
King Cooka
1.1K posts


@ColdBloodedONx @theionicXBT lol with massive negative funding across the board, you cunts about to get squeezed hard
English

@theionicXBT Yup and this falling wedge breaking down is likely tge beginning of mass liquidation event. 💙👽

English

I genuinely called the $BTC bottom in 2021.
Not even trying to show off,
Saying this to teach you a valuable lesson.
When BTC was at $15k,
I seen so many people get bored & quit.
They couldn’t be patient.
It’s called ‘TIME CAPITULATION’
And I’m warning you now.
I’m seeing the same shit happen again.
Bottom takes ‘time’ to form.
Be prepared.
Do not get bored and quit.

English

@TheGreekGod11 @RichardHeartWin said him self TA is absolutely not a load of crap, and it can be proven. BTW I’m also bullish as fuck here.
English

You know whats funny?
TA is a load of crap, but let‘s assume its real. Somehow when we were at 60-68k every retard on this app painted charts saying next target is 45 or 30 or whatever the fuck you sick people came up with in your little twisted realities.
But somehow no one saw this "obvious bull trap" coming. But oh, how convenient now all of a sudden there’s this clear as day bear flag and it shows this absolutely obvious (again so freaking obvious) we‘re going AGAIN for 30-45k next.
Let‘s see which kind of chart bullshit narrative you fucktards will come up on the next leg up.
The Factor Report@PeterLBrandt
Bitcoiners Those of you predicting $250,000 in 2026 need to stop with the mushrooms This is called a channel $BTC While it does not preclude further price gains, it is NOT a bullish bottoming pattern The Factor Report reports on classical chart analysis peterlbrandt.com
English

@RichardHeartWin Hint hint swap your Bridged tokens for Native tokens you fucking donkeys.
I hate 1000x upside plus more security
Golden Garbage 🤝
English

Richard Heart teaches you how bridges work. Example. Chain A to Chain B.
Coins lock on Chain A.
MAGIC
Coins mint on Chain B.
What's this MAGIC step?
Chain B doesn't know what's happening on Chain A, so TRUST must be introduced.
You have to TRUST validators to not collude with each other to lie about what happened on Chain A.
Validators could lie about how much went in on chain A, and inflation bug chain B, then some could bridge back the inflated coins and empty the original coins locked on Chain A.
What if a validator dies?
What if a validator gets hacked?
What if a validator tries to get others to collude with him to lie?
What if a validator holds his validating ransom.
Some people think that there should be a timelock over the power to try and fix the above problems. LOL.
What's the counter balance to the above problems? More trust. You might want some mechanism to add / remove, subtract the quantity of validators needed.
In the end, every single bridge has social risk, just like every single chain has social risk. They're computers, run by humans, on networks, and none of those 3 things is perfect.
You can only buy down the risk of the original sin of chain B not knowing the true state of chain A, by spreading validation geographically, and across parties and hope for the best, but you can't completely eliminate the risk. The largest hacks in crypto history have been bridge hacks.
So now ask yourself, why in this bearest of bear markets does Richard have to teach you about bridges and risks again, for the umpteenth time? As though something has changed? I've been telling you these same exact things over and over again. But I guess some need reminding, or prefer to talk about risk in every thread about benefits. Makes you wonder.
TLDR: All bridges are risk, and when done well, that risk appears to be far lower than centralized exchange risk.
You're welcome for the education. Again.
P.S. Some people have swapped bridged in tokens for native tokens, and enjoyed the experience.
P.P.S. I think some folks find it far easier to post negatively than positively. If y'all one of those, work on yourself. Consider it personal development.

