Angularly Unresolved

2.5K posts

Angularly Unresolved

Angularly Unresolved

@luthian

Katılım Mart 2007
108 Takip Edilen73 Takipçiler
Angularly Unresolved
@market_sleuth I continue to be amazed at the number of people who will *watch* something going down, be it a fight or a rescue, and just video it. No attempt to get involve or solve anything; just want it on their “Insta” 😖
English
0
0
0
83
End3of6Days9 (Helen) 🇺🇸
This woman completely lost it when her Ring camera notified her that a "black bear was walking on the gravel area"… only to realize the “bear” was actually her walking to her car. She went straight into “count your days” mode over the AI description 😭 Ring rolled out these AI-powered video descriptions back in June 2025 for Premium subscribers to give quick text summaries of activity. It’s equal parts funny and a little alarming how off the description was. While the goal is to make notifications more helpful, moments like this show that AI still has some growing pains — and sometimes you just have to laugh at the chaos it creates. Have you ever had your security camera or AI feature get something hilariously wrong?
English
669
746
5.5K
529.1K
Ambassador Mike Huckabee
Ambassador Mike Huckabee@GovMikeHuckabee·
Neither of these ppl are dumb. I worked w/ them at Fox. They know how to Google basic facts. The US provides $3.8 billion (NOT $1.5 trillion) but @Israel spends many X over that on US. We get a huge ROI-are they too lazy to research or intentionally lying?
The Megyn Kelly Show@MegynKellyShow

.@TuckerCarlson: "Israel could not sustain a blockade or defend itself for 24 hours without the $1.5 trillion U.S. military backstopping it and enforcing the long-standing defense guarantee... If that were to go away, Israel would have two choices: Suffer elimination or use nuclear weapons."

