🇬🇧 Sir Benson 🇬🇧

I have decided ... Anyone who holds extreme Leftist views (much as I hate the terms Far Left, Far Right) is going to be blocked. It's only those who spout their vitriol that cause the death and slander those with any integrity. People are dying because of your insane views of the world, for nothing better than "Clickbait" and your "Likes and Subscibers" .. Grow the fuck up for once in your sad, sorry lives. We ALL have to live this life and I refuse to give those who advocate extreme views, the time of day. I support Centralist views, not any "Far" ones. To all the "Far People" .. I say this simply ... Go to hell on a one way ticket !

Any stay will only be temporary, of that you can be sure. Once the Government changes, any stays will be revoked. Based on support for parties outside the uniparty, that day will come .. and soon. If I was one such immigrant, I would think it wise to book my passage out of the UK, before things turn forceful.

As I predicted in January, feeble Starmer is about to make THE WORST U-Turn of all time: allowing the low-skilled BORISWAVE to stay here PERMANENTLY & claim BILLIONS in benefits & housing Under pressure from his Loony Left MPs, the Muslim Vote & the Green Party, Starmer's now signalling he'll DROP the plan to extend Indefinite Leave to Remain eligibility from 5 yrs to 10 yrs This means that, from this year, the Boriswave will be allowed to stay permanently, costing the UK taxpayer billions - in fact, eventually TENS of BILLIONS. BORISWAVE: 4.8 MILLION people arrived in the UK btw 2021-2024. 7% of the UK pop. changed in just 3 years. This was the largest demographic shift in 1000 years The first ripple of the Boriswave already became eligible for permanent settlement & benefits two months ago (January). This is disastrous Starmer knows this and wished to extend Indefinite Leave to Remain eligibility from 5 to 10 years. However, so weak is he - and so beholden to sectarian votes - that he is being held hostage by the "Red-Green", Islamo-Leftist alliance. In addition, Starmer's open border comrades (i.e. immigration lawyers) are promising to block this extension in the courts. Let's be clear: the majority of the Boriswave are low-skilled, low-earning migrants from the third world / developing nations. Allowing them to stay in the UK will be an economic, social and cultural catastrophe. Up to 1.6 MILLION migrants could become eligible to stay in the UK permanently, with some estimates saying it is closer to 2.5 MILLION We know from the OBR etc. that this type of low-skilled migrant will end up costing the tax payer approx. £465,000 EACH if they live to 80 years. In the shorter term, at least 800,000 will immediately become eligible for benefits. The government - and any new government - must commit to blocking the Boriswave from settling in the UK If Starmer takes the knee to his radicals and grants the Boriswave ILR, a new government should ABOLISH Indefinite Leave to Remain as one of its first acts. Benefits should only go to British citizens. And eligibility for citizenship should be extended to 15 years. Link to my full monologue in the tweet below. Clip:👇 1/2

I will give you my input as a Brit. We will try the constitutional approach first, but, if that fails, then all hell will break loose, of that, you can be certain. Surrender is not, nor ever will it be an option. The world needs to understand that the UK has not been conquered in Centuries, through even World Wars, where we stood alone for a good part of that. Remember, this wasn't just in the UK, but in all it's Sovereign territories also. The Law all comes down to who wishes to dictate, is just words, and when Liberties are threatened, will become meaningless. The UK will never be taken over by any 3rd world inbreeds, of that I am sure. There is plenty of sea surrounding us that could accomodate the invaders if necessary.

What is your opinion: Will the British ultimately rise up and forcibly resist the process of Islamization forced upon them by traitors among them, or will they surrender without a fight because it is illegal to resist with force?

Keep up the great work 👏👏👏

Freedom can also be lost little by little, by what the Fabians call the doctrine of gradualness. A little more taxation here, a little more government expenditure there, year after year until the people are no longer the masters of the state but its servants. There are always, it seems, good reasons advanced for the state to have more power. But rarely for the state to divest itself of power. Each new problem becomes an excuse for more government intervention and less individual responsibility.

