❤️CharliesMantle

16.7K posts

❤️CharliesMantle banner
❤️CharliesMantle

❤️CharliesMantle

@prof_SJGreene

#CJKRIP ProfAnon for a reason! disgusted with progressive & liberal hate! global warming, why all the lies? Pronouns: #IAmABiologist so don't EVER ask!

USA Katılım Temmuz 2016
2.8K Takip Edilen2.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
❤️CharliesMantle
❤️CharliesMantle@prof_SJGreene·
English
46
148
279
0
❤️CharliesMantle
❤️CharliesMantle@prof_SJGreene·
@jeremybernier Time to get these people the f*** out of our country. I'm not kidding how damn many people do we have to let in who discriminate against us. If you're going to discriminate against Americans in our own country then it's time for you to get the f*** out.
English
0
0
1
60
Jeremy Bernier
Jeremy Bernier@jeremybernier·
Interesting that this went viral, but mostly in the Chinese community. Westerners are either too scared to touch this topic, or don't care about other westerners, especially westerners in high paying industries like tech. Americans would rather let their own people suffer than risk sounding racist. It took @nickshirleyy having to film himself knocking on obviously fraudulent daycare centers with hostile fraudsters intimidating him on camera for Americans to acknowledge the Somalian Minnesota daycare fraud. It would probably take something like that on this scale for Americans to confront this problem. The main things I want Americans to know are: 1. Americans are practically non-existent in the most coveted, high paying tech jobs in the world at American companies in America. 2. Ethnic enclaves of orgs completely dominated by people from one country (eg. China, India) are very common in top American companies on American soil. In my experience and in that of many others, members of the minority are routinely excluded, disadvantaged, and disproportionately targeted in layoffs. There is nothing inherently wrong with a foreign dominated org in an American company. But once an org becomes 90% dominated by one country who predominantly speak their own language at the office, and 90% of the qualified pipeline obviously isn't just coming from that country, then the burden of proof shifts towards proving how this is even possible, and how there aren't nefarious factors at play. Common sense would indicate that the minority are disadvantaged, and either getting kicked out or leaving on their own. Again I want to emphasize that this is not necessarily deliberate, but it is the result. I imagine most sensible countries with a shred of dignity would acknowledge that there is a problem if their own people are being disadvantaged in their own country. There's not necessarily a silver bullet solution here. But the first step is always acknowledging the situation/problem. My fear is that Americans are too afraid of sounding racist to even get to that first step of acknowledging the situation, and thus will likely never solve the problem short of some crazy espionage scandal or Trump erratically banning all immigration (which is not something I've ever endorsed). I have zero faith that companies will acknowledge the situation, so government is the only realistic possibility. I can't solve the problem - I'm just a random dude. But if I can raise awareness and steer the conversation 0.01%, then it was all worth it.
Jeremy Bernier@jeremybernier

At Meta, 90% of my coworkers were Chinese, and non-Chinese were routinely excluded, disadvantaged, and targeted for layoffs. 6 out of the 7 layoffs I observed targeted non-Chinese despite non-Chinese being the vast minority. Certain orgs like ads and MRS are notorious for being Chinese dominated. I think Americans would be outraged if they knew that their own citizens were getting marginalized and laid off at their own companies, while Chinese promote themselves up, conquer entire orgs, and reap millions. Imagine if Huawei in Shenzhen had entire orgs and leadership chains completely dominated by Japanese people who brazenly spoke Japanese at work without a care in the world that their Chinese coworkers don't understand, imposed their own work culture without respecting Chinese culture, excluded the Chinese, and laid off Chinese people while promoting their own. I imagine Chinese citizens would be outