Oscar Mairey
4K posts
@oscarmairey
I explore deep-technologies (Blockchain, AI, Longevity...) and their real life applications
4/ My order completed after several minutes but the issue is a Near Intents refund txn of 0.001598 ZEC was also made to my t - address I initially shielded from which establishes a clear link between my addresses. Someone can simply match up timing/amounts from the Near Intents address and identify ZEC refund txns allowing someone to deanonymize your t-address you intially shielded ZEC from since it is static and refunds are not shielded. Refund txn to t1MQ9Z cf1d5ac83394ed21dd43f123b37e94826b46cd524d045e94165f81a774153953 Near Intents Zcash address t1Ku2KLyndDPsR32jwnrTMd3yvi9tfFP8ML
Unpopular opinion post: On Listing "Fees" (saw this a few times recently) 1. If you are a project complaining about listing airdrops or "fees" (to users), Don't pay it. If your project is strong, exchanges will race to list your coin. If you have to beg an exchange to list, then... You need to ask yourself why, and who is providing value to whom. 2. If you complain about a competitor exchange's listing fees, then by all means, make your own listing fees 0, and be happy. In fact, why not set all your fees to 0? including trading fees? In a decentralized world, businesses are free to have their own business models. No one is forcing you to adopt a certain model. Focus on treating your users well. Don't focus on your competitors. 3. If you are a bag holder of a coin, complain to the project. Not the exchange. Or use a DEX. 4. PancakeSwap doesn't have listing fees, and has very good volumes. Further on this topic, exchanges adopt different listing models. 1. List everything on every blockchain. Most tokens are scams. Of the real "hard working" projects, most fail. Only a few projects will succeed. 2. Selectively list and make listing fee a revenue source. It's fine business model if you can attractive enough projects to list. Many small exchanges use this model, as they don't have enough trading fee revenue. 3. Selectively list. Ask for Airdrops to users. Security deposits, to make scams and failed projects more expensive to pull off. Protect users. These models are not black and white, and many exchanges adopt a combination of them between spot listing, futures listing, alpha listing, web3 wallet buys, etc. Work on your project, not other people. 🙏
Not speaking for Binance, but I think you're being immature. 1/ No principles — you signed an NDA but are casually talking about the terms as if it's no big deal. If you don't like the offer, just refuse it. Go get listed on @krakenfx or @coinbase and see how that works out for you... Base-related projects are launched in a disorganized way, and after listing, they drop by 90%. What’s even the point? 2/ Coinbase listings lost their retail appeal a long time ago; some of those tokens don’t even have trading volume. 3/ Don’t overestimate yourself — if it weren’t for @KaitoAI Launchpad’s oversubscribed funding, do you really think your product is that great? Have you even tried using your own product? I think for the exchange’s perspective, having one more project or one less project doesn’t make a difference.
if your AI girlfriend is not a LOCALLY running fine-tuned model, she’s a prostitute.
