I Think
3.5K posts





















"250,000 girls. Let that sink in."



The strangest part of the Jonathan and Suzy Lamb situation is how much of it seems to orbit around Jonathan’s “rightful” place at Daystar. If this were purely about their daughter, you’d expect that to remain the centre, no? Instead, so much of the narrative keeps circling back to succession, inheritance, betrayal, Jonathan being pushed out, and the unbearable injustice of a grown man not being handed mommy and daddy’s empire. That is the part no one seems to want to say out loud. This does not read like two parents soberly seeking truth for their child. It reads like a family throne dispute with a horrifying allegation welded onto it. This assault allegation is serious. Which is exactly why serious people should speak carefully. Police investigated and closed the case with no charges filed due to insufficient evidence. So at minimum, anyone claiming certainty should be saying “allegedly,” and not presenting an unfounded allegation as fact while calling it discernment. An *actual* reporter would tread carefully. A real lover of truth would openly admit what is actually known, what is alleged, and what is still unresolved. Laura-Lynn and her followers are doing the opposite. They are turning accusation into doctrine, suspicion into proof, and a very typical family power struggle into a crusade. And frankly, this whole thing has become a feminist tantrum in church clothes. Emotion is being treated as discernment, accusation and feelings as proof, and caution as moral failure. Anyone who questions the timing of this allegation, the inheritance angle, or this public campaign, is immediately cast as wicked, abusive, or part of some conspiracy (we are all Rachel, right?) But no! Some of us just think it is extremely convenient when a horrifying allegation becomes inseparable from a nepo baby’s grievance about not inheriting the throne. The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it? Stay tuned for more of my thoughts on the matter if you’re interested @LauraLynnTT

@LauraLynnTT You want to dox people for… disagreeing with you? What crime has been committed? How exactly is it your right to know the personal lives of random people on the internet because they don’t accept your version of events?









