
Matthew McDaniel
193 posts

Matthew McDaniel
@mattcmcdaniel
Graduate student @wscal. PCA.
Escondido, CA Katılım Nisan 2023
115 Takip Edilen159 Takipçiler

@JimLincoln1517 @WMcNeil1967 “Good works are the evidence that faith is real, and thus necessary for final salvation, though not the ground of it, as the death and righteousness of Christ are, or the means of it, as faith is.” Where do you disagree?
English


@reformedtexan He studied with Egli for a time. Egli declined the Bremen chair that Crocius ended up taking in 1610.
English

I’m lying. We need Crocius’ Syntagma. I’m working on it!
Michael J. Lynch@reformedtexan
@Benjthoven_ We don’t need another Reformed ST.
English

Matthew McDaniel retweetledi

@Methodist_Prime I like B&H’s Going Deeper + Wallace’s Beyond the Basics. Get a good 1 John reader to go with it (Merkle, or Baugh). Wallace also recorded some good lecture videos that aren’t too expensive.
English

@jstephentrotter Given Fesko’s emphasis on podcasts, blogs, etc, I think he’d agree.
English

@jstephentrotter By good boy network I mean a group of credentialed folk who trust each other to produce good work. They write for each other with little oversight and thus occasionally publish things that wouldn’t pass the initial editorial decision prior to peer review w a reputable publisher
English
Matthew McDaniel retweetledi
Matthew McDaniel retweetledi

Panel brutally frame mogged by @RScottClark who exudes pure John Wayne-esque aura with the cowboy boots and jean combo along with his great physical stature. The sublime authority of immense physical presence...
Glorious

Scott R. Swain@scottrswain
It was a joy to participate in Project Geneva’s “Confessing the Faith” conference yesterday evening. Below is a link to the talks by Ryan McGraw, @RScottClark, and me.
English

@ferrismattic @Cathedralulus @PatAbendroth Certainly portions of his books that cite Olevianus as a proponent of the IAOC need to be edited + the claim that Piscator converted to Arminianism (an error from outdated sources). But I’m sure he’d be happy to eventually correct these mistakes and release a second edition.
English

@ferrismattic @Cathedralulus @PatAbendroth I sent Pat a copy. I think he’s ok w/ saying Ursinus and Olevianus were “inadvertently opponents of the gospel.” This was more or less Beza’s later stance, that the denial of the IAOC is an error from hell. This view was taken up by the French Reformed, Basel... A loud minority.
English

@MarkMacdonald75 @DrInquisitivus @ToCelestialCity @NatSchreffler Strange binary. Probably a little bit of both. It's easy for brilliant people to misunderstand and talk past each other, esp. re: complex issues. It happens all the time, lol.
English

@DrInquisitivus @ToCelestialCity @NatSchreffler You can consistently argue that Baxter was right, but the matter was worded such that even a genius like Rutherford could misunderstand him.
Or you can consistently argue that he was the pinnacle of perspicuity, and Rutherford thinks he’s wrong having grasped his argument.
English

@jonathanramont I do this every few hours until whatever I’m writing is due. Very efficient. Very healthy.
English

@reformedtexan This “Muller” character should spend more time in the sources and less time on Discord.
English
Matthew McDaniel retweetledi

I recommend having a look at this recently published article by @mattcmcdaniel.
He shows how the IAOC was designated as adiaphora, and "a distinctly contra-IAOC position constituted a legitimate strand of early Reformed doctrine, insofar as there was a lack of ecclesiastical pressure on those who held either position to change their views."
tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
English

@JasonBrown96 @dgh5391 @jesserandolph_ No. Some of the earliest covenant theologians rejected the IAOC and had a robust conception of the CoW/Cov of Nature. What you said might seem anecdotally true in contemporary NAPARC controversies, but isn’t the case historically.
English

@dgh5391 @jesserandolph_ Is it fair to say that not all who reject the Covenant of Works deny the imputation of the active obedience of Christ, but that all who do deny the imputation of His active obedience deny the Covenant of Works?
English

For those who reject the imputation of the active obedience of Christ, what is the alternative doctrine proposed? What's the systematic category which replaces it?
@jesserandolph_
English









