
lstygar1
33 posts








Mitchell, no one cares if you responded to a request for comment. That proves nothing. We did NOT receive one, which is odd given the Daily Mail knows how to get ahold of us. If everything was on the up and up, why was The Daily Mail forced to immediately retract that their anonymous source was a Kirk Family member? Because the entire thing is BS, and we both know it. One plausible explanation remains that it was planted as fodder for your client's show so she could play victim and rage against an imaginary caricature of Erika, which is exactly what she did.


Decided against my better judgment to briefly turn on Candace and she was spouting some theory that UVU's Military-Affiliated Student Hub (MASH) is a part of the conspiracy. Yeah, I think that's enough for me. Remember: Candace privately envied and hated Charlie, and she wants his killer to be get away with it.


And that Jesus didn't really rise from the dead, that was just a body double, and Mary was actually a homicidal psychopath who engaged in a grand conspiracy to have her own family member killed.











I'd say Stephen King should be ashamed of himself, but what's the point?














