Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc

2.7K posts

Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc banner
Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc

Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc

@micoolcho

I ❤️ robots, cheap hardware, steam engines, XGBoost, Liverpool FC & SG 🇸🇬 | Plane crash survivor | Building @BitRobotNetwork @frodobots

Singapore Katılım Mayıs 2010
2.5K Takip Edilen5.8K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc
Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc@micoolcho·
Super psyched for this competition! While folding origami is not "economically valuable task" which many commercial labs care about outright, I love this challenge b/c: 1. Origami, at the highest level, is IMO one of the most complicated dexterous task human hands are capable of. 2. I reckon even for fairly simple origami designs, you'd need more than 2 fingers. So this is a task that really showcase the use of 5-fingered hands. 3. Folding origami involves lots of occlusion. In fact, I've seen an origami master fold a crane more or less completely based on touch. This means tactile and even force sensing would be required for complicated origami designs. 4. Origami is an art form with long cultural history in Japan. It's not just the physical manipulation techniques involved, there's also a creative aspect that I think will be a frontier goal for Embodied AI to shoot for. 5. We're co-organizing this challenge with the Nippon Origami Association, who are basically the human experts. This means we'll have human expert benchmark against what embodied AI can do. I reckon this is such a difficult task that this competition will last for years before embodied AI (both model and hardware improvements) can catch up to human performance. I'm also very confident that on the path of solving robotic origami we'd have also unlocked some fundamental manipulation capabilities that'd be useful in lots of other real-world dexterous tasks. Grateful to be able to do this with my buddies @DJiafei @chris_j_paxton as well as strong partners from @SharpaRobotics @LightwheelAI @BitRobotNetwork as well as friends from academia.
RoboPapers@RoboPapers

3 of us @micoolcho @chris_j_paxton @DJiafei are super excited to help organize the Robotic Origami Competition at IROS (Sept 2026), along with @BitRobotNetwork @SharpaRobotics @LightwheelAI @hq_fang @sanatem @Noriaki_Hirose @gao_young Calling for teams!

