Sabitlenmiş Tweet
My pinned tweet until we get our coins back!
English
Mark - 'It ain't over till it's over'
7.5K posts
Mark - 'It ain't over till it's over'
@presel_
Trusting Celsius for yield was picking up pennies in front of a steamroller (hindsight).
Katılım Haziran 2022
201 Takip Edilen500 Takipçiler
@presel_ @JiujitsuOtter Yes... I was wrist locked 2 months ago. You almost have to crank them for them to work.
English
@nntaleb Testing for Low IQ matters, testing for High IQ doesn’t.
English
The best test of intelligence is this Tweet.
Note: IQ tests cannot be estimated from performance, & may correlate to tests that did not exist for Gauss, Voltaire, etc.)
Note: Einstein was the inverse of a premature test taker, (the kind of people who score high in school then do nothing)
Tansu Yegen@TansuYegen
The smartest people in history and have high IQ's
English
Mark - 'It ain't over till it's over' retweetledi
Are you talking to AI about legal matters? Be careful.
He chatted with Claude about his legal strategy.
Then discussed with his lawyers.
A Federal judge just ruled that those AI chat logs have zero legal privilege
Moish Peltz@mpeltz
Your AI conversations aren't privileged. Yesterday, Judge Jed Rakoff ruled that 31 documents a defendant generated using an AI tool and later shared with his defense attorneys are not protected by attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine. The logic is simple: an AI tool is not an attorney. It has no law license, owes no duty of loyalty, and its terms of service explicitly disclaim any attorney-client relationship. Sharing case details with an AI platform is legally no different from talking through your legal situation with a friend (which is not privileged). You can't fix it after the fact, either. Sending unprivileged documents to your lawyer doesn't retroactively make them privileged. That's been settled law for years. It just hadn't been tested with AI until now. And here's what really hurt the defendant: the AI provider's privacy policy (Claude), in effect when he used the tool, expressly permits disclosure of user prompts and outputs to governmental authorities. There was no reasonable expectation of confidentiality. The core problem is the gap between how people experience AI and what's actually happening. The conversational interface feels private. It feels like talking to an advisor. But unless you negotiate for an enterprise agreement that says otherwise, you're inputting information into a third-party commercial platform that retains your data and reserves broad rights to disclose it. Judge Rakoff also flagged an interesting wrinkle: the defendant reportedly fed information from his attorneys into the AI tool. If prosecutors try to use these documents at trial, defense counsel could become a fact witness, potentially forcing a mistrial. Winning on privilege doesn't make the evidentiary picture simple. For anyone advising clients or managing legal risk, this is a wake-up call. AI tools are not a safe space for clients to process their counsel's advice and to regurgitate their legal strategy. Every prompt is a potential disclosure. Every output is a potentially discoverable document. So what do we do about it? First, attorneys need to be proactive. Advise clients explicitly that anything they put into an AI tool may be discoverable and is almost certainly not privileged. Put it in your engagement letters. Make it part of onboarding. Don't assume clients understand this, because most don't. Second, if clients want to use AI to help process legal issues (and they clearly will, increasingly), then let's give them a way to do it inside the privilege. Collaborative AI workspaces shared between attorney and client, where the AI interaction happens under counsel's direction and within the attorney-client relationship, can change the analysis entirely. I'm excited to be planning this kind of approach, and I think it's where the industry needs to head. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
English
Mark - 'It ain't over till it's over' retweetledi
@KrissyMeehan_ Alex Mashinsky not getting out of prison in his lifetime would be a good one.
English
@PaulPortesi For most with salaries, living within one’s means, provided there is steady cash flow, increases independence.
Maximizing the amount of cash flow (salary) can subtract from one’s independence.
English
Most think maximizing money gives you Independence, after a certain limit it starts taking it away.
Its a NNT dose response sigmoid.
English
See Otis and related ret*rd 🍋’s,
Even Krissy is saying Alex Mashinsky stole the money.
PS she and her kids are starving out of their luxury home and private schools btw
English
We buy real bitcoin. We audit our custodians. We don’t rehypothecate. You shouldn’t either.
English
Why does Artur (Celsius Facts) seem so dumb? Can he not read?
“as there’s a disclosure process that has to be followed.”
Assuming the disclosure process is dictated by legal constraints, as most are, maybe the basement dweller, wannabe kickboxer challenger, can get a real job
English
@Pledditor @alexjeser Well at times, Bitcoin and Gold people act like religious zealots, so yeah 👍
English
@alexjeser Probably.
But the market can remain irrational longer than you can stay solvent
English
@Pledditor Wait, where is the referral code like Celsius Network 🫠
English
this is going in my cringe collection
GIF
Mark Harvey@thepowerfulHRV
Tell your friends and family they can earn 11% with $STRC
English
THIS is why Airlines hate GROK⚠️
My flight was $1,260, I paid $118.
No points. No shady third-party apps.
Copy these 7 prompts and see the magic:
English
@JiujitsuOtter Full 15 minutes, LMAO with the Craig Jones face on every cop
youtu.be/A6yo75KL00Q
YouTube
English
@paoloardoino Privacy test!
If a US court were to subpoena all the questions that were asked on the app by a specific individual, would QVAC itself (not the individual) be able to produce any records?
@qvac @paoloardoino
English
Tether AI innovation, fully open-source, highly accurate.
QVAC@qvac
Meet Genesis V2. We’ve introduced "Option-Level Reasoning"—a method that trains models to understand why distractors are incorrect, not just pick the right answer. 📈 The Result: ~30% avg accuracy (competitors ~12%). ✅ Reliability: 99.4% valid, clear answers. Read the paper & get the dataset on Hugging Face: huggingface.co/blog/qvac/gene…
English
@Pledditor Not to mention wasn’t it a plus mentioned back in the day you could set and forget your bitcoin, unlike other crypto.
Now it’s gone. Some hard money. Guess cash in the mattress is better.
Thought Saylor said something like that in the past as an advantage of BTC
English
Why are so many bitcoiners now suddenly calling for UTXO freezing? What the fuck is wrong with you guys? Where are the principled sound money advocates at?
It's so easy to call for freezing property when the property is not yours.
Michael Saylor@saylor
The Bitcoin Quantum Leap: Quantum computing won’t break Bitcoin—it will harden it. The network upgrades, active coins migrate, lost coins stay frozen. Security goes up. Supply comes down. Bitcoin grows stronger.
English
@SimonDixonTwitt @WatcherGuru If there was no ethereum, there would have been no Mashinsky.
Ethereum is a financial disease vector, like a mosquito, enabling bad things to happen and spread.
English
@WatcherGuru “You will own nothing and be happy.”
JPMorgan will own the money market fund and pledge it as collateral.
You’ll own the token and be encouraged to borrow against it until you own nothing at all.
English
JUST IN: $4 trillion JPMorgan to launch first tokenized money market fund on Ethereum.
English
Bitcoin preserves your economic energy. Beanies preserve your physical energy. Winter hats now live on the @Strategy merch store.
store.strategy.com/?link=hats
English