roko’s modern basilisk 🐊

19K posts

roko’s modern basilisk 🐊 banner
roko’s modern basilisk 🐊

roko’s modern basilisk 🐊

@ope_sec

“What all these gentlemen lack is dialectics.”

Katılım Haziran 2009
523 Takip Edilen344 Takipçiler
🔻
🔻@uncle_authority·
@RodericDay all I read in the quote was "Westoids don't bitсh nearly enough about how China is able to rapidly urbanize without creating dystopian hyperslums"
English
1
3
45
1.1K
Roderic Day
Roderic Day@RodericDay·
Interestingly, I have an unpublished draft about both Hukou system + the Great Firewall. In sum: it's scandalous for a liberal Westerner (i.e. young me) to first encounter those two, but it becomes a defensible and even smart tradeoff after studying their cause and effect.
Nondescript Communist@NondescriptRed

Discussions about China among socialists in the west very rarely bring up hukou, which is odd seeing as it's probably the single greatest systemic inequality in China and the Chinese economy basically would not function without it.

English
8
17
291
16.1K
roko’s modern basilisk 🐊
@BolshevikBeyond If you really want to be a pedant you could do a comparative reading of the first chapters. That’s where most of the differences that matter are located.
English
0
0
2
56
roko’s modern basilisk 🐊
@BolshevikBeyond Has some useful clarifications in the jargon, like preferring “thingification” over “objectification” due to changes in how that word is interpreted. But also blunts some of the more memorable passages. I’d say Fowkes is fine.
English
1
0
4
269
Bats ☭🔻
Bats ☭🔻@BolshevikBeyond·
for next time I read Capital, do we like or dislike the Reitter translation
English
11
1
41
3.2K
roko’s modern basilisk 🐊
@mitsuhiko From the IC side: they lack the communication skills necessary to gain buy-in from management for the things they want to do. From the management side: insecurity of their ability to understand what their ICs are doing and why.
English
0
0
0
59
Armin Ronacher ⇌
Armin Ronacher ⇌@mitsuhiko·
Why does everybody want managers to be ICs? Please someone explain this to me from first principles.
Brian Armstrong@brian_armstrong

This is an email I sent earlier today to all employees at Coinbase: Team, Today I’ve made the difficult decision to reduce the size of Coinbase by ~14%. I want to walk you through why we're doing this now, what it means for those affected, and how this positions us for the future. Why now Two forces are converging at the same time. We need to be front footed to respond to both. First, the market. Coinbase is well-capitalized, has diversified revenue streams, and is well-positioned to weather any storm. Crypto is also on the verge of the next wave of adoption, with stablecoins, prediction markets, tokenization, and more taking off. However, our business is still volatile from quarter to quarter. While we've managed through that cyclicality many times before and come out stronger on the other side, we’re currently in a down market and need to adjust our cost structure now so that we emerge from this period leaner, faster, and more efficient for our next phase of growth. Second, AI is changing how we work. Over the past year, I’ve watched engineers use AI to ship in days what used to take a team weeks. Non-technical teams are now shipping production code and many of our workflows are being automated. The pace of what's possible with a small, focused team has changed dramatically, and it's accelerating every day. All of this has led us to an inflection point, not just for Coinbase, but for every company. The biggest risk now is not taking action. We are adjusting early and deliberately to rebuild Coinbase to be lean, fast, and AI-native. We need to return to the speed and focus of our startup founding, with AI at our core. What this means To get there, we are not just reducing headcount and cutting costs, we’re fundamentally changing how we operate: rebuilding Coinbase as an intelligence, with humans around the edge aligning it. What does this mean in practice? - Fewer layers, faster decisions: We are flattening our org structure to 5 layers max below CEO/COO. Layers slow things down and create coordination tax. The future is small, high context teams that can move quickly. Leaders will own much more, with as many as 15+ direct reports. Fewer layers also means a leaner cost structure that is built to perform through all market cycles. - No pure managers: Every leader at Coinbase must also be a strong and active individual contributor. Managers should be like player-coaches, getting their hands dirty alongside their teams. - AI-native pods: We’ll be concentrating around AI-native talent who can manage fleets of agents to drive outsized impact. We’ll also be experimenting with reduced pod sizes, including “one person teams” with engineers, designers, and product managers all in one role. In short: AI is bringing a profound shift in how companies operate, and we’re reshaping Coinbase to lead in this new era. This is a new way of working, and we need to leverage AI across every facet of our jobs. To those who are affected I know there are real people behind these decisions — talented colleagues who have poured themselves into this company and our mission. To those of you who will be leaving: thank you. You’ve helped build Coinbase into what it is today, and I am sincerely grateful for everything you've done. All impacted team members will receive an email to their personal account in the next hour with more information, and an invitation to meet with an HRBP and a senior leader in your organization. Coinbase system access has been removed today. I know this feels sudden and harsh, but it is the only responsible choice given our duty to protect customer information. To those affected, we will be providing a comprehensive package to support you through this transition. US employees will receive a minimum of 16 weeks base pay (plus 2 weeks per year worked), their next equity vest, and 6 months of COBRA. Employees on a work visa will get extra transition support. Those outside of the US will receive similar support, based on local factors and subject to any consultation requirements. Coinbase prides itself on talent density. Our employees are among the most talented people in the world, and I have no doubt that your skills and experience will be highly sought after as you pursue your next chapters. How we move forward To the team that is staying, I know this is a difficult day. We’re saying goodbye to colleagues and friends you've been in the trenches with. But here’s what I want you to know as we move forward together: Over the past 13 years, we have weathered four crypto winters, gone public, and built the most trusted platform in our industry. We’ve made it this far by making hard decisions and by always staying focused on our mission. This time will be no different – nothing has changed about the long term outlook of our company or industry. And most importantly, our mission has never been more important for the world. Increasing economic freedom requires a new financial system, and we’re building it. The Coinbase that emerges from this will be more capable than ever to achieve our mission. Brian

