mick

2.7K posts

mick banner
mick

mick

@mickcodez

Staff Software Engineer - Just a ghost in the machine 👻 . 🧑‍🚀 High Agency Individual.

Alpharetta, GA Katılım Nisan 2011
1.1K Takip Edilen894 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
mick
mick@mickcodez·
I have to post it again because I’m so excited about it. I was featured in a video with @cursor_ai and I just can’t stop smiling about it. cursor.com/blog/box
English
0
0
8
641
mick
mick@mickcodez·
@steipete How are the build tools? Have you ran into any issuses?
English
0
0
0
196
Peter Steinberger 🦞
I started updating a few of my Macs to Golden Gate and it's a pleasantly boring performance update.
English
50
6
775
109.1K
Jason Fried
Jason Fried@jasonfried·
Period correct.
Jason Fried tweet media
English
11
6
78
23.9K
mick retweetledi
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Grok places second after Fable on real-world software engineering
Mercor@mercor_ai

Grok 4.5 from @SpaceXAI places #2 on the APEX-SWE leaderboard at 51.2% Pass@1 (±6.0), behind Fable 5 (65.5% ±6.2) on our benchmark for real-world software engineering work. It leads Integration (65.0% Pass@1) and places #2 in Observability (37.3% Pass@1), covering multi-step build tasks and diagnosis/debugging respectively. The Integration lead maps directly to the agentic workflows Grok 4.5 was built for: multi-step coding tasks run in collaboration with Cursor. Grok models have improved 30.2 pp in a year on this benchmark: Grok 4 (21.0% Pass@1) to Grok 4.5 (51.2% Pass@1). Congratulations to the xAI and Cursor teams.

English
1.4K
1.9K
11.1K
2.4M
mick
mick@mickcodez·
Perfect place to run my agents from. I have about 6 Grok 4.5 agents grinding through implementing a test ontology for my secret project. 5.6 Sol extra high coordinating it all while I sit in the time machine. The future is so weird but awesome.
mick tweet media
English
0
0
3
145
maria
maria@aqvilegias·
the way this is the exact moment she decided she was going to #bounceonthat
English
107
723
43.8K
2.8M
mick
mick@mickcodez·
There's a really good chance that I'm going to drop my Claude Max subscription down to Pro and invest that money in an XAI Grok subscription. And yes, invest is intentional. For next month, it will be Codex and Grok for me.
English
3
2
30
2.3K
mick
mick@mickcodez·
@iruletheworldmo I have a feeling I know what it is, but I'm curious...
English
0
0
1
318
🍓🍓🍓
🍓🍓🍓@iruletheworldmo·
ive been quietly using grok four five to make an obscene amount of money, i could explain exactly how, but then it would stop being funny, people still think these models are for writing emails, we are not playing the same game
English
37
4
210
23.4K
mick
mick@mickcodez·
@tobi Now you can store the HTML in @Box and render it anytime while also securely sharing it with your other doctors if needed.
English
0
0
1
25
tobi lutke
tobi lutke@tobi·
My annual MRI scan gives me a USB stick with the data, but you need this commercial windows software to open it. Ran Claude on the stick and asked it to make me a html based viewer tool. This looks... way better.
tobi lutke tweet media
English
1K
1.8K
33.7K
8.3M
mick
mick@mickcodez·
@kenwheeler 5.6 Sol and Grok 4.5 is a killer combo for me right now.
English
0
0
0
123
mick retweetledi
patagucci perf papi
patagucci perf papi@kenwheeler·
i played with both 5.6 sol and fable/4.8 a lot this week. anthropic limited out in under an hour. repeatedly. i literally cannot put a dent in codex usage. fucking thing is just ripping.
Dorian Smiley@dsmiley411

We banned the use of all Anthropic models and their harness this week at Codestrap. Not only becuase we dont like Anthropic's leadership and culture, but also becuase they are cash incinerators. Take a look at those blue bars. 30 fing % of the cost at miniscule usage levels.

English
17
1
131
9.1K
mick retweetledi
Box
Box@Box·
We dropped a 30-page office lease into Box AI and asked @grok 4.5 one simple question: what would it actually cost us to walk away after three years? The lease is written to make you think the answer is easy: six months' rent (about $267K) stated right in the termination section. But the real cost is scattered in pieces across the whole document. The termination clause quietly points to a defined term that, when you chase it down, pulls in leftover build-out costs and broker fees from two other sections. The "free rent" you were given at signing is really taken back by a separate clause if you leave early. And there's a cleanup-and-restore obligation tucked into an exhibit at the very back. You only get the true number if you find all five and add them up — across 33 sections and 10 attachments. Grok 4.5 nailed it: ~$830K, about 3x the number the lease wants you to see, and it showed exactly where each piece came from. Then it kept going, pointing out the costs that have no cap, the auto-renewal trap that kicks in if you miss a deadline, and which terms to push back on before signing. That's the difference between skimming a contract and truly reading one and it's the kind of careful, connect-the-dots work over long documents that real business runs on. And this is the power of the latest reasoning models right now on working with unstructured enterprise data.
English
18
21
191
1.1M
mick
mick@mickcodez·
Here's a wild idea... don't have the LLM run your test suite
English
0
0
0
148
mick
mick@mickcodez·
At the @GTRI pitch competition and it's neat to see what people are working on. I also see so many opportunities here help and mentor. Going to be a great day.. I may have also pitched @Box HTML support to quite a few people 😂
English
0
0
3
1.1K
mick
mick@mickcodez·
This is really what it’s all about. Collapsing redundant coordination roles raises margins, while the output of a smaller resource pool grows. Or, if you want to keep margins the same, you can scale output tremendously without scaling the workforce, assuming the work is there.
Aaron Levie@levie

