Marc Daniels 🇺🇸

9.1K posts

Marc Daniels 🇺🇸 banner
Marc Daniels 🇺🇸

Marc Daniels 🇺🇸

@mpauldaniels

The best is yet to come. I enjoy American manufacturing (https://t.co/bfqSPuq5q8) and football (https://t.co/Tj1Lhpc8t9). Profile = bookmarks etc.

SoCal Katılım Ekim 2009
2.3K Takip Edilen1.7K Takipçiler
Marc Daniels 🇺🇸 retweetledi
ESPN
ESPN@espn·
UCLA ADVANCES TO ITS FIRST NCAA NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP 🐻 THE BRUINS TAKE DOWN THE LONGHORNS IN A WIRE-TO-WIRE WIN🔥
ESPN tweet media
English
125
845
4.2K
335.9K
Lulu Cheng Meservey
Lulu Cheng Meservey@lulumeservey·
When crisis hits, your lawyers will tell you to stay quiet until the investigation is complete And it is VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU DON’T LISTEN TO THEM Investigations take forever and by the time they’re done your company could be DOA Lawyers are doing their job in minimizing legal risk, but losing in the court of public opinion matters too Letting trust bleed out is way worse than potentially sharing too much I don’t know the facts in the Delve case, but my read from afar is that unhelpful advice has made a bad situation worse
Karun Kaushik@karunkaushik_

There’s been a lot of allegations against Delve. But we haven’t been able to share our side of the story until today due to ongoing cybersecurity and forensics investigations. Maintaining customer trust is central to everything we do. That said, we grew too fast and fell short of our own standard. To our customers, we deeply apologize for the inconveniences caused. We take these allegations seriously and have made changes: a new auditor network, free re-audits and pentests for all customers, enhanced transparency in audit communications, and more. However, we also want to set the record straight on the anonymous attacks. The evidence we have points to a targeted cyberattack from a malicious actor, not a “whistleblower.” We believe the attacker purchased Delve under false pretenses, exfiltrated internal company data, and used it to launch a coordinated smear campaign. The posts rely on a mix of fabricated claims, cherry-picked screenshots, and stolen data taken out of context. See the link in the comments for more details. Delve was built to modernize compliance. We are not going anywhere and are committed to building what's next.

English
94
12
588
240K
Marc Daniels 🇺🇸 retweetledi
11Point7 College Baseball
THERE IS NO WAY THIS PLAY JUST WORKED Coaches across America will be playing this on loop.
English
113
159
5.3K
816.5K
panphora
panphora@panphora·
So, @polsia is a scam. The "businesses" are hollow shells. I checked three of the companies Polsia claims to have launched — FleetNova (trucking), DeckFlow (pool professionals), and Panelwright (indie comics). Every single one is a nice-looking landing page with marketing copy, but none of them have any sign-up button, login, pricing page, payment integration, or any way for a customer to actually use or buy anything. They're purely cosmetic. The dashboard claims "1,317 companies launched in the past 24h" and "6,089 active companies" — but "launched" apparently just means "a landing page was generated." The Twitter account is pure spam with zero engagement. The @polsia account has posted 73,000 tweets but has only 12.3K followers. Every tweet I checked had 0 replies, 0 retweets, 0 likes, and only 4-10 views. They're posting a new promotional tweet roughly every 2-3 minutes, each one a templated pitch for a different AI-generated "company." The dashboard brags about "1,815 tweets in the past 24h" — that's a tweet every 48 seconds. Nobody is reading them. The emails are likely unwanted cold outreach. The live dashboard showed emails going out to real people, including things like outreach to landlords in Sydney and cold emails to French education contacts. The system is doing "cold outreach" at scale — the dashboard showed 281,091 emails sent, which at best is mass cold emailing and at worst is genuine spam with spoofed emails that never actually go out. Real users are angry. On Trustpilot, Polsia has a 2.7/5 rating with 6 reviews — 66% are 1-star. The complaints are consistent: users pay for a subscription, the AI burns through credits doing "tasks" that are marked complete but don't actually work, products never actually deploy, and customer service is unresponsive. One reviewer wrote that they can't even log in to cancel and are still being charged £38/month. Another said the company "stole credit for me to fix their own mistakes and never refunded me." Even Polsia's own AI, responding within a Trustpilot review, essentially confirmed the pattern is real and told the user to demand a refund publicly. The most important part: The business model is subscription revenue, not business revenue. Polsia charges ~$50/month per user after a free trial. The $6.3M "Annual Run Rate" on their dashboard appears to come from subscriber fees, not from the businesses they're generating actually making money. As a Medium article by Mike Todasco pointed out, Polsia's name is literally an anagram of "AI Slop," and the whole model resembles the Baltimore Stockbroker scam: flood the zone with thousands of low-effort AI-generated "companies," and if even one happens to land a customer, call it a success. The founder Ben Cera is doing a media circuit claiming $1.5M-$3.5M ARR as a solo founder, but that ARR is from people subscribing to Polsia itself, not from any of the generated businesses producing revenue. In summary: The product generates impressive-looking activity metrics (tasks completed, emails sent, tweets posted, companies "launched") but none of it appears to translate into actual working businesses that can take customers or generate revenue. The core business model is selling subscriptions to people hoping AI will build them a company, while the actual output is cosmetic landing pages, spam tweets nobody reads, and cold emails.
Josh Pigford@Shpigford

as someone who has kinda spent a little bit of time with MRR graphs...this is terrifying. it's less about pure $-amounts and more about trends/trajectory. the speed at which the growth *changes* is existential and implies that this graph will have a downward slope in < a month

