Farrell249

“Landmark deal”?! Wake the f’up. It didn’t dismantle Iran’s nuclear program. It let them keep enriching, handed them sanctions relief, and built in expiration dates so they could just wait it out. That’s not a solution. That’s a countdown. And what happened the minute pressure shifted? They ramped enrichment, blew past limits, and restricted inspections. So spare the revisionist history. It wasn’t a breakthrough. It was a delay and a predictable one at that.

@newnorm249 @ambrose_pike @Acyn You're the dumb ass. The Iran nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), was a landmark agreement reached in July 2015 between Iran the United States, United Kingdom, France, China, Russia, and Germany) + EU.

Reporter: The president said we might blow up and completely obliterate all of their generating electric plants, oil wells, Kharg island, and possibly all desalination plants. Under international law, striking infrastructure is generally prohibited. Why is the president advocating potentially a war crime and how do you square that with the US aying it does not target civilians? Leavitt: Their best move is to make a deal or else the united States armed forces has capabilities beyond their wildest imagination Reporter: Including potential war crimes? Leavitt: With respect to achieving the full objectives, the president is going to move forward… Reporter: Which of those objectives would destroying a desalination plant most help?

That’s your argument 😂? Lame insults about someone’s parents and teachers…. you’ve already admitted you don’t have a real point. And the rest of your comment isn’t any better. Reducing a complex geopolitical issue to “you just want to hurt brown people” isn’t analysis, it’s lazy bs. It ignores everything about state behavior, security threats, and decades of conflict just to throw out a cheap accusation. No one is talking about race. They’re talking about a government and its actions. If you can’t separate the two, seems you’re pretty limited…. No surprise there. You don’t win arguments by name-calling and projecting motives. You win them by addressing facts, dickhead.

@newnorm249 @Acyn I was wrong. It’s not just you that’s a joke but your parents and teachers. What a shame. Lowering the USA to the level of a terroristic regime isn’t what being American is about. You seem gleeful to be given an excuse to hurt brown people EXTRA hard because their govt sucks.

@JoeGold44935611 @grozzian @Acyn Right, if your best response is “you used ChatGPT,” you’ve already lost the argument, ‘Dude’. Facts are facts, genius.

@newnorm249 @grozzian @Acyn Dude. Stop using ChatGPT to formulate your argument 😑

@BlakeBla4570 @ambrose_pike @Acyn Jeez, just completely ignoring reality. Just fucking dumb. I mean, really, you simply have your head way too far up your ass.

@newnorm249 @ambrose_pike @Acyn Why are we where we are today. BECAUSE TRUMP ATTACKED W/O Provocation. Why? he needed distractions from Epstein and Low favorable ratings. A quick war would boost those poll numbers but Trump screws up everything he does and here's Farrell249 going human centipede on Trump.

“Same as them”? That’s not just wrong, it’s intellectually lazy. Iran has spent decades building a strategy around proxy terrorism, attacking civilians, and destabilizing entire regions. That’s not a talking point, that’s documented history. Iran-backed groups have carried out hundreds of attacks on U.S. and allied targets, including civilians and infrastructure . It’s literally how they operate. They’ve: •funded groups like Hezbollah and others across multiple countries •targeted Americans, diplomats, and civilians for decades •threatened global shipping and energy routes •and are actively escalating attacks right now across the region That’s not “war conduct.” That’s a playbook. Now compare that to the U.S. The U.S. operates under rules of engagement, legal review, and the law of armed conflict, where targets are evaluated based on military necessity and proportionality. Even critics acknowledge that infrastructure targeting is judged on whether it provides military advantage, not just labeled illegal by default . Are mistakes possible? Yes. Are they investigated and debated publicly? Also yes. That’s the difference. So no, this isn’t “if you can’t beat them, join them.” It’s responding to a regime that has never followed the rules to begin with, while still being held to legal and operational standards that Iran openly ignores. Putting those two on the same level isn’t nuanced. It’s flat-out dumb.

@newnorm249 @Acyn Sooo.. if you can’t beat them join them? So you’re the same as them now?

Calling ME a “joke” is a joke. Doesn’t fix the fact that your argument ignores reality. You suddenly care about infrastructure when it fits your narrative, but where was this outrage when Iran and its proxies were hitting cities, civilians, oil tankers, and critical infrastructure across the region? They’ve threatened shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, targeted civilian areas, and destabilized entire economies. That’s not hypothetical, that’s been happening. Now you want to pretend this is some clean, one-sided legal issue? International law isn’t your personal talking point. It doesn’t say all infrastructure is off limits. It comes down to military use, necessity, and proportionality. If something contributes to a war effort, it can become a lawful target. That’s how this actually works. What’s illegal is deliberately targeting civilians or purely civilian infrastructure with no military relevance. Which, inconveniently for your argument, is exactly what Iran has been accused of doing. So spare the selective outrage. You don’t get to ignore years of attacks, terrorism, and escalation, and then act like a legal expert the second there’s a response. And calling someone a joke while missing all of that? That’s not an argument. That’s just loud, obnoxious ignorance.

