lovedebug

百家讲坛为什么被停播了？ 因为专家教授太敢说了！

Morning. The last 48 hours of Codex and ChatGPT Work have been intense! Three important updates: - Temporarily removing the 5 hour usage limit restriction for all Plus, Business and Pro plans - Rolling out changes that will make GPT 5.6 Sol more efficient across the board and that will be reflected in less usage being used so that it can take you further. Exact impact to be quantified and shared - We hit 6M active users, and are landing a usage reset in the next hour Go do things

关于“南海仲裁案”，新华社讲了个寓言故事 十年前，菲律宾在域外势力支持下，导演了一出政治闹剧，也就是所谓的“南海仲裁案”。 这几天，菲律宾又高调纪念这场闹剧，大美子小日子带领一小撮辣鸡大张旗鼓炒作，企图混淆视听，固化其非法的搞笑主张。 7月11日，新华社在海外社交媒体平台推出一部寓言式动画《谁在扮演“正义者”》，彻底地揭穿了所谓“裁决”颠倒黑白，混淆是非的本质。

下届世界杯有戏了！国际足联主席确认，内部正在研究将世界杯，扩军到 64 支球队。 由于此次世界杯，参赛球队从 32 支球队，扩大至 48 支，出现了几场大爆冷的比赛结果，他们认为扩军球队数是非常成功的。

有关国家炒作“南海仲裁案裁决”出台十年，中方声明 关于美国、菲律宾、澳大利亚、加拿大、爱沙尼亚、德国、意大利、日本、拉脱维亚、立陶宛、新西兰、罗马尼亚、斯洛文尼亚、英国等国于2026年7月12日发表所谓“纪念南海仲裁案裁决”十年联合声明，中华人民共和国外交部郑重声明如下： 一、中国对南海诸岛，包括东沙群岛、西沙群岛、中沙群岛和南沙群岛拥有主权；中国南海诸岛拥有内水、领海、毗连区、专属经济区和大陆架；中国在南海拥有历史性权利。中国对南海诸岛的主权和在南海的相关权益，是在漫长的历史过程中确立的。早在公元前2世纪的西汉时期，中国人民就在南海航行，并在长期实践中发现了南海诸岛。中国最早并持续、和平、有效地对南海诸岛及相关海域行使主权和管辖。南海诸岛属于中国早已成为国际社会的普遍共识。 二、南海是世界上最安全的海上通道之一，南海的航行和飞越自由从来不存在任何问题。中国坚定维护在南海的领土主权和海洋权益，坚定维护南海的和平稳定。针对有关国家在南海的侵权挑衅，中国采取坚定措施捍卫自身权益，合理合法，专业克制。美国等域外国家持续在南海强化军力部署，横冲直撞、煽风点火，此种军事化、胁迫性行径才是当前南海局势面临的主要挑战。 三、陆地领土问题不属于《联合国海洋法公约》调整范围。海洋划界争议已被中国2006年根据《联合国海洋法公约》第298条作出的声明排除出《联合国海洋法公约》强制争端解决程序。在领土问题和海洋划界争议上，中国不接受任何强加于中国的争端解决方案。中国将继续遵循联合国宪章确认的国际法基本原则和国际关系基本准则，包括尊重国家主权和领土完整以及和平解决争端原则，坚持与直接有关当事国在尊重历史事实的基础上，根据国际法，通过谈判协商解决南海有关争议，维护南海和平稳定。 四、中国在“南海仲裁案”问题上的立场是明确的、一贯的、坚定的。“南海仲裁案”违反“国家同意”“约定必须遵守”等国际法基本原则，违反《联合国海洋法公约》本身，更违背南海基本事实。所谓“裁决”是一张非法无效没有拘束力的废纸。中国不接受、不承认该“裁决”，反对且不接受任何基于该“裁决”的主张和行动。中国在南海的领土主权和海洋权益任何情况下不受该“裁决”影响。 五、“裁决”出台十年来，不但没有解决中菲涉海问题，反而成为菲律宾扩张领土海洋声索的工具，激化了地区矛盾，并为域外势力介入南海问题、搅动南海局势提供了借口，已成为影响中菲关系和南海和平稳定的“绊脚石”。如果按照“裁决”的标准，很多国家的岛礁将失去主张海洋权益的依据。试问，个别支持“裁决”的国家是否已自愿放弃本国相应岛礁的海洋权益？有关国家持续炒作非法“裁决”，与地区和平稳定的大势不符，同地区国家和人民谋求发展繁荣的愿景相悖，其企图注定不会得逞。我们敦促有关国家切实尊重中国在南海的领土主权和海洋权益，停止在南海问题上挑事生非，停止破坏南海和平稳定。

虽然说现在有钱就能登顶珠峰，夏尔巴人抬都能把你抬上去 但有钱也是一门能力...

These foolish Westerners so insistent on persuading that China should deindustrialize—even dragging Zhu Rongji into their arguments. But they clearly have no grasp of the actual history and simply fabricate narratives that sound superficially plausible, but are in fact utter nonsense, designed to feed their even less informed readers. Zhu Rongji's reform three decades ago was never about deindustrialization—it was about 'mass layoffs and massive restructuring.' It was about transforming the Soviet-style mega-enterprises established during the Mao era into state-owned enterprises better suited to a market economy. Yes, a large number of workers were laid off as a consequence, but China's core industrial capacity was never diminished—on the contrary, it was strengthened. The competitive edge we see today in China's state-owned enterprises across infrastructure, energy, metallurgy, and defense—that foundation was laid precisely by Zhu Rongji.

Though China does not admit it, the entire world already treats China and the United States as a de facto G2. For decades, China embraced the wisdom of modesty, restraint, and keeping a low profile—developing quietly with a pragmatic and unassuming approach. But today, the new world order no longer allows us to remain humble. In today’s international system, humility, especially excessive humility, is no longer a wise diplomatic approach for China. Because apart from China, majority of actors in the world today operate on the logic of bullying the weak and fearing the strong, of taking an inch and demanding a mile, of mistaking every gesture of goodwill as an invitation to push even further. They will not see China as moderate or rational if China remain humble; they will only conclude that China’s strength must be a sham. Good-neighborly relations are certainly essential for China, but they are earned not only through the good will, but also the will/action to fight. Obviously, a hundred years of negotiation between China and Japan would achieve nothing. If China wants to achieve peace and prosperity in East Asia, the only viable paths are economic sanctions, political criticism, military strikes, and, where necessary, physical elimination.