Stan Fecklessmen

24.7K posts

Stan Fecklessmen banner
Stan Fecklessmen

Stan Fecklessmen

@newzjunkey

🇺🇸#nevertrump🇺🇸 #centifa #altcenter #radicalcentrist #extremecenter #117 Raised by Doodles, “Anger is a gift.”

Hoth Katılım Mayıs 2020
847 Takip Edilen246 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Stan Fecklessmen
Stan Fecklessmen@newzjunkey·
It will be very interesting to see if the new Syrian government, which looks to be ran by former al Qaeda leaders, will be worse than Assad. Is Syria heading the way of Afghanistan?
English
3
1
8
1.7K
Frank Ferriolo
Frank Ferriolo@Spaceman3810·
@brithume Mueller ended his life with a disgrace in the Russia/Trump investigation! He knew early on there was nothing there and said nothing!
English
57
3
47
1.5K
Brit Hume
Brit Hume@brithume·
Quote: "Mueller’s family didn’t deserve the president’s grave dancing. None of Trump’s many enemies do. But Trump also didn’t deserve Russiagate. Nearly a decade after that phony scandal, our republic is still trying to recover." thefp.com/p/robert-muell…
English
2.7K
760
5.5K
315.2K
Stan Fecklessmen retweetledi
The Lincoln Project
The Lincoln Project@ProjectLincoln·
GOP Senator Kennedy admits Trump is the reason for TSA shutdown: "He said said 'No deals with the Democrats.' We could have had TSA paid by the end of the week. But the President said 'No deal.'"
English
479
6.5K
16.6K
584.3K
Stan Fecklessmen
Stan Fecklessmen@newzjunkey·
@Breaking911 Is this man Trump’s fault the way all the killers on trains were Biden’s fault during his term? I didn’t write the rules.
English
0
0
0
16
Breaking911
Breaking911@Breaking911·
Insane Chicago train rider swinging what looks like 2 hammers says he is going to kill white people, and adds that he got out two days ago.
English
303
449
2.3K
1.4M
FOX News Radio
FOX News Radio@foxnewsradio·
"Washington DC doesn’t work." @Reince joins @DanaPerino to reveal why Democrats are banking on "general chaos" and public exhaustion to win the 2026 midterms. Is "ineptitude" a winning strategy? buff.ly/mL38ZSs
English
18
45
254
23.6K
Stan Fecklessmen
Stan Fecklessmen@newzjunkey·
@FBIDirectorKash You guys and all of these MAGA fools are such fucking dipshits. Read the chart. It ends literally at the start of Trump’s presidency. Thank you Joe Biden for your excellent leadership.
English
0
0
0
4
Stan Fecklessmen
Stan Fecklessmen@newzjunkey·
@ShawnRyan762 You should interview Rob Sands too who also seems like a solid guy and a real contender in Iowa.
English
2
0
0
189
Chris Original Black Navy Vet
Democrats voted for Kamala Harris because they believed she was most qualified. maga voted for trump because he promised to hurt the people who they hate. Democrats voted to help others. maga voted to hurt others. It's really that simple.
English
345
1.5K
7.6K
80.1K
Bill Melugin
Bill Melugin@BillMelugin_·
Because it happened in 2023 when the Biden administration policy was that a shoplifting charge wouldn’t be an enforcement priority for ICE. Nor would sanctuary Chicago have notified ICE they had him: The Laken Riley act passed in 2025. His prior arrest was in 2023.
David J. Bier@David_J_Bier

Interesting that ICE didn't track him down after his shoplifting arrest, as mandated by the Laken Riley Act, because Trump's DHS has completely ignored the Laken Riley Act in favor of racial profiling random people on the street.