This is a great post if youre thinking about applied AI in the enterprise. The headline of this post is about what companies have huge upside from AI, but the deepest nuggets are about what AI transformation looks like in an organization. It’s fundamentally about changing the underlying workflow or business process. As we move from chat tools to agents, those agents actually have to be deployed against workflows, which usually span multiple functions in an org. This is a different way of deploying AI than solely rolling it out to end users. It takes much more work upfront, but the results are the things that actually drive significant ROI. “Software asks the employee to adopt a tool, but infrastructure changes the operating layer underneath the employee. The employee should still know what happened, and the process owner should still be able to pause the workflow, change a rule, approve an exception, or pull a person back in when needed. But the value should not depend on someone remembering to use the AI every day.” The winners of this will be the platforms that can be deployed for specific workflows and business processes with a deep domain expertise. The playbook will often heavily require FDE support, change management, getting data well organized, be able to have comprehensive evals for the workflows, and much more to get right.

English
0
0
2
228
mick
mick@mickcodez·
@pkuhar @pkuhar you just don’t miss! I’m still using your Meta Rayban prototype charger. Let me know if you need a beta tester for this device!
English
1
0
1
47
Peter Kuhar
Peter Kuhar@pkuhar·
The website for pre-orders is up, it'll ship in 2-4weeks. There are 200 units of SidePulse (sd-card slot) and 200 units of PulseDot (usb-c) available. sidepulse.io/sidepulse.html
English
16
6
66
8K
Peter Kuhar
Peter Kuhar@pkuhar·
I'm exploring 3 options for the AI Agent ambient status display that fits into the SDCard slot of the MacBook Pro. I'm kind of set on one, but I'd love some feedback. I also have a name and domain. It's SidePulse.
English
36
24
685
130.2K
mick
mick@mickcodez·
@hnshah You should check out what we're doing with HTML and agents at @Box Would love your feedback!
English
0
0
2
126
Hiten Shah
Hiten Shah@hnshah·
In my AI session today about using HTML with AI tools, I shared Notion’s new HTML blocks that are incredibly useful. I also spoke about my disappointments with the product. It feels like Notion has too much surface area and lots of paper cuts that add up to user frustration (imo). This makes me sad. The team and people are incredibly talented but the product feels like a Microsoft product that requires a PHD to get the value that the company is prescribing. It doesn’t help that Notion uses Notion but has been for many years. That can easily make a company out of touch with new users and actually make the cold start problem much more worse. An eco-system of implementation partners (ala Salesforce, HubSpot and Clay) is ultimately the solution if the product isn’t able to be made less confusing upfront. But with AI and the speed the team could improve the product, I still have hope. You can compress a confusing and complicated product down because a real AI front door can greatly reduce complexity and make the use cases feel very intuitive. I’m seeing that with new products I’m personally working on.
English
10
4
33
3.6K
mick retweetledi
Aaron Levie
Aaron Levie@levie·
The reason I have an unhealthy obsession with AI right now is because I've spent my entire professional life on essentially one problem: how do you increase the value of content in the enterprise. How do you secure it, how do you collaborate on it, how do you govern it, and how to integrate it across all your applications. But there's been one glaring issue that we've dealt with since the founding of Box. We could never really process information at scale in any real automated way. There have been many attempts at this problem (often in the search space), but nothing that really fundamentally transformed what you can do with enterprise knowledge. For years the primary kind of data that we could query, analyze, and process with computers was structured data. This meant anything you could shove into a database you could understand with computers - your CRM, ERP, product analytics, HR, and other data. But all of the unstructured data that powers our daily knowledge work - marketing assets, contracts, financial documents, medical research, engineering documentation - was only valuable when a human was operating on it. There was just simply no real way to apply automation at scale to any of this data, which meant all knowledge work was largely rate limited by our ability to process information ourselves, often manually. AI models have obviously dramatically changed this reality. And the past couple weeks perfectly highlight this incredible progress. GPT-5.6, Fable 5, Grok 4.5, Muse Spark 1.1, and a leading array of open weights models are all showing incredible advancements on working with unstructured data. The inherent broad intelligence, reasoning, math, and coding skills in these models, combined with deep domain expertise trained into them across finance, legal, healthcare, life sciences, and other critical fields, means that we're able to completely change what we can do with this unstructured data at scale. What this unlocks is the ability to ask insanely complex questions of your data that were never before possible, and let agents just run on for minutes or hours across these data sets to accelerate knowledge work. And it's not just about automating the work that we already do. While this is highly valuable, it wouldn't be particularly transformative. What's exciting is that you can now throw compute at unstructured data problems that wouldn't have been possible before. Analyze every risk on my contracts, do due diligence more deeply on a prospective investment or acquisition, look through all past client interactions in an industry to find best practices to replicate, comb through life sciences research or clinical trial data for new insights, and on and on. So that's why we're insanely excited about what AI Agents can now do with content on Box.
Box@Box

GPT-5.6 Sol is a breakthrough in complex reasoning and data analysis. Here, it analyzes hundreds of pages across a lending deal, reconciles terms across agreements, financials, diligence, collateral, and risk materials, flags issues, and saves a source-cited report to Box.

English
67
63
393
96.6K