Master Ridley

1.7K posts

Master Ridley

Master Ridley

@mstr_ridley

Katılım Kasım 2022
217 Takip Edilen49 Takipçiler
Werner Zagrebbi🇦🇿
Ran the experiment for Columbia using admissions data (h/t @cremieuxrecueil). If Columbia admitted purely by SAT in 2024, the cutoff would be 1560 — and the class would be 46% East Asian. Black and Hispanic students would essentially disappear.
Werner Zagrebbi🇦🇿 tweet media
VB Knives@Empty_America

If Harvard admitted students strictly by SAT score, filling slots in descending order starting at 1600, what would be the lowest SAT score admitted to the school? And what would be the resulting demographics of the student body?

English
38
49
675
104.1K
Master Ridley
Master Ridley@mstr_ridley·
@Empty_America Yea, that's why I never understood getting aghast at Picasso's womanizing or Kanye's loony political views. These guys are supposed to exist outside the confines of bourgeois respectability. Otherwise they couldn't produce great art.
English
0
0
1
79
VB Knives
VB Knives@Empty_America·
It used to be said that the purpose of the artist was to "Épater la Bourgeoisie." Good expression, it means to scandalize the middle class, to make them talk and seethe.
English
1
1
23
2.2K
Master Ridley
Master Ridley@mstr_ridley·
@RuxandraTeslo Absolutely nothing worse than someone who insists on overquantifying everything, to give it a veneer of authority / objectivity. Dimensionless quantities are meaningless.
English
0
0
1
94
Ruxandra Teslo 🧬
Ruxandra Teslo 🧬@RuxandraTeslo·
Above the "studies shows" upper midwit in intelligence, but equally mind-diseased is another phenotype: the open-minded, hyper-rational guy who sees their inability to appreciate things that are non-quantifiable and belong to the spiritual as a sign of intellectual superiority.
English
21
22
345
14.9K
Master Ridley
Master Ridley@mstr_ridley·
@conor64 If you don’t understand why “lockdowns” are totally antithetical to our tradition of liberty and limited government, you have no business being a public functionary.
English
0
0
0
4
Conor Friedersdorf
Conor Friedersdorf@conor64·
A question for everyone: survey data suggests that by the end of the Covid-19 emergency trust in public health institutions had decreased significantly. If you are among the people who reacted that way, why specifically? I'm hoping for long, diverse, individualized answers.
English
2.4K
87
1.1K
872.8K
Xanthippe
Xanthippe@BoredXanthippe·
A self-made, successful 46yo man with >$5M net worth can get an attractive 38yo doctor/successful professional or he can get a hot 28yo model/actress/bartender who hasn’t been able to make real money and has no reasonable path to do so. However, he’s almost certainly not getting a hot 28yo doctor. 🤷🏼‍♀️
Blaine Anderson@datingbyblaine

Why is matchmaking expensive? To illustrate, here’s how I’ll lose money on a client’s $49,000 package. Client is 46, 6’2, exited tech founder. He’s looking for a woman 27-33, very specific criteria around match personality, appearance, and profession. Without diving into specifics, she: • Isn’t easily searchable online... • Isn’t likely to reply when we find her… • Isn’t likely to be single… • Often has a deal-breaker trait we can’t screen for without a phone call… • Isn’t necessarily interested in my client… I was expecting this to be a difficult search, so I quoted $49,000. I wasn’t expecting ~100 hours of labor to find each match, not including communication with the client! To date I’ve spent $45,000 on salaries for the women staffed on his search, plus $2,750 on styling and photos, and we still owe the client 2 matches... Before considering overhead (let alone opportunity cost) this will be a huge L financially. Things balance out though. Most engagements are profitable. Some engagements are quite profitable. For example, a new client in NYC paid $30,000 and paused after his first match, because he’s 99% sure we found his wife. That's still a new relationship, and engagements last 9 months (6 months of active matching + up to 3 months of pause), so we could be on the hook for more work in coming months. But you get the point 🙏