@newnorm249 @Acyn So targeting a desalination plant in a country ALREADY facing an existential water crisis isn’t a war crime? You’re a joke.

That’s a lazy talking point, not an argument. Fairly typical of you…. Half truths at best. You’re making a sweeping claim about “not caring about laws” with zero substance behind it, then jumping straight to international law like it proves your point. That’s not analysis, that’s rhetoric. International law isn’t a slogan you throw around when it’s convenient. It’s applied based on context, facts, and legal standards. especially in conflict. And whether you like a president or not doesn’t change how those standards are evaluated. If you want to have a serious discussion, then point to specific actions, specific laws, and make an actual case. Otherwise, this is just political noise pretending to be moral authority.

No one should expect a President who doesn’t care about America’s laws to follow international law.

“Without provocation”? That’s not analysis, that’s either ignorance, willful denial, or outright lying…. This didn’t start a few months ago during negotiations. This is decades in the making. A regime that has funded terrorist proxies, targeted Americans and our allies, attacked shipping lanes, and openly chants “Death to America” doesn’t suddenly get a clean slate because there were talks happening. Framing this as “unprovoked” is not just wrong, it’s intellectually dishonest, genius. And then dismissing the people speaking for the administration? Karoline Leavitt has actually been inside government, worked in Congress, served in the White House, run a campaign, and now stands at the podium representing U.S. policy on a global stage every single day. Meanwhile, you’re parroting a surface-level take that ignores fifty years of context and calling the country “not serious.” That’s the real joke. Pretending this all started “without provocation” just exposes how ignorant you really are.

@Acyn A 28-year-old Florida sorority girl is at the White House podium justifying the destruction of desalination plants in a country the United States attacked without provocation in the middle of negotiations. This is not a serious country.

@MimzyNGB @Acyn Jealous??

@Acyn Leavitt lies, every single time. And what is that shower curtain she is wearing?

What exactly have you been watching, or ignoring? “Free trade”? The U.S. has been actively reshaping trade deals, using leverage, tariffs, and direct negotiations to get better outcomes. That’s not abandoning trade, that’s actually fighting for it. “Diplomacy over war”? Where have you been? There have been constant attempts at diplomacy, pressure campaigns, negotiations, and containment efforts with Iran. To pretend none of that happened is either willful ignorance or deliberate misrepresentation. At some point, reality matters. You’re dealing with a regime that has spent decades funding terrorist proxies, destabilizing the region, attacking U.S. interests, and openly chanting “Death to America.” How many more rounds of failed diplomacy does he need before acknowledging the obvious? No one wants war. But pretending that more talks will suddenly change the behavior of a regime that has repeatedly used negotiations to stall and advance its position isn’t principle, it’s fantasy. And framing this like the administration hasn’t pursued trade or diplomacy is flat-out misleading. It’s not a difference of opinion, it’s rewriting what’s actually happened. Acting like these efforts never existed? That’s not leadership. That’s political posturing and everyone can see it. Time to hang up your Congressman cleats. Game over.

The Republican Party needs free-market, pro-trade, anti-war voices. I’ll keep fighting for those principles no matter what.

@AmericaStan_ Good…..UN is a corrupt, racist, organization…. Tear it down

🚨 BREAKING: Donald Trump has decided to withdraw the U.S. from UN-Habitat, UN Women, and 66 other organizations funded by American taxpayers. He says the UN promotes invasions instead of stopping them, and America will no longer fund its own harm. Do you support Donald Trump on this decision ? A. Yes B. No

@TrumpsHurricane Chuck walks around in a constant state of hypocrisy…. Of course he wants that they’re looking for an additional 11 million votes. Joke.

Chuck Schumer says "The ultimate goal is to… get a path to citizenship for all 11 million or however many undocumented there are here." What is your response to him ??

@simonateba If anyone thinks this has to do with race or gender, they’re barking up the wrong tree….

BREAKING — Be brutally honest: Do you agree with the left that America should be outraged this morning after Hegseth just now removed two Black and two female officers from a one-star promotion list, spurring allegations of racial and gender bias? Yes or no?

@Suzierizzo1 Someone should have put this trash out….

OMG Shonique showed up with other debaters at Cerrito’s College where MAGA & TPUSA were and totally schooled them and also found out that they’re fine with Pedophiles and some of them actually are & have been arrested for it! These people are disgusting!

