Max Campagna

Remember this when they say Iran was not a threat to the USA. The IRGC was not only operating in Venezuela, they were also giving weapons and tech to Venezuela. With the Iranian Regime targeting Diego Garcia, they have shown the world that they possess an Intermediate Range Ballistic Missile capable of a 4,000 km range. If one of these were to have been placed in Venezuela, the ENTIRE east coast of the USA would have been in play.

JUST IN: Goodbye to American air superiority. Chinese defense company Jingan Technology announced that its system intercepted radio signals emitted by a US Northrop Grumman B-2 Spirit stealth bomber over Iran. We know that the bomber's most important feature is its stealth capability. Nevertheless, Jingan's system successfully captured radio signals emitted by the aircraft as it returned from a mission in Iran, operating under the call signs Petro 41 to Petro 44 during the initial phase of the operation. The system relies on artificial intelligence to analyze activity patterns. The company stated that it not only detected the signals but also managed to infer early indicators of conflict before it erupted by reconstructing the sequence of signals and movements of the US military. It described what it detected as the largest US military buildup in the Middle East in two decades. This marks the end of the era of American air superiority. All US aircraft are now exposed to the eyes of Chinese artificial intelligence.

> be WinRAR creator: Eugene Roshal > release WinRAR in 1995 > give everyone a 40-day trial > never actually enforce the trial > people use it for 20+ years anyway > millions of PCs still running the “trial” > no DRM, no lockouts > just a small reminder popup > accidentally give the entire planet a permanent trial absolute legend 🐐

La Casa Blanca publicó un video que mezcla escenas de Gladiador, Top Gun, Breaking Bad y Mortal Kombat con imágenes reales de ataques militares clasificados. Lo que estamos viendo es la muerte del comunicado de prensa y el nacimiento del Estado como creador de contenido. Durante décadas, los gobiernos creyeron que la seriedad institucional era sinónimo de credibilidad. Hoy esa fórmula no tiene alcance, no genera conversación y no mueve a nadie. Este video tuvo 58 mil likes. Ningún boletín oficial en la historia ha logrado eso. Esto tiene un nombre en comunicación digital y es el shitposting institucional. Las IDF lo descubrieron antes. Ucrania lo perfeccionó durante la guerra. Ahora lo adopta la primera potencia del mundo desde su cuenta más oficial. El patrón es claro: los gobiernos que quieren relevancia cultural ya no pueden hablar como gobiernos. Tienen que hablar como internet. La pregunta que le hago a cada estratega y candidato que me lee es esta: mientras el gobierno más poderoso del planeta ya migró su comunicación al lenguaje de la Gen Z, ¿tú todavía estás diseñando espectaculares y grabando spots con corbata? El mundo cambió. La comunicación política que no entiende la cultura pop hoy no tiene audiencia. Y sin audiencia, no hay poder.

I think I just figured something out about why things feel different right now. And then I'm logging off X for the night. This is the very first time, in the modern history of our country, that we can communicate openly about military campaigns, without having our accounts suspended. Think about it, Elon Musk took over Twitter while Biden was still in office. And Biden was just a drooling mindless cucumber. So he didn't know what he was doing, nobody knew what he was doing. He just opened the country to let murderers, terrorists and the most evil people in the world come in. We are actually watching Trump take out drug cartel boats, remove brutal dictators, liberate Iran, do what he knows is right, and we can talk about it openly like we actually have true Free Speech. And not only can we freely talk about it, without censorship, the people that are deeply involved can talk about it freely. Look at all the Venezuelans celebrating, praising Trump. Look at all the Iranians saluting pictures of Trump in Iran. Look at Iranians celebrating in America right now. A few short years ago, we would have never seen any of the REAL information, and each others REAL opinions. Jack would have shut you down. God Bless President Trump and God Bless Elon Musk. The Golden Age has arrived, and I'm here for it.