English
3.4K
3K
13.6K
795.6K
Angularly Unresolved
Angularly Unresolved@luthian·
@simonmaechling Who’s “we”? Are you some representative of The Science and, if so, how did you get that esteemed position? Why should I trust you?
English
0
0
0
10
Simon Maechling
Simon Maechling@simonmaechling·
The collapse of trust in science is going to go down in history as one of the most sad, bizarre, and destructive social contagions of modern times. We fed billions, cured diseases and powered nations - yet people ran toward conspiracies instead.
English
6.1K
5.5K
25.1K
1.9M
Angularly Unresolved
Angularly Unresolved@luthian·
@monsterhunter45 These kinds of “feuds” don’t go on this long without someone, or multiple someones, getting paid. As always, follow the money; she’s either raking in donations or this is being funded in other ways.
English
0
0
0
39
Larry Correia
Larry Correia@monsterhunter45·
I know Candace fans are delusional and retarded, but their understanding of “discovery” is hilarious.
English
6
11
324
4.1K
Angularly Unresolved
Angularly Unresolved@luthian·
@OhioPatriotme @llake58 Which do you think is more efficient? 1. Burn gas in a car 2. Burn fuel oil in a generator and then send the electricity over lossy high-voltage wires to a local power station where it is stepped down and then sent to your house where it then is used to charge an electric car
English
0
0
0
18
OhioPatriot
OhioPatriot@OhioPatriotme·
@llake58 While that's true, it would lower the demand for oil and maybe up the demand for coal?
English
1
0
0
7
Rapid Response 47
Rapid Response 47@RapidResponse47·
.@SecScottBessent on pressuring the IRGC: The retirement funds they thought they had outside of Iran, we are freezing. Same with their villas in the South of France. We are going to track them down, and we are going to continue the economic pressure as well as the blockade.
English
237
2.7K
12.7K
245.8K
PaxTrader777🇺🇸
PaxTrader777🇺🇸@paxtrader777·
Back when I still believed we had a two party system, I thought Andrew Ross Sorkin @andrewrsorkin was to smarmy and liberal for me. Those days have passed. I bought his book “1929 Inside The Greatest Crash in Wall Street History-and How It Shattered a Nation”. It is a great read and it is definitely a harbinger of what is to come.
English
23
3
211
18.9K
Angularly Unresolved
Angularly Unresolved@luthian·
@DickSlapperman3 @LeadingReport I want to know who the guy in the red shirt is; he walks up, appears to force the gun from the guy's hand, picks it up, thus getting his prints all over it, and then *walks away*, leaving the principal still holding the guy down! How about a little help there, dude?
English
0
0
0
27
Leading Report
Leading Report@LeadingReport·
Oklahoma high school principal heroically saves school from school sh**ter.
English
144
295
4.6K
2.5M
Angularly Unresolved
Angularly Unresolved@luthian·
As with everything, time will tell. We'll see how the midterms play out and we'll see who is running Iran in a year and what alliances have been made as a result. My hope is that those who forecast, often with significant vitriol, the results that *don't* happen will have the integrity to say, "Whoops, we were wrong."
English
0
0
0
22
Larry Correia
Larry Correia@monsterhunter45·
Sure, the Trump as Jesus meme was a dumb, crass, tasteless move, but compared to him obliterating the fundy psycho government of Iran (now, before they have even better missiles and nukes) rather than kicking the can down the road to be the next generations' problem to deal with, like we have for the last five decades... I just truly don't give a shit. So get your mandatory pearl clutching out of the way. Put up the required virtue signal post about how you don't approve of this latest of his many outrages. Yes. He's uncouth. Yes, he's barbaric, bombastic, prideful, and narcissistic, we're all fully aware. We've been observing this for ten years now. Yet at the end of the day the other side remains a bunch of America hating idiots who want to manage our decline, while the loud asshole you hate actually really likes America and keeps doing a bunch of shit the rest of us voted for. Personally, I'll take asshole who obliterates the psycho government who has been holding a big chunk of the world hostage through threats and funding terrorist proxy groups over the previous polite (at least in public) presidents who coddled, ignored, or actively enabled them.
English
44
38
447
4.7K
turmIq SuvwI'
turmIq SuvwI'@tlhIngan_qoH·
@Chesschick01 Starfleet Academy is the best example of burning down a franchise for the sake of tax money or some crap. I like everything before ENT. But I kind of like LDS and SNW, because those had decent episodes, although the last episodes of SNW made me think I was watching Doctor Who.
English
2
0
5
206
Larry Correia
Larry Correia@monsterhunter45·
Oh cool. All the experts on the Iranian nuclear program from yesterday are also experts on the oil industry and naval warfare today. Is there any field these super geniuses can't master over night? :D
English
82
33
859
7.9K
Mike Kupari 🚀💥
Mike Kupari 🚀💥@RocketPulpHack·
Me, innocently, unwrapping some butter so I can put a fresh stick in the butter dish: “Huh. This butter is one brick. I thought it was two sticks.” My wife, from the living room: “DON’T USE THAT! THAT’S GOOD BUTTER!” The “good butter” isn’t for me, I guess, SMDH.
Mike Kupari 🚀💥 tweet media
English
102
11
533
16.6K
Angularly Unresolved
Angularly Unresolved@luthian·
@monsterhunter45 I’m told many kids learned the following line in boot, back in the day: “This is my rifle, this is my gun. One is for shooting and one is for fun.” I am going pretend that’s what this person meant. 😳
English
0
0
0
23
Larry Correia
Larry Correia@monsterhunter45·
As a certified expert instructional professional firearms type person..... WHAT THE FUCK NO STOP BAD ARE YOU DOING I LITERALLY CAN'T EVEN HOLY SHIT NO ... Sorry, my brain shorted out for a minute there. The internet was a mistake.
English
48
11
300
6.7K
Angularly Unresolved
Angularly Unresolved@luthian·
I love that they say, "...or have already migrated to the fediverse." They were definitely part of the Fediverse!
English
0
0
0
19
Tim
Tim@NASA_Tim·
@monsterhunter45 Just a few months ago, they were ballistics experts, now they’re all experts on Middle East politics, war, and oil. It’s incredible how quickly people can gain an education.
English
1
0
1
49
Larry Correia
Larry Correia@monsterhunter45·
It’s funny. The Griftosphere and their 80 IQ audience were screaming about how impossible it was for a 30-06 to not exit a neck, so I wrote this post explaining some of the many variables, just 5 days ago. I got screamed at by a bunch of morons. Note how one of the things I talked about which would make an exit wound less likely was fragmentation. So it turns out the bullet did fragment (enough to prevent visual ballistic match at the crime lab) that gets reported (with a terribly misleading headline) and the Griftosphere immediately switched gears to scream about that instead even though it obliterates their dumb shit claims about their YouTube “recreations” from the prior months. Like I explained before, you can’t do a recreation when you don’t know most of the main variables. A huge one being bullet construction. If a bullet fragments those pieces have less mass, and unpredictable shapes. Those will all create different wound tracks, but they will usually be shorter than if the bullet stays in one piece. Skin is extremely elastic, and when it gets hit from the inside it stretches rapidly, but returns (mostly). The smaller/lighter/slower the bits poking it from the inside, the more likely it is to stretch rather than split. So fragmentation explains the lack of exit wound these fools have been screeching about nonstop for months. AND Ballistic matching a bullet to a barrel is based on a visual confirmation. Under a microscope they compare the marks on the recovered bullet to the gun. Irregularities in the metal leave marks on the bullet. However, if the projectile deforms enough (or breaks into a bunch of jagged pieces) then that visual confirmation is no longer possible. That does not mean “the bullet did not come from this gun” like these same dishonest grifters are barking today. It just means they can’t match the two together by that one process. It still could have, and likely did. It just got so damaged they can’t tell that way. That’s normal. Anybody who has ever see the twisted mess shed bullet jacket turns into is not surprised by this at all. Ballistic matching usually doesn’t work on high velocity, fragile projectiles. Imagine you took something sharp and scratched an X into the hood of your car. But then you drove your car into a truck at 100 miles an hour. Everything crumpled to shit. If you could no longer find that scratch you wouldn’t say the car doesn’t match. This is that, but smaller, faster, and probably with more deformation. TV cop shows have really done a disservice to the gullible. Quit paying attention to histrionic idiots who profit off of riling up dummies.
Larry Correia@monsterhunter45

