O21 Solutions

For Immediate Release: O21 Solutions launches 'Sound Strategy: A Framework for Bitcoin-Powered Durable Business.' Building thriving enterprises has become increasingly difficult. Leaders struggle to deliver consistent results, sustain growth, and create genuine value for customers, employees, and shareholders. O21 Solutions has published a corporate strategy framework that orbits Bitcoin as the North Star, fusing sound money values into a cyclical process that bridges visionary aspirations with practical execution. Bitcoin is money, as well as a long-term savings technology, but it's also a lifestyle, set of core values, principles, and behaviors. "Fix the money, fix the world" can only happen if you fix the culture, and you can only begin fixing the culture by naming the one we aspire to. Consisting of Sound Strategy Principles, The Orange Horizon Model, and Bitcoin-Based Budgeting, the Sound Strategy framework provides corporations a stable foundation to escape debasement and foster multi-decade innovation horizons.

Bitcoin is down 50% from all time highs. Why would you buy now?

PQ maybe actually be a trojan horse to implement digital signature schemes with backdoors in them. Note that all PQ signature schemes are standardized by the NIST. Then do some research on NIST and backdoors. Create an imaginary enemy, provide the "solution", that's how you successfully introduce backdoors in target systems.

@TFTC21 Yup x.com/i/status/20393…

Australian PM Albanese begs citizens to take the bus amid fuel crisis triggered by Middle East conflict. “Managed demand destruction” phase 1 in a G20 nation has begun.

@TheEnergyGang @WoodMackenzie @amoshochstein @AmyJaffeenergy @samanthaenergy x.com/i/status/19169…

80% of US energy was fossil fuels in 1980. Despite massive renewable deployment exceeding projections, it’s still 80% in 2026. New episode with @amoshochstein, @AmyJaffeenergy & @samanthaenergy on why the energy transition is far harder than assumed: okt.to/89hIDv 🧵👇

NEW: He built a business at 24, stacked Bitcoin on the balance sheet, then took it public. Now @btconlyscott is issuing BTC-backed bonds: 📌 The bond where conversion price tracks BTC 📌 Why $STRC solves the savings problem 📌 @XCEofficial's Bitcoin Flywheel Watch ⚡️ CHAPTERS: 00:00 Cold Open 00:59 Scott's Early Journey Building A Recruitment Business 05:38 Discovering Bitcoin To IPO'ing A Bitcoin Treasury 13:29 The IPO Process & Outperforming Bitcoin 20:42 Interim Results & Business Growth For XCE 25:24 Innovative Financial Instruments: ATM and Bitcoin Bonds 32:47 Building a Bitcoin-Centric Recruitment Arm 39:08 Michael Saylor's Influence and Future Outlook 43:53 How To Follow Scott & XCE 44:42 Stay Orange

These are actually permanent policy recommendations. Hope you like cooking on an electric stove and taking the bus anon.

@milessuter @Square Opt into retaining BTC as BTC, and prepare for tax and accounting needs x.com/i/status/20372…

@zerohedge Wow no love on this one?

@zerohedge Ha. x.com/i/status/20017…

Since Exxon was kicked out of the Dow Jones "Industrial" Average and replaced by Salesforce in August 2020, Exxon is up 325%. Salesforce is down 32%

JUST IN: Bitcoin has closed its first green month after 5 months of red 👀

@IIICapital @fundstrat x.com/i/status/20391…

@IIICapital @fundstrat Many parallels, including the focus on strong balance sheet. $XOM was in fact delisted subjectively from the DJI Index in Aug 2020 after 92 years, on the back of ESG fud and COVID, replaced by Salesforce. Since then, XOM has returned >300% incl dividends, vs CRM ~20%.

Great clip from @fundstrat earlier this year highlighting how $XOM historically traded based on its largest asset: oil reserves. That framework is even more relevant today as MSCI evaluates bitcoin treasury companies acquiring BTC and issuing Digital Credit products. Under the same logic, Exxon itself would not qualify for index inclusion either.

@Jet_iiv @giacomozucco @alexdunsdon Yeah x.com/i/status/20390…

@giacomozucco @alexdunsdon This is like say XRP paying Greenpeace to gaslight an artist to build a btc environmental death skull or paying newspapers to publish long debunked btc is boiling oceans fud ….. oh wait

Scamception.

@jack The organization still needs an identity and deeply embedded leadership principles: x.com/o21solutions/s…

@BitPaine Who are you appealing to? This is the same argument Al Gore and his friends used to destroy the West. EF desperately wants you to fuck with Bitcoin's security, while Google can't even protect your gmail password.

