Dave Pomerantz

1.5K posts

Dave Pomerantz

Dave Pomerantz

@pom56

Katılım Temmuz 2009
72 Takip Edilen39 Takipçiler
Dave Pomerantz
Dave Pomerantz@pom56·
If you're running to Canada or Australia or France or England or Spain to escape Trump, just remember that Jews are better off here. Still need to be careful at Columbia and UCLA and MIT and many others. Oh, synagogues have armed guards here, too. Still, worse in Canada.
Michael Geist@mgeist

“At a bar mitzvah I attended in Toronto recently, the rabbi began the service by explaining the emergency plan in case of an attack. At a synagogue. To beaming relatives and 13-year-old kids.” theglobeandmail.com/opinion/articl…

English
0
0
1
34
Dave Pomerantz retweetledi
Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib
Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib@afalkhatib·
The pro-Hamas militias in New York City (they’re wearing Hamas headbands) have entered a new phase of their derangement in the name of being “pro-Palestine” while protesting. Apparently, it is now acceptable to call random Jewish people “pedophiles” and label them as the “Epstein class” just because they happen to be eating at a Jewish restaurant. Imagine doing this to Palestinian, Arab, or Muslim-owned restaurants. Despite the existence of vast types of pedophilia in the Arab and Muslim worlds, where child marriages are legally protected in many parliaments, and despite the vast Muslim-majority child grooming and rape networks that have been exposed in the United Kingdom, we didn’t see “pro-Israel” protesters engaging in this kind of behavior. We didn’t see the attack, harassment, and sieging of Arabs, Muslims, and Palestinians in Europe or the United States while they were dining at restaurants. This behavior is primarily flowing in one direction – and that is shameful, disgusting, and should be embarrassing. Freedom of expression should not be a free license to engage in antisemitism, hate, violence, and thuggery, especially by the same people who are the first to cry about racism and “Islamophobia.” Shame on this disgusting movement of hate, for it is neither pro-Palestine nor does it embody the values of Arab hospitality or Islamic compassion and kindness. Ban the pro-Hamas, pro-terror movement in the Western world now!
English
159
862
2.9K
113.2K
Dave Pomerantz
Dave Pomerantz@pom56·
Holy shit. He's not entirely wrong.
LHGrey™️@grey4626

No British government ever imagined an American president might finally tell the truth about the “special relationship.” Until now. Spare me the pearl-clutching obituary from The Economist, that decaying salon of transatlantic nostalgia where the ghost of Churchill is still being pimped out like a rent-boy for Davos subscriptions. Your precious bunting of flags in the bin isn’t some tragic metaphor for Trump’s “betrayal.” It’s the autopsy photo of a one-way parasitic bargain that America has carried on its back like a drunk uncle for eighty goddamn years. And the drunk finally woke up, looked around, and said: Fuck this. This isn’t “turning his back.” This is a sovereign nation refusing to keep subsidizing a continent of strategic eunuchs who have spent decades castrating their own militaries, hollowing out their industrial bases, and importing the very pathologies that make them security liabilities rather than allies. You want the special relationship? Earn it. Reciprocate it. Stop treating the United States like an ATM with nuclear weapons. Geopolitically and militarily, the numbers don’t lie and they never have. The United States still shoulders roughly sixty percent of total NATO defense spending...$845 billion out of a collective $1.4 trillion last year. Most of your European “partners” couldn’t hit the 2% GDP target even after Russia parked tanks on Ukraine’s border and started lobbing missiles at civilian infrastructure. Britain under Starmer talks a big game about “global Britain” while quietly slashing capability, courting CCP-linked cash, and letting its own streets burn under the weight of demographic transformation and speech codes that make the old East German Stasi look libertarian. You lecture us about values while your own government criminalizes tweets and turns Rotherham into a cautionary tale the media still refuses to fully autopsy. Historically, the ledger is even more damning. We bled for you in 1917 and 1941 when your empires were on the ropes. We bankrolled your reconstruction, anchored your defense for the entire Cold War, and let you punch above your weight on the world stage because sentimental Anglosphere nostalgia still meant something. In return? Suez 1956, where you expected us to back imperial nostalgia while we were trying to contain Soviet expansion. Vietnam, where you sat it out. Iraq, where you half-assed it and then spent the next twenty years sneering at us in your broadsheets. And every single time an American president dared put America First, your commentariat wailed like Victorian widows about the death of the alliance...as if the alliance was ever meant to be a suicide pact. You’ve internalized a victimhood narrative so profound it borders on the clinical...projecting your own national decline, your own loss of agency, your own self-inflicted castration onto the one country that still possesses the will to act like a great power. Trump doesn’t “deprioritize” the relationship; he simply refuses to indulge the delusion any longer. He sees what you refuse to admit: the United Kingdom of 2026 is no longer the reliable offshore balancer of 1945. It’s a mid-tier European power wrestling with internal entropy, elite disconnect, and a demographic trajectory that makes long-term strategic partnership… let’s just say, complicated. We are sick of it. Sick of the free ride. Sick of the lectures from people whose capitals are turning into no-go zones while their defense ministers beg Washington for more F-35s and more carrier groups to patrol waters they can no longer secure themselves. Sick of the pomp, the pageantry, the royal visits, and the hand-wringing editorials that treat American self-interest as some kind of moral failing. The special relationship isn’t dead. It’s being stress-tested by reality. And reality, Mr. Economist, is a vicious bitch with a ledger in one hand and a mirror in the other. Look into it. 💀⚖️🗡️