I messaged my MP on the issue @HowardCCox as per your template message and here's just some of the reply I recieved in response .. "have called on the Government to boost businesses by overhauling business rates, cutting red tape for international trade, fixing the apprenticeship system and investing in infrastructure." Can you understand the relevance to Fuel Duty here ? It beats my decyphering skills. Just what the hell have we got in the House these days ? Either illiterate or just plain out of their boxes on substances ?

Read my opinion piece in the @Daily_Express express.co.uk/news/uk/218433…

@TRobinsonNewEra Just why the fuck the British Lads don't just deal with these weasels, is honestly beyond me at this point.

Yeah we love our daughters being raped in every town & city you bafoon

@TrishHodkinson I disagree. He should be told to answer questions properly and any refusal or sidelining being an imprisonable offence and also an admission of guilt.

I think all opposition parties should not attend the next PMQs, what’s the point? He never answers questions. Make a stand and boycott the next one. Let him talk to himself! Hopeless, useless PM!

@ManOfKent15 Because of the voting demographics. The white working classes can't be arsed to vote, while Muslims see it as compulsory.

Can someone explain to me why both the Greens and Labour are courting the Muslim vote if Muslims make up only 6% of the population? Labour has abandoned the white, working class, who I'm sure account for more than 6% of the population.

@sappholives83 The best (and safest) option for him at this point is to book a 1 way flight back to Pakistan, while he still can.

This is Banaras Hussein. He’s the leader of the Rotherham grooming gang, and he’s just been released. Hussein was convicted of raping 15 girls for ten long years, starting when they were 11. He threatened to kill them and their families. He ripped out the fingernails of girls who tried to escape. Hussein was found guilty on 55 separate counts. That was just 9 years ago. Now he’s a free man - in a country where you can get two years for a tweet. Don’t tell me there’s no such thing as a two-tier justice system. (In the US, this would have gotten him life without parole, and there’s a solid chance someone would have provided the extrajudicial application of the sentence he should have received. American prisons are bad places for men who rape little kids.)

I don't really give a monkeys about what your book says, nor do I give a monkeys about your religion. What I care about, is Muslims pitching themselves against the British in Britain. Your "religion" doesn't give you ANY rights, legally or religiously to do as you please to others. Would I pander to a murderer ? .. would I pander to a rapist ? .. no ! So why should I make allowances because of a religion. It is not going to happen, especially when they use that as a justifiable reason for what they are doing and expect leniency, while others who know what they are doing, fail to speak up also, in the name of their faith. Every last one of them are going to hell, and I can help them along their path if necessary, then so be it. No back down and certainly no surrender !

