Harrison Bergeron

More than 10,000 U.S. Sailors, Marines, and Airmen along with over a dozen warships and dozens of aircraft are executing the mission to blockade ships entering and departing Iranian ports. During the first 24 hours, no ships made it past the U.S. blockade and 6 merchant vessels complied with direction from U.S. forces to turn around to re-enter an Iranian port on the Gulf of Oman. The blockade is being enforced impartially against vessels of all nations entering or departing Iranian ports and coastal areas, including all Iranian ports on the Arabian Gulf and Gulf of Oman. U.S. forces are supporting freedom of navigation for vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz to and from non-Iranian ports.

BlackRock CEO Larry Fink—who played an instrumental role in forcing woke diversity quotas on companies—now concedes that the "woke era" was "a failed experiment".

Making everything ugly is a powerful form of social engineering

Palantir's CEO just told a room of Silicon Valley investors that AI is about to blow up the Democratic Party's professional class base.​ Alex Karp runs Palantir, which builds AI systems for the Pentagon, the CIA, and allied militaries.​ He is describing what his technology is likely to do to the workforce and the political map. Karp says AI will heavily disrupt college educated, highly trained professionals, the core Democratic voter base in cities and suburbs.​ He argues their economic power will shrink as AI eats white‑collar work. He also says vocational, working class jobs in the physical world will gain relative power because AI cannot easily replace them.​ Those workers are often male, non‑degreed, and more likely to vote Republican. Karp calls anyone who thinks this disruption will somehow be politically manageable "in an insane asylum".​ He is saying out loud that you cannot wreck one side's core voters and expect politics to stay stable. Then he turns to Silicon Valley. He argues the industry cannot both destroy professional‑class jobs and refuse to support the US military at the same time.​ In his view, the only justification for taking on huge social risk from AI is national defense.​ If America does not build these systems, adversaries will, and Americans could end up under someone else’s rules. He warns that if AI companies decouple from the military, they invite a backlash from both left and right.​ That backlash, he suggests, points toward bringing AI companies under direct government control. Karp says these technologies are “dangerous societally” and will disrupt “the very fabric of our society, including the most powerful parts of our society”.​ He is telling the industry it owes the public an explanation for why this disruption is worth it. His core message is that AI will weaken Democratic leaning educated workers, strengthen vocational workers, and push politics toward a showdown over who controls the tech.​ And unless AI is clearly tied to defending the country, he thinks the public will eventually move to seize it.