Mufonover

@CuriousNHI @Rizstanford You have to be kidding, right?

@Rizstanford I don’t think that disagreements over political issues should be the basis to believe or disbelieve someone. In any event, it’s not entirely clear the MIC wanted the Iran war, given the amount of misgivings that “leaked” prior to it starting.

I decided I won't listen to what Luna has to say on the UFO issue because she shows she's a tool of the Military industrial complex and the Epstein class w/ regard to Iran. Is it time to conclude the same with Weinstein because of his support for operation Epstein Fury?

@ChrisBartelSWR @LogicznyFilozof @AmericanALCHMY Suddenly you know everything mother fucker?

@LogicznyFilozof @AmericanALCHMY The fact nothing was presented or has ever been presented should be the first clue.

"It's 100% real!" Physicist Eric Davis says he used his security clearances, his need-to-know access, and a letter deputizing him as a representative of the Defense Intelligence Agency under Jim Lacatski to get into the UFO crash retrieval program. He couldn't access the craft or the bodies directly but he got to the people who managed all of it at the programmatic level. Davis also says Roswell is 100% real. This is a credentialed physicist with DIA backed clearances saying the US has retrieved non-human craft and bodies. This is direct programmatic confirmation. Full episode out soon.

@StuartHameroff You need to explain the Disneyland piece of this all, quickly, before your reputation and important work are stained forever. Thanks.

With great regret and contrition I confirm cancellation of TSC 2026. The University of Arizona and conference organizers have determined this was necessary due to several speakers and organizers including myself being mentioned in the Epstein files. In 2017 I obtained one time funding for a TSC conference in San Diego from Mr Epstein. I deeply regret that, and apologize to Epstein survivors, those horrified by his activates, TSC participants and my colleagues at the University of Arizona, especially the Arizona Astrobiology Center.

@StuartHameroff Stuart, please explain why you planned an event at Disneyland, China with THE Jeffery Epstein. Thanks.

All animal, plant and archaebacteria cells have microtubules. Prokaryotes have polymers with FTSZ proteins instead of tubulin with aromatic rings but not tryptophan. Viruses have a polymer capsid which could serve a similar function.

@shellenberger @galexybrane Sorry, are you trying to say our IC had zero clue what was going on? With all the powerful people who flocked there? When they have satellites that can see what you’re doing at any time INSIDE your own house? They def knew and def let it happen. Gimme a break…

We suspected Epstein ran a sex blackmail operation for the Intelligence Community, but the newly released files strongly suggest he worked for himself. If he was a slave to anything, it was to his perversions. New deep dive by @GalexyBrane and me.

@pieter_mj_j @plassoplo @StuartHameroff Agreed. Stuart has WAY more explaining to do! The Disneyland piece of this disgusts me. Whether he knew it or not, he conspired with THE Jeffrey Epstein to commit a horrific crime(s), hunting for child victims at an amusement park… vile shit right there!!!

@mufonover @plassoplo @StuartHameroff See my timeline, I've been aware for six years. This is extremely serious and a much bigger problem than most people assume.

I deeply regret interacting with Jeffrey Epstein in 2017 and strongly condemn his awful activities. He offered to help financially with a conference problem and I accepted. Nothing more. I have apologized to my colleagues at the University of Arizona, and do so to everyone for my shameful behavior.

@plassoplo @pieter_mj_j @StuartHameroff Leaving this here

@pieter_mj_j @mufonover @StuartHameroff You wouldn't know what to do with the answer anyways other than feed it into your predetermined ontological machination you believe is your own, but isn't.

@02percent_ @plassoplo @StuartHameroff Yes I’d confirmed all of that and I’m STILL ASKING if Stuart knew JE used Disney and a hunting ground… THINK, PEOPLE!

@mufonover @plassoplo @StuartHameroff Do you actually know that hamerroff was the one planning it and in charge of all the organizing? Did he fund it himself? That information is likely public knowledge, and you need to confirm it before going to this line of argument.

@plassoplo @02percent_ @StuartHameroff Because you mother fuckers attacked my line of questioning about this…!

@mufonover @02percent_ @StuartHameroff Go on. Call me the first thing that comes to mind. I dare you.

@plassoplo @StuartHameroff Notorious*, obviously

@plassoplo @StuartHameroff I’m asking a man to explain why he planned the *science event* at a KIDS PARK IN CHINA with a nutritious international child sex trafficker

@plassoplo @02percent_ @StuartHameroff I wanna know why he was planning a professional science conference at a kids park in China with the world’s most infamous child sex predator/trafficker, that’s it. You’d think I was waving around a giant picture of Mohammed, the way y’all are attacking me over this…

@mufonover @02percent_ @StuartHameroff Idgaf. Do you have evidence Stuart was fucking someone he shouldn't? No? Then fuck off.

@plassoplo @02percent_ @StuartHameroff I don’t follow ANYONE blindly. If your curiosity is satisfied, so be it, but stop harassing me because I have REASONABLE questions in the face of new information. Like, seriously guys… the conference has never been held ANYWHERE like Disneyland… so why was he planning that?!?

