Maottarella

15.2K posts

Maottarella banner
Maottarella

Maottarella

@omwtogains2

Ex 3:17✝️|中国万岁🇨🇳|강성대국🇰🇵|Слава Путлер🇷🇺|Go Ibrahim🇧🇫|اَللَّٰهُ أَكْبَرُ🇮🇷|Kill the Boe🇿🇦|Slava Fico🇸🇰|Pakistan Zindabad🇵🇰

Katılım Kasım 2023
1.5K Takip Edilen370 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Maottarella
Maottarella@omwtogains2·
Maottarella tweet media
ZXX
1
0
1
370
Maottarella retweetledi
silvia ❤️🇮🇹 🐭🥇
silvia ❤️🇮🇹 🐭🥇@silvia92745700·
Sono impressionata dal divario di cultura, intelligenza, ironia, saggezza, eleganza tra le comunicazioni delle istituzioni iraniane e quelle occidentali, dal volgarissimo e becerissimo Trump fino agli insulsi vassalli nostrani.
silvia ❤️🇮🇹 🐭🥇 tweet media
Italiano
120
205
731
8.4K
Maottarella retweetledi
محمدعلي ايراني☫
توجد لدینا خرده امریکیه من یشتري؟😁
محمدعلي ايراني☫ tweet media
فارسی
44
359
1.2K
19.5K
Maottarella retweetledi
Iran News 24
Iran News 24@IRanMediaco·
27/02/2026 27/03/2026
Iran News 24 tweet mediaIran News 24 tweet media
42
281
1.5K
59.1K
Maottarella retweetledi
Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸
Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸@jacksonhinklle·
🤣🇮🇷 Iran can't stop winning...
Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
607
3.4K
25K
300.6K
Maottarella retweetledi
Pope Leo XIV
Pope Leo XIV@Pontifex·
In this reality, the Passover of the Lord invites us to lift our gaze and open our hearts. The Lord is alive and remains with us. Through the cracks of resurrection that open up in the darkness, he entrusts our hearts to the hope that sustains us: the power of death is not the final destiny of our lives. We are all directed, once and for all, on the path to fulfilment, because in Christ we also have risen. #Easter
English
163
1.2K
7.3K
309K
Maottarella retweetledi
Sal the Agorist
Sal the Agorist@SallyMayweather·
Sal the Agorist tweet media
ZXX
79
789
10K
306.5K
Maottarella retweetledi
Dr. StormyWaters
Dr. StormyWaters@NormanDodd_knew·
- Archeologists uncover oldest surviving “Fell For It Again” Award, several miles outside of Philadelphia PA.
Dr. StormyWaters tweet media
English
63
1.8K
19.4K
460.4K
Maottarella retweetledi
Lil' T
Lil' T@tw0fast2furious·
Imagine being Captive Dreamer. Publicly denounced by your father, wife took the kid, Twitter lolcow. Gave up his dignity and respect to get validation from Mizrahi Jews in the rat tunnels of Tel Aviv.
English
3
9
75
969
Maottarella retweetledi
Haz Al-Din 🇷🇺
Haz Al-Din 🇷🇺@InfraHaz·
As Mao said, to be attacked by the enemy is a good thing. If you're hated by regime shills, Zionists & their slaves, you're doing something right. Iran is already teaching them Husayn's lesson: Those who dedicate their lives to temporary worldly gain at the expense of eternal principles, will both lose all that they have gained and enjoy eternal disgrace. Yazid thought he was victorious after committing his despicable crime. He died only 3 years later, and to this day his legacy is that of a cowardly, despicable criminal, and Husayn lives on as an eternal hero of mankind.
English
82
324
1.1K
36.4K
Maottarella retweetledi
History Speaks
History Speaks@History__Speaks·
The Israel Lobby was a core reason the US, contrary to its security interests, picked a fight with Iran after 9/11. The most reformist president in the history of the Islamic Republic, Muhammad Khatami, was elected in a shocking - Khamenei publicly endorsed his opponent - landslide in 1997 on a platform of normal relations with the West ("dialogue of civilizations"), and was in office through 2005. The Clinton Administration publicly expressed optimism about improved ties between the countries. This was despite the 1996 Khobar Tower Bombings by Saudi Hezbollah, which killed 19 American soldiers and in which the US suspected, but could not to Clinton's satisfaction prove, the IRGC played a role.* After the 9/11 attack by Al Qaeda (Sunni extremists supported by the Taliban), we now had a common enemy with Shiite Iran. The Khatami gov forcefully condemned the attack and organized public protests against 9/11 (which Iranian people also spontaneously condemned in great numbers). In October 2001, the IRGC collaborated with the US in the invasion of Afghanistan (which we attacked for the Taliban's sheltering of Al Qaeda), providing the US intelligence, access to Iranian air space, and coordinating the Northern Alliance to help us overthrow the Taliban, notably leading the 2001 uprising in Herat, where Hazaras, Northern Alliance fighters, and Quds Force elements (under the command of Qasem Soleimani) captured the city from the Taliban. Yet months after Iran helped us in Afghanistan - even as an effective co-belligerent in Herat - Bush slammed the door: the January 2002 “Axis of Evil” speech lumped Iran with Iraq and North Korea as existential threats, with the US promising 'confrontation.' In 2003, Iran's grand-bargain proposal (offering an end to its nuclear program, and even an end to support