English
272
23
1.5K
443.5K
Andrew W Mayhall
Andrew W Mayhall@awmayhall·
What the actual F###. @amazon Not only are my delivery instructions specified and explicit, but the hilarity of signs plastered everywhere only reinforces said instructions... Based on that perfect delivery photo angle, this driver clearly knew what they were doing…
Andrew W Mayhall tweet mediaAndrew W Mayhall tweet media
English
432
217
11.5K
1.3M
kaffe
kaffe@probablykaffe·
disgusting, but how to make it better: 1. just do this with greek yogurt curds aka labneh 2. put that shit back in the fridge and use them as pre-portioned cinnamon spread for toast or toss them on top of cinnamon rolls or pancakes/waffles
Grimmjow’s Hollow Hole@yamsnmac

Viral????

English
5
1
20
879
roko’s modern basilisk 🐊
@CPrimestone In Lewis' English intro to "A Textbook of Marxist Philosophy" he wrote: "The philistine's mind is a mass of prejudices, unexamined assumptions, shallow and insufficiently substantiated generalities and dogmas. The man who says he is no philosopher is merely a bad philosopher."
English
0
1
4
64
SeventyTwoTrillion
SeventyTwoTrillion@CPrimestone·
Great thread. While growing up I wasn't interested in philosophy even when getting into Marxism, but when engaging with others offline and online, philosophy became interested in me. The outwardly eclectic positions people have deep roots, even if they don't know that.
Roderic Day@RodericDay

This is in a sense the value of philosophical study. Each camp of thought necessarily evolves a kind of organic best representative. If you identify who they are and learn to counter them *at their best*, everyone aping them (consciously or not) becomes kind of easy afterwork.

English
2
3
19
1.5K
roko’s modern basilisk 🐊
The claims that AI is going to make us all redundant are certainly overblown, but one thing it has undeniably automated is brown-nosing. Which explains why it’s tearing through C-Suites like cocaine in the ‘80s.
English
0
0
1
101
roko’s modern basilisk 🐊 retweetledi
Optic Baudrillard
Optic Baudrillard@mauvaismoments·
The computer told me I'm the smartest boy and that I solved Marx when I was 18 and also it said I was handsome and good at kissing
English
51
605
15.6K
446K
Roderic Day
Roderic Day@RodericDay·
I think red button / blue button discourse is pretty amazing. It's one of those strange situations where a trivial nothing event is somehow causing people to compulsively reveal deep aspects of their psyche. Like a collective massive "How do they treat the waiter?" experiment.
English
7
2
80
4.8K
roko’s modern basilisk 🐊 retweetledi
coretapper
coretapper@scrollwrack·
Reading some of Wolfe’s recent works, then later stumbling across this thread, I am astounded by how he has only doubled down on the pitfalls revealed in this thread (nearly two years later!). To me, it is a grave revelation of intent. From embarrassing to read to useless junk.
Roderic Day@RodericDay

