blitzy

114 posts

blitzy banner
blitzy

blitzy

@polyblitz7

aquila non capit musca

Katılım Aralık 2025
119 Takip Edilen14 Takipçiler
Tam Nguyen
Tam Nguyen@TheAI_Frontier·
Quantum AGI still sounds insane to most people. so did coding agents not that long ago.
English
16
0
15
1.8K
blitzy
blitzy@polyblitz7·
@cremieuxrecueil its not about reason, its about the quality of their souls. the ones dunking on it exposed themselves.
English
0
0
0
520
Crémieux
Crémieux@cremieuxrecueil·
There's no slam-dunk reason to be against the Midjourney scanner. Just wait for it to be used and to show if it works. Let them prove themselves.
English
61
24
1.1K
58.3K
blitzy
blitzy@polyblitz7·
yes, quite right but i am more worried about an underlying permament corruption of the human soul that has given us individuals who would gladly wish for good things not to happen as long as they can retain their power or privileges. the world is deeply divided now also in terms of two or more movies on one screen.
English
0
0
0
4
Marcus Pittman
Marcus Pittman@ImKingGinger·
The Midjourney Scanner and Snap Glasses have revealed people in the tech world who have no vision. My timeline this week has been filled with people complaining about the Midjourney Scanner and the Snap AR Glasses, not because of what they are capable of but because these projects are in their infancy. Sure the Snap Glasses are huge, and fold the ear-lobe. But you know what else folded earlobes? The very first cellular phones. They were massive. The amount of computational power in an average cell phone nowadays is beyond anything that could have been imagined back in the eighties. These AR glasses are just in the first generation of design with todays technology. Eventually you won't be able to tell the difference between AR glasses and standard prescription glasses. The same is true for medical innovation. MRI Scanners would have seemed absurd back in 1960s. But now they are vital. And they are insanely expensive, and incredibly slow. The Midjourney Scanner wants to innovate early treatment by creating a fast and easy process for people to get health scans. It might sound like science fiction, but I am certain at one time organ transplants sounded like science fiction as well. All of that to say that you need to pay attention to the people on your timeline who lack vision and complain at the first sight of first generation technologies. History has long shown these people will be forgotten about. The same horse farmers who complained about automobiles are out of business. The scribes who complained about The Printing Press are out of business. As the world moves on, technology always innovates forwards. It never remains stagnant. It becomes better over time. Technology gets smarter, faster and smaller. Keep a record of the naysayers. Notice what technologies they are heavily invested in and you will see their complaints are not rooted in reason and technical knowledge of what is and is not science fiction. Nearly 100% of the time it is because their business is dependent on keeping things the same because they lack the foresight and courage to change things.
Marcus Pittman tweet mediaMarcus Pittman tweet media
English
5
3
13
727
blitzy
blitzy@polyblitz7·
@richa_lq you can't hate gatekeepers enough, lol
English
0
0
0
92
Richa Sharma
Richa Sharma@richa_lq·
Every cultural singularity begins by collapsing under the weight of a gatekeeper's conventional thinking. I recently came across a video clip of Demis Hassabis' lectures. For a long time, he couldn't even raise a few $100k to start DeepMind. Just a few 100 thousand dollars. J.K. Rowling was rejected by almost every publisher she submitted her manuscript to. Einstein was rejected from nearly every academic position before he published his work on relativity. When I observe people who have fundamentally changed the world's trajectory, I notice a pattern: the convictions that were perfectly clear to them seemed completely ridiculous to anyone unable to step outside the norm. Most people require consensus to move forward. Genuine outliers often have to face a period of quiet struggle before their ideas explode, pushing the world in a direction no one (but them) could have predicted .
English
7
4
91
5.4K
blitzy
blitzy@polyblitz7·
@justalexoki the greatest challenge will remain mental health.
English
0
0
0
207
blitzy
blitzy@polyblitz7·
legit question, we need to turn that energy in2 infrastructure. If wallets are weak, map them. If liquidity fragile, define a public liquidity policy. If snipers are the issue, stop rewarding extraction. If culture is the goal, build transparent html viewsource. Only turning this project into the very best, worth it of lore and attention it wins. html
English
0
0
0
17
HTML
HTML@HopeThisMoons·
Serious question: Everyone talks about market cap. Few talk about liquidity. How do we build the kind of liquidity that survives volatility, attracts conviction, and gives a project real staying power?
English
5
4
13
463
blitzy
blitzy@polyblitz7·
not at all...models are currently so good. I haven't found anything they are not able to do. People have to realize that hard stuff won't just magically appear. models or not. If you approach the problems correctly with current models anything can get done. Don't think people can actually see the improvements any more.
English
1
0
0
1.3K
Sotiris Kaniras
Sotiris Kaniras@CastAsHuman·
Would you be disappointed by OpenAI if GPT 5.6 is an incremental update of 5.5, but is largely more cost-efficient?
English
135
1
406
81.7K
blitzy
blitzy@polyblitz7·
@iandcosmos apple watch, lol. This take reveals an inner scan of you and its not so great but hey, lets wait and see.
English
0
0
0
105
M. U. Dalmis
M. U. Dalmis@iandcosmos·
I think there is overhype about this. For the short to mid term, the realistic take is that it is a non-medical device, similar to the Apple Watch or other health trackers that provide some health information with limited medical use (rarely found useful by doctors). There are huge technical and medical difficulties in incorporating it into real medical practice. In the long term, things might change. Widespread use by asymptomatic people (like a screening program) could accumulate valuable data, which might lead to interesting new and unforeseen medical uses.
Midjourney@midjourney

