Oxide
1.7K posts










i can't remember a time opus 4.5 has lied to me. it screws up all the time, since we work on tricky stuff, but it's never lied to me about it as far as i can remember. one thing that i think anthropic should do with their fancy anonymized convo analysis stuff from the economic impact studies is run user behavior studies on claude code users. they could push a survey with questions like "how frequently does claude lie to you" and then look for patterns of user behavior, installed plugins, type of work, etc. that drive e.g. higher self-reported "being lied to" scores. it'd be fascinating data.


E. Coli's "run-and-tumble" is peak agency and fuck around & find out. If what you are trying to sense is way beyond your static scale, better start moving and doing stuff even randomly, and then change direction more frequently when things are not going well, and no change when it is going well.

@vivposts the affordances of these technologies is large enough to be easily parasitised by the oral mind (in the sense of walter ong)

I feel that the "AI will unlock widespread creativity and agency" mantra is reminiscent of the "information wants to be free"-adjacent technooptimism about the Internet in the early oughts

the etymology of the word "virtual" is so good it shares roots with both "virtue" and "virility", originally it derives from PIE *wiHrós = "man" in identification with manliness and heroism, this morphed into "virtue", which eventually became gender-neutral

technologies that don’t augment the mind are easily 'metabolised' by humanity at large. fire, the wheel, steam engine, spears—people master these easily. but no technologies that augment thought have been metabolised. (1/5)






