
Mark Zelinka
577 posts

Mark Zelinka
@mzelinka
Atmospheric scientist studying clouds and their role in climate change at Lawrence Livermore National Lab. Views are my own.
California, USA Katılım Kasım 2012
567 Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet

We just published a paper on climate sensitivity in #CMIP6 models: agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.102…
Figured it was time for my first twitter thread!
English
Mark Zelinka retweetledi

Looking for a postdoc position, or know someone who is? Interested in cloud feedbacks? @mzelinka and I are recruiting for a project focused on high cloud feedbacks funded through the DOE RGMA program. Feel free to contact us for more information. Please share! jobs.virginia.edu/us/en/job/UOVU…
English

@PauloCeppi @LeverhulmeTrust @ImperialSci @ImperialPhysics @Grantham_IC Awesome Paulo! Well deserved.
English

@rupephoto @coxypm @AnuRuhanen This doesn't fully answer the question posed by @coxypm since some of the cloud changes are feedback, some are due to aerosol-cloud interactions, and some are not forced at all. So it is definitely a worthwhile open research question.
English

Declining planetary albedo is contributing hugely to the acceleration of global warming, but why is the planet getting darker? This new PhD studentship, with Mark Williamson and me, sets out to answer that vital question. Please retweet.
exeter.ac.uk/study/funding/…
English
Mark Zelinka retweetledi

@AndrewIWilliams @cristiproist @PauloCeppi @Tim_AndrewsUK @YueDong35680721 @PaulJDurack @markjwebb We are also considering replacements for this experiment, if someone comes up with a good one and documents it in a manuscript. GFMIP may have this covered already...?
English

@AndrewIWilliams @cristiproist @PauloCeppi @Tim_AndrewsUK @YueDong35680721 @PaulJDurack "We" being @PauloCeppi, @markjwebb, Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo, and myself
English

@mzelinka @D_McCoy_Atmos @pochedley @PauloCeppi @doescience @LLnL Haha. You missed a key qualifier though - think I wrote "*almost* impenetrable" ;-)
Maybe the world is ready for the original Fig 3 now?
It was a great paper though, bravo.
English

Shout out to my co-authors Tim Myers, @D_McCoy_Atmos, @pochedley, Peter Caldwell, @PauloCeppi, Steve Klein, and Karl Taylor, without whom this would not have been possible. And of course to the RGMA program at @doescience for funding this work thru PCMDI at @LLNL
AGU (American Geophysical Union)@theAGU
@wileyearthspace @CSUAtmosSci @UW @Harvard @LamontEarth @ANU_Research @ourANU @altmetric @UCBerkeley @UCIrvine @MIT @NASAGoddard @EU_ScienceHub @CIMAFoundation @SMHI @metofficeUK @AGUSciPolicy 🏅Editor’s Choice Paper🏅 “Causes of Higher Climate Sensitivity in CMIP6 Models” by Zelinka et al. (2020) doi.org/10.1029/2019GL… @Livermore_Lab @CUBoulder @D_McCoy_Atmos @imperialcollege (6/6)
English

@Tim_AndrewsUK @D_McCoy_Atmos @pochedley @PauloCeppi @doescience @LLnL That is certainly true. @Tim_AndrewsUK stopped us from presenting the original Figure 3 that was "impenetrable" in his words and would have doomed the paper to obscurity.
English

@cristiproist @hausfath @benmsanderson Agreed, though my recollection was that it didn't make much difference in practice when we Haus-filtered by ECS rather than TCR
English

@cristiproist @hausfath @benmsanderson One would think the link between ECS and warming around the time of doubling in a 1%/yr compounding CO2 run would be tighter than between ECS and transient warming during the recent historical period, no?
English

@cristiproist @hausfath @benmsanderson I'm confused. Sherwood, Webb, et al (2020) also derived a posterior TCR range that is essentially identical to IPCC's [1.5 to 2.2K, see Table 11] but which did not rely on observed warming rates to arrive at that constraint.
English
Mark Zelinka retweetledi