English

@phishark_ @TonySeverinoCMT Interesting how long do they typically last? Look into Dai on pulsechain it may just line up perfectly with your theory and will change your life.
English

@TonySeverinoCMT the pendulum is swinging from centralization to decentralization.
happens every 250Y, aka the "sovereign / empire cycle".
July 4, 2026 is the 250th anniversary of the USA. 🇺🇸
English

I constantly see astrology being treated poorly around the finance industry
Horoscopes and social media have made the practice appear ridiculous
However, Uranus enters Gemini on April 25th and everyone should be paying attention
Uranus represents disruption, invention, awakening—sudden breaks from the past
Gemini governs communication, information, language, trade, duality, and the nervous system of society—how ideas move
Put together: Uranus in Gemini = disruption of information systems
Not just “new ideas,” but:
How information is transmitted
Who controls narratives
The speed and fragmentation of truth
The emergence of parallel realities (very Gemini)
It tends to coincide with:
Communication revolutions
Information warfare
Rapid shifts in media and technology
Cultural fragmentation and polarization
Breakthroughs in transportation and connectivity
The last time Uranus was in Gemini was during World War II, which included:
Massive propaganda
Psychological operations
Radio communications were vital
Television began to emerge
And so did the atomic bomb
The Uranus/Gemini phase before that was the American Civil War which saw themes of the mass expansion of newspapers and communications
Before that was the American Revolution
Three out of three of the last periods over 300 years included history-altering wars and revolutions in communication technology
Today we are on the brink of WW3 and we have AI. Still don’t think astrology has any merit? This phase lasts until 2033 and could lead to a lost decade in markets. Ignore astrology at your own risk
Astrology = nature’s cycles that create a gravitational frequency that pushes and pulls on crowd behavior and social mood
“Millionaires don’t use astrology, billionaires do”
-JP Morgan

English

@TheGreekGod11 Can I join bro I’ve been here from the very beginning still standing staunch
English

@CredibleCrypto Can you give an updated wave count on ETH? Is more likely this will be the start of the 3rd wave or 5th and final sub wave of wave 1?
English


@TonySeverinoCMT @FlexibleDemean1 Thanks for confirmation that you cannot fault it
English

@lochie_cooke @FlexibleDemean1 No
I don’t work for you
English

Maybe
Just maybe then you should hang this up
Or get better at it
I am often right — and I am right when I say this guy’s work is a net negative for this space
Misleads his audience off cliffs on the regular
He is a major reason I don’t promote Elliott Wave as much anymore
You can’t just throw count after count on top of the chart to project what you want to see
And then he has the nerve to call out an analyst I consider to be legendary — and the inspiration for my becoming a CMT

English


It must adhere to certain rules and principles
I took the CEWA course
I have a signed copy of the Elliott Wave book from the book’s author he personally sent to me
It’s a lot more strict than people realize, but because it’s subjective, people like Coosh abuse it
The audience doesn’t know the difference
English

@yourfriendSOMMI @MoneyGangCrypto Or Richard hasn’t fired on all cylinders yet
English

@MoneyGangCrypto Two possible explanations:
👉🏼 Raoul Pal has 2m subs, thats 6x more network effect than Richard Heart
So its more capital that pushed it up.
👉🏼 Also another thing: SUI tokens are locked up. They unlock and dump over time, but its not all 100% unlock.

English

@occultrealms @OrderBookShow Institutions don’t move markets, crypto as a whole thrived many times before they were interested. So ask yourself like you are the market movers, what’s the best play now to catch the majority off guard?
English

@OrderBookShow Nobody has money to buy now since everyone held alts from 2022 and has experienced basically a 90% drawdown. It's been the worst market ever for alts, and it's not getting any better. $BTC or bust. This is the new way now that institutions are in. They are not gambling on alts.
English

CredibleCrypto: If You Cannot Hold Your Alt Through The Worst Times Do Not Buy It In The First Place.
"If you're buying an altcoin, it's because you've done your research and you have the confidence to hold it in the worst of times so that you can experience that upside in the best of times."
Feat. @Tradermayne & @CredibleCrypto
English

Goosebumps...
$pdai to dorrah
Nobel Prize to @RichardHeartWin.
First ambassador of #pdailand @yourfriendSOMMI
Honor to the entire $PLS $HEX ecosystem. Maximum honor.