Entra de cabeza en el Top5 de las mejores respuestas que he leído en toda la historia de esta red social

BREAKING: Iran has been supplying Russia with Shahed drones to kill Ukrainians since 2022. The Pentagon just asked Ukraine to help kill Iranian Shahed drones in the Gulf. That is not irony. That is the most elegant strategic reversal of this entire war. Here is the economics that made this conversation inevitable. One Iranian Shahed drone costs $30,000 to manufacture. One Patriot interceptor missile costs $1.5 million. For every dollar Iran spends building a drone, it costs the UAE $20 to $28 to shoot it down. Iran has tens of thousands of Shaheds. The Gulf states have a finite number of Patriot missiles and a finite production rate to replace them. That ratio is a slow-motion financial siege. Iran does not need to get through Gulf air defenses. It just needs to drain them faster than they can be replenished. Ukraine spent three years solving exactly this problem. When Russia began deploying Iranian Shaheds against Ukrainian cities in September 2022, Ukraine could not afford to burn $1.5 million missiles against $30,000 drones indefinitely. So Ukrainian engineers built something different. Interceptor drones. Small, fast, cheap, designed specifically to kill other drones at a fraction of the cost. The interception ratio is not 1:50. It is closer to 1:1. Drone kills drone. The economics invert. Ukraine went from being the world’s test laboratory for Iranian drone warfare to being the world’s leading expert in defeating it. And now the Pentagon, watching Gulf air defenses burn through interceptor stockpiles against Shahed swarms, has picked up the phone to Kyiv. The geopolitical architecture of this moment is worth sitting with. Iran armed Russia. Russia used those weapons to develop tactics. Ukraine defeated those tactics under fire and built countermeasures. The Gulf is now buying those countermeasures to defeat the original Iranian weapons. Tehran’s drone doctrine has completed a loop that ends with its own drones being hunted by technology born from fighting its own drones. That is not a footnote to this war. That is the war economy of the 21st century operating in real time. open.substack.com/pub/shanakaans…

@NestorSiurana Burkina what?

El Presidente de Burkina Faso, Ibrahim Traoré, ha calificado oficialmente a Israel y a Estados Unidos como estados terroristas. Tras los ataques a Irán, ha cerrado la embajada de Burkina Faso en Washington y ha llamado al embajador. Además, Burkina Faso enviará 200 soldados y maquinaria de guerra a Teherán para, según Traoré, combatir el imperialismo americano e israelí. Trump y Netanyahu constan ahora como terroristas altamente peligrosos en el país del Sahel.

@DavidClarkGA "This ain’t your father’s regime change. It’s not the Global War on Terror. It’s not even war. It’s avoiding war through the limited, extremely violent and decisive use of force that achieves decisive overmatch and ends the ability for conflict altogether." This is it!

I couldn’t agree more with my good friend and fellow Green Beret, Congressman Pat Harrigan. He’s absolutely right. “Here’s how I really feel about Iran. People used to ask me how I felt about progress in Afghanistan. I would always say we were three weeks away from victory and three days away from defeat on a sliding scale. Yesterday we were in the exact same spot. Tomorrow we’d be in the exact same spot. We were allowed to do enough to not lose, but we never were allowed to do what we needed to do to win. Play that theme across the rest of our Middle Eastern involvements, anywhere we decided to sponsor a color revolution. Grand idea and scheme of involvement. We’d get involved, commit resources, people, and try to Westernize or “capacity build.” Tons of military contracts and money pouring overseas. Then. Nothing. We’d hold short, get politically bogged down, and paralyze our military operations. And we’d lose. For years, that became the playbook—getting into conflicts without a clear path to victory. Big ideas. Lofty objectives. But no willingness to do what it actually takes to win. Our troops were asked to operate in the gray, constrained by politics, chasing goals that sounded good in think tanks but did not translate on the battlefield. President Trump tried to take the handcuffs off during his first term. He did some bold things—demolishing ISIS in weeks and assassinating Soleimani on the tarmac of Baghdad International. But what we are seeing now is a fully formed doctrine: clarity of purpose, decisive action, and no apologies for defending American interests. Enter President Trump’s second term. An incredibly decisive operation in Midnight Hammer, sending a clear message to Iran. Picking off Maduro in Venezuela—sending the clearest message to all of the adversaries of the United States that we are willing to use unprecedented capabilities and are truly done messing around. And today, Ayatollah Khomeini is dead. He was an evil man, and American and Israeli airpower sent him into the next world, straight to Hell. Gone are the days of failed regime change and capacity building. Gone are the days of kicking the can down the road and getting nothing done. Gone are the days of sacrificing our military authority and capabilities on the altar of political correctness. The world is a dangerous place. When nations threaten the United States of America or its close allies, President Trump is very clear: we will seek terms of peace. But if peace is unobtainable, we are going straight for the jugular, because we are done getting nothing done. Because the world deserves peace, and to be free of leaders who oppress and oppose peace. And simply, more than anyone else in the world by a factor of ten, because we can. This ain’t your father’s regime change. It’s not the Global War on Terror. It’s not even war. It’s avoiding war through the limited, extremely violent and decisive use of force that achieves decisive overmatch and ends the ability for conflict altogether. It is reshaping the globe and the balance of power in favor of the United States of America again. We are rolling the tables. Anyone who has been to war, hates war. But I like what we’re doing, and why. A lot. Because decisive strength is what prevents long wars and protects American lives. This isn’t over. Pray for our Troops” 🇺🇸

