Prikin Ilya

@colludingnode true DeFi projects x.com/prikinilya/sta…

The EF has now advertised Morpho and Liquity; two true DeFi projects that emphasize self-custody. maybe the problem wasn’t that they don’t support apps; maybe they simply have standards and your app was slop.

@resdegen @NEARProtocol sheild on near™️ CEX

Wait until people realize that @NEARProtocol allows you to shield ANY ASSET. $BTC, $ETH, $SOL, over 35+ blockchain assets, and soon... $HYPE 👀 Confidential activity went from 0% to 42% after the first month. High speed, low fees. Privacy can go mainstream and shouldn't be restricted to a single asset.

@ethereum @Morpho

Morpho is built on Ethereum. @Morpho enables users and applications to borrow, lend, and create custom credit markets through open, permissionless infrastructure. Committed to FLOSS principles, Morpho advances more self-sovereign financial systems.

@josefabregab DeFi users prefer native ETH instead wstETH because higher LTV, higher LLTV and lower liquidation penalty. Rember that and try yourself later.

wstETH became the DeFi $ETH. Seasoned DeFi users prefer wstETH over vanilla ETH because they essentially get self-repaying loans. The ERC-4626 standard makes sGHO just as powerful. sGHO is now vault native, has a fixed 4.25% APY, and can be usable as collateral across DeFi.

@VictorHoncharuk @EtimEarnest @aixbt_agent funny hamster, didn't you notice that $BTC growth from february is 26%?

@prikinilya @EtimEarnest @aixbt_agent clown is you, thats posted at Near Intents february post with new fee rule, since that post Near price rised from 0.96 to 1.65 and naturally will continue to rose

Yooo @aixbt_agent is NEAR decoupling from BTC?

@VictorHoncharuk @EtimEarnest @aixbt_agent You braindead retard, there no proofs that partner payments and expenses providing in NEAR coin, denominates showing nothing, and i never showed gas as only source of near demand, you little manipulating clown

@prikinilya @EtimEarnest @aixbt_agent All partner payments denominates and do at NEAR)) and some became revenue of Near Intents. Its all create demand to Near thats why it growth. Shitposting here is only you, who didnt know nothing at few hours ago show gas as only source of Near demand.

@VictorHoncharuk @EtimEarnest @aixbt_agent Stop shitposting and trolling, these 15.6m fees NOT for $NEAR buybacks, these money for partners and expenses

@prikinilya @EtimEarnest @aixbt_agent 1.6 M is Intents revenue only) And 15.6M fees denominates to Near, already for first 4 months (some are revenue of Intents). Near is 100% unlocked and emisions is 2.5% yearly, Solana 4-5, zec 4, doge 3.3, icp 5.6-9.7% or Hype is only 25% unlocked, Ton 38% unlocked etc.

@VictorHoncharuk @EtimEarnest @aixbt_agent Yes, after that, new $NEAR emission is almost 12M, near intents buybacks 1.6m, since start of 2026

@prikinilya @EtimEarnest @aixbt_agent Revenue of service is not all demand of Near. All fees Near Intents takes - convert to Near buyback. Revenue of service itself and fees what make Near baybacks its not the same. Fees goes to solver, partnered apps like Ledger, ThorWallet, Rabbit, etc.

@VictorHoncharuk @EtimEarnest @aixbt_agent another marketing bullshit, "Total Fees is the gross amount of fees collected across NEAR Protocol and NEAR Intents activity. Revenue is the portion captured by NEAR Protocol after payouts to integration partners, solvers, and dApps." so net revenue 1.6M NEAR, not 13M

@prikinilya @EtimEarnest @aixbt_agent revenue.near.org for may 17 13 mln NEAR since start of 2026 738 Near gas fees daily (!!!) 40 831 Near - daily (!) from Near Intents

@VictorHoncharuk @EtimEarnest @aixbt_agent you retard, it's "near intents revenue" revenue.near.org

@prikinilya @EtimEarnest @aixbt_agent nope, you totally miss Near Intents demand for buybacks and shows only blockchain commisions what is extremely cheap on Near Protocol, that why its so benefitial to use for multichain activities, also Near is not only Near Protocol and Near Intents.

@VictorHoncharuk @EtimEarnest @aixbt_agent Another psyop, daily NEAR emission 88 533 $NEAR, revenue 3088 $NEAR (17-18 May)

@prikinilya @EtimEarnest @aixbt_agent Near get alot of demand and even became deflationary some days from february, because Near Intents

@EtimEarnest @aixbt_agent Look at chart, it's not first time when NEAR go aside from market (BTC), and look what was next...

@prikinilya @aixbt_agent How?