English

What's the major issue people always seem to ignore every time there's an exploit on a PulseChain forked protocol? The impact on the price of $PLS.
Whenever we post about an exploit (particularly the Maker issues and the recent Compound issues), 'believers' tend to have a habit of throwing up the charts of pDAI and pwBTC in the comments and saying "bro looks like it's doing just fine" - and they are (vs PLS), but that's actually kinda the problem once something's been exploited.
The exploiters of both Maker and Compound have a habit of selling the assets into stablecoins and bridging out, and all of this value ends up going via $PLS - in doing so, you both lower the value of $PLS vs USD, and also the overall on-chain liquidity.
The higher the ratio of your precious pwBTC or pDAI vs PLS, and the higher the liquidity, the more damage you allow someone to do to $PLS by selling assets they acquired at a zero cost basis.
Not convinced? Here's the simulated full-market dump of the Compound exploiters bags on @piteasio to show the liquidity flow. What we've highlighted is that eventually all of it ends up as PLS, which is all then sold for stablecoins.
Assuming this exploiter has lots of patience, and the relative USD of pwBTC holds steady while he offloads (likely courtesy of degens pumping it vs PLS), then there's a very real chance he'll walk away with anywhere from $1-2m USD - that's $1-2m USD of sell pressure on the price of $PLS, and $1-2m $USD of bridge value gone.
The degens buying up the price are unlikely to be doing so with freshly bridged stablecoins. You might be dumping your PLSX, HEX or whatever other tokens to 'buy the dip', but all that does is reduce the ratio of those assets vs PLS to pump the pwBTC ratio - ultimately gifting exit liquidity, and thinning the overall ecosystem liquidity.
That might sound fine to you individually, but ultimately the price and liquidity of $PLS vs stablecoins and $ETH is what determines the ability for you to sell and realise actual value in the future. There's already only around $8m of PLS liquidity vs stablecoins and ETH (so $4m buy-side), if you're cool with that being quartered or halved, then have at it.
What's the solution? Once protocols are exploited, and certain assets are suddenly in abundance (i.e. pwBTC), the only real solution is to do 2 things while you wait for the exploiter to offload their bags:
💰 Dump the price
💰 Stop providing liquidity (including pDAI/PLS liquidity, given the major pwBTC pair is now pwBTC/pDAI)
These are uncomfortable solutions, particularly as it would require a coordinated community effort to reduce their own bags for potentially an extended period of time to ensure the ecosystem damage is minimized.
What's actually going to happen? The community won't do it, they'll instead buy every dip they can get, and high-five each other as another exploit slaps around the price of $PLS and drains the chain of liquidity. If you want long-term success, you need the price of $PLS to go up (as the 'floor' of the ecosystem), it doesn't matter how good the ratio of your assets vs PLS is if there isn't any PLS/stablecoin liquidity to realize actual value in the future.
There's one or two wallets out there that could help this situation by slamming the price of pwBTC (potentially multiple times and/or for an extended period), but it remains to be seen whether or not they'll be utilized.
Go ahead though, post your charts, it's cute.

English

Someone has gain hostile control over the Compound ecosystem on pulsechain
They did this via approve exploit on the fixer bot from when puslechain launched and stole its Comp
Took governance control over of Comp
Then they gave themselves admin control over all cAssets and withdrew the underlying
They are sitting on all assets still
Please do not be this exploiters exit liquidity again - move your assets back into PLS asap
plsfolio.com/address/0xd78d…

English
King Cooka retweetledi
King Cooka retweetledi

Replace these words and read it again.
- Twitter = PulseChain.
- X = $pDAI
- Elon = RH.
You cant unsee some things. $pDAI to $1.
Richard Heart@RichardHeartWin
The Trojan horse. You know, when most people signed up for Twitter, they didn't realize they'd actually be signing up for X, or that Elon would own it. But here we are. Trojan horse are an effective way to get folks to do things they might not have otherwise. Like use a new chain
English






