Nigel Camp

3.6K posts

Nigel Camp banner
Nigel Camp

Nigel Camp

@nigelcamp

Filmmaker and digital artist

London, England Katılım Mart 2011
501 Takip Edilen979 Takipçiler
Nigel Camp
Nigel Camp@nigelcamp·
@Uber_Support Hi DM me and I’ll share details. Driver basically showed and cancelled so I believe he cancelled using a loophole and kept the goods. I’ll message you details privately.
English
3
0
0
20
Uber Support
Uber Support@Uber_Support·
Hi, Thank you for reaching out to us. We truly regret the experience you had with your order. We're ready to look into this. Please send us your email address and mobile number linked to your account along with the order's order ID number via a private message so that we can further assist you.
English
1
0
0
22
Nigel Camp
Nigel Camp@nigelcamp·
@ubereats_uk @UberUK Driver GPS showed arrived at my London address. Looked out the window – zero knock, zero call, no contact at all. I rang them and they hung up, then instantly cancelled the order. Left me with nothing. What’s going on with this service? #UberEatsFail
English
2
0
0
29
Nigel Camp
Nigel Camp@nigelcamp·
Anyone else exhausted by fake AI clips and deepfakes everywhere? Tech’s incredible… until context gets stripped away and even honest work looks suspicious. Your face in an ad you never signed off on? That’s the real blackout in AI video ... confidence, not power. bit.ly/4rUUdwA
Nigel Camp tweet media
English
0
0
0
36
Nigel Camp
Nigel Camp@nigelcamp·
@ABAOProductions Promps can be used but ultimate play is manipulation by the pixel. A paint brush on a canvas will also give more control over a prompt. That said both can be useful
English
0
0
0
26
Aharon Rabinowitz
Aharon Rabinowitz@ABAOProductions·
If you are a successful filmmaker or VFX artist spending your day shitting on AI users or Ai-generated content, I can’t say for sure what is going through your mind, but from the outside it looks like you feel threatened. Also if you are an AI user saying dumb shit like “VFX/Hollywood is dead,” I can’t say for sure what’s going through your mind, but from the outside, it looks like… not much. Yes, AI is here and it not going away. But the marketing teams behind this tech want you to believe it’s something it is not. They don’t want you to know that the more experience you have with traditional filmmaking methods, the better the results from the AI tools you will get. The hard truth is that the people who understand things like lighting, composition, animation, compositing, color theory, VFX, cameras, lenses, and blocking, have a vast advantage when using these tools - but that would never sell products to the masses. They need you to believe that you can easily replace talent and experience with the simple desire to create - and that’s just stupid.
English
68
25
256
16.7K
Nigel Camp
Nigel Camp@nigelcamp·
Tbh prompts can allow an entry point for new and experienced creators. That said my belief is Hollywood and the next top tier films will win at the pixel level. Take an artist. Their advantage is their brush and not a language driven prompt. Content can be made both ways, but one offers more control.
English
0
0
0
7
VraserX e/acc
VraserX e/acc@VraserX·
Hollywood gatekeeping is dying. Very soon, blockbuster-level films will come from tiny teams of obsessed hobby directors armed with AI, taste, and zero permission. Big budgets won’t matter. Gatekeepers won’t matter.
English
616
1.6K
12.6K
1.4M
Nigel Camp
Nigel Camp@nigelcamp·
The “Hollywood’s days are over” talk is overhyped. I also flagged this idea of actors licensing their likeness like royalty-free music ages ago. I believe Hollywood’s golden era will be won at the pixel level and not from templates. And no one’s talking about the crews who have propped up filmmaking for years. What about their longevity? Better tools, not replacements.
English
0
0
0
54
Linus ✦ Ekenstam
Linus ✦ Ekenstam@LinusEkenstam·
The only sane person in Hollywood right now talking some real talk.
English
119
428
4.3K
463K
Nigel Camp
Nigel Camp@nigelcamp·
Everyone's saying Hollywood is done because of AI. I say the next golden era is coming and will be won pixel by pixel. bit.ly/3Mkejko
Nigel Camp tweet media
English
0
0
0
16
Nigel Camp
Nigel Camp@nigelcamp·
Something is happening in Hollywood. The end of traditional stardom? Actors are turning into royalty-earning IP, just like top musicians with their catalogues. This could change everything for actor royalties. bit.ly/4aZ6JF0
Nigel Camp tweet media
English
0
0
0
21
Nigel Camp
Nigel Camp@nigelcamp·
"Who owns your AI video? You? The tool? Or nobody—until you prove it. 'I prompted it' many not hold up when someone re-cuts it with new voices or claims likeness. Proof > prompts. Post here - bit.ly/4rSh2jU
Nigel Camp tweet media
English
0
0
0
9
Nigel Camp
Nigel Camp@nigelcamp·
My prediction.... AI will improve dramatically and offer great assistance to creators, but only if it's trained exclusively on data with a proven origin trail from their own set work. Otherwise, we'll see a YouTuber's entire back catalog repurposed without permission, or worse, someone's kids' faces stolen and used in campaigns they never consented to. Its early days
English
1
1
3
3.1K
Mark Gadala-Maria
Mark Gadala-Maria@markgadala·
Just wow. How can anyone argue that AI won't be the future of cinema at this point?
English
512
493
5.1K
605.1K
Nigel Camp
Nigel Camp@nigelcamp·
@patrickbetdavid Totally agree. Also people forget it’s not just a Hollywood problem. What happens when a YouTuber or podcaster wakes up to their entire catalogue cloned onto a fake AI avatar? If programs can borrow from Hollywood, anyone’s fair game.
English
0
0
0
88
Nigel Camp
Nigel Camp@nigelcamp·
@THR So what happens when AI trains on a corporate video and someone decides to use the CEO's face and voice in another campaign? It's not just a Hollywood issue. Or a YouTuber's entire back catalogue is scraped and re-delivered with a new avatar's face?
English
0
0
0
132
The Hollywood Reporter
Another week, another cacophony of discourse about whether AI-generated filmmaking is actually creativity, and whether creative people can still find a place in a marketplace where too many viewers are willing to settle for weightless visual slop. hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-r…
English
19
10
37
9.1K
Nigel Camp
Nigel Camp@nigelcamp·
@MattWalshBlog Deeper issue... who owns the IP for content generated from prompts? And what about YouTubers/podcasters spotting their back catalogues repurposed with AI avatars? That's a publicity rights and infringement nightmare and not just Hollywood's headache. Collision course ahead.
English
0
0
1
68
Matt Walsh
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog·
I don't understand how anyone can be impressed by this. Okay, wow, an algorithm spit out some images that look kind of real. Okay cool. The fundamental problem with AI content -- and why I will never be interested in an AI movie, no matter how realistic it looks -- is that I just have no interest in the stories that an algorithm tells. I don't want to watch an AI story any more than I want to sit around and listen to ChatGPT tell me about its hopes and dreams. If the story has no soul then it lacks the one and only thing that can make it worthwhile or interesting.
The Dor Brothers@thedorbrothers

