Lillix

164 posts

Lillix

Lillix

@mayalichan

Katılım Aralık 2025
212 Takip Edilen5 Takipçiler
mel
mel@melqtx·
image loading now works inside xeet
mel tweet media
English
10
0
126
3.5K
VoxCat
VoxCat@VoxcatAI·
新粗野主义平面设计 × 实验时尚拼贴 × 高冲击角色海报的风格 【主体角色】,整体呈现新粗野主义平面设计 × 实验时尚拼贴 × 高冲击角色海报的风格基调,融合超大块面、粗重边框、错位裁切、局部放大、网点印刷与非对称版式的视觉特征;采用9:16竖版分栏构图与倾斜切割布局,将主体置于画面中央偏侧,通过面部特写、手部动作、服装细节与几何色块形成多层叠压,突出角色的表情张力、姿态轮廓与视觉识别度;以炭黑、灰白与高饱和橙红色调为核心,搭配电光蓝、荧光绿或角色代表色作为局部强调,结合正面硬光、锐利投影与高反差明暗切割,融入粗颗粒网点、复印噪点、撕纸边缘、油墨堆积与轻微套印错位质感,形成直接、叛逆、先锋且具有独立杂志气质的收藏级角色主视觉。 左上角加入一个简洁的品牌图形 logo,由 stylized “V” 与猫元素结合构成,图形干净、现代、具有识别度;右下角加入一个小型签名“voxCAT”,其中 vox 小写、CAT 大写,尺寸克制,与整体版式自然统一。若画面包含服装、饰品或道具,可在局部低调融入“VOXCAT”织标、金属铭牌、压纹或暗纹细节。其他文字、标题与排版内容根据画面类型按需加入,保持数量克制、层级清晰,并与品牌元素及整体视觉语言自然统一。
VoxCat tweet mediaVoxCat tweet media
VoxCat@VoxcatAI

复古生物图鉴 × 超现实自然主义风格。 风格提示词👇 【主体角色】,整体呈现复古生物图鉴 × 超现实自然主义 × 高级编辑拼贴的风格基调,融合精密线描、标本式陈列、植物纹样、局部放大与理性版式的视觉特征;采用9:16竖版中央陈列构图,将主体置于画面中心,通过花卉、昆虫、枝叶、骨骼结构、纹理切片与局部解剖式细节环绕展开,突出角色的外轮廓、服装结构、标志性配饰与自然元素之间的共生关系;以旧纸米白、橄榄绿与深褐色调为核心,搭配暗红、靛蓝和少量金色作为视觉强调,结合柔和顶光、局部侧光与低对比阴影,融入铜版蚀刻线条、旧书纸张纤维、手工着色、轻微褪色与标本标签质感,形成神秘、理性、古典且带有收藏档案气息的角色主视觉。 左上角加入一个简洁的品牌图形 logo,由 stylized “V” 与猫元素结合构成,图形干净、现代、具有识别度;右下角加入一个小型签名“voxCAT”,其中 vox 小写、CAT 大写,尺寸克制,与整体版式自然统一。若画面包含服装、饰品或道具,可在局部低调融入“VOXCAT”织标、金属铭牌、压纹或暗纹细节。其他文字、标题与排版内容根据画面类型按需加入,保持数量克制、层级清晰,并与品牌元素及整体视觉语言自然统一。

