awb

@joktanovich @dissdisinfo @be46990499 That is a very salient point. No MP can serve the W3F and their country.

@dissdisinfo @be46990499 Wouldn't it be easier to ask New Zealanders if they know what the W3F demands of its members and prospects?

Hipkins lied, people died.

@2ETEKA Juxtapose the FTA inclusion of UNDRIP with the government choosing to ignore the UNDHR and New Zealand's own Bill of Rights during the c0v1d farce.

🚩Wellington Lawyer John McLean wrote this morning: “National, Labour and Act are sneaking United Nations Declarations of Indigenous Peoples into NZ law via the India FTA. The 2021 Labour Government’s ministerial He Pūapua report advocated for full implementation of UNDRIP by 2040, the bicentenary of the Treaty of Waitangi, and the Government secretly began work on a plan. UNDRIP is cited by race activists - including in the Waitangi Tribunal – in support of a separate, self-determining Māori nation. The awkward reality is that, by working to embed UNDRIP in New Zealand’s legal fabric, through the backdoor of the NZ/India FTA, the National Party is breaching its coalition agreement with NZ First.” The Indian deal is NOT a free trade deal. It is an undemocratic, sovereignty destroying take over. Read his substack here: open.substack.com/pub/mcleanj/p/…

@3dom13 @jndub ...add to that, when have you ever heard scientists disagree with whomever is funding them at the time. Not often, A.K.A experts, peer review.

@mensallobos @jndub Said a cultist 😉

What's the biggest cult in existence today? I go first: SCIENCE

@2ETEKA What would happen if Winston @winstonpeters forced an early election? He would definitely have the numbers and the power to rescind the "deal"

📣India runs the worlds largest Ponzi scheme, it’s a by product of their largest export - People. Remittances are the key strategy India has to grow its economy. It has hit $250 Billion NZD a year, it finds half of Indias trade deficit. The NZ govt has estimated that the India FTA will add a measly 0.7% GDP over 20 years to our economy. Unfortunately this is near identical to the amount Indians in NZ will send home, shrinking our economy. Australia has seen a 15% year on year increase in remittances, which is now $7.3b AUD - or 0.5 of their GDP. Australia has an Indian population of 5.2%, we have 5.8%. Expect 2.7 Billion a year to leave our shores, that is on top of the $35 billion National have committed to promote investment from NZ, to India in the parasitic FTA. Why is Winston Peters the only Politician who is identifying this as another major issue ? He spoke to Laws about this last week. New Zealand will be an empty husk of the FTA goes through. *quoted tweet has additional information about Indian remittances.

@dissdisinfo @NZNationalParty Yes, Luxon appropriated the phrase "free trade" in an attempt to justify his treason. It is anything but. No matter how you look at the "deal" New Zealanders lose on every front. Not that I am making excuses for Luxon, but it is a W3F directive.

@NZNationalParty It's not free trade. It's free migration, costly ($30b), and reinforces UNDRIP and Paris Accord BS. It is NOT a good deal; it's a betrayal of Kiwis. Luxon must go. #Penk4PM

Three years ago, Christopher Luxon said he’d deliver a Free Trade Agreement with India. He stood by his word. It’s done.

@3dom13 @jndub Don't confuse profitability with integrity. Virology recognises there will always be ample sufficiency of the gullible and intransigent to take advantage of.

@jndub Strangest thing, virology has been debunked refuted disproven and proven to be fraudulent, yet the cultists don't acknowledge it. Yes science is a cult like religion.

@sasha_latypova Good to hear from you again Sasha. And yes, it is a distraction from spike induced progressive neurodegenerative decline.

Total bullshit, it's vaccines that cause brain damage in young people. PS. please take an acting class. That fake concerned face is just too cringe...

@JamieAA_Again Why doesn't this surprise me...

Next Level conducted Blinded Genetic controls sending in Dog, Sheep and Human samples into independent genetics labs. They were not able to distinguish between these samples and even thought the human sample was from a dog.

@tuffnstuff13031 @cereal_truther @joktanovich @Ons3cass3 @lapagipalagi @deverclick @linds_longcovid @BoomslangCreate @ShaneyWright The PCR template has been revealed as not testing for a pathogenic microbe, hence downplaying the need for a positive PCR test. I am more concerned about "available information, expert advice, and risk assessment" all of which have been shown to owned by the profiteers.