English
166
91
3.9K
644.8K
Master Ridley
Master Ridley@mstr_ridley·
@Empty_America I think they're also forgetting how young everyone looks these days. These "kids" might be mid 20s. In any normal society that's a perfectly reasonable age to be a patrolman.
English
1
0
46
1K
Master Ridley
Master Ridley@mstr_ridley·
Correct point but most engineers deciding whether to go to a startup aren’t making 500k at Google. In your early career the monetary trade off is smaller (maybe 90k vs 150k in big tech) and the gain in experience/autonomy can be massive. I tell people to timebox it but every engineer should work at an early stage startup at least once in their career. Best to do it early on.
English
0
0
0
197
Patrick OShaughnessy
Patrick OShaughnessy@patrick_oshag·
William on how an early stage employee takes way more risk than a founder: "If I'm making $400-500K at Google or Meta and go to an early stage company to get 1% of this company and make $90,000. I've now changed the trajectory of my life, that's a lot of risk. But as a founder, you're not. It's a much higher likelihood that of the next round, regardless of your company, you'll be able to sell some secondary. If it shuts down, you can get employed at a great company, and you have a CEO on your resume. That first employee, they have first employee at a failed company. That's actually not a great resume line item. So we've de-risked the founder, but we haven't de-risked the early stage employee."
Patrick OShaughnessy@patrick_oshag

.@williamhockey is one of the least visible founders in tech relative to what he has created. He co-founded Plaid and is now building Column, a software company that owns a bank, and powers Ramp, Wise, Bilt, Mercury, and others. He funded it himself by borrowing against nearly everything he had in Plaid shares, and has never raised any outside capital. His story matters because so much of the value in our industry gets created through exactly this kind of extreme personal risk. He is maniacal about being the best in the world at his thing, and has spent his entire career betting on himself and doing whatever it takes to win. He also spends a lot of time outside the US (in places like Kinshasa) which has given him a rare perch on the power of the US dollar. We discuss: - Why emerging markets are often the most financially innovative - What owning 100% of his company allows him to do that VC-backed founders cannot - Getting margin called and nearly going bankrupt - Why the best founders are specialists - What it takes to be the best in the world at your thing - How Silicon Valley's consensus culture produces consensus founders - How the US dollar functions as an instrument of national security Enjoy! Timestamps: 0:00 Intro 9:19 Emerging Markets 14:03 Silicon Valley's Elite Consensus Problem 16:03 Rejecting the VC Hamster Wheel 21:45 Equity and Liquidity 26:03 Funding a Bank 29:45 The Necessity of Extreme Founder Risk 37:18 Finding Leverage 45:20 Longevity and Profitability in Banking 48:46 Matching Your Capital Structure to Your Business 51:44 The Unseen Power of the US Dollar 1:02:30 How AI Will Transform Legacy Banks 1:09:23 The Kindest Thing

English
109
104
2.5K
899.3K
Master Ridley
Master Ridley@mstr_ridley·
In a weird way they actually have a lot _less_ power than the average person because they have more at stake to lose. Tech CEOs for example are extremely limited in what opinions they can voice, even in what are seemingly confidential spaces. See for example the total 180 so many of them did on DEI etc.
English
0
0
0
567
Pablo Antonio Penietzsche
Pablo Antonio Penietzsche@PabloPeniche·
After meeting multiple billionaires, I realize that they are mostly powerless. Most normal people think that money gets you power (and some of these new-money billionaires thought so too!) but that is not the case.
English
48
17
540
175.8K
Master Ridley
Master Ridley@mstr_ridley·
Interestingly those same people would think nothing of letting your ten-year-old 'play' on the iPad unsupervised for three hours, even though the latter is much worse for the kid's development. Peter Hitchens talks about this in Abolition of Britian - we've given kids extraordinary freedom in the digital world but reined them in maniacally in the physical world.
English
0
0
2
114
Daniel Buck, “Youngest Old Man in Ed Reform”
A full 36 percent of Americans think that a ten-year-old playing alone at a park is grounds for a CPS call. Absolute insanity, but I feel this. I can feel the judgement when I tell people that I let my 5-year-old daughter play outside alone in our yard.
Daniel Buck, “Youngest Old Man in Ed Reform” tweet media
English
61
48
708
21.2K
Master Ridley
Master Ridley@mstr_ridley·
The way it was explained to me by an actual admissions officer is that they first filter by SAT/grades and that culls about 25% of applicants right away. After that they start really digging into other factors. So what people don’t get is that what the legacy advantage does is bumps one smart kid ahead of _other_ smart kids.
English
1
0
5
668
VB Knives
VB Knives@Empty_America·
Yeah many people don't grasp that the median SAT of Harvard students is 1550 and this INCLUDES all DEI admits, legacy, athletes. The great majority of kids walking around that campus scored 1500+, even if they had some type of preference.
Master Ridley@mstr_ridley

It's a good question. My guess is the composition of students would not actually change that much. Only about 500 kids get a perfect score each year. Harvard has 2000 slots to fill. The median score of admits _currently_ is like a 1550. And that includes all the athletes, legacy kids and underprivileged minorities. Everyone forgets how smart Ivy League kids actually are!