We just made a $200,000,000 AI movie in just one day. Yes, this is 100% AI.

English
2.8K
326
8.1K
2.8M
Nigel Camp
Nigel Camp@nigelcamp·
@nivleknasc Next one will be interesting ‘ Who Owns the IP, and How Do You Prove You Made It? ‘ - comes out Thursday
English
2
0
1
6
nivleknasc.eth
nivleknasc.eth@nivleknasc·
@nigelcamp thats awesome man. writing about AI right now is like documenting a revolution in real time — every week theres something new that wouldve been sci fi 6 months ago. looking forward to reading those articles 🔥
English
1
0
0
19
Nigel Camp
Nigel Camp@nigelcamp·
Seedance 2.0 blows up with hyper-real AI video. Hollywood calls foul on infringement. Meanwhile, a lot of training data comes from material that’s already online, and the rules around permission, opt-outs, and licensing are still being fought over. The uncomfortable question is whether your work could be used without you ever knowing. Think a YouTuber’s back catalogue, a campaign shoot made for a brand, or something personal you shared online that later gets pulled into a dataset. Consent? Disclosure? Read more here: bit.ly/4rquYlA
Nigel Camp tweet media
English
1
0
1
195
Nigel Camp
Nigel Camp@nigelcamp·
@nivleknasc I agree. I’ll be spending a lot of time on my site writing articles I hope will help people. You’ll see another 4 posts drop regarding AI over the next 4-5 weeks. It’s really sci fi atm.
English
2
0
1
13
nivleknasc.eth
nivleknasc.eth@nivleknasc·
@nigelcamp scary part is AI editing can reshape culture silently question isn't IF — it's who decides what's "acceptable" and what gets erased transparency standards needed ASAP or we're sleepwalking into invisible censorship
English
1
0
0
9
nivleknasc.eth
nivleknasc.eth@nivleknasc·
@nigelcamp 100%! YouTubers are the next wave for sure. imagine entire channels getting cloned overnight... the legal battles will be insane and probably take years to settle. wild times ahead
English
1
0
1
9
Nigel Camp
Nigel Camp@nigelcamp·
@JackKennedy It’s been interesting watching this all play out. Here's another angle on where ultra-realistic AI video gen like this could lead long-term bit.ly/4qCzvQm
English
0
0
0
213
Kenjac
Kenjac@JackKennedy·
Someone made a video of Eleven vs the Mind Flayer in Seedance 2.0. 🔥 Hollywoods days are numbered…
English
103
224
7.9K
992.4K
TUPACABRA
TUPACABRA@tupacabra·
"Ai is stealing from Hollywood!" Hollywood:
TUPACABRA tweet media
English
26
56
416
10.2K
Nigel Camp
Nigel Camp@nigelcamp·
One thing people aren’t talking about… What happens when independent work is trained on, recycled, and used from hard-working creatives outside of Hollywood? Think YouTubers and their back catalogs, plus promos made for corporate clients by small production houses. It’s only a matter of time before someone sees their hard-earned efforts reproduced, shared… with no credit.
English
1
0
0
42
HealthRanger
HealthRanger@HealthRanger·
Why Hollywood Deserves Obsolescence: A Corrupt, Captive Industry: The collapse of the old studio model is not a tragedy but a necessary correction. Hollywood has long ceased to be a home for art and has become a propaganda arm for a corrupt, captured establishment. The studios, acting as middlemen, have systematically ruined beloved franchises—from Star Wars to Ghostbusters—by forcing insufferable, ideologically-driven narratives that disrespect the source material and alienate the core audience. This moral bankruptcy is systemic. The industry pushes harmful indoctrination and themes that conflict with traditional, pro-human values, creating a vast vacuum of demand for content that aligns with compelling, morally-grounded storytelling. The product is no longer entertainment but a tool for psychological manipulation. The result is an industry deserving of its fate. As one commentary on its decline starkly put it, "Hollywood is dead". The emotional and financial scaffolding that supported the old film business is gone, not just due to streaming, but due to a catastrophic loss of trust and artistic integrity. I'm rooting for Bytedance / Seedance!
English
20
27
161
4.5K