Announcing a new division of Midjourney called "Midjourney Medical"

English
22
0
53
11.1K
blitzy
blitzy@polyblitz7·
good analysis
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta

Let me explain why an AI art company just built a full-body medical scanner, because almost everyone is reading this as a random pivot. Ultrasonic CT works by firing sound through your body and recording the ripples that scatter back. Half a million emitters the size of a grain of sand, surrounding you in water, each one listening. What comes back is noise. Reconstructing a clean 3D image of muscle and tissue from that scattered acoustic mess is an inverse problem, and it is brutally hard. The hardware is the easy part. Butterfly Network already makes the chips. The reconstruction is where every previous attempt stalled. That reconstruction is the exact problem Midjourney spent years getting good at. Turning ambiguous input into a coherent image is what they do. They aimed it at sound waves instead of text prompts. This is why the scan takes 60 seconds while a full-body MRI takes 60 to 90 minutes. Close to 100x faster, no radiation, no magnets, resolution down to a fraction of a millimeter. Then read the part most people skipped. The scans happen at a spa. Hot tubs, cold plunges, and a machine that quietly images your whole body while you relax. The scan is a side effect. You barely notice it. Run it forward. The plan is 50,000 machines doing a billion scans every month. Midjourney has no investors and no quarterly hardware margin to chase. The payoff was never the scan fee. A billion monthly full-body scans is the largest longitudinal map of human anatomy ever assembled. Every model trained on it gets sharper, and every sharper model makes the next scan worth more. This was always an image company. They just found a kind of image nobody else could generate.

English
0
0
0
11
blitzy
blitzy@polyblitz7·
yes this is better kind of scepticism. A fair point although i still sense some kind of weird vibe, lol. Its much better than what we are seeing from other types. I believe this is the beginning of something incredible and we should all be cheering and celebrating. Nothing wrong with this kind of hype, so maybe you can ask yourself why it bothers you
English
0
0
1
120
blitzy
blitzy@polyblitz7·
@bitcloud i wouldn't be surprised if they threw some cultures into it.
English
0
0
0
3
blitzy
blitzy@polyblitz7·
@operationdanish well done. why would one choose to be pessimistic on something like this? thanks for being on the good side.
English
0
0
1
97
blitzy
blitzy@polyblitz7·
@bitcloud that glorious warm and painful feeling of a folded ear. I think they'll win though, specs look great, all they have to so is to redesign it a bit, The sides are what mostly kill them. Front looks cool imo.
English
0
0
0
6
blitzy
blitzy@polyblitz7·
@tunguz they really forked with the wrong admin
English
0
0
1
37