Being able to kidnap a head of state, and decapitate a regional military power back to back without taking a single american casualty is such a wild spectacle of power i don't think it has any other historic precedent

Tu anonimato online se fue al carajo por menos de lo que cuesta un café Y no gracias al FBI ni un hacker pro, basta con que alguien tenga acceso a un LLM potente (Claude, GPT, etc.) y unos cuantos posts tuyos viejos Investigadores de Anthropic, ETH Zurich y Mats soltaron un paper escalofriante: “Large-Scale Online De-Anonymization with LLMs” Los resultados son de los más jodidos que he visto en privacidad este año: Montaron un sistema automático que agrupa tus comentarios anónimos, saca pistas de tu personalidad/estilo/intereses, busca matches en la web y te linkea a tu identidad real Todo sin intervención humana. Funciona en Reddit, HN, LinkedIn, hasta transcripciones anonimizadas de entrevistas Los números duelen: 67% de aciertos correctos como base y cuando el sistema se anima a apostar fuerte hasta 90% de precisión Pasos del monstruo: *Extrae señales de identidad con LLM *Busca candidatos con embeddings en miles/millones de perfiles *Razona y rankea con modelos grandes *Calibra para que solo ofrezca un resultado cuando está casi seguro Los autores son pesimistas: ni rate limits ni guardrails lo paran fácil Conclusión directa del paper: si usas usernames persistentes, asume que 100% te pueden conectar a tu vida real Pero incluso, puede agrupar todas tu cuentas secundarias o las desechables que usaste para un shitpost o hablar mal de tu jefe, todo es data indexable ahora El costo por target? Menos de $5. La anonimidad práctica murió, la mataron con matemáticas y APIs baratas TL;DR: LLMs desanonimizan tus cuentas anónimas con 67% accuracy y 90%+ precisión por casi nada Tus throwaways de Reddit, foros, “identidades separadas”… todo linkeable Consejo: *Varía brutal tu estilo de escritura *Compartimentaliza todo *Asume que nada de lo que posteaste es anónimo de verdad La era del “nadie sabe quién soy” se acabó (Link al papel en el primer comentario) Tiempos muy oscuros en ciberseguridad, gente

@PeteHegseth Forever grateful! 🇺🇸 🇻🇪

HERO.

@scooterrat @BuckWilde_ Absolute resolve was an absolute display of American badassery 🇺🇸 🇻🇪

@BuckWilde_ Definitely an American badass.

Flies his Chinook through hostile fire, takes AP rounds in his legs, keeps the helo in the air, sees a machine gun nest, FUCKING DRIFTS THE HELO around so the door gunner can cancel some birthdays and returns with no casualties. He’s not just a unicorn, he’s a goddamn unit of a man. 🇺🇸🫡

@BuckWilde_ @Twain813021Mark +1!!

@Twain813021Mark Definitely rename Caracas.

