Max Savelyev

We've redesigned Claude Code on desktop. You can now run multiple Claude sessions side by side from one window, with a new sidebar to manage them all.

Every person who has tried to sell software to a small Indian law firm has heard this: "Bhai, send me the proposal. I'll look at it." You follow up. "Still reviewing." You follow up again. Nothing. Three months pass. The deal is dead. You cut the price. Same response. You add features. Same response. You offer a free trial. They log in once and disappear. The problem is not your pricing. The problem is not your product. The problem is you are selling the wrong thing. Small Indian businesses do not buy software. They hire people. This is not a behavioral quirk. It is how trust and accountability work in this market. Think about what happened when Indian courts started going digital. E-filing became mandatory. Case status went online. Court orders became downloadable. The portals existed. They were not complicated. Any lawyer with a smartphone and an internet connection could have figured it out in an afternoon. Nobody figured it out. Instead, thousands of e-filing operators and court typists set up shop near every district court complex in India. The same typists who used to type petitions on typewriters now started filing cases online for lawyers. Charging Rs 200 to Rs 500 per filing. Just to use portals the lawyer could have accessed themselves. These operators now handle everything from e-filing to downloading court orders to checking case status. Many of them charge monthly retainers from 15 to 20 lawyers each. They are the person the lawyer calls when anything digital does not work. The lawyers did not want the portal. They wanted a person who would handle it and be answerable when a filing deadline was missed. Same story with GST. ClearTax built software. Tally added modules. The tools existed. Nobody learned. Instead, 3 lakh GST consultants emerged across India. Charging Rs 500 to Rs 2,000 per month per client. Just to file returns using tools the client could have accessed themselves. Because the person you hire is accountable. The app is not. Now apply this to AI. You build an AI workflow system for a 5-person law firm. Client intake automation. Hearing date reminders. Document drafting. Legal research summaries. It works beautifully. You try to sell it as a SaaS product for Rs 2,000 a month. They will not buy it. Not because Rs 2,000 is too much. They pay their munshi Rs 12,000 a month. They pay for their Manupatra subscription. They pay the typist outside court for e-filing. They will not buy it because they do not trust a subscription to an unknown product. Nobody to call when something breaks. Nobody accountable when the reminder does not go out before the limitation date. The way to sell AI to small Indian law firms is not to sell software. It is to sell yourself as the person who builds it, runs it, and fixes it. Rs 15,000 to 20,000 to build and set up. Rs 2,000 a month to maintain and be available. Same pricing as their e-filing operator. Same mental model. You are not a product. You are a person they can call. And here is where the distribution insight gets interesting. Think about who already walks into a lawyer's chamber every month. The legal book supplier. The local distributor who drops off bare acts and commentaries. These people have been visiting the same 200 to 300 lawyers for years. They know which advocate sits in which chamber. They know their practice area, their court, their temperament. The lawyer already trusts this person. Already buys from them. Already opens the door when they knock. Now imagine that book supplier says: "Sir, along with your commentary subscription, I can also set up an AI system for your office. Hearing date reminders, draft notices, client follow-ups. Rs 15,000 setup, Rs 2,000 a month. I will handle everything." The conversion rate on that pitch is not 2 percent. It is 40 to 60 percent. Because the trust already exists. The relationship already exists. The regular access to the chamber already exists. The same applies to the stamp vendor and the notary agent who sees the same set of lawyers week after week. Or the munshi inside the firm who handles all the filings and would be the one actually operating any new system. This is how India adopts new technology. Not through app stores and LinkedIn ads. Through trusted intermediaries who bundle the new thing with an existing relationship. The person building AI deployment businesses for Indian law firms who figures this out first will not be selling to one advocate at a time. They will be training legal book suppliers and e-filing operators to offer this as a service to their existing clients. That is a distribution model. Not a product. Not a marketing funnel. The SaaS model assumes the buyer wants to learn and self-serve. The India model says: find the person the buyer already trusts. Work through them. One is selling software. The other is understanding how India actually works. Know anyone who has done this yet for legal software or AI in India?