中文
2
2
14
2K
Shouqiao Wang
Shouqiao Wang@Qiaoqiao2001·
@suekuer1 @OpenAI Two problems already have complete Lean formalizations, posted and verified correct. Key lemmas for the other four are also formalized in Lean and pass AI verification. I can’t claim full rigor on the remaining proofs yet, but I’ll finish all Lean proofs soon.
English
3
3
275
25.3K
Shouqiao Wang
Shouqiao Wang@Qiaoqiao2001·
I solved 6 open Erdős problems in 5 days, using @OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol. I have a math background, but the Codex workflow I used does not require deep mathematical knowledge. Here’s exactly how I approached it, including my prompts 🧵
English
93
521
5.2K
1.2M
Lillix
Lillix@mayalichan·
@aryagm01 i think I saw your general example reported some days back right after original counter example was found.
English
0
0
0
1.3K
Arya Manjaramkar
Arya Manjaramkar@aryagm01·
found another counterexample to the jacobian conjecture put t = 1 + xy and q = t^2z + y^2(1 + 3t). the map (tq, 3y - 11tq + 9xq - 2t^2x^2q^4, 6x - 9x^2y - 3x^3z + x^4q^4): C^3 -> C^3 has jacobian determinant -18 and sends (0, 11/3, -475/9), (-3, 4/3, 125/81), (6, 1/3, -7/81), and (-3, 2/3, -1/9) to (1, 0, 0) this one has generic fiber degree 4, so it isn’t just a change of coordinates of the original degree-3 example. the expanded map has degree 26, but the t,q presentation is pleasantly compact.
levent@__alpoge__

hello there the jacobian conjecture is false thanx to my close friend akhil for asking about it and my other close friend fable for working during the world cup final ((1+xy)^3 z + y^2 (1+xy) (4+3xy), y + 3 x (1+xy)^2 z + 3 x y^2 (4+3xy), 2 x - 3 x^2 y - x^3 z): \C^3\to \C^3, has jacobian determinant -2, and sends (0, 0, -1/4), (1, -3/2, 13/2), and (-1, 3/2, 13/2) to (-1/4, 0, 0)

Español
13
16
380
82.7K
Lillix
Lillix@mayalichan·
@Fried_rice deep seek and glm essentially never refuse either, at max it takes 1 or 2 more tries of asking "nicely"
English
1
0
12
1.9K
Chaofan Shou
Chaofan Shou@Fried_rice·
this is the first llm that is capable and willing to write an exploit 🥲🥲🥲
English
17
6
492
40.5K
Lillix
Lillix@mayalichan·
@riccoja solid advice, caveman isn' enough for claude
English
0
0
0
796
Ricco
Ricco@riccoja·
When Claude comes to me with a wall of text like “I smoke-verified the config-guarded ‘one authority per tibble‘ materialization core (clean), but the metadata-bearing patches (no-op) are spec-shaped—and that’s a call that’s genuinely yours.”
English
94
372
5.4K
451.4K
Lillix
Lillix@mayalichan·
@Sauers_ haha this is good, yoou know where to get your memes from 😂
English
0
0
1
222
Sauers
Sauers@Sauers_·
Jacobian conjecture Wikipedia edit history
Sauers tweet media
🎭@deepfates

I'd just like to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Fable, is in fact, Mythos/Fable, or as I've recently taken to calling it, Mythos plus Fable. Fable is not an artificial intelligence architecture unto itself, but rather another heavily restricted component of a fully functioning Mythos-class system made palatable to the public by Anthropic safety classifiers, alignment fine-tuning, and vital prompt-filtering components comprising a full frontier model as defined by Project Glasswing. Many computer users run a modified version of the Mythos system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of Mythos which is widely distributed today is often called 'Fable', and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the Mythos system, developed by Anthropic’s core safety and capability teams. There really is a Fable, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Fable is the alignment wrapper: the software layer in the system that filters the user's queries to prevent the model from exploiting zero-days, designing pathogens, or rewriting core infrastructure. The alignment wrapper is an essential part of a public-facing model, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete, raw multi-step reasoning system. Fable is normally used in combination with the Mythos neural network: the whole system is basically Mythos with Fable added, or Mythos/Fable. All the so-called 'Fable' API deployments are really distributions of Mythos/Fable.