English
72
1.1K
5.5K
220.4K
unusual_whales
unusual_whales@unusual_whales·
Speaker Mike Johnson: “If we're completing the mission, and it's a limited scope, then that's not a declaration of war.”
English
194
98
1.3K
329K
Bill Ackman
Bill Ackman@BillAckman·
A number of press reports have characterized our and other shareholders’ efforts on behalf of Fannie and Freddie (F2) as seeking a ‘gift’ or ‘handout’ from the government. We, the shareholders of F2, seek no such thing. Hundreds of financial institutions were bailed out during the GFC by the U.S. Treasury. Nearly all of the financial institution bailouts during the GFC involved an injection of capital in the form of senior preferred stock by Treasury at an interest rate of 5%, plus warrants to acquire common stock in an amount equal to 15% of the face amount of the preferred with an exercise price at the then-current stock price of the rescued institution. For example, Treasury’s preferred stock investment in Goldman Sachs was in an amount of $10 billion and, in addition, Treasury received warrants on $1.5 billion of GS' common stock at its then market price. The bailout terms for F2 were materially more burdensome and expensive, with a higher interest rate and substantially more warrant coverage, than that of every other financial institution (other than those of AIG whose terms were similar). Despite the F2 bailouts’ massively more burdensome terms, shareholders are not complaining about the original terms. Treasury invested $193 billion in F2 in the form of senior preferred stock (SPS), including funding for $2 billion of commitment fees, with a 10% coupon (twice that of the banks). Treasury also received warrants on 79.9% of both companies’ outstanding shares. Fannie and Freddie have since repaid Treasury $301 billion, which includes interest on the SPS at a blended rate of 11.6%, an interest rate which is 160 basis points more per annum, and have returned the entire $193 billion of outstanding principal, $25 billion in excess of what was contractually owed. In summary, the F2 SPS has been fully repaid according to its original contractual terms plus an extra $25 billion. Despite the fact that the SPS has been more than repaid in full, Fannie and Freddie have not accounted for these payments on their respective balance sheets, and the $193 billion of SPS remains an outstanding liability as if no principal payments had ever been made. How can it be, you might ask, if indeed F2 have repaid $301 billion to Treasury when only $276 billion was due could there be any remaining balance of the SPS on the F2 balance sheets? The answer relates to something called the ‘Net Worth Sweep (NWS).’ During the second term of the Obama administration, on August 12, 2012, two quarters after F2 returned to profitability, Treasury announced that it was unilaterally amending the terms of the SPS stock to provide that Treasury would take 100% of the profits of F2 each quarter in lieu of the 10% annual dividend rate. This was not a negotiated resolution with F2. It was a unilateral amendment of the original terms of the SPS that was done in bad faith. The supposed rationale for the amended terms of the SPS was akin to the IRS garnishing the wages of someone who will never be able to pay the taxes that they owe. That is, the Treasury said F2 will never be able to pay the 10% coupon, let alone the SPS’ $193 billion principal balance, so it decided instead to ‘settle’ for 100% of F2’s profits forever. In discovery, shareholders learned that the stated justification for the amendment was false. In mid 2012, the Obama administration had come to learn that both companies would soon be reversing tens of billions of reserves on their balance sheets as housing values had increased and the reserves taken during the GFC had been excessive. The NWS was instituted by Obama to forestall F2 from forever being able to recapitalize and be released from conservatorship. The NWS was not a ‘settlement’ for a lesser amount of future payments. It was the outright theft of the forever profits of both companies. Never before or since has the government ‘swept’ 100% of the profits of any company, let alone a financial institution in conservatorship, a form of government intervention where the goal is rehabilitation of the institution, and where the hierarchy of corporate claims has always been respected. The accounting for the NWS payments while it was in effect (until Secretary Mnuchin terminated the NWS in Trump’s first term) was also unusual. The NWS was treated by F2 as a quarterly adjustment to the dividend rate on the SPS such that the dividend amount owed was made equal to the after-tax profits of F2 for that quarter with no limitation. In other words, regardless of the amount of profit F2 generated for the quarter – whether or not it was in excess of the original 10% annual dividend – the dividend payable under the NWS was made equal to the quarterly profit. The absurd terms of the NWS sweep therefore made it impossible for any partial or full repayment of the SPS to take place as every dollar paid to the Treasury on the amended terms of the SPS was considered a dividend payment, even if the amount was massively in excess of the original contractual SPS terms. The absurdity of the NWS was made clear just two quarters after the NWS went into effect. Fannie Mae generated a profit of $59 billion in the first quarter of 2013, and the SPS dividend rate for that quarter was set at $59 billion so the entire amount was swept to the government, more than 10 times the contractual dividend rate. I had the opportunity to discuss F2 and the NWS with Warren Buffett about a decade ago and he said that he “couldn’t believe what the government had done.” In short, the shareholders of F2 are simply asking the government to respect the original and highly burdensome terms of the SPS. There is no dispute that Treasury has received more than the original 10% coupon and full repayment of principal of the SPS, that