@BuckWilde_ What a LEGEND. God bless him! Forever grateful 🇻🇪

El 3 de Enero de 2026, Eric Slover, Piloto de un MH-47G Chinook adscrito al regimento del 160 SOAR Nightstalkers, lideró el aterrizaje de Helicopteros en la operación #AbsoulteResolve que extrajo a Maduro de su Bunker en Fuerte tiuna. Mientras se preparaba para aterrizar, posiciones de defensa en el bunker de Maduro dispararon desde varios ángulos donde Slover resultó herido en la pierna y la cadera. Recibió 4 disparos y su pierna resultó fracturada a varios niveles. A pesar de ello, voló su Chinook con precisión para preservar la vida de los operadores Delta Force los cuales transportó hasta el objetivo y posicionó la aeronave de un manera que permitió a los artilleros neutralizar las defensas del Bunker para luego permitir que los operadores Delta Force entraran a cumplir su misión: Encontrar a Maduro en su bunker en un escenario practicado docenas de veces en condiciones simuladas en una réplica de la fortificación construida en Kentucky, Fort Campell por parte del JSOC (Joint Operations Command). Eric no solo es un héroe para los Estados Unidos sino para Venezuela y todo el mundo libre. Por ello, Trump en el State of the Union le confirió la mas alta distinción del Gobierno de EUA: La Medalla de Honor del Congreso. Los tiranos del mundo deben dormir muy ligero sabiendo que Pilotos como Slover pueden liderar la carga en una operación tan compleja en el medio de una total oscuridad, ser heridos gravemente, proteger a su escuadrón, cumplir su mision y volver para contarlo.

La presentadora de La Sexta no pregunta qué pasa con determinados agresores. No pregunta qué falla en determinados entornos. Solo pregunta qué pasa con todos los hombres. En España hay aproximadamente 24 millones de hombres, unos 48 millones de habitantes y alrededor de 50 a 60 mujeres asesinadas al año en el ámbito de pareja o expareja. Cada asesinato es un crimen absoluto. Pero estadísticamente significa que el 99,999 % de los hombres no comete ese crimen. Sin embargo, este editorial habla del grupo entero como si el fenómeno definiera al conjunto. Eso es equivalente, en estructura lógica, a decir: “Hay políticos corruptos, ¿qué os pasa a los políticos? “Hay inmigrantes delincuentes, ¿qué os pasa a los inmigrantes?” Es el mismo mecanismo retórico. Se toma un subconjunto y se proyecta sobre todos. También confunde la existencia de delitos y crímenes con la existencia de un sistema de impunidad. El editorial de La Sexta afirma que los hombres “siguen actuando con total impunidad”. Esto es objetivamente falso si se analizan los datos judiciales. Solo en España hay órdenes de alejamiento, juzgados especializados en violencia contra la mujer, agravantes penales específicos y detenciones automáticas ante denuncias en determinados contextos. Los homicidios de pareja suelen resolverse con tasas superiores al 90%. La mayoría de agresores son detenidos, juzgados y condenados. Es decir, el sistema puede fallar en casos concretos, pero no existe impunidad generalizada. Decir que existe impunidad estructural implica que el sistema no actúa. Y eso no es cierto. El sistema actúa. A veces tarde. A veces imperfectamente. Pero actúa. Este editorial no quiere analizar las causas reales. No habla de personas que se aprovechan de su poder, de entornos sociales específicos, de alcoholismo, trastornos psicológicos, celos patológicos o de un historial previo. Sustituye el análisis causal por una atribución moral difusa. “Hombres que creen que las mujeres son su propiedad.” Esto convierte un fenómeno complejo en una categoría moral simple pero los homicidios no ocurren porque exista un “colectivo masculino con una ideología común”. Ocurren por la acción de individuos concretos, con perfiles concretos, en circunstancias concretas. Reducirlo a una identidad colectiva impide comprender el fenómeno y lo que no se comprende, no se puede prevenir eficazmente. El editorial muestra las caras de algunos hombres. Esto es una técnica narrativa. No es un análisis estadístico. Se usan casos extremos, altamente emocionales, para construir una impresión general. Pero los casos extremos no definen el comportamiento promedio. Son excepciones. No la norma. La función de esa técnica no es explicar la realidad, sino producir un impacto emocional. En un Estado de derecho, la responsabilidad es individual, no colectiva. Cada persona responde por sus actos. Cuando se empieza a hablar de grupos enteros como si compartieran responsabilidad moral, se abandona ese principio. Se entra en una lógica de culpabilidad difusa y eso es incompatible con la base jurídica moderna. Este editorial no menciona que la inmensa mayoría de hombres jamás agrede a una mujer, que la mayoría de hombres protege, cuida y respeta a las mujeres de su entorno. Que padres, hermanos, hijos y parejas forman la red principal de protección real. La sociedad no está dividida entre hombres agresores y mujeres víctimas, está formada por millones de relaciones normales, funcionales y protectoras. Los agresores son una minoría peligrosa, pero minoría. Este tipo de manifiestos no distinguen entre el criminal concreto y el grupo al que pertenece biológicamente Eso genera una categoría abstracta llamada “los hombres” como sujeto moral único. Pero “los hombres” no actúan. Actúan individuos concretos. La justicia no condena categorías, condena a personas. Aquí no hay una explicación, hay una narrativa que moviliza emociones pero que no sustituye al análisis riguroso de la realidad.