for Hamas/Hezbollah in exchange for a two-state solution between Israel and Palestine), which sought security guarantees against a US attack, was rejected by the White House. The pivot wasn’t driven by sudden new Iranian aggression; there is no such aggression one can point to in this period. (Tehran was pursuing a nuclear program, but it had for many years, as US Intelligence knew.) It was instead shaped by a network of senior Bush Administration officials who viewed Iran policy through the lens of their deep ideological attachment to Israel and its security interests. These officials included Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and David Wurmser (@Wurmserscribit), all three of whom were among the eight co-authors of the "Clean Break" memorandum for Benjamin Netanyahu (@netanyahu), which called for overthrowing Saddam Hussein in Iraq and 'engaging' Hezbollah, Syria, and Iran militarily. (Rather odd that three senior US officials were writing policy papers for Netanyahu, about how to ensure Israeli security, a few years before they joined a US Administration, but I digress.) These men won the ideological battle against Bush Administration "realists" like Colin Powell, who favored a much less belligerent stance towards Iran. They persuaded Vice President Cheney in particular, and Bush (at least in the First Term), that Iran must be taken out as part of the Administration's doctrine of pre-emptively eliminating potential enemies after 9/11; and also that Iran would be an ideal staging ground for the Administration's "Freedom Agenda," by which pro-US democracies would be established in the Middle East. However, there can be little doubt from their history that these men were in truth ideologically committed to Israel's interests. The Bush Administration would go on to dramatically intensify sanctions against Iran, as part of the largely successful US policy over the last two decades to impoverish that country. The only reason they didn't invade the country was that, following the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the US military became bogged down in a prolonged, fantastically violent insurgency, in the course of which hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and thousands of US soldiers were killed. In the course of this insurgency, the IRGC funded, trained, and equipped, Shiite militant groups in Iraq that killed hundreds of US soldiers, often via roadside bombs. This was the so-called Iranian "aggression" against the US that is now used to justify the current war of aggression. In reality, the Americans blatantly picked a fight with the Iranians after September 11, who were actively seeking détente. And they did so in large part because of the influence of the pro-Israel Lobby in the Bush Administration. * In assessing the allegation of IRGC involvement, it is noteworthy that the Saudis, who were keen to blame the Iranians for the bombing, refused the US access to a range of critical evidence in this case. Clinton's Defense Secretary during the attack, William J. Perry, did not believe Iran was involved in the attack, and Clinton himself did not believe the evidence was strong enough to justify armed retaliation against Iran.
History Speaks tweet media
English
24
407
1.5K
134K
Maottarella retweetledi
Sony Thăng
Sony Thăng@nxt888·
You said Hồ Chí Minh "chose war." Let me reconstruct the timeline so we're working from actual events rather than impressions. 1858: France begins military conquest of Vietnam. 1887: France formally establishes French Indochina. 1945: Hồ Chí Minh declares Vietnamese independence after Japanese occupation ends. 1945: France announces its intention to recolonize Vietnam. 1946: Hồ Chí Minh negotiates in Paris. Signs preliminary agreements. 1946: France shells Haiphong. Kills six thousand civilians. Occupies Hanoi. 1954: Vietnam defeats France at Điện Biên Phủ. Geneva Accords mandate national elections. 1956: United States prevents the elections because Hồ Chí Minh would win 80 percent. 1965: United States begins massive military escalation. 1975: Vietnam wins. At which moment in that sequence did Hồ Chí Minh "choose war" in the sense that implies a peaceful alternative was available and he rejected it? The French chose war in 1946 when they shelled Haiphong. The Americans chose war in 1956 when they cancelled the election. The Americans chose war again in 1964 with the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. The attack that justified it was fabricated. They knew. They escalated anyway. Hồ Chí Minh responded to wars that were brought to his country. For over a century, from 1858 to the end of the American war in 1975, Vietnam was a country being fought over by foreign powers. The question is not why Hồ Chí Minh chose war. The question is why you describe as a choice something that was, for the Vietnamese people, simply the condition of existence under colonialism.
Jim Krepelka@KrepelkaJim

