前是跑赢比特币20%的。 也包括风险和收益高的基金如专门用来买meme的MEME.ssi,最高跑赢了比特币的一倍,现在也超过比特币的60%,其持仓包括DOGE、SHIB、PEPE、BONK、WIF、FLOKI、POPCAT、MOG、PNUT、MEW,尽管是投meme的但也不会过于激进,目前最小的流通市值也超过8亿。 专门投defi的基金DEFI.ssi就表现的不好了,毕竟defi这一轮整体都很疲软,目前处于跑输比特币的状况,持仓和特朗普的wlfi 有一半重合,这个板块主要还是看特朗普未来的政策对于Defi是否会有利好。 购买这些指数基金的方式也很简单,其实每一个指数基金就是一个单独计价的Token,其价格由背后所持仓的一篮子币种所决定,卖买起来也很方便,可以连接钱包后直接用USDC进行购买和出售,所以如果对于没有太多时间精力研究和看盘,但是又想获得行业发展收益的朋友,可以试试。 另外sosovalue昨天开放了新一批无交互门槛空投,只要你持有于eth、aave 、link 、ena、ondo等就可以领域,大家可以检查一下资格 x.com/SoSoValueCrypt…
陈剑Jason tweet media陈剑Jason tweet media陈剑Jason tweet media陈剑Jason tweet media
中文
25
17
101
25.9K
lilan retweetledi
jesse.base.eth
jesse.base.eth@jessepollak·
在这个团圆的节日里,Base 祝大家新春快乐,阖家幸福!愿我们在蛇年携手前行,把更多人带上链!
中文
276
96
951
145.9K
lilan
lilan@lilaneth·
@EmberCN 不好意思請問這個是什麼圖表 我應該去哪裡使用
中文
0
0
4
29
余烬
余烬@EmberCN·
由特朗普家族支持的 DeFi 项目 World Liberty Financial (WLFI) 在 5 小时前再次花费了 1000 万 USDT 购买了 3,247.3 枚 ETH,价格 $3,079。 到目前,WLFI 已经累计花费了 2.75 亿资金来配置 7 种代币。在配置比例上,ETH 占 65%、BTC 占 25%。这两个占比九成,另外 5 个山寨占比一成。 目前 WLFI 的投资组合浮亏 $1583 万 (-5.75%)。 intel.arkm.com/explorer/addre… 本文由 #Bitget@Bitget_zh 赞助
余烬 tweet media余烬 tweet media
中文
34
10
66
52.4K
lilan retweetledi
柴郡🔔|Crypto+AI Plus
柴郡🔔|Crypto+AI Plus@0xCheshire·
1985 年的海湖庄园: 一座拥有 126 间房间的豪华庄园,却无人问津。 后来,唐纳德·特朗普以 700 万美元买下了它。 多年间,这座庄园持续亏损……直到特朗普想出一个绝妙的主意,将它变成了一年收入 4000 万美元的“摇钱树”。 一起来看看这个故事的完整经过:🧵
柴郡🔔|Crypto+AI Plus tweet media
中文
52
355
2.3K
2.1M