Dear @NJ_Timothy You described mass ritual prayer in public places as "an act of domination." You said the adhān - the Muslim call to prayer - is "a declaration of domination." I think you are profoundly wrong, in ways that matter - not just for Muslims, but for every Briton who wants to live in a country where diverse expressions of reverence are still possible in public life. Let me tell you what you are actually looking at when you see Muslims pray. What the Qur'an actually teaches The Qur'an contains a verse (22:40) that is extraordinary in the history of religious scripture. It grants permission to those who have been wronged to fight back against persecution - and then it explains why such resistance matters. The reason given is this: "Had God not repelled some people by means of others, monasteries, churches, synagogues and mosques - in which God's name is much remembered - would have been destroyed." The Qur'an does not say: defend mosques. It says: defend monasteries, churches, synagogues and mosques. It places Christian, Jewish and Muslim houses of worship in a single breath, united by a single criterion - that they are places where God's name is remembered. The theological implication is breathtaking. The divine concern, in this verse, is the protection of all worship, not the supremacy of one form of it. The Qur'an goes further. In 2:62, it says: "Those who believe, and those who are Jewish, and the Christians, and the Sabians - whoever believes in God and the Last Day and does good - they shall have their reward with their Lord. They have nothing to fear, nor shall they grieve." In 5:69, the same promise is repeated almost word for word. The Qur'an also emphasises that salvation is not solely dependent on belief in any particular scripture, whether Islamic scripture, or the scriptures of 'People of the Book' (Jews and Christians). Rather, the criteria is sincere devotion to God: “If they argue with you [Prophet], say, ‘I have devoted myself to God alone and so have my followers.’ Ask those who were given the Scripture, as well as those without one, ‘Do you too devote yourselves to Him alone?’ If they do, they will be guided, but if they turn away, your only duty is to convey the message. God is aware of His servants.” (3:20) These verses say plainly that salvation is not the exclusive property of Muslims. In 3:113-115, the Qur'an describes the People of the Book - Jews and Christians - with striking tenderness: "Among the People of the Book is an upright community. They recite God's revelations throughout the night and they prostrate. They believe in God and the Last Day, and they enjoin what is right and forbid what is wrong, and they hasten to do good deeds. These are among the righteous. Whatever good they do, they will not be denied it." And in 5:82, the Qur'an says something remarkable about Christians specifically: "You will find the nearest of them in affection to the believers are those who say, 'We are Christians.' That is because among them are priests and monks, and because they are not arrogant." The Arabic word here - lā yastakbirūn -means they do not place themselves above others. What the adhān actually says You singled out the adhān as a declaration of domination because it contains the words "there is no god but God" and "Muhammad is the messenger of God." Let me offer you a different way to hear those words. "There is no god but God" - lā ilāha illallāh - is the foundation of tawhīd, the radical oneness at the heart of Islam. It is a statement that no finite thing is ultimate. Money. Power. Ego. Tribe. Race. Nation. Not even the self. Every idol - every false absolute that human beings construct and then bow before - is swept away in that single phrase. The point of the shahāda is liberation. It frees the human being from servitude to anything less than the Real, al-Haqq, another name of the Divine. The Arabic word Allāh, Nick, is simply the Arabic word for God - al-ilāh, the God. Arabic-speaking Christians use it in their liturgies. Arabic-speaking Jews use it in their prayers. The Maltese word for God - Alla - comes from the same root, and Malta is one of the most Catholic countries in Europe. When the adhān says Allāh, it is naming the same ultimate Reality that every monotheist reaches toward. As the Qur'an itself says (29:46): "Our God and your God is One." And "Muhammad is the messenger of God" simply places Muhammad in a chain of prophecy that the Qur'an honours at enormous length. "We surely sent a messenger to every community" (16:36). Abraham, Moses, Jesus, David, Solomon, Jonah, John the Baptist - the Qur'an names them all as messengers of the same God, carrying the same essential call. To say Muhammad is a messenger is to say he belongs to that company. It is an act of humility about the Prophet himself - he is a messenger, not the message. The adhān, in its entirety, is an invitation. Literally. It calls Muslims to turn away from whatever they are doing - buying, selling, eating, talking, working - and to stand before God in gratitude and surrender. It is a public announcement that the time for reconnection with the Real has arrived. It is addressed to Muslims. It is telling them: stop. Remember. You are not the centre of the universe. God is. What the Prophet actually built After the Prophet Muhammad migrated to Medina, he did something that has few parallels in the ancient world. He drew up what historians call the Constitution of Medina - a covenant between the Muslim community and the Jewish and pagan clans of the city, establishing a shared civic order across religious lines. Under this covenant, all communities retained the freedom to practise their faith and govern their own affairs. The principle was universal, even though the Jewish tribes were the primary non-Muslim signatories. And the language of the covenant is extraordinary: the Jews of Banū ʿAwf are "one community with the believers" - ummah wāḥidah ma'a al-mu'minīn - with "the Jews having their religion and the Muslims having theirs." One community with the believers. Not subjects, or a tolerated minority. One community bound together in a shared civic body, each retaining its own faith, its own law, its own courts. The Constitution of Medina established a framework of secular religious pluralism in which diverse communities coexisted under mutual obligation and shared civic belonging. That was the Prophet's model of governance, built in the first generation of Islam. The same principle extended beyond Medina. When a delegation from the Christians of Najrān came to the Prophet, he granted them a covenant protecting