Ross Wolfe once wrote a dumb tasteless note on Losurdo called "Moar like absurdo amirite?" It wasn't only puerile in tone, but Wolfe's grasp of geopolitics aged like a drunk repeatedly stepping onto rakes and slapping his own face with their handles. Anyway, compare to Losurdo:

English
1
3
33
2.9K
roko’s modern basilisk 🐊 retweetledi
Cosmonaut ☭
Cosmonaut ☭@CosmonautMag·
Gennady Yanin takes up the defense of Domenico Losurdo's project, specifically his evaluation of Western Marxism, in the face of the criticisms raised by Ross Wolfe in the series of articles Neo-Stalinism and Philosophy: Domenico Losurdo’s New School of Falsification. cosmonautmag.com/2026/04/the-po…
English
2
15
55
14.7K
roko’s modern basilisk 🐊 retweetledi
Roderic Day
Roderic Day@RodericDay·
Western grassroots political organizations tend to have goals like 1) just exist 2) organize marches 3) get members/votes All of these are so meek that yeah you rarely rise to having to engage domain experts, or evaluate anyone on any metric other than charisma.
English
1
13
81
2.6K
roko’s modern basilisk 🐊 retweetledi
Dohaciel Ygzgzot
Dohaciel Ygzgzot@ygzgzot·
The “400-hour ugly chair” example is a textbook strawman. Marx never said all labour creates value, only socially necessary labour does. If a chair normally takes 2 hrs, then 398 hrs are simply wasted labour. This critique misreads Marx’s theory of value and fails to refute it.
Brivael Le Pogam@brivael

Tu viens de résumer la théorie de la valeur-travail de Marx. Je vais t’expliquer pourquoi elle a été réfutée il y a 130 ans, sans méchanceté. L’idée que la valeur vient du travail a un problème fondamental. Si je passe 400 heures à construire une chaise moche que personne veut acheter, elle vaut pas plus qu’une chaise construite en 2 heures que tout le monde s’arrache. La valeur ne vient pas du temps passé. Elle vient de ce que quelqu’un est prêt à payer. C’est la révolution marginaliste de 1871 (Menger, Jevons, Walras), confirmée par Böhm-Bawerk en 1896 qui a formellement démoli la théorie valeur-travail. C’est pas un débat ouvert. C’est réglé depuis plus d’un siècle dans la littérature économique. Maintenant “le propriétaire extorque la plus-value”. Extorquer implique une contrainte. Or un contrat de travail est volontaire. Personne te force à signer. Tu peux partir demain. Tu peux monter ta propre boîte. Tu peux devenir freelance. Et surtout, le propriétaire ne “prend” rien. Il prend un risque. Il avance le capital. Il paie les salaires AVANT que le produit soit vendu. Si la boîte fait faillite, le salarié touche son chômage. Le propriétaire perd tout. Ses économies, son temps, parfois sa maison. La “plus-value” que tu décris, c’est la rémunération de ce risque. Sans quelqu’un pour avancer le capital et organiser la production, le travailleur produit rien du tout. Demande à n’importe quel freelance : le plus dur c’est pas de faire le travail, c’est de trouver le client et de structurer l’offre. Dernier point. Si le travail seul produisait la richesse, les pays avec le plus de travailleurs seraient les plus riches. L’Inde et le Bangladesh auraient un PIB par habitant supérieur à la Suisse. C’est évidemment pas le cas. Ce qui fait la différence c’est le capital, l’innovation, l’organisation, et les institutions. Je te dis ça sans animosité. La théorie valeur-travail est séduisante parce qu’elle est simple et qu’elle a un héros (le travailleur) et un méchant (le patron). Mais la réalité économique est plus nuancée que ça.

English
8
86
628
11.6K