@KevinCastley @Discipln_trader Your lack of military prowess is laughable…. Do you read what you post??

@Discipln_trader Are you serious?

We don’t talk enough about just how badly the US would get COOKED if it were foolish enough to start a war with China We often hear in the news American politicians demonizing China and threatening a war over Taiwan— an island they don’t even recognize as a state… But if they were to make good on their threats and appease the reddit libcon-zionist Atlantoids who post B2 dam memes and uphold cartoon dogs on blu*sky— they would get so pulvarized it’s not even funny Let’s look at each traditional dimension of a war with China: air, land, and sea. I won’t get into AI and satellite warfare because that’s beyond obvious in favour of China. China leads AI development and was first to shoot down a satellite But in the air, the US has the most favourable matching. The US has more stealth aircraft and could do some damage. But Chinese air to air missiles are superior these days. Pakistan SMOKED India’s Air Force last year armed with Chinese missiles Once China detects the US it’s ejection time for their pilots They will have a challenge staying out of radar detection even with their stealth In sea it’s not close. US ships are technically better, but China has more ships. But more importantly, China has 200x the shipbuilding capacity of the US So once both navies have sustained a large amount of damage, China can rapidly replenish their numbers The US is down and out once they lose their ships. It will take them decades to rebuild their navy On the ground they will be unable to get very far because China has a larger army equipped with drones and goodies to throw at the US And they can’t paratroop troops from stealth fighters or bombers so they won’t be able to get far inland without getting shot down The only things the US can really do is hit their critical infrastructure and manufacturing. But if they go in that direction, China can do the same to the US with their ICBMs. The US doesn’t have a path to victory They don’t even have a path to victory against Iran. It’s beyond goofy for them to claim they could take China The People’s Liberation Army would COOOK the US 🔥

This reads like Reddit-tier analysis dressed up as expertise. You’re taking fragments of truth and turning them into sweeping conclusions that ignore how modern warfare actually works. First, the idea that the U.S. would get “cooked” ignores the most basic reality: the United States still has unmatched global power projection. No country on earth can deploy, sustain, and fight across multiple theaters the way the U.S. can. That’s not opinion — that’s decades of demonstrated capability. Second, experience matters. The U.S. military has been continuously engaged in complex operations for decades — joint operations, naval dominance, logistics, air superiority, real combat. China has not fought a major war since 1979. War isn’t theory — it’s execution under pressure. Third, you’re treating war like a video game stat sheet. “More ships,” “better missiles,” “bigger army.” That’s not how conflicts are decided. Training, integration, command structure, logistics, alliances, and real-world combat experience matter far more than raw counts. Fourth, the “China can just replace everything” argument ignores reality. Shipbuilding capacity doesn’t equal instant combat power. War production takes time, protection of supply chains, and freedom from disruption — all of which would be contested. And finally, the biggest point you missed: Any U.S.–China conflict wouldn’t be some isolated duel. It would involve alliances, regional dynamics, and escalation risks that fundamentally change the equation. Bottom line: You’re not describing a serious military assessment. You’re repeating internet talking points and calling it strategy. No one serious thinks a war with China would be easy. But claiming the U.S. would be “cooked” just shows a lack of understanding of how military power actually works.

Yes, you have the right to ask for a supervisor, but you CANNOT refuse, pause or stop an officer from doing their job. You still must follow lawful orders (license, registration, exit vehicle, etc.). Every yahoo out there thinks they know the law better than the officers. You can ask for a supervisor You cannot demand one You cannot delay or refuse compliance because of it. Smarten up!

Rudy Ornelas was pulled over in Sacramento in 2018 for tinted windows. His Smith & Wesson was registered and locked in his trunk. He told the officers. He stayed calm. He knew his rights. He asked for a supervisor. In return, a female officer drew her gun and pointed it at his head. He was cited, his legal firearm was temporarily seized, and he was forced to complete a safety class and wait two months to get it back. Every charge was dropped. He didn’t file a lawsuit—he won in criminal court when the charges were thrown out. The officer? No public discipline. Reports say she was later promoted to detective, but SPD never confirmed it because they never had to. The real loss isn’t just what happened to Rudy. It’s a system that rewards escalation instead of punishing it. Compliance doesn’t protect us. Accountability will. 🎥: @flexxinruee

@Azariel91 Racist pos….

They better block her from Uber. He should file a police report. I feel so bad for him.

@scottwhite1065 @Viralvid_89 Absolutely Dems….😬

@Viralvid_89 Id love to know the people who do this stupid shit-liberal or conservative?? What do you think they are? DEM or republican?

Woman gets caught stealing from Target and thinks she doesn't have to go to jail.