@cereal_truther @joktanovich @Ons3cass3 @lapagipalagi @deverclick @mensallobos @linds_longcovid @BoomslangCreate @ShaneyWright I rest my case.

#LongCovid is whole-body hypoperfusion: Blood is not getting to where it needs to be because the blood vessels are not dilating / constricting properly. This is demonstrably true and underlies most if not all symptoms. Resolve this, you resolve a significant amount of Long Covid.

@8of9J @tuffnstuff13031 @joktanovich @Ons3cass3 @cereal_truther @lapagipalagi @deverclick @linds_longcovid @BoomslangCreate @ShaneyWright Well said.

@tuffnstuff13031 @joktanovich @Ons3cass3 @cereal_truther @lapagipalagi @deverclick @mensallobos @linds_longcovid @BoomslangCreate @ShaneyWright When you consider the biggest contributors to the WHO, you have to consider their influence and motives.

@joktanovich @LizGunnNZ @craigkellyAFEE I agree. It is so clearly a diversion from the crime of mass injection. Anything but focus on governments guaranteeing the commercial success of vaccines by sacrificing their citizens to the cause.

@LizGunnNZ @craigkellyAFEE A diversion (theatre). After 5 years, 194 WHO member states, CDC, NIAID, NIH, US DoD, UNC Chapel Hill, EcoHealth Alliance have been unable to produce a single SARS-CoV-2 virus isolate. There did not have to be a virus. People merely needed to believe there was a virus.

Well articulated by @craigkellyAFEE "The wheels of justice have turned painfully slowly — but they are turning. This is only the first of many COVID criminals who must face arrest, prosecution, and full accountability. Never forget: while these officials were rigging the narrative, Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter ruthlessly censored highly qualified medical experts and scientists who dared suggest the virus was engineered in a lab. They branded the truth as “misinformation” ...and silenced dissent at the very moment the public needed open debate most. This scandal proves exactly why absolute freedom of speech is non-negotiable."

@lapagipalagi @harryfisherEMTP Heh heh.....absolutely.

@harryfisherEMTP Don't cast pearls before swine.

Before debating someone I will now ask: 1. Is abortion murder? 2. Can men be women? If the answers are not 1. Yes 2. No They are completely insane. I’ll just pray for them and mute. God bless

@AaronSiriSG Absolutely. Vernon Coleman: "It is quite impossible to give a precise figure for the number of people who haven’t died of something and were possibly saved by something else."

