Mark Brown
22.3K posts

Mark Brown
@mark74brown
PhD criminology student & was teaching @unisouthampton. MA criminology & crim/psych, ex-police, loves a bit of sport & done a bit of travelling in my time







We asked police officers what one thing they would change to improve the police. By far the top answer, at 45%, is more resources 👇 Results link in replies







define ‘perfect casting’



The home secretary Shabana Mahmood has announced that Lord Hogan-Howe, the former commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, will lead her radical review of policing in England and Wales. Hogan-Howe, 68, was a policeman for 38 years and became chief constable of Merseyside and an inspector of constabulary before leading Scotland Yard. He has been asked to deliver “evidence-based recommendations” by the summer. That’s not a lot of time, but Shabana Mahmood has already made her mind up. Instead of 43 forces, she wants a smaller number of larger forces plus an overarching National Police Service (being likened to a British FBI). The argument is that big forces can handle big investigations into homicides, major drug crime and firearms more effectively. Within these new forces, smaller teams would handle neighbourhood policing and petty crime. Police leaders have been asking for a quarter of a century for an overhaul of police structures; most favour a reduction to either nine or 12 regional forces. Politicians have, however, been reluctant to grasp the nettle, calculating that there are no votes in abolishing forces with names such as Staffordshire, Dorset or Norfolk that are clearly linked with place and community. Is Hogan-Howe the right man for this job? He arrived at Scotland Yard in 2011 promising a back-to-basics return to “total policing”. He left in 2017 with his record tarnished by the Met’s handling of Operation Midland, the unhinged investigation into fabricated allegations of child abuse and murder made by the fantasist Carl Beech. The Met had to apologise for its treatment of the ex-Army chief Lord Bramall, the family of the former home secretary Leon Brittan and the ex-MP Harvey Proctor. The real issue, however, is not Hogan-Howe’s personal record but whether it is appropriate for a long-serving police officer to be leading this review at all. The Home Office says he will be assisted by an advisory panel but, in the short time available, can there be adequate consultation with those who have legitimate interests in and concerns about the future of policing? Will the victims of crime (either survivors of sexual violence or retailers plagued by shoplifters) be heard? How will these superforces be scrutinised? The British model of policing by consent means those given powers of arrest, coercion and the use of force must be held accountable. Few doubt that the architecture of policing needs an overhaul, but should a policeman be overseeing that reform? As a former chief constable said to me the other day: “Police reform is far too important to be left to the police.” Link TK the article: thetimes.com/comment/column…


The home secretary Shabana Mahmood has announced that Lord Hogan-Howe, the former commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, will lead her radical review of policing in England and Wales. Hogan-Howe, 68, was a policeman for 38 years and became chief constable of Merseyside and an inspector of constabulary before leading Scotland Yard. He has been asked to deliver “evidence-based recommendations” by the summer. That’s not a lot of time, but Shabana Mahmood has already made her mind up. Instead of 43 forces, she wants a smaller number of larger forces plus an overarching National Police Service (being likened to a British FBI). The argument is that big forces can handle big investigations into homicides, major drug crime and firearms more effectively. Within these new forces, smaller teams would handle neighbourhood policing and petty crime. Police leaders have been asking for a quarter of a century for an overhaul of police structures; most favour a reduction to either nine or 12 regional forces. Politicians have, however, been reluctant to grasp the nettle, calculating that there are no votes in abolishing forces with names such as Staffordshire, Dorset or Norfolk that are clearly linked with place and community. Is Hogan-Howe the right man for this job? He arrived at Scotland Yard in 2011 promising a back-to-basics return to “total policing”. He left in 2017 with his record tarnished by the Met’s handling of Operation Midland, the unhinged investigation into fabricated allegations of child abuse and murder made by the fantasist Carl Beech. The Met had to apologise for its treatment of the ex-Army chief Lord Bramall, the family of the former home secretary Leon Brittan and the ex-MP Harvey Proctor. The real issue, however, is not Hogan-Howe’s personal record but whether it is appropriate for a long-serving police officer to be leading this review at all. The Home Office says he will be assisted by an advisory panel but, in the short time available, can there be adequate consultation with those who have legitimate interests in and concerns about the future of policing? Will the victims of crime (either survivors of sexual violence or retailers plagued by shoplifters) be heard? How will these superforces be scrutinised? The British model of policing by consent means those given powers of arrest, coercion and the use of force must be held accountable. Few doubt that the architecture of policing needs an overhaul, but should a policeman be overseeing that reform? As a former chief constable said to me the other day: “Police reform is far too important to be left to the police.” Link TK the article: thetimes.com/comment/column…


Police reform is far too important to be left to the police #Echobox=1773641329" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">thetimes.com/comment/column…