La única manera de conquistar el universo es con inteligencia artificial, y acabamos de dar el primer paso en Marte.  El problema es que el planeta está tan lejos que, aunque la señal viaje a la velocidad de la luz, tarda más de 20 minutos en llegar. Si el carrito está por caer a un cráter, para cuando te enteraste ya se hizo puré.  Por eso, planificar de antemano cualquier tramo requería de un equipo gigante. Pero en diciembre, la NASA usó la IA de Claude para generar la ruta automáticamente en base a las imágenes y mapas.  No solo fue exitoso, sino que esto es solo el primer paso, porque lo lógico es que mandemos vehículos totalmente autónomos con objetivos que tomen decisiones en tiempo real sin tener que depender de los tiempos terrestres.  Colonizar el universo con nuestros robotitos es muchísimo más fácil que mandar humanos. Siempre soñamos con astronautas plantando banderas, pero quizás le demos la inteligencia, objetivos y capacidad de decisión a nuestros hijitos digitales.  ¿Qué puede salir mal?

anyone with an IQ above 85 understands that the iliad and the odyssey are fictional epics. no one is debating whether her mom actually got knocked up by a god in swan form. we all know it's myth. but what people like this can't seem to grasp is that the books are real. the iliad is a real text. the odyssey is a real text. they have specific contents and those contents are not arbitrary. the elements in these stories exist to justify the actions taken in the stories. helen's not a real person, but she is a real character in the books, and her beauty is not up for debate. it's the causal mechanism for everything that follows. the entire premise of the trojan war is: "what happens when the most beautiful woman in the world is taken" not "a woman" or "an ugly woman." THE most beautiful woman alive. that's the load-bearing element of the whole trojan war. that's why agamemnon sends a thousand ships and why achilles and hector die. that's why troy burns. you remove that element, and the actions stop making sense. why would the greeks wage a decade-long war and sacrifice their greatest heroes over someone this ugly? they wouldn't and the story collapses. there's no "historical accuracy" for a myth. this is about internal coherence. fiction has rules and the rules come from the text itself. you want to make a new story with different characters? make it. no one is stopping you. people will judge it on its own merits. but when you take an existing story and remove the element that makes the plot function, you haven't "adapted" anything the story is ruined, there's no point anymore, people will be confused and won't understand the message of it. the history of one of the most important masterpieces of western culture will be desecrated, homer insulted, and you'll get your DEI golden star. well done

Everyone’s reading this as a valuation story. The real story is compute leverage. SpaceX launches 90% of global commercial payload. xAI operates Colossus, the largest AI training cluster on Earth with 100,000 H100s. Starlink has 7,000+ satellites generating $11.8 billion in recurring revenue. Musk just vertically integrated space infrastructure with AI infrastructure. The math here is interesting. SpaceX can launch Starlink satellites for roughly $15 million per mission. Competitors pay $100 million+. That cost advantage funded Starlink’s growth from zero to 8 million subscribers in five years. Now apply that logic to AI. xAI owns its compute instead of renting from cloud providers. It trains on X’s data firehose instead of licensing datasets. It’s projecting profitability by 2027, two years ahead of OpenAI’s 2029 target. The combined entity controls the full stack: launch capacity, orbital bandwidth, terrestrial data, and frontier AI models. The $1.25 trillion IPO target assumes one thing most analysts are missing. SpaceX’s direct-to-cell service with T-Mobile goes live this year. That’s not satellite internet for rural areas. That’s global 5G coverage for every smartphone on Earth. Starlink revenue projections jump to $40-100 billion by 2027 once direct-to-cell scales. xAI plugged into that distribution changes the AI race entirely. Grok accessible on every phone, everywhere, with no app download required. OpenAI has Microsoft. Anthropic has Amazon and Google. Musk just built his own distribution layer from orbit.