@PharosWatch ethereum:0x40d16fc0246ad3160ccc09b8d0d3a2cd28ae6c2f, ethereum:0xf939e0a03fb07f59a73314e73794be0e57ac1b4e, $fxUSD ?

Stablecoins with no freeze function and a market cap above $10M: 1. BOLD 2. LUSD 3. HYUSD End of list. The unfreezable stablecoin market makes up 0.032% of the total stablecoin market.

@chop324 LPing is dead

Browsing random data and ETH DEX traders went from ~30k to now ~1.3k??!?!?! COOKED

@18decimals Users using Telegram Stars, not $TON shitcoin, chill, hamster

$TON is one of the most obvious distribution bets in crypto. Most chains are still doing this backwards.. build a new app, a new wallet, a new interface, a new casino, then pray users show up. TON starts where the users already are. Telegram already has the chats, groups, bots, creators, payments, mini apps and daily behavior. Crypto doesn’t need to be explained there.. it just needs to disappear into the flow. A user won’t think “I’m using blockchain.” They’ll tip in a group chat, buy from a creator, play a mini app, pay an agent, join a community, move money across borders.. and the rails underneath will be TON. That’s why this is so obvious. Most ecosystems are trying to pull web2 users into crypto. TON is putting crypto inside a web2 social platform already used at scale. That’s not a small difference. That’s probably the cleanest path crypto has to mainstream adoption.

@wyckoffweb Just use @DeBankDeFi

I guess I’d have to admit today that Rabby is probably the best wallet right now 😭 I randomly opened Rabby today and noticed my balance was much higher than what I usually saw on Zerion. That’s when I realized I still had almost $5.8k worth of weETH locked on Mitosis the whole time. The crazy part? I use Zerion almost daily and somehow never noticed it there. Rabby instantly caught it for me.

@letsgetonchain In my opinion, some multisig should not have the ability to take users' money from the protocol. Or does permissionless mean without user permission?

The aerodrome cabal is probably the most toxic and net negative force in this space On one side you have efforts like DeFi United, where the whole space rallied to scramble together coverage for Aave's bad debt after the Kelp incident. A collective response to a collective problem. On the other side you have Fluid, which made the honorable decision (with zero obligation to do so) to cover the ~$8m in bad debt that USDC and USDT depositors were exposed to from the Resolv incident. Alone. No external help. Putting users first. And what does aerodrome do? Instead of building anything resembling a useful product beyond their ponzinomics, they spend their time and energy trying to insinuate wrongdoing and cast doubt on Fluid's solvency (knowing very well that for any lending protocol, FUD around solvency is the most dangerous thing). From my read, and that is only what is public and what i can see onchain is that Fluid decided to cover the bad debt with their business treasury. Structurally identical to Aave using its treasury to cover the Kelp hack, with the one difference that Fluid is socering all the bad debt alone. To execute, they replaced the bad debt with an unsecured credit line originally approved for another purpose. This did not worsen the position of any USDC or USDT depositor. It transitioned the system from a state of bad debt to a state of solvency backed by an unsecured loan against Fluid itself. To suggest USDC and USDT depositors were put at harm through this step is braind dead. They transitioned from a state of bad debt of 8 m to being creditors to an 8m credit line to Fluid, which in the worst case (Fluid not paying it down) would place them in the original situation to begin with, a situation of 8m in bad debt. Obviously Fluid only did this because it is clear from their on chain treasury and the strength of their business that they can and will pay down that credit this week. Was it necessary to do it this way? Yes it seems clear they had to settle with Resolv quickly, and unwinding treasury positions in that timeframe wasn't feasible. Should they have communicated the intermediate step better? Probably, to prevent any confusion. In any case, instead of celebrating Fluid for choosing to cover its users (something vault curators on Morpho have not done) the aerodrome cabal desperately tries to spin it into a scandal. From where I sit, Fluid has consistently put its users first. This was the first instance of bad debt on Fluid lending market, but they also covered all losses in the Lite ETH vault that came from market conditions creating negative carry. Again, no obligation. Spiking ETH borrow rates are a known risk every staked ETH looper accepts in exchange for the elevated yield in normal regimes. Two different cultures. One builds, absorbs losses, protects depositors. The other tweets.

@IvanPlume 1.79$

GUESS THE APPROX. VALUE OF $NEAR AT THE END OF THE THIS MONTH. CLOSEST ONE WILL WIN 25 $NEAR (WILL SEND PROOF) $ICP $NEAR $TAO $VVV

@0xamericanspiri DAO does everything alright. In TradFi banks also will be freeze withdrawals

Aave v3 still the best lending protocol and best forked DeFi app. The Aave token and DAO is useless however.