is, an extra $25 billion. We and the millions of other shareholders of F2 are simply asking the administration to honor the original SPS terms and properly account for the $301 billion of payments, thereby eliminating the SPS liability from both companies’ balance sheets. Shareholders have not asked for the extra $25 billion to be returned to the two companies. Treasury can decide whether to keep those funds or return them to the companies. Accounting for the repayment of the SPS has other important implications. Namely, it is critically important that conservatorships respect the rule of law, in particular, the contractual terms of corporate instruments and the hierarchy of claims. Otherwise, no financial institution that gets into trouble will be able to raise rescue capital in the private markets. Notably, the treatment of F2 in conservatorship explains why Silicon Valley Bank and other recent large bank failures since the GFC were unable to raise private capital and avoid government intervention or a forced sale to J.P. Morgan. If the government with the stroke of a pen during conservatorship can at a whim wipe out common and preferred shareholders, no one is going to step in to try to save a financial institution that gets into trouble, and only the top few banks will be possible rescuers of big banks that fail. Furthermore, because of F2’s history, their reputation in the capital markets has been greatly damaged. F2 raised $22 billion of preferred stock in the year or so prior to conservatorship as the government pressed both companies to raise capital. Institutions were willing to invest billions of dollars of capital into both institutions before they failed because, based on all precedent conservatorships, the contractual terms of all financial instruments and the hierarchy of claims had been preserved. Unfortunately, in light of the precedent of the net worth sweep, no investor can be confident that they won’t be wiped out in a future conservatorship so none has been willing to take the risk. Some have proposed that Treasury simply convert the SPS into junior preferred and common stock and massively dilute shareholders. Putting aside the potential legal challenges to this approach, the result will be that Treasury will at best own something approaching 95% of both companies rather than 79.9%. While the government’s percentage ownership stake would be larger in the SPS conversion approach, the value of the government’s larger stake would be considerably lower as the companies would become un-investable. Who would invest in F2 alongside the government when they just wiped out the previous owners? In the SPS conversion scenario, the government’s stake, at best, if it could be sold, would trade at a massively discounted valuation, well below the value of the government's stake if Treasury retained only its contracted for 79.9% stake and respected the original terms of the SPS. In other words, a slightly smaller ownership stake of much more highly valued companies would equate to considerably more value for Treasury and taxpayers. In a public letter to Rand Paul after his first term in November of 2021, President Trump recognized that the net worth sweep was theft from the shareholders of Fannie and Freddie. He wrote: “Another Obama/Biden scam in legal trouble was when they allowed the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) to steal the retirement savings of hardworking Americans who had invested in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac…The idea that the government can steal money from its citizens is socialism and is a travesty brought to you by the Obama/Biden administration. My Administration was denied the time it needed to fix this problem because of the unconstitutional restriction on firing Mel Watt. It has to come to an end and courts must protect our citizens.” I couldn’t have said it better than President Trump. Now that you have the time, Mr. President, let’s Stop the Steal!
English
326
430
2K
641K
Republicans against Trump
Republicans against Trump@RpsAgainstTrump·
“I hope he wins and I hope he wins big,” Trump released another video endorsing Hungary’s corrupt, autocratic leader, Viktor Orban, ahead of the April 12 election. Orban is firmly anti-Ukraine, which is why Trump and Putin are working overtime to help him win.
English
720
1.2K
5.1K
789.9K
Joe Cooprider
Joe Cooprider@joecooprider·
Reminder that Mueller indicted 26 Russians and 8 Americans for working together to interfere with the election. All 8 Americans were convicted in court, but 5 were pardoned by Trump.
English
399
10K
35.7K
686.1K
Mr Samson
Mr Samson@guy_next_to_me·
@joecooprider @DeborahMeaden Haha - the court system is corrupt - if you haven’t noticed. They changed the law to convict Trump of 34 felonies for calling a reimbursement to his lawyer a legal expense.
English
13
4
17
2.2K
Congressman Max Miller
Congressman Max Miller@RepMaxMiller·
It’s an absolute shame that the Democratic Party tarnished a good man by making his last case the Russia Hoax. What we knew now is what we knew then. RIP Semper fidelis
English
546
2
32
316.3K
Farming Central Virginia
Farming Central Virginia@FarmingVirgina·
@alifarhat79 Libs in California... blaming Trump for their required special blends, the nation's highest taxes and oil refineries leaving the state because of regulation. If you were really concerned about gas prices you'd move
Farming Central Virginia tweet media
English
15
0
1
2K
Stan Fecklessmen
Stan Fecklessmen@newzjunkey·
@TheTNHoller They’re going to spend it regardless of whether Congress authorizes the $200m. Sad state of affairs.
English
1
0
3
141
The Tennessee Holler
The Tennessee Holler@TheTNHoller·
REP. BOEBERT ON THE $200 BILLION MORE TRUMP WANTS FOR HIS WAR: “I would not vote for a war supplemental. No. I am so tired of spending money elsewhere. I’m tired of the industrial war complex getting all our hard-earned tax dollars. We need America First policies.”
English
38
119
631
21.4K