While this is correct, what the theoretical advance in the Google paper does to change my risk calculus is compress the timeframe we would have to react if the impossible thing were to become possible. I had naively assumed that the impossible thing would become possible gradually. This paper argues both that it may become possible suddenly, and/or that it may become incrementally possible but kept classified until such time as secp256k1 is rather imminently at risk. In such a scenario, moving sooner rather than later to implement a safety measure, even if it is premature and unnecessary, and even if it does not become widely adopted, is nonetheless prudent. Bitcoin has undergone many changes that were arguably unnecessary and undeniably underutilized (e.g. taproot, which has mostly been used for JPEG spam) for things that weren’t existential risks, and which are now prompting rollback discussions. Taking such an action preemptively to mitigate an existential risk is a far better reason to take on technical debt - even if all it does is shut up FUDsters that slow adoption. If you have only 5-10% of your net worth in Bitcoin, an existential risk may be of little consequence. But many people, myself included, have all or a majority of their portfolios in Bitcoin or Bitcoin-backed equities like $IBIT or $MSTR. We are comfortable with volatility because we understand the fundamentals of the system to be sound. For such people, even a 5-10% probability of an ECDSA break in a short timeframe is an unacceptable level of risk if left unaddressed, and would necessitate a significant hedge or de-risking for basic risk management because it threatens the fundamental soundness of the system and poses a likely unsalvageable wound to the monetization/adoption curve. In 2021, you would have called the capabilities of the AIs we now routinely interact with “impossible.” That was five years ago. We live in a time when it is unwise to bet your entire net worth that the impossible will never become possible, particularly when it involves a technology whose progress you cannot readily assess because it will be kept tightly classified until it is ready for prime time. The worst-case scenario of a too-soon PQC upgrade is that it must be modified or rolled back. The worst-case scenario of a too-slow PQC upgrade is that Bitcoin dies. Taking Pascal’s wager here is an easy call.

At this point, they should call the paper "Bitcoin: An Inconvenient Truth" and get Al Gore to deliver the ppt. Brought to you by the Ethereum Foundation.

@_Checkmatey_ Quantum is the equivalent of ESG. Existential threat spurs urgent action to change Bitcoin's security. If only we had more governance, coordination, and regulation, we would be safe.

The one question I can't help but ask, is the following; This paper, if I understand it correctly, is Google saying we have cracked the design for a cryptographically relevant quantum computer. That's a very big deal. Why oh why, did they focus the paper on our blockchain bags? Not government codes. Not banking infrastructure, Not internet protocols. Internet funny money. By no means disqualifying, but certainly an odd think to be the topic of interest for such a discovery.

I read the paper, to the best of my ability. I'm willing to entertain the idea that we have a genuine QC threat on the cards. At a minimum, it would be a mistake to not take it seriously, and start developing a formal PCQ plan for Bitcoin. Having a plan, and not needing it, is far better than the other way around.

I know the truth about Ethereum Foundation being a literal scam created by literal fraudsters. I was here since the beginning. I know the truth about ONE SINGLE logical qubit with low enough error rate to create practical issue on secp256k1 has no credible roadmap to even exist, engineering-wise, let alone 1200 of those in coherence. I've studied my quantum physics in university. My prediction is that in 2029, let alone 2027, my pk-bound taproot utxos will be fine. Not sure how to bet on it in a trustless way, but if you find one I'm game.

Google wants to sell the urgency of quantum computing (and their leadership in it). The Ethereum Foundation wants to showcase coordinated adaptability while subtly underscoring Bitcoin’s rigidity. Together they’re accelerating a narrative that benefits quantum-tech incumbents, more governable blockchains, and regulatory engagement while the actual hardware is still orders of magnitude away from threatening real keys. Institutional self-interest dressed up as responsible disclosure.

Energy 🤝 Bitcoin: - Critical societal need - Cash flow - Commodity experience - Price cycle experience - Long-term planning horizon - Billions of surrendered cash - Wasted / stranded energy Also, please look into the difficulty adjustment, it's brilliant. If you need a workshop or strategy session, let us know!

I could have bought Bitcoin for less than £10 per coin. I said no. And here is the 3-part case that is now playing out in real time. Bitcoin wastes energy by design. Every transaction requires 10 minutes of computing power to be deliberately burned across the network. The total energy consumption has already passed Switzerland. War is threatening 20 to 30% of global energy supply. 2 of Qatar's 14 LNG processing trains have been destroyed. Each takes 5 years to rebuild. Oil has no real substitute. When physical supply falls, output falls. The store of value argument destroys Bitcoin as a currency. When people expect the price to rise, they do not spend it. It stops being money and becomes a speculation. When energy rationing arrives, and governments are already moving in that direction, Bitcoin mining will not survive that conversation. Live proof: Trade in the Strait of Hormuz is moving to Chinese yuan. Not to Bitcoin. One fiat replacing another. The full breakdown is in my latest video going live now. youtu.be/EJicZxhhzgc?si… #Bitcoin #Cryptocurrency #EnergyEconomics #GlobalEconomy #PostKeynesian #FinancialCrisis #MacroEconomics #BitcoinMining #EnergyPolicy #EconomicTheory

PSA: the more live trackers and announcements of $STRC near par, the less likely it is to get above par