English
0
0
0
5
Dave Pomerantz retweetledi
Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib
Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib@afalkhatib·
A photo has gone viral of an Israeli soldier destroying a statue of Jesus in Lebanon, drawing the ire and fury of many Christians and highlighting similar patterns that some Palestinian Christians in the West Bank have faced at the hands of settlers and soldiers. The IDF acknowledged the photo and promised an investigation. However, this type of behavior has been a regular occurrence during the war in Gaza and elsewhere. Since October 7, multiple videos have been shared online showing the desecration of mosques, including a mosque that belonged to the facility of the Rafah border crossing, which in 2024 was turned into a kitchen full of offensive graffiti like "Mohammed Sharmoota." The lack of discipline, professional conduct, and antagonizing of Christians in Lebanon and elsewhere is an entirely unnecessary and deeply harmful behavior that will further erode support for Israel and fuel those who believe this is a religious war of conquest. At some point, if you consider yourself pro-Israel, there have to be red lines and boundaries for what is tolerable and acceptable, especially if problematic behavior like this is part of a consistent trend and a pattern.
Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib tweet media
English
44
69
341
20.4K
Dave Pomerantz retweetledi
Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib
Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib@afalkhatib·
We can still do civil! Last week, I had an incredible opportunity to speak to students, faculty, administrators, and community members at the University of Nevada Las Vegas (UNLV), along with my ally and RFP deputy director, Melanie Robbins, about the Israel and Palestine conflict and how to navigate this challenging subject on college campuses with civility, respect, humility, the ability to hold multiple truths, and the need to navigate intricate and complex details which cannot be understood through simplistic proclamations or mob mentalities. This is part of an initiative the University’s administration is launching to create spaces that foster actual dialogue and discussion, not shouting matches, aggressive protests, or shutting down speakers just because they share divergent views. Attendees spanned the entire spectrum of views on this contentious issue, with some leaning toward the pro-Israel position, others toward the pro-Palestine camp, and others who were generally curious and not particularly opinionated. As was expected, some of the “pro-Palestine” students in attendance asked confrontational and quite aggressive questions, while others were closer to what one would describe as “passive-aggressive” in their tone. Regardless, I wanted to model what I preached, and as long as individuals were not disruptive, did not engage in personal attacks, and were considerate, the goal was to participate in an exchange that showed how possible it was to disagree respectfully in the context of a dialogue and or a discussion in academic settings. 1- One individual asked about who funds me and voiced deep issues with the Atlantic Council because it receives money from oil and weapons companies that “support the genocide” in Gaza. I responded that the Council is a $70 million a year organization made up of 16 centers which receive different funding streams based on their focus, and that those companies do not fund me, plus there is a robust and well-acknowledged policy of intellectual independence that has allowed me to say whatever I want without censorship or limits – I am supported by the general operating fund of the Middle East Programs, something that I have clarified time and again. Still, I added that questions about funding are problematic because this wouldn’t matter if I shared views that “pro-Palestine” activists agreed with (look at Mehdi Hasan or others supported by Qatar), they presume that Gazans can’t think for themselves unless they’re “paid,” and they often suggest that Jews must be behind funding divergent Palestinian voices. 2- Another individual asked why I am not anti-Israel enough and don’t focus on Israel as much as I do on Hamas, Palestinian mistakes, and failures. My reply was that there is no shortage of anti-Israel voices that are massive and have a mainstream platform and billions of people cumulatively listening to them; instead, my focus is on filling a gap pertaining to the lack of self-critique and reassessing Palestinian mistakes and the lack of accountability and agency from an actual pro-Palestine point of view. I also shared that measuring the degree to which someone is pro-Palestine by how anti-Israel they are is a narrow-minded, short-sighted, and terribly destructive approach and ethos. Thank you to the UNLV administration and to those who participated in this event. Remember: emotional intelligence, logical argumentation, evidence, and level-headedness are the only way to plot an effective, radically pragmatic course forward to the benefit of both Palestinians and Israelis.
Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib tweet mediaAhmed Fouad Alkhatib tweet media
English
12
54
285
9.5K
Dave Pomerantz retweetledi
Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib
Ahmed Fouad Alkhatib@afalkhatib·
This is the same Hasan Piker who incited violence against me & is now campaigning along several Democratic candidates for political office. The Democratic party is finished if it allows for pro-Jihadi, pro-terror, pro-Hamas, champaign communists to be part of its senior ranks! 🤦‍♂️
Shannon Watts@shannonrwatts

Jon Favreau: "When you say Hamas is a thousand times better, do you mean that?" Hasan Piker: "I do mean it … I would vote for Hamas over Israel every single time.”