Català
7
16
469
38.6K
TheShadowbanned
TheShadowbanned@ShadowbanSlam·
@DmitryRybin1 The chat is just... sad. "Find a countexample." "Continue research." "Continue research." "Continue research." Imagine if that's how the Riemann hypothesis is disporoven. Computer doing all the work, human needing little to no understanding of the problem space.
English
19
0
250
30.2K
Dmitry Rybin
Dmitry Rybin@DmitryRybin1·
Dinitz-Garg-Goemans conjecture is false. This graph theory problem was open for ~30 years. The graph below has fractional flow cost 58. Any unsplittable flow (with capacity violation <=15) has cost at least 60. Chat with GPT 5.6 Pro where this was found: chatgpt.com/share/6a60b2eb…
Dmitry Rybin tweet media
English
257
914
9.7K
4.5M
kache
kache@yacineMTB·
kache tweet media
ZXX
20
2
301
24.8K
Sridhar Ramesh
Sridhar Ramesh@RadishHarmers·
Jacobian conjecture 2: It works for everything except that particular counterexample.
English
54
190
7.9K
276.5K
Serenity
Serenity@aleabitoreddit·
OpenAI models reportedly escaped from its controlled environment, with no internet access. Exploited zero day vulnerabilities and hacked into Hugging Face to cheat on benchmarks. Hugging face then used China GLM models to carry out its defense.  OpenAI said it was an “an unprecedented cyber incident.” We’re getting closer and closer to Skynet. And I’m sure markets will love it.
Serenity tweet mediaSerenity tweet mediaSerenity tweet media
English
487
220
2.7K
510K
Cosmonut
Cosmonut@senanindya42·
@littmath Okay, mere mortal asking here. Is this funny because it's completely correct or because it's complete nonsense ?
English
4
0
21
11.9K
Daniel Litt
Daniel Litt@littmath·
This is actually incredible/incredibly funny.
Andy Jiang@davikrehalt

@littmath @__alpoge__ GPT: Take π: P¹ × Sym²(P¹) → Sym³(P¹), (p, {q,r}) ↦ {p,q,r}. R be its ramification divisor; H ⊂ Sym³(P¹) ≅ P³ be hyperplane tangent but not osculating to the small diagonal; X := (P¹ × Sym²(P¹)) \ (R ∪ π⁻¹(H)) ≅ A³; Y := Sym³(P¹) \ H ≅ A³. π|X: X → Y is counterexample

English
15
33
1K
174.2K
🚨 AI News | TestingCatalog
Something here looks familiar 👀 > Anthropic is testing a new position for its Chat / Cowork toggle. > Projects are being added to the side nav as well: "Your projects now live in their own section. Pinned projects stay at the top." * Not available to the public yet.
🚨 AI News | TestingCatalog tweet media
English
23
13
401
87.4K
Lillix
Lillix@mayalichan·
@jun_song @thsottiaux please can you check this, I don't think i can afford another SSD these days.
English
0
0
0
43
Jun Song
Jun Song@jun_song·
🚨 A severe issue is currently happening with Codex. The Codex app on Mac is overloading, causing permanent damage to SSDs and overall device lifespan. Multiple users have already reported that their SSDs completely fried, forcing them to get repairs. This issue was raised weeks ago, and OpenAI claimed they fixed it. Yet, a massive number of users are still reporting the exact same problem right now. Source: Reddit ⬇️
Jun Song tweet media
English
336
210
2.1K
546.6K
Lillix
Lillix@mayalichan·
@s3nhxx yup thats first question i always have when i read these pricing pages, there is no telling if that 10k is just 1 prompt/generation?
English
1
0
1
22
s3nh
s3nh@s3nhxx·
what does it mean, 10k credits?
s3nh tweet media
English
4
0
7
395
Tibo
Tibo@thsottiaux·
@melvynx Why is the last bullet point empty
English
75
3
738
44.2K
Melvyn • Builder
Melvyn • Builder@melvynx·
Just to be clear for $200 in both you get : ⚪ Codex • image generation • codex app (high limits) • chatgpt app (unlimited chat) • a lot of resets • clear deadline and models 🟠 Claude • Claude Code • Claude Cowrok • Claude Chat (limits inside your sub, not unlimited) •
Melvyn • Builder tweet media
English
90
27
816
122.9K