their churches, their clergy, and their right to practise their faith - and tradition records that he invited them to pray in his own mosque (huffpost.com/entry/pluralis…) And the Prophet reinforced this ethic with a warning that rings across the centuries. He said: "Whoever killed a mu'āhid" - a non-Muslim living under covenant protection - "shall not smell the fragrance of Paradise." The protection of religious minorities was so central to the Prophetic model that violating it could, in the Prophet's own words, cost a Muslim the hereafter. The Qur'an's own instruction on this point is unambiguous. "There is no compulsion in religion" (2:256). And in 3:64, it tells Muslims what to say when they encounter Jews and Christians: "Say: O People of the Book, come to a common word between us and you - that we worship none but God, that we associate nothing with Him, and that none of us takes others as lords beside God." Come to a common word is the Qur'anic posture toward other faiths - not domination, Nick, but invitation to shared ground. And in one of the most beautiful expressions of deliberate divine pluralism, the Qur'an says (5:48): "To each of you We have given a law and a way. Had God willed, He would have made you one community, but He tests you through what He has given you. So compete with one another in doing good." God could have made humanity uniform. He chose otherwise. And the response the Qur'an demands is that all communities, whatever their religion, race one another toward goodness. I wish you could hear that, Nick, before calling it domination. What prayer actually looks like The physical form of Muslim prayer - standing, bowing, kneeling, prostrating - is also not alien to the Biblical tradition. Genesis 17:3: "Abram fell on his face, and God talked with him." Joshua 5:14: "Joshua fell on his face to the earth and worshipped." Matthew 26:39: "He went a little farther and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, 'O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me.'" That is Jesus, in his most anguished hour, praying in the posture of sujūd - forehead to the ground. Psalm 95:6 calls the faithful to worship in exactly the language of Islamic prayer: "O come, let us worship and bow down; let us kneel before the Lord our maker." Jewish liturgical practice preserves this embodied grammar to this day. The Amidah - the central prayer of Jewish worship - is a standing prayer. Bowing remains integral to it. And on the High Holy Days, Yom Kippur above all, kneeling, bowing and forms of full prostration remain living elements of Jewish worship. When Muslims stand, bow, kneel and place their foreheads on the ground, they are doing what Abraham did. What Moses did. What Jesus did. What the Psalmist called all people to do. The form of prayer you find threatening is one of the oldest continuous practices of worship in the Abrahamic world. These prayer forms share striking similarities with yoga asanas and forms of Hindu worship practised over thousands of years. What sujūd actually means In sujūd - prostration - the forehead touches the earth. The highest point of the human body, the seat of reason and pride and self-regard, is brought to the lowest place. Dust meets dust. The ego, for a moment, is dissolved. This is surrender - islām, in its most literal meaning. Surrender of the will, the pride, the illusion that any human being is sovereign. The surrender of the egoic self - its greed, its cruelty, its hunger for dominance - to something immeasurably higher. In the Islamic tradition, what the worshipper surrenders to is spelled out in the Divine Names themselves: al-Wadūd, the Loving; al-Raḥmān, the All-Compassionate; al-ʿAdl, the Just; al-Karīm, the Generous. The ego bows so that love, compassion, justice and generosity can rise in its place. In sujūd, the Muslim enacts what every mystic tradition in every civilisation has always known: that the deepest freedom comes when the lower self yields to what is highest and most beautiful. That is what was happening when you saw Muslims praying in public, Nick. Hundreds of human beings, in the middle of a city that celebrates its diversity, placing their foreheads on the ground in an act of yielding the self to Love, to Mercy, to Justice. The body enacting humility. The forehead returning to dust. I wonder what it would take for you to see that. What public worship in Britain actually looks like It is worth noting, Nick, that public religious observance in Britain is not uniquely Muslim - nor is it new. Trafalgar Square has hosted major Christian prayer and worship gatherings, including the 2019 Pentecost event where thousands of Christians gathered in open prayer and praise. It hosts Vaisakhi on the Square each year, celebrating Sikh faith, culture and the founding of the Khalsa. A giant Chanukah menorah is lit there annually, recorded in London's official reports as a public celebration of Jewish life. The square already belongs to many communities. Christians have prayed there. Sikhs have worshipped there. Jews have celebrated there. Muslims are doing what everyone else has already done - bringing reverence into public life, openly, in a city that has long made room for it. The question is whether that room will continue to exist. Or whether, one public statement at a time, we will construct a Britain where some citizens are not welcome. Nick, perhaps you saw something unfamiliar and interpreted it through a framework of anxiety that is widespread in British public life - a framework in which Muslim visibility is automatically read as Muslim threat. But the tradition you described so confidently is one you do not appear to know very well. And that gap between confidence and knowledge is dangerous in a lawmaker, because it shapes policy, it shapes rhetoric, and it shapes the lives of real people, your constituents among them. If you genuinely want to understand the theological vision behind what you saw - tawhīd, love, pluralism, the Prophetic ethic of protecting difference rather than erasing it - I would warmly invite you to explore these ideas at Perennial Vision (perennialvision.org). The work there examines Islam's deepest teachings on the unity of the Divine, the dignity of every human being, and the sacred obligation to protect the worship and freedom of all communities, not only one's own. Britain is enriched when people bring reverence, gratitude into public life respectfully. It is diminished when every unfamiliar act of devotion is redescribed as conquest by those who have yet to understand what prayer is. With love, and in good faith, Nafeez

