Damian

@BellitheWise @akanoego @RichardHanania Ok, i accept. I bet against that and will give 100$ to the charity you choose if you win. Do you want to include a cutoff date or how do we resolve the question? For example, does a negotiated ceasefire that lasts at least 6 months count, if it wasn't the result of Trumps recent

@ClassicJukeboxx @joeljackson @nicknorwitz mendelian randomization evidence.

@ClassicJukeboxx @joeljackson @nicknorwitz You also need body fat, blood glucose, blood pressure...to exist, but just this fact doesn't tell you anything about the threshold were it gets unhealthy. For body fat, it is pretty low compared to what most people have. And for LDL this is also the case, see

What's the #1 biggest misconception about cholesterol and LDL? This👇

@PolymarketIntel Ist fox news a book?

Karoline Leavitt: “You always want to be the most well-read person in the room, and I try to be every day. But Donald Trump always is.”

@NutritionMadeS3 i will look more into it tomorrow, but the biobank paper is surely more convincing on first sight. But need to check the statistics more.

@NutritionMadeS3 You mean what my field of expertice is? Process engineering. I just looked into the biobank study. This is a bit more tricky. The crude effect of unprocessed red meat on dementia for A4 is not significant, but gets highly significant after adjustment. Not a huge red flag. I think

A recent study suggests some people with higher risk of Alzheimer´s may reduce their risk of dementia by eating MORE meat Here´s what they found. Spoiler alert: this particular study has a number of substantial weaknesses but overall I find the link quite possible

@NutritionMadeS3 if someone is b12 deficient, also processed meat would help.

@NutritionMadeS3 carrier, i would also expect some positive effect from processed red meat. Not on overall health, but in dementia. Sure, that is not necessary, because some negative impact from processed meat could fully compensate the positive impact. But this is at least some evidence. E.g.

@NutritionMadeS3 But this data is from sweden...is there a subgroup with more A4 frequency and different lifestyle?

@NutritionMadeS3 I would expect that this is either a noise (compatible with p value) or the right tail for meat consumption in Apoe4 carriers has a selection problem. In theory: a subpopulation with a higher A4 frequency that also has a more traditional lifestyle. We see that in some tribes.

@RichardHanania Sure Trump fucked up on Iran, but you should have included that in your calculation when you were euphroical about the war.

Bannon: Trump is going to declare Hormuz to be Europe's problem and declare victory. It will be like ‘I came, I saw, I conquered’, even though Trump conquered nothing, and in fact lost the Strait to Iranian control.

@BillyBo01168681 @masterchief7478 @TheEclectic1One @sentdefender But just from your reaction it is very obvious that you aren't interested in a good faith discussion. Everything is a weak gotcha, sarcasm and so on. I won't waste more time. Bye

@BillyBo01168681 @masterchief7478 @TheEclectic1One @sentdefender It is pretty obvious that i didn't imply that it is the exact same, but you leavt out that the partnership got much closer than what is necessary with iran after something much worse (Nukes) happened. Japan could have moved away from US after occupation. They didn't

U.S. President Donald J. Trump is set to set the stage for an off-ramp for the ongoing conflict with Iran in the Middle East. Amongst other things, the president is expected to announce that the military objectives of Operation Epic Fury have not only been met but surpassed during his 9 p.m. ET address tonight.

@BillyBo01168681 @masterchief7478 @TheEclectic1One @sentdefender they get neutral. But we will see what happens. But acting like it is absurd to get closer to a close country that can fuck you up, only because they sent some drones...is absurd.

@BillyBo01168681 @masterchief7478 @TheEclectic1One @sentdefender If you think this kind of sarcasm is convincing, then fine. US nuked Japan and directly after WW2 they moved closer. Iran did much less, UAE didn't even really enter the war (why If they are so pissed?). And they don't even have to become partners, it would likely be enough if

@BillyBo01168681 @masterchief7478 @TheEclectic1One @sentdefender more sense if US really pulls out. The adavantage of having US military bases isn't that large and a partner that causes a mess in your region and then leaves... isn't a good partner.

@BillyBo01168681 @masterchief7478 @TheEclectic1One @sentdefender Or countries like UAE would move closer to Iran politically instead of building pipelines more than 1000km Long through foreign land...also the pipeline doesn't solve the Iran issue for them, as Iran could destory the pipeline or desalination plants. So a deal with Iran makes