The WHO's claim that vaccines saved 154 million lives in the past 50 years is corrupt "science" at its apex. This claim comes from an advertising report by the WHO touting its own vaccination program. In a real paper, there would be a confidence interval for the claimed “154 million lives saved.” The reason there is no confidence interval is that this figure is fabricated guesswork, as explained—or I should say buried—on page 42 of the supplement to this paper, in a section titled “Uncertainty of estimates.” [1] There, it explains that it cannot put “bounds around the veracity of the estimates” and that any “bounds are arbitrary” and “should not be interpreted as a claim to where the edges of valid estimated possible [sic] lie.” Meaning, the confidence that any estimate in this paper is correct is zero and it could be just as true that vaccines resulted in a net death of 154 million lives in the last 50 years. That alone renders this study entirely unreliable, and claims made using this study corrupt. But it gets worse. This claim also fails to account for studies with actual data about vaccines and mortality. For example, almost the entire 154 million lives the report claims were saved comes from two vaccines, the DTP vaccine and the measles vaccine. As for the DTP vaccine, the body of science based on actual real-world data is clear: this vaccine kills more children than it saves. In fact, the seminal study found that children receiving DTP died at 10 times the rate as those who received no vaccines in the first six months of life. [2]. Ten times. That study is based on real data and has a confidence interval. The study found that DTP may have reduced deaths from the diseases it targeted (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis) but children were dying from other diseases and issues that otherwise would not have been associated with vaccines, absent the study. Accounting for this real-world data would wipe away the entirety of the 154 million lives saved, if you calculated those lives lost from DTP use over the past 50 years. As for the measles vaccine, this product can prevent transmission of measles, and so it can save some lives by preventing measles deaths. But that is not the entire story. First, this WHO advertising report estimates that 40% of the decline in measles mortality is due to measles vaccine. But this estimate defies reality. In the United States, measles mortality declined by over 98% before a measles vaccine was introduced in 1963 and declined by over 99% in the U.K. before a measles vaccine was introduced in 1968. [3]. As living conditions improve, the hard data reflects that measles mortality declines by close to 99%, not 60% as this WHO advertisement report used. Using the real data regarding reduction of measles mortality absent a vaccine when living conditions improve, and accounting for the DTP data discussed above, the benefit of vaccines over the last 50 years becomes inverted. But it gets even worse. A 100,000-person study conducted by the nation of Japan over a period of over 20 years found that those who had measles and mumps died at a far lower rate from cardiovascular disease than those who never had measles and mumps. [4]. In fact, 20 years after the start of the study, around 14% of those who never had measles and mumps were dead of heart disease whereas only 7% of those who had measles and mumps were dead of heart disease. Heart disease is the number one killer of Americans. Not only does measles have a statistically significant reduction in deaths from heart disease, study after study shows having measles provides a statistically significant reduction in death from various cancers. [5]. Notably, these cardiovascular and cancer studies were based on real data, not estimates, provided confidence intervals, and were statistically significant. If you now add this data to the above about DTP and measles, you are far negative in terms of the benefits of vaccines. Consider that unlike other pathogens that have come and gone, these pathogens apparently conferred a survival advantage and hence may explain why they became less virulent over time and remained in circulation. Bottom line, the WHO’s advertising report, masquerading as science, epitomizes the corruption of science regarding vaccines. Overstating the benefits of vaccines is just as dangerous as overstating their risks. Doing so deprives the policy makers, medical professionals, and the public of the ability to make rational, informed, decisions regarding these products. The above is an abridged discussion of this topic. For an illuminating, detailed, and fully cited discussion showing that the claimed reduction in mortality from vaccines is a belief, not science, see Chapter 7 of Vaccines, Amen. [1] #page=43" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">thelancet.com/cms/10.1016/S0… [2] pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC53… see Chapter 7 of Vaccines, Amen for full discussion and additional citations. [3] cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus…; webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20160111…; and see Chapter 7 of Vaccines, Amen for full discussion and additional citations. [4] pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26122188/ [5] For example, the International Agency for Research on Cancer found that those who never had measles had a 66% increased rate of Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and a 233% increased rate of Hodgkin lymphoma. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16406019/(See Table 2: in the Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL) column, divide the odds ratio 1 (never had measles) with .6 (had measles) which results in a 66% increased risk, and in the Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (HL) column, divide the odds ratio 1 (never had measles) with .3 (had measles) which results in a 233% increased risk). These two cancers killed an estimated 21,170 Americans in 2022 (see seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html… seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html…). There are event studies that found remission of Hodgkin’s disease after having measles (see pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4574047/). Likewise, researchers at the Department of Health Care and Epidemiology at the University of British Columbia and the Department of Biology at the University of Victoria found that those who never had measles had a 50% increased rate of ovarian cancer, which killed an estimated 12,810 Americans in 2022 (see pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16490323/and seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html…). Other studies have reached similar conclusions that measles—as well as mumps, rubella, chickenpox, etc.—reduce the rate of various forms of other cancers, including a study from researchers at the University of Berne, Switzerland that specifically reviewed these fever-causing illnesses and found that the “study consistently revealed a lower cancer risk for patients with a history of FICD [febrile infectious childhood diseases]” (see pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9824838/). Studies have also found that children who have had measles have far less allergies and atopic diseases, such as asthma, and adults who had measles have a reduced risk of Parkinson’s Disease (see pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19255001/; pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16854347/and pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4061437/).

@thoughtsofchao2 @AliaVFF Oh the irony. "Lessons we need to learn from covid" Not government, their functionaries, district health boards, surgeries, profiteering hospitals, doctors and vaccine facilitators.

@AliaVFF Lessons we need to learn from covid. The main lesson was our government is owned and a large proportion of the population actively worked to suppress freedom.

