Sabitlenmiş Tweet
My pinned tweet until we get our coins back!
English
Mark - 'It ain't over till it's over'
7.5K posts
Mark - 'It ain't over till it's over'
@presel_
Trusting Celsius for yield was picking up pennies in front of a steamroller (hindsight).
Katılım Haziran 2022
200 Takip Edilen496 Takipçiler
Happy Mother’s Day 🌺 to all the fantastic moms out there
Not you Krissy.
English
Just think of all the “at’s” they missed during the Celsius Bankruptcy
U.S. Department of Justice@TheJusticeDept
The @DOJFraudDiv is now on X! Give them a follow and be on the lookout for a major announcement tomorrow👀
English
@GWAM_Abbate Ask Andy, when can we sell our shares?
English
check out the new web site that Ionic Digital rolled out
ionicdigital.com
Our CEO, Andy Stewart, is building a world class team. Exciting things lie ahead.
English
@elveton101 @SMB_Attorney At their hourly rates, that lawyer should be held in contempt and forced to spend 30 days in County.
Bet they and others won’t do it again.
English
@SMB_Attorney I was trying to be less petty in 2026, but oh well, 2027 is gonna be my year
Screenshots if anyone wants to read the full thing
English
POV: You just paid S&C, one of the three most expensive and high-powered law firms in the world, $3000 per hour to submit AI slop to the court on your behalf.
No one is safe.
English
Mark - 'It ain't over till it's over' retweetledi
@tetherwallet “The People’s Wallet”
wallet.tether.io/application-te…
– Access can be suspended
– Service can be restricted
– KYC required
– Data shared with authorities
And the asset inside it?
Can be frozen and blacklisted.
Now whose wallet is it?
English
MicroStrategy CEO is confirming what I've been screaming from the rooftops for awhile: $MSTR, $STRC, etc. are a RETAIL driven phenomenon. 80%...that's nearly the entire bid!
We were told these products were built for money market fund investors.... they clearly are not buying.
Phong Le@phongle
~ 40% of $MSTR shares are owned by retail. ~ 80% of $STRC shares are owned by retail. Retail investors prefer low-volatility, high-yield digital credit.
English
@presel_ @JiujitsuOtter Yes... I was wrist locked 2 months ago. You almost have to crank them for them to work.
English
@nntaleb Testing for Low IQ matters, testing for High IQ doesn’t.
English
The best test of intelligence is this Tweet.
Note: IQ tests cannot be estimated from performance, & may correlate to tests that did not exist for Gauss, Voltaire, etc.)
Note: Einstein was the inverse of a premature test taker, (the kind of people who score high in school then do nothing)
Tansu Yegen@TansuYegen
The smartest people in history and have high IQ's
English
Mark - 'It ain't over till it's over' retweetledi
Are you talking to AI about legal matters? Be careful.
He chatted with Claude about his legal strategy.
Then discussed with his lawyers.
A Federal judge just ruled that those AI chat logs have zero legal privilege
Moish Peltz@mpeltz
Your AI conversations aren't privileged. Yesterday, Judge Jed Rakoff ruled that 31 documents a defendant generated using an AI tool and later shared with his defense attorneys are not protected by attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine. The logic is simple: an AI tool is not an attorney. It has no law license, owes no duty of loyalty, and its terms of service explicitly disclaim any attorney-client relationship. Sharing case details with an AI platform is legally no different from talking through your legal situation with a friend (which is not privileged). You can't fix it after the fact, either. Sending unprivileged documents to your lawyer doesn't retroactively make them privileged. That's been settled law for years. It just hadn't been tested with AI until now. And here's what really hurt the defendant: the AI provider's privacy policy (Claude), in effect when he used the tool, expressly permits disclosure of user prompts and outputs to governmental authorities. There was no reasonable expectation of confidentiality. The core problem is the gap between how people experience AI and what's actually happening. The conversational interface feels private. It feels like talking to an advisor. But unless you negotiate for an enterprise agreement that says otherwise, you're inputting information into a third-party commercial platform that retains your data and reserves broad rights to disclose it. Judge Rakoff also flagged an interesting wrinkle: the defendant reportedly fed information from his attorneys into the AI tool. If prosecutors try to use these documents at trial, defense counsel could become a fact witness, potentially forcing a mistrial. Winning on privilege doesn't make the evidentiary picture simple. For anyone advising clients or managing legal risk, this is a wake-up call. AI tools are not a safe space for clients to process their counsel's advice and to regurgitate their legal strategy. Every prompt is a potential disclosure. Every output is a potentially discoverable document. So what do we do about it? First, attorneys need to be proactive. Advise clients explicitly that anything they put into an AI tool may be discoverable and is almost certainly not privileged. Put it in your engagement letters. Make it part of onboarding. Don't assume clients understand this, because most don't. Second, if clients want to use AI to help process legal issues (and they clearly will, increasingly), then let's give them a way to do it inside the privilege. Collaborative AI workspaces shared between attorney and client, where the AI interaction happens under counsel's direction and within the attorney-client relationship, can change the analysis entirely. I'm excited to be planning this kind of approach, and I think it's where the industry needs to head. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
English
Mark - 'It ain't over till it's over' retweetledi
@KrissyMeehan_ Alex Mashinsky not getting out of prison in his lifetime would be a good one.
English
@PaulPortesi For most with salaries, living within one’s means, provided there is steady cash flow, increases independence.
Maximizing the amount of cash flow (salary) can subtract from one’s independence.
English
Most think maximizing money gives you Independence, after a certain limit it starts taking it away.
Its a NNT dose response sigmoid.
English
See Otis and related ret*rd 🍋’s,
Even Krissy is saying Alex Mashinsky stole the money.
PS she and her kids are starving out of their luxury home and private schools btw
English
We buy real bitcoin. We audit our custodians. We don’t rehypothecate. You shouldn’t either.
English
Why does Artur (Celsius Facts) seem so dumb? Can he not read?
“as there’s a disclosure process that has to be followed.”
Assuming the disclosure process is dictated by legal constraints, as most are, maybe the basement dweller, wannabe kickboxer challenger, can get a real job
English
@Pledditor @alexjeser Well at times, Bitcoin and Gold people act like religious zealots, so yeah 👍
English
@alexjeser Probably.
But the market can remain irrational longer than you can stay solvent
English
@Pledditor Wait, where is the referral code like Celsius Network 🫠
English
this is going in my cringe collection
GIF
Mark Harvey@thepowerfulHRV
Tell your friends and family they can earn 11% with $STRC
English
THIS is why Airlines hate GROK⚠️
My flight was $1,260, I paid $118.
No points. No shady third-party apps.
Copy these 7 prompts and see the magic:
English