David ⚔️ Soards

2.2K posts

David ⚔️ Soards banner
David ⚔️ Soards

David ⚔️ Soards

@ninjasoards

Software Engineer | UX/UI Designer

Louisville, KY Katılım Nisan 2009
224 Takip Edilen205 Takipçiler
David ⚔️ Soards retweetledi
sunil pai
sunil pai@threepointone·
remember when programming was free
English
139
166
2.1K
257.8K
David ⚔️ Soards retweetledi
Mitchell Hashimoto
Mitchell Hashimoto@mitchellh·
I strongly believe there are entire companies right now under heavy AI psychosis and its impossible to have rational conversations about it with them. I can't name any specific people because they include personal friends I deeply respect, but I worry about how this plays out. I lived through the great MTBF vs MTTR (mean-time-between-failure vs. mean-time-to-recovery) reckoning of infrastructure during the transition to cloud and cloud automation. All those arguments are rearing their ugly heads again but now its... the whole software development industry (maybe the whole world, really). It's frightening, because the psychosis folks operate under an almost absolute "MTTR is all you need" mentality: "its fine to ship bugs because the agents will fix them so quickly and at a scale humans can't do!" We learned in infrastructure that MTTR is great but you can't yeet resilient systems entirely. The main issue is I don't even know how to bring this up to people I know personally, because bringing this topic up leads to immediately dismissals like "no no, it has full test coverage" or "bug reports are going down" or something, which just don't paint the whole picture. We already learned this lesson once in infrastructure: you can automate yourself into a very resilient catastrophe machine. Systems can appear healthy by local metrics while globally becoming incomprehensible. Bug reports can go down while latent risk explodes. Test coverage can rise while semantic understanding falls. Changes happens so fast that nobody notices the underlying architecture decaying. I worry.
English
514
1.9K
15.3K
1.6M
ThePrimeagen
ThePrimeagen@ThePrimeagen·
without googling, i still cannot figure out how to copy and paste on a mac into: 1. the provided Terminal app (which sucks) 2. Ghostty. C-V does nothing, C-v goes into escape insertion (expected). I refuse to google this and it should just be obvious...
English
411
9
1.7K
352.6K
Ryan Florence
Ryan Florence@ryanflorence·
I've heard to try out gpt-5.5-none (no reasoning effort) giving it a shot today to see how it goes, I'm skeptical!
English
6
0
47
11.6K
David ⚔️ Soards retweetledi
JD Flynn
JD Flynn@jdflynn·
This radio station is called “classic rock” but it’s playing cool current music like Pearl Jam and Nirvana.
English
294
1.1K
18.6K
395.6K
David ⚔️ Soards retweetledi
me irl
me irl@me_when_irl·
POV: going on LinkedIn
English
156
1.5K
15.4K
1.1M
The Audio Programmer
The Audio Programmer@audioprogrammer·
Cursor vs Claude Code - which is better for building audio plugins? Some folks in our community have been telling me Cursor outperforms Claude Code for plugin work, so I gave it a spin to see what the hype is about. I built the same ping-pong delay from last episode - same product spec, same Claude model running underneath, just a different IDE. Honest takeaway: for a plugin this simple, the two tools felt more or less interchangeable. Cursor's in-window file editing was more convenient. Claude Code wrote slightly more efficient code under the hood. From what I've seen so far, the question is more akin to what we see in the world of DAWs, where workflow largely defines the choice. So "which AI tool is best?" might be the wrong question for our world. It's more about which wrapper fits how you build. Full code review and breakdown in the new episode, including where I think the gap will widen as workflows get more complex. youtube.com/watch?v=BFhSYh…
YouTube video
YouTube
The Audio Programmer tweet media
English
2
1
6
404
Shayan
Shayan@ImSh4yy·
The worst part of getting a new Mac is that there's no way to uninstall this liquid glass garbage.
English
20
3
99
11.5K
David Cramer
David Cramer@zeeg·
holy fuck Apple- new Macbook and I'm seeing the latest implementation of Finder and its absolutely unusable at this point this is a **workstation** stop fucking trying to turn it into a shitty iOS clone anyone who legitimately thinks macos is better than windows in 2026 (or 2025, 2024, 2023..) is hallucinating
English
63
5
206
40.6K
Wes Bos
Wes Bos@wesbos·
Nikki had me crying with this edit
English
9
3
76
15K
David ⚔️ Soards retweetledi
Rhys
Rhys@RhysSullivan·
seeing claude add itself as a coauthor on my work
Rhys tweet media
English
66
314
10.5K
201.7K
coalhands
coalhands@C0alhands·
@Birdyword Connery is a couple months to a year older than Chalamet and Tim Holland here.
coalhands tweet media
English
24
47
1.9K
1.8M
Ruben Hume
Ruben Hume@rubenhume·
Apple shipped macOS Tahoe with an icon next to every single menu item. And in doing so, destroyed the entire point of icons. An icon is a signal, and signals only work through contrast. The moment everything has one, none of them mean anything, you've just added noise that looks like clarity. Apple even reuses the same icon for completely different actions. The right menu is my take: icons only on the actions you actually reach for daily: New Window, New Tab, Close. Everything else stays clean. Your eye knows exactly where to go. The left is Tahoe. Every item screaming at the same volume. Apple's own 1992 design guidelines called out every single one of these mistakes. Thirty years later, they made all of them. Adding more is not the same as adding value. What's your take?
Ruben Hume tweet media
English
97
118
1.5K
118.5K
David ⚔️ Soards retweetledi
Lissa♥️♥️
Lissa♥️♥️@lizzkelly7·
The fake urgency created in corporate life for absolutely no reason is one of the worst things humans have invented.
English
694
26K
168.6K
5.4M