English
5
8
48
11.5K
Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc
Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc@micoolcho·
Out of 13 papers at the Humanoid session at #RSS2026 , 12 of them use @UnitreeRobotics G1 for real-world eval. Basically G1 has become the default embodiment for humanoid research, at least for this current generation/cohort. There's some FUD abt their IPO but if u look at their penetrarion rate in the research community, they have completly won.
Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc tweet mediaMichael Cho - Rbt/Acc tweet mediaMichael Cho - Rbt/Acc tweet mediaMichael Cho - Rbt/Acc tweet media
English
3
7
50
2.8K
Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc
Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc@micoolcho·
Great #RSS2026 (Sydney) opening talk from Matei Ciocarlie; just one complaint: where's Messi photo in this slide?? 😅
Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc tweet media
English
1
0
20
1.2K
Dhruv Shah
Dhruv Shah@shahdhruv_·
While I am very sad to miss RSS this year, my brilliant students and collaborators will be presenting five exciting papers 🧵: 1. Visual Verification Enables Inference-time Steering and Autonomous Policy Improvement by @alexzhang_robo veritas-improvement.github.io We show a simple recipe for self-improving generalist policies using a VLM verifier and an off-the-shelf generator (policy).
Dhruv Shah tweet media
English
2
9
83
7.5K
Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc
Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc@micoolcho·
@oyhsu "Minimum deployable robot" probably gonna be some specific embodiment-task-environment combo that get success rate close to 99% so customers will start paying for and get data flywheel going to hill climb towards 6sigma; clothes folding robot is a prime candidate.
English
0
0
3
234
Oliver Hsu
Oliver Hsu@oyhsu·
A review of patterns we've observed in physical AI over the last 2-3 years, as the field has continued to make technical progress and aggregate talent and capital across new and existing companies: In 2023-2024, we started noticing more teams building for a given layer of the robotics stack. Whereas historically teams built all their own infrastructure, the promise of scaling laws for robotics meant generality was on the table, and what generality enables is for teams to build on top of a common platform — a huge advantage given the long tail nature of the physical world. We also posited that given the variance of the physical world, the proliferation of such a platform might resemble more of an open ecosystem in the vein of Android. This dynamic could kick off an apps>infrastructure cycle that robotics has historically lacked, but every other major technology cycle has seen (web, mobile, crypto, etc.). This is partially because there has been no breakout robotics app, but maybe, like with language models, this would be a case where infrastructure (and generality) kicks off the cycle. I wrote about that idea here 2 years ago: a16z.com/toward-a-gener… Much of 2024-2025 was focused on the infrastructure side of this ecosystem, particularly around different methods of scaling robot data. Concurrently, there was also more activity in building the hardware platform and components of robot infrastructure, as well as the emergence of tools built for a 'robotics developer' persona. 2025-2026 saw more entrepreneurs and engineers shift their focus towards the application layer. Specifically, the idea of a 'neo-systems integrator', or a company focused on deploying the new generation of learning-based robots, started coming into focus as more early stage teams began to pursue this. Concurrently, large robotics labs began pursuing both first and third party deployments, and the app<>infrastructure relationship started taking shape. I wrote about the deployment layer and some of the problems to be solved in deploying learning-based systems here: a16z.news/p/the-physical… In parallel, throughout 2024-2026 we saw the proliferation of research around different elements of solving generalist robotics. Beyond overarching methods built around VLAs, world state prediction, and sim, there were key building blocks in areas like human motion transfer, online RL, domain randomization, and bridging the high and low levels. Moreover, we continue to see more evidence for scaling laws for robot actions. This research progress across the field forms the building blocks for the pursuit of generalist robotics and a robust robotics developer ecosystem. I've also started focusing more on the frontiers of physical AI beyond robotics, specifically on incorporating physical reasoning and physical modalities into AI in general. Much of this work is still somewhat nascent, and I wrote about some of these areas here: a16z.com/frontier-syste… Some of the things I think are interesting to observe now: - Where we are in the Perezian financial/technological cycle with robotics. - Without knowing the thresholds we have to scale to see inflections in robot capabilities, robustness, and generalization, what is a minimum deployable robot? - Signals around adoption of common hardware platforms for robotics developers. - The combination of scaling less-than-reliable deployments + continual learning for robots. In general, I continue to believe that many of the most interesting things in robotics in the coming years will be emergent behaviors and properties. This is exciting and also involves working with a lot of unknown unknowns.
English
9
20
219
19.4K
Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc
Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc@micoolcho·
@lacey_wisdom @plcapital Energy begets AI. Meanwhile, AI will also push for new advancements in Energy (be it new generation sources or just less wastage thro transmission).
English
0
2
4
610
Lacey
Lacey@lacey_wisdom·
AI's hidden cost isn't the models. It's the electricity. ChatGPT hit 1B monthly users in May 2026 and every single query burns energy. At @plcapital, we don't see a compute crisis coming. We see an energy one 🧵 (1/9)
Lacey tweet media
English
4
11
47
1.2K
Suzannah Wistreich
Suzannah Wistreich@s_wistreich·
So much fun chatting on @RoboPapers about Dexskin and tactile sensing! Thank you @chris_j_paxton and @DJiafei for having us, episode below👇
RoboPapers@RoboPapers

Human skin plays an important role in how we interact with the world and robustly manipulate objects. It’s not just important when we can’t see things with out eyes, but when we want to pick up something heavy, or apply a very specific amount of force. So, it makes sense to want to give robots skin. Enter DexSkin: a soft, deformable electronic skin which can be applied across different surfaces and used to cover robot hands or fingers. @s_wistreich and @BaiyuShi147 talk to us about their work building DexSkin, showing how it’s useful for policy learning, including online reinforcement learning, and how it' can be calibrated and policies transferred across sensors. They also open sourced their code and methods for building the sensors. To learn more, watch Episode #88 of RoboPapers now, hosted by @chris_j_paxton and @DJiafei!

English
1
4
22
3.9K
Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc
Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc@micoolcho·
Very cool work from the DexSkin team! I saw the live demo myself at Stanford; really neat, affordable and open source!!
RoboPapers@RoboPapers

Human skin plays an important role in how we interact with the world and robustly manipulate objects. It’s not just important when we can’t see things with out eyes, but when we want to pick up something heavy, or apply a very specific amount of force. So, it makes sense to want to give robots skin. Enter DexSkin: a soft, deformable electronic skin which can be applied across different surfaces and used to cover robot hands or fingers. @s_wistreich and @BaiyuShi147 talk to us about their work building DexSkin, showing how it’s useful for policy learning, including online reinforcement learning, and how it' can be calibrated and policies transferred across sensors. They also open sourced their code and methods for building the sensors. To learn more, watch Episode #88 of RoboPapers now, hosted by @chris_j_paxton and @DJiafei!