@MuscularEnglish The modern day Pontius Pilate. A closet Muslim, just like Starmer who would like to see the removal of Christianity from these lands. To hell with them I say.

Why must the King go? Constant pandering to Islam. He is not our King. He is not of us. He is not for us. He should remember his first namesake.

They stabbed her 36 times and slit her throat 17 times. She held her head on with one hand, pushed her organs back in with the other and crawled to the road, she survived and her name is Alison Botha❤️

Of course .. A Muslim must absolutely celebrate Eid with a feast of a king. The fact that they are one, and of the same religion, shouldn't cloud the fact that they are only a shill of the Christian Religion. The modern day Pontius Pilate and a traitor to the Christian Demographic of the UK.

Final touches taking place for this evening’s State Banquet! 🍴🌷 The table has been decorated with handpicked seasonal flowers and foliage from the gardens at Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle and The Savill Garden in Windsor Great Park. 🌼 After the Banquet, the flowers that cannot be reused are donated to Floral Angels, of which The Queen is Patron. The charity delivers flowers to hospices, elderly care homes, shelters, and many other deserving beneficiaries within the local community.

@magstricks @TRobinsonNewEra Absolutely. It's a thousand pities he isn't in charge here. This excuse of a PM is inept and useless. If things get worse, expect bloodshed to happen. The Brits won't accept this breakdown of our Society much longer, that's for sure.

@ploppage @TRobinsonNewEra I hope our president is working for the Brits 🙏

I’m preparing for the most important presentation I’ve done to date & in the process I’ve kidnapped an American . Thanks for all the love america ❤️🇺🇸

@Suffragent_ 2 tier ? .. sick of hearing that. It's not 2 tier at all, it is just plain bias and corruption.

This is Judge Amjad Nawaz. He allowed a 70-year-old muslim to walk free after sexually assaulting a 12-year-old girl. In 2016, he did the same with a similar case involving a muslim. Yet, in the same year, he gave a white man 8yrs for rape. #twotierjustice 🇬🇧

@MarkHeath45 Shithole

Describe Birmingham Uk in just one word??

@NotFarLeftAtAll Retards and clear mental illness.

Ladies and gentlemen I give you … The future of Britain We began with brilliant minds like inventors, medical pioneers and engineers shaping the world and now we’re here. Britain is not Great anymore…

@liamtuffs1 At this point, even the Monster Raving Loony Party would be a better bet. Or is Labour the rebrand I wonder ?

I’m lost for words & looking for help.. thoughts?👇🏼

@TRobinsonNewEra I disagree Tommy. Let him burn them all to the ground. Who knows ? he may just decrease the immigrant population in the process.

An Iraqi invader risked lives by setting fire to two taxpayer-funded hotels where he was being housed, including the Bell Hotel in Epping, a court has heard. Rawand Abdulrahman, 37, admitted to having started two fires, firstly at the Phoenix Hotel, five miles from Epping in North Weald, and then one at The Bell eight days later. They're all taking liberties. Get them out!

@CharlotteCGill I've boycotted it for years, never done me any harm and I don't feel inadequate for not financing the grifters.

Comic Relief awarded: £340,000 to Bail for Immigration Detainees £200,000 to Detention Action and £2,254,267 to Refugee Action, which provides "activist packs" on its website. Is it time the British public boycotted Red Nose Day? charlottecgill.co.uk/p/comic-relief…