English
22
4
165
55.3K
Master Ridley
Master Ridley@mstr_ridley·
It's a good question. My guess is the composition of students would not actually change that much. Only about 500 kids get a perfect score each year. Harvard has 2000 slots to fill. The median score of admits _currently_ is like a 1550. And that includes all the athletes, legacy kids and underprivileged minorities. Everyone forgets how smart Ivy League kids actually are!
English
3
0
30
33.2K
VB Knives
VB Knives@Empty_America·
If Harvard admitted students strictly by SAT score, filling slots in descending order starting at 1600, what would be the lowest SAT score admitted to the school? And what would be the resulting demographics of the student body?
English
112
9
2K
1.2M
Master Ridley
Master Ridley@mstr_ridley·
@lambdacalcc Directionally correct but the actual fence posts are $150k and $1M. People don’t really how little tax the sub $150k crowd pays, especially if you have children.
English
4
0
19
3.3K
Max Marchione
Max Marchione@maxmarchione·
@bentkennedy Probably an incomplete answer, but largely by their quality of reasoning, depth of knowledge, speed of processing, quality of recall, ability to grapple with abstract concepts, and to an extent, the things they've worked on / built
English
5
1
18
4.7K
Max Marchione
Max Marchione@maxmarchione·
Just about every >150 iq person I know uses nicotine. Nicotine is underrated and misunderstood
English
159
23
631
634.3K
Master Ridley
Master Ridley@mstr_ridley·
@DCinvestor Meanwhile Denmark and Mexico are faring quite well. Proving once again you’re better off being Trumps enemy than his friend.
English
1
0
10
849
DCinvestor
DCinvestor@DCinvestor·
i've gotta hand it to him fleecing the Arabs for billions and sweeping it into your family’s personal accounts, hell, even taking a jumbo jet from them then royally (pun intended) fucking them over in a poorly conceived op your handlers convinced you to do with no real off-ramp as they must then watch their economies and reputations for being safe havens crumble is just an incredible move maybe the best to ever do it
Annmarie Hordern@annmarie

WSJ: Arab governments were furious about Israel’s attack and the U.S. failure to head it off, officials said. They had aggressively lobbied the Trump administration to stop U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iranian energy infrastructure and now feel a target has been put on their backs, they said… America’s Arab allies are now fuming that they don’t seem to have any influence with the Trump administration despite heavy investments of time and money.

English
60
434
3.9K
332.4K
Reads with Ravi
Reads with Ravi@readswithravi·
This sentence by Dostoyevsky hits so hard. “You sensed that you should be following a different path, a more ambitious one, you felt that you were destined for other things but you had no idea how to achieve them and in your misery you began to hate everything around you.”
English
77
893
6.6K
169K
Philip Proudfoot
Philip Proudfoot@PhilipProudfoot·
🚨 Iran is strategically holding back its doctors of philosophy. Larijani was a moderate Kantian. DC fears the escalation ladder: Hegelian → Schmittian → Heideggerian → post-structuralist At the final stage, the subject dissolves, the target disappears, power is everywhere
English
81
916
6.2K
249.6K
Master Ridley
Master Ridley@mstr_ridley·
@Empty_America This used to be understood by the way. Men wouldn't change diapers or whatever but they _would_ teach their 12 year old how to fish, fix a car etc.
English
0
1
4
166
Master Ridley
Master Ridley@mstr_ridley·
One of the weirder fallouts from the new "parenting" culture we have is there's this implicit expectation that being present as a father for ages 0-5 is super duper important, but after that you can withdraw a bit and head back to work. Kid is school etc. So men plan their whole careers around that. In fact it's the opposite - fathers aren't really much help at the infant stage but they're really needed starting around pre-pubescence (11-ish).
English
2
3
11
1.2K
VB Knives
VB Knives@Empty_America·
The other issue with fathers is that lots of guys are at work a lot, and have no idea of the stuff their sons are sinking into online. By the time they realize something is seriously wrong they have a 14y/o trans-anime-nazi who isn't real interested in going deer hunting. Dawns on them all at once and way too late that Jr. isn't going out for the football team like dad did, won't be going to Prom, isn't interested in learning how to turn a wrench, etc.
English
20
7
343
20.2K
Master Ridley
Master Ridley@mstr_ridley·
@DonPJenn “It's all now you see. Yesterday won't be over until tomorrow and tomorrow began ten thousand years ago.”
English
0
1
14
667
DonPJenn
DonPJenn@DonPJenn·
"Homer is new this morning, and perhaps nothing is as old as today's newspaper." Charles Peguy
DonPJenn tweet media
English
13
182
1.5K
36K