English
72
398
2K
59.1K
Dave Pomerantz retweetledi
Miad Maleki
Miad Maleki@miadmaleki·
10/10 BOTTOM LINE: A naval blockade imposes ~$435M/day in combined economic damage. Storage fills in 13 days, forcing well shut-ins that cause permanent reservoir damage. The rial enters terminal collapse. Iran's alternatives outside the Strait can replace less than 10% of Gulf throughput. The blockade makes continued resistance economically impossible.
English
99
510
2.9K
351.2K
Dave Pomerantz retweetledi
Ari Fleischer
Ari Fleischer@AriFleischer·
Sorry Jonah. I actually sat in the room for the first half of the movie. For 24 polite years, Presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama diplomatically asked NATO members to increase defense spending. For 24 years, it was one excuse after another, all focused in Western Europe on how they wish they could spend more, but their social welfare spending priorities wouldn’t let them. In other words, you the US will spend on defense and protect us. Along comes rude Donald Trump. Finally, someone made clear that if Europe kept freeloading the US was done. It took a bill in the China shop to move Europe. Diplomacy failed. Trump prevailed. That’s reality whether you or I like it. NATO self-withered after 75 years. If Spain, England, Italy and France won’t spend what’s necessary to have a real military, it’s time for something new.
English
788
4K
22.1K
1.3M
Dave Pomerantz retweetledi
Beer Explains
Beer Explains@BeerExplains·
Blue Alchemist is a masterclass in molten electrolysis. Lunar regolith is roughly 45 percent oxygen by weight, but it is chemically bound to metals like iron, silicon, and aluminum. By heating the dirt to over 1600 degrees Celsius, Blue Origin can pass an electric current through the melt to separate the oxygen. A massive byproduct of this specific ISRU process is high-purity silicon. This means we are not just making air; we are effectively mining the raw materials needed to manufacture solar cells directly on the lunar surface. It is a self-sustaining energy loop.
English
0
4
51
2.5K
Dave Pomerantz retweetledi
Department of State
Department of State@StateDept·
SECRETARY RUBIO: Why are we in NATO? You have to ask that question. Why do we send trillions of dollars and have all of these American forces stationed in the region, if in our time of need, we won't be allowed to use those bases?
English
4.8K
6.7K
28.6K
1.6M
Helion
Helion@Helion_Energy·
Hint:
Helion tweet media
English
6
0
25
2.6K
Helion
Helion@Helion_Energy·
In Polaris, we used G10 (pictured) as an insulator, a high-pressure fiberglass laminate that is widely used in many industries like aerospace, industrial equipment, and boatbuilding. But as we push toward commercial fusion systems at scale, our materials will need to withstand far more extreme environments. We have our next material in mind – any guesses?
Helion tweet media
English
14
10
86
6K
Dave Pomerantz retweetledi
Eyal Yakoby
Eyal Yakoby@EYakoby·
Well that ends the debate on deaths in Gaza. Hamas itself is admitting that 80% of casualties were combatants. There was never a genocide. You have been lied to and manipulated.
Eyal Yakoby tweet media
English
1.4K
8.5K
31.1K
765K
Dave Pomerantz retweetledi
Eric Berger
Eric Berger@SciGuySpace·
It’s interesting to read critiques of the Moon base proposal, which seems like the smart path forward and could fit within NASA’s budget. The gist I’m hearing from critics is that this Isaacman priority is happy talk, will all fade away, and not happen. Then you realize these were the same people who: - Said Isaacman wouldn’t be renominated - Said he would was a political amateur - Said he couldn’t build a coalition to cancel EUS and put SLS on a path toward sunset -Said he was an Elon puppet (who has subsequently prioritized getting Blue Origin moving on HLS due to Starship delays) - Said he would never get Congress, which called it a “national priority,” to go along with canceling Gateway - Said he would never actually cancel Gateway These people are now saying Isaacman can’t get NASA and its contractors to execute on a plan that has administration and Congressional support. The reality is, from a policy and political standpoint, NASA is in a better place now than it has been for years. If the Moon Base fails that’s on NASA and private industry, not stupid policy. And believe me, I’ve seen a lot of terrible, pie-in-the-sky space policy over the decades. #JourneyToMars It’s a new era. I’m not sure everyone realizes this, but Isaacman and his team have eyes wide open to a lot of the major challenges facing NASA and they’re trying to fix them. They’re working long days. Weekends. It’s inspiring to see our government work like this, especially in an era when so much seems broken. I don’t know what will happen. Maybe this Moon base all will fade away. But I do know that NASA’s chance for success in the next couple of decades is a lot higher today than it has been for a long, long time. What we were doing was decidedly not working. This has a chance.
English
140
278
2.7K
80.8K
Dave Pomerantz retweetledi
מיכל קוטלר-וונש | Michal Cotler-Wunsh
Not despite…because of nightly missile barrages, endless trips to bomb shelters & safe rooms…& the devastating results of a fraction of the hundreds of ballistic missiles & rockets targeting us by the Islamic regime & its genocidal terror proxies that get through life-saving defense systems. As opposed to many in the west, the Israeli public has not lost our survival instinct…
English
2
6
64
16.9K