@mufonover @02percent_ @StuartHameroff With "fans" like you, who the fuck needs *enemies*

@02percent_ @plassoplo @StuartHameroff No. It’s started and continues *to this day* because randos like you HOLD WATER for convinced pedophiles and their associates/conspirators. Stuart doesn’t seem genuinely sorry, he seems sorry that he was caught! I will need to hear more directly from him, not from you lackies.

@mufonover @plassoplo @StuartHameroff “This is how Epstein island started the first time” lol, fuck your goofy trolling ass for that. Epstein island started the first time because Epstein and his buddies set it up that way, not because some rando called you out.

lol so because I’m asking a REASONABLE question about Stuart’s ties and Disneyland plans with the world’s most infamous child sex trafficker, I’m a “performative nerd” and the “actual pedophile”? Got it. Yanno, this is how Epstein Island started the first time. Shame on you assholes!

@plassoplo @mufonover @StuartHameroff Well said. Fuck all these performative nerds and the actual pedophiles, people need to stop wasting time on this gotcha bullshit.

@02percent_ @plassoplo @StuartHameroff That’s conjecture! Can Stuart chime in please to confirm if he knew about Epstein’s 2008 pedophelia conviction? Whose idea was it to host this conference at a children’s park - Disneyland, China? Why didn’t it take place there? These are all VERY reasonable follow-up questions.

@mufonover @plassoplo @StuartHameroff Assuming you meant “notorious”, it’s entirely possible that hammeroff didn’t know who he was at the time. Not everyone buries their head in the media, especially scientists. Part of epstein’s operation was co-opting the academic and scientific community by getting involved.

Was Stuart open to switching locations to Disneyland, China? Or was it a coincidence? Why did the event end up taking place in San Diego? You’re literally holding water for a pedophile that trafficked child sex slaves to elites, including (especially!) scientists. Reasonable questions. Idk why you continue to attack ME… these are REASONABLE questions

@plassoplo @StuartHameroff I think we deserve to know from Stuart why this event, for adult scientists, was planned with an infamous convicted (2008) pedophile at a CHILDREN’S amusement park in China. Seems exceeding reasonable to request an explanation. Was it Jeffery’s idea to host there? Did Stu know?

@plassoplo @StuartHameroff It’s very weird and so are you

@mufonover @StuartHameroff Worst. Fan. Ever.

@skdh Haha, the model “fears” being certain? How about start here — it’s doesn’t actually understand anything because it’s just a model 🤣

An update on my maths/physics work with ChatGPT (Pro 5.2) I regret to inform you that ChatGPT still has not solved the Navier Stokes Millenium problem... though it has several times claimed implicitly that it either proved or disproved it. Like Gemini, ChatGPT has a peculiar fear of making any concrete claims about what it has or hasn't proved, evidenced both in output and in the thinking window ("we cannot claim..."). I've partly managed to offset this by custom instructions that set it up as one of the world's best mathematicians... Unfortunately, this also created an exasperating habit of trying to prove no-go theorems for every second prompt that I give it. (So far they all turned out to be wrong.) That said, ChatGPT Pro is *extremely* good at converting even a vague prompt into a technically meaningful question and then digging up related methods. I thought I know a lot about GR, but like half of the stuff it comes up with I've never heard of. GPT Pro now does calculations with simphy and those are usually correct in some sense... but sometimes it simply forgets to do the entire calculation. Ie, it might claim that a certain set of functions solves a system of equations just because it forgot to check all equations. You basically always have to ask 2 or 3 times. Its ability to lead proofs is still mediocre. I have settled on asking it to give me a proof and then ask a second instance of itself to check the proof. Half of the time it will find its own proof is wrong. (Usually because it has made an unstated assumption that had to be proved, not because the calculation was wrong.) The notation it uses is still a mess. It has a tendency to use layers of nested definitions that are difficult to follow. I suspect this is because it strings together methods it finds in the literature in a sort of trial and error procedure. Sometimes it accidentally uses a symbol twice for different things. Again, one can ask it to clean this up with a follow-up prompt, but it takes some getting used to. And there is still the issue that if I didn't myself know some things about general relativity and the Navier Stokes equation, I wouldn't have any chance making sense of what it's doing. It makes no sense to me to compare ChatGPT to a student or postdoc. In some sense it is clearly better and more useful (it "knows" more), but in other ways it isn't remotely as good, in particular it tends to lose track of what it was supposed to do, so you have to constantly remind it. From my perspective, one of the biggest shortcomings is at the moment that I can't specify a problem and tell it to come back when it's found a solution, even if that takes a week. At best, it will try for an hour, and then inform me it didn't manage to solve the problem. That said, all in all, I am having a lot of fun (kind of) with ChatGPT Pro and I have learned a lot, so I haven't cancelled my subscription, though I do think it is quite pricey. I'll let you know if it solves the Navier Stokes problem...