niftesty 🫐
3.8K posts

niftesty 🫐
@niftesty
Full stack developer rebuilding https://t.co/69O8aMLWfD in modern react Ex @Polkadot Curator @PolkadotUX + OSGrants https://t.co/DFL8v6LAZi open for gigs

the first thing I do when I install @shadcn is to add cursor pointer on the button


we're working on something new, and would love to get some early testers to try it out and give feedback! apply using the link below ↓











Das ist falsch. Die Belastungen der Migration gehen die Normalverdiener in der GKV nichts an. Reicht, dass sie schon die Hauptbelastung in ihren Wohngegenden und Schulen zahlen. Migration stemmen entweder alle bundesstaatlich, oder wir lassen es und gestehen uns ein, dass wir keinen Platz und kein Geld mehr haben. So einfach ist. Und nein, DIE Reichen, die man ja nur stärker belasten müsste, damit man die Belastungen stemme könnte, gibt es nicht im erforderlichen Umfang.


@levelsio @sonofatailor I’d say the colors are a bit too positive for the current state of the world.

Many of the designs in Polkadot Relay as well as JAM lack security discipline. "Cool" engineering features, without considering the security implications. Yes, the system works flawless if there are no bugs. But if a bug is discovered, the damage is catastrophic. System accelerates to destruction. Zero defence-in-depth. No graceful shutdown. In Polkadot consensus, there's even a probabilistic assumption that other PoS chains don't usually make. Yes, and same situation -- once threshold is passed, damage accelerates, rather than being graceful and give defenders time. Yes, both Polkadot Relay and the planned JAM design have those problems. We know people write bugs. We just discovered one in Hyperbridge, three additional in Polkadot SDK, in their core algorithms. So we really need to reconsider all those assumptions they made. Throughput will not be worth it if the risks of security incidents are significantly higher. We'll dedicate some time to address those problems before launching @jarchain.




Well he is adamant about Polkadot, but you can literally make the same case with any chain when you bring AI into the mix. That’s the point I’m trying to make. He also thinks he’s the only one who can reverse engineer a PR and figure out what went wrong… I already did that hours before him. I just didn’t post it here because 1. No real value to add 2. That’s exactly how FUD spreads If there’s a genuine flaw, then post the Polkadot Forum discussion and get some sharp minds on it. Posting it like this just shows how much he hates Polkadot… and if someone hates Polkadot, I’ll go even harder the other way.







Polkadot just leveled up. Today's runtime upgrade marks the beginning of a faster, simpler, more usable network designed for real apps. What changes for you? → Apps feel fast and fluid → Transactions confirm quicker → Builders can focus on products, not protocol engineering 1/3


After months of sustained effort, we’re sharing difficult news: The Alliance is discontinuing ink! language development. This decision was not taken easily. 🧵👇