English
0
3
10
2.2K
Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc retweetledi
Rerun
Rerun@rerundotio·
We added new skills to the Rerun repo to make it easier to investigate existing robotics data with Rerun. Very excited to see the new Human in the Wild dataset by @bitrobotnetwork, @huggingface, and @unitreerobotics this week as a great opportunity to try them out, We'll be playing more with this dataset in the coming weeks, but check out the repo below if you want to start looking at and querying this new dataset in the interim.
English
4
8
55
9.2K
Chaoqi Liu @ RSS
Chaoqi Liu @ RSS@liu730chaoqi·
Really excited to finally share IMPACT! One thing I really like about this project is that it tackles a practical challenge in robot learning: adapting to changing environmental dynamics online, while still running at 1000 Hz on real robot hardware. That’s a much harder systems and control problem than it might sound. Huge credit to @WinstonGu_ for leading this work. As a co-author, I got to see firsthand how much engineering and systems work went into making this happen. He’s an exceptionally strong and independent researcher. Check out the thread below 👇
Winston Gao@WinstonGu_

People are talking about building world models for AI systems. But for world models to be truly useful for robots, they need to model the changing dynamics of the physical world, such as gravity, friction, and external disturbances. Introducing IMPACT: Internal Model Predictive ConTrol. Inspired by the mechanism in human cerebellum, we propose learning an internal model of environmental dynamics on the fly and adapting to changing dynamics accordingly. This internal model runs at 1000 Hz on real robot hardware!! Controlled experiments in both simulation benchmarks and the real world demonstrate that IMPACT significantly outperforms baseline methods.

English
2
3
34
6.6K
Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc
Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc@micoolcho·
@juanbenet has a new podcast! Early episodes (mostly on neurotech) all look bangers! There goes my entire weekend 😅
Juan Benet@juanbenet

New episode with Dr. Konrad Kording (@kordinglab), professor of bioengineering and neuroscience at the University of Pennsylvania (@Penn) and co-director of CIFAR's Learning in Machines & Brains program (@CIFAR_News). Konrad works at the intersection of causality, machine learning, and neuroscience, building rigorous methods for causal reasoning when experiments aren't possible — and challenging how researchers interpret neural data and build AI. Konrad argues the most promising path to understanding how the brain works is to read the brain’s wiring directly, down to the molecular detail of each connection, and to build compilers and simulations to understand the brain’s computation directly. In this episode we go deep into how neurons work, how neurons wire together, and how organic and artificial neural networks differ. We discuss why organic neurons are doing much more; how a model of a single organic neuron can solve MNIST — computing more like a 3-layer artificial neural network; how the brain might learn by solving credit assignment with only local signals; how to approximate backprop without a global algorithm; why AI and humans are intelligent along different dimensions; why Konrad isn’t very worried about AI replacing us; economic models of intelligence and physical work; and much more. Konrad is a brilliant, contrarian thinker who explains complex concepts very intuitively. It is a solid computational neuroscience primer. I hope you enjoy this conversation as much as I did! Other links to this episode and references below. Chapters 00:00:00 Introduction 00:01:01 How organic neurons work 00:24:13 How the brain learns: circuits and credit assignment 00:45:29 Recording the brain 00:52:47 Why simulating brains is hard 01:05:00 A new approach: connectomes and compilers 01:21:00 Why simulate brains? 01:29:50 How AI and human intelligence differ 01:41:04 Evolution, intelligence and AI risk 01:52:42 Robotics, causality, and the roots of intelligence 02:05:53 AI for science and scientific rigor 02:13:05 The economics of intelligence 02:27:50 A hopeful future

English
0
1
5
675
Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc
Michael Cho - Rbt/Acc@micoolcho·
@fancy_yzc Would love to have u guys come on RoboPapers, when u'r ready :) Super cool work; congrats again Zhecheng!
English
0
0
2
35
Zhecheng Yuan
Zhecheng Yuan@fancy_yzc·
@micoolcho Thx, Michael! We may release a relevant technical report in the future.
English
1
0
3
206
Zhecheng Yuan
Zhecheng Yuan@fancy_yzc·
🌶️🤖𝐖𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐨𝐤𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐨𝐛𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐬 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝’𝐬 𝐟𝐢𝐫𝐬𝐭 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐌𝐚𝐩𝐨 𝐓𝐨𝐟𝐮.🤖🌶️ This was not just a cooking demo. It was a 30-minute, long-horizon robotics challenge packed with delicate, continuous, high-dexterity actions. With only a small number of demonstrations, our model learned to perform complex manipulation over an extended sequence. At the same time, we pushed hard on motion control and system-level optimization, making the robot move smoothly while keeping the high success rate. For us, this plate of Mapo Tofu is more than a dish. It is a small but meaningful step toward home robots that can handle real everyday tasks with the dexterity, consistency, and reliability people expect.
English
15
25
135
24K