As an actual gun guy, watching ignorant dummies on here pontificate about how bullets should behave is a hoot. Everybody who shoots a lot has seen bullets do weird stuff. Bullets obey the laws of physics. The same bullets fired under the same conditions into standardized testing medium under the same conditions will produce similar results. However as more variables are introduced, the results will diverge. And there's a LOT of variables. What type of bullet is it? There are a whole bunch of different kinds. They are constructed differently using different materials for different results. What was the velocity? Was the ammo in good condition so it was close to the listed factory velocity, or was it degraded? On impact, did the bullet tumble? Did it poke a hole and zip through? Did it fragment? How did it fragment? And each fragment has a different weight and shape, which can all do different things. Then you get into the living thing getting hit, and it gets even more complicated because bodies are complicated. Some bits are solid. They absorb energy differently. Some are stretchy and elastic. Some smoosh. Some shatter. Some will do either based upon the mass or velocity of the individual bits which strike it. And that's the SHORT version. Anybody who says one particular bullet is going to do one exact thing to one specific target, every time, when they don't even know a fraction of the variables I listed, is full of shit and trying to sell you something.

English
47
117
913
20.5K
Angularly Unresolved
Angularly Unresolved@luthian·
@monsterhunter45 @piratecapt16 Your post got "Visibility Limited" because, I'm guessing, you mentioned a bundle of sticks. Given the other insults thrown around in this thread, it's interesting that this was the "bad" one. 🤔
English
0
0
0
11
Larry Correia
Larry Correia@monsterhunter45·
As an actual gun guy, watching ignorant dummies on here pontificate about how bullets should behave is a hoot. Everybody who shoots a lot has seen bullets do weird stuff. Bullets obey the laws of physics. The same bullets fired under the same conditions into standardized testing medium under the same conditions will produce similar results. However as more variables are introduced, the results will diverge. And there's a LOT of variables. What type of bullet is it? There are a whole bunch of different kinds. They are constructed differently using different materials for different results. What was the velocity? Was the ammo in good condition so it was close to the listed factory velocity, or was it degraded? On impact, did the bullet tumble? Did it poke a hole and zip through? Did it fragment? How did it fragment? And each fragment has a different weight and shape, which can all do different things. Then you get into the living thing getting hit, and it gets even more complicated because bodies are complicated. Some bits are solid. They absorb energy differently. Some are stretchy and elastic. Some smoosh. Some shatter. Some will do either based upon the mass or velocity of the individual bits which strike it. And that's the SHORT version. Anybody who says one particular bullet is going to do one exact thing to one specific target, every time, when they don't even know a fraction of the variables I listed, is full of shit and trying to sell you something.
English
112
99
1.5K
64K
Cabaret Macabre
Cabaret Macabre@macabaret_17·
Which is more likely, the homosexual socialist who confessed to the murder and left his dna at the scene is the shooter or that Erika Kirk colluded with Israel to have Charlie murdered with an exploding mic and underground tunnels so that she could take over TPUSA while setting up a 22 year old kid to take the fall and face the death penalty?
English
3
2
17
323
Bonchie
Bonchie@bonchieredstate·
Person who has probably never fired a gun and didn’t know what causes thunder is now a ballistics expert who thinks all bullet are the same and result in the same wound, every single time. But she said it’s “so overwhelming,” so case closed.
Bonchie tweet mediaBonchie tweet media
English
83
165
1.5K
34.1K
Herman P. Hunter, Author
Herman P. Hunter, Author@HermanPHunter1·
@monsterhunter45 At this point, I think I'd rather stick my arm up a cow's ass than read any more of his posts. The dude needs to get a hobby. Maybe crochet. Or body piercing.
English
5
0
9
206
Larry Correia
Larry Correia@monsterhunter45·
As of this morning FarmFu Panda has been barking stupidly at me for an entire week. 😀 Normally I block morons fast but I’m kind of curious how long this pathetic dork can go, but I am also super bored of listening to him whine and lie.
Joel Rees in Japan@korashimenojoel

@monsterhunter45 @TroubleSh0073r Larry, you can't talk with you. I mean that literally. You seem to have no ability to ask yourself if what comes out of your mouth is useful to other people. No internal dialogue. I don't remember having new shoes until I was about twelve. I bought my own gym shoes (cont)

English
15
2
162
3.9K