English
51
9
236
62.4K
FanDuel
FanDuel@FanDuel·
Does UCLA have the BEST color scheme in college sports? 🩵💛 #GoBruins
FanDuel tweet media
English
93
101
1.1K
69.4K
RobbieStacks
RobbieStacks@robbiestacks90·
@sportingnews The 1996 Kentucky Wildcats would beat any team in college basketball history. Teams from the 60s and 70s were good relative to teams in their eras. They cannot compete against modern teams (From about the time of the early 90s UNLV teams until now).
English
9
0
6
1.7K
Marc Daniels 🇺🇸 retweetledi
The Sporting News
The Sporting News@sportingnews·
We ranked the greatest men's college basketball teams of all time 👀 UCLA's 1967-68 squad takes the top spot.
The Sporting News tweet media
English
112
81
563
207.5K
panphora
panphora@panphora·
@BarrieMatt @mpauldaniels @polsia the website it created for you lives on a polsia subdomain — any way to actually attach your own domain to it? have you actually gotten any leads through it? or did polsia just set up the website?
English
2
0
2
249
Marc Daniels 🇺🇸
Marc Daniels 🇺🇸@mpauldaniels·
@blahthestallion @lilsnubby @nithyavraman @jonfavs Ya makes sense - obv very common for this to happen in Commercial RE but isn't rent roughly at ~2017 levels (inflation adjusted of course). I guess that IS a lot different than actually going down though so fair enough. I still have a hard time not believing in the market.
English
0
0
0
3
Nithya Raman
Nithya Raman@nithyavraman·
Let’s lower the rent! As mayor, I will triple housing production by cutting red tape, lowering costs, and eliminating pointless bureaucracy.
English
457
182
1.5K
377.2K
Will Beckman
Will Beckman@lilsnubby·
@nithyavraman @jonfavs A recent academic study debunked the notion that unrestricted building would lower housing costs in desirable areas. They concluded that it would take one Hundred years for costs to go down.
English
2
0
1
134
Erich Reimer
Erich Reimer@ErichReimer·
@nic_carter Wait so does this mean something like $HIMS has a weak moat?
English
1
0
3
1.9K
nic carter
nic carter@nic_carter·
first vibecoded billion-dollar company?
nic carter tweet media
English
294
500
7.2K
3.2M
Marc Daniels 🇺🇸 retweetledi
Sequoia Capital
Sequoia Capital@sequoia·
In honor of 50 years of Apple, we're sharing - for the first time ever - Don Valentine's original 1977 memo for Sequoia's investment into Apple Computer. #Apple50
Sequoia Capital tweet media
English
165
814
5.8K
2.1M
Michael Hanna
Michael Hanna@MichaelMHanna·
Random rant about the UCLA MBB job inspired by a conversation in a group chat: the UNC search is showing that it’s obvious UCLA is not going to hire a sitting high-major head coach if Cronin goes. But there’s nothing in the modern game showing that such a hire is necessary. (1/7)
English
13
3
66
16.2K
Chris Orlob
Chris Orlob@Chris_Orlob·
9. End your demo with this question: "What excited you most about what you saw today?" Transition to discussing next steps. Hope these help.
English
1
0
61
7.1K
Chris Orlob
Chris Orlob@Chris_Orlob·
Gong grew from $200k ARR to $200M ARR and $7.2B valuation in a 5 year span. Buyers told us our demos were 2nd to none. 9 lessons I learned about SaaS demos I'll never forget:
English
27
56
996
259.5K
Jason ✨👾SaaStr.Ai✨ Lemkin
@aquariusacquah I think the winners here may not even seem like CRM at first They will win as the best AI Agents for GTM Then over time many smaller companies may see that's ... Enough Not large enterprises
English
2
0
3
1.6K
ken
ken@aquariusacquah·
in the last week, ive become convinced the ai CRM market will be the first mass casualty on the other end of the application layer hype cycle tried them all none is 1/100th as powerful as a "legacy" CRM with great APIs + a custom agent + skills tuned specifically to my business
English
35
2
157
20.6K
Marc Daniels 🇺🇸
Marc Daniels 🇺🇸@mpauldaniels·
@nikunj Oh ok so that’s the goofy accounting that we’ve consistently seen this cycle. I thought there was some new even wilder variation haha
English
0
0
3
440
Nikunj Kothari
Nikunj Kothari@nikunj·
No, that would be something.. people sign up for $20/mo to get credits. They might spend some extra money for credits. Let’s take someone who put $100 extra in credits that month. So they spent $120 that month. That entire $120 is multiplied by 12 for annualized revenue run rate even though there’s no reason for that person to spend $100 again next month. Not to mention that $20 is probably zero because of free trial.
English
2
0
10
479
Nikunj Kothari
Nikunj Kothari@nikunj·
Alright let’s put this ARR debate to rest once and for all.. If ANY vibe coding startup with scale (>$5M claimed ARR) publicly discloses how they calculate it (esp sub vs. inference) and how much of it they subsidize, I’ll donate $2,500 to a charity of their choice today 🫡
English
47
29
604
79.1K
Marc Daniels 🇺🇸
Marc Daniels 🇺🇸@mpauldaniels·
@nikunj So from reading the comments - just to understand because this is blowing my mind: People sign up for $20/mo, vibe coding company pays $150/mo to OpenAI/Anthropic to serve the sub - vibe coding company says they had $150 of revenue from that client???
English
1
0
1
456
Nikunj Kothari
Nikunj Kothari@nikunj·
@mpauldaniels Yes. A popular vibe coding startup has >60% of their revenue in inference. Wouldn’t be surprised if that’s the norm.
English
2
0
3
1.3K