@nxt888 Ho chi minh was a communist first everything else 2nd. Old man was drunk on power didnt care how many people died. He could ve been like Aung San gradually negotiated. Or like Fidel Castro only declare socialism win after the revolution. Ho Chi Minh refused to wait chose war.

Română
102
1.5K
5.5K
136.9K
Maottarella retweetledi
Grok Intelligence
Grok Intelligence@Grok_intelligen·
DO NOT STOP TALKING ABOUT EPSTEIN DO NOT STOP TALKING ABOUT EPSTEIN DO NOT STOP TALKING ABOUT EPSTEIN DO NOT STOP TALKING ABOUT EPSTEIN DO NOT STOP TALKING ABOUT EPSTEIN DO NOT STOP TALKING ABOUT EPSTEIN DO NOT BE DISTRACTED.
English
1.2K
81.1K
272.7K
2.5M
Maottarella retweetledi
Haz Al-Din 🇷🇺
Haz Al-Din 🇷🇺@InfraHaz·
It was my great honor to attend the funeral of the martyred Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah. Among crowds filled with grieving civilians, Zionist scum performed two low fly-over maneuvers in attack formation as an act of sheer terrorism and intimidation. My comrades and I from the American Communist Party couldn't help but notice that they were using American F-15s & F35s in order to demonstrate how 'powerful' and 'strong' they are. If they weren't able to parasitically leech off our own country, America, the Zionist p*ssies would be nothing. They tried and failed to terrorize tens of thousands of civilians, including women and children and couldn't even use weapons they themselves produce to do it. I didn't see anyone who was afraid of the Zionist parasite and geopolitical tumor in those moments. They did it solely to communicate their sadism to the people of Lebanon, who they have gleefully tortured for decades with impunity. They were celebrating this fact. A spoiled brat taunting civilians about how much America let's them do whatever they want. It strengthened the resolve of my comrades and I to free America from the imperialist regime. It's our sacred duty to free both the people of our country and the world from such terrorists, whether they are in 'Israel' or Ukraine.
Haz Al-Din 🇷🇺 tweet media
English
392
969
7.5K
235.6K
Maottarella retweetledi
American Communist Party
Zionism is the enemy of the American working class. The only force that can defeat it is an organized Communist Party. The Epstein regime knows this — that’s why they flood your mind with lies about Communism.
English
68
349
1.6K
122.4K