Of all the people I expected to speak up during Covid, Sandra was one of them. As one of the people responsible for NZ's informed consent laws, I thought it would have been a no-brainer for her to weigh in on the active trampling of said laws at the time. Bribery, coercion, social exclusion and punishment, mandates, a glaring lack of information on a clearly experimental product, and the active suppression of safety signals should have been a neon flashing light to any and all concerned about informed consent and consumer safety. But it wasn't. When it came to the crunch, these people were nowhere to be seen or heard. Only now, five years after the fact, does it appear to be 'safe' enough to speak. Yes, I am glad something is finally being said. But the silence when those voices would have counted most will continue to be a great disappointment to me. Their voices would have saved lives and young hearts. Their cowardice cost them.

@LizGunnNZ Mike Yeadon is the most genuine chap you could meet. He has risked and sacrificed everything to make people aware of vaccine toxicity. When c0v1d was first mooted, he knew the pharma playbook and the motive inside out.

Vaccines are "diabolical" according to this former Pfizer VP, the brave Michael Yeadon. "Diabolical" is from the word "Diabolo". Diabolo is the name for ...the Devil .

@PlatonianFire @tuffnstuff13031 @olsenmunk61 @dissdisinfo @nzdsos @HopeRising19 @voices_nz @MurfittTauranga Controlled opposition silence is deafening.

@tuffnstuff13031 @mensallobos @olsenmunk61 @dissdisinfo @nzdsos @HopeRising19 @voices_nz @MurfittTauranga No judiciary or government will allow the case of treason to be brought against it. They are complicit in the treason, as are media. The lives of New Zealanders were, without their approval, sacrificed in order to guarantee the commercial profitability of Pfizer. Treason.

Cancel culture is protecting the "mRNA-Covid-jab-good" lie... I wonder why...?

@joktanovich @winstonpeters Yes. Come out and say what everybody knows Winston. The New Zealand government W3F agenda policy implementation is impossible to hide. Acknowledge the truth of their conflict of interest. Even you @winsonpeters cannot possibly argue Luxon and Hipkins are serving New Zealand.

@winstonpeters Publicly make it clear @winstonpeters Luxon and Hipkins cannot uphold their W3F oath of allegiance and their oath as Prime Minister and Leader of the Opposition respectively. They are conflicts of interest. W3F mass immigration policy is clear throughout the commonwealth.

The Labour Party and National Party have just sealed an FTA that means that our country MUST promote $33 billion in just 15 years into a foreign country and NOT into New Zealand. This is madness. Labour themselves have said this FTA is “high risk” because if we don’t meet that threshold to India’s satisfaction India will CLAW BACK whatever gains New Zealand thinks it has achieved. Most people would call that a disgraceful sellout of our country’s future. This is an utter unmitigated disaster of an agreement for New Zealand’s future. National and Labour need to explain to New Zealanders that under the immigration provisions of this FTA the visa holders can still bring in their family members, in addition to the number of students being able to come to New Zealand being uncapped - those students are given a guarantee to work while they study which will be taking kiwi jobs from desperate kiwis. This is supposed to be a free trade deal, not a free migration deal. How can they possibly support this? All of this is unprecedented in any other FTA our government has signed. It is clear now that NZFirst is the only party that cares about our own country and the only party that puts New Zealand and New Zealanders first. We will continue to oppose this deal and fight against this disaster of an agreement.

@x_L_Ls @JamieAA_Again That is a very good picture. Says it all really.

@JamieAA_Again If this is true why introduce a contrived and convoluted invisible demon particle? It’s a redundant concept

Why do people get sick if not for fictitious "Viruses"?

@chinglan3000 @JamieAA_Again Exactly. People got sick, before, during, and after the vaccine campaign.

@JamieAA_Again Ehmmm...interesting. But so then what about the humans that got sick BEFORE all these so-called modern interventiona in the environment and in our food?

@joktanovich @lapagipalagi @redpillb0t An admission of guilt, malfeasance, and profiteering.

@lapagipalagi @redpillb0t There wouldn't be many who do not recognise the testing fraud. There's been enough exposure on all media platforms re: %86 false positive PCR tests. WHO have recognised this and moved to obviate testing. Proof of a virus or pandemic won't be required under the IHR Amendments.

The flu shot is the opposite of protection…it makes you 27% MORE likely to catch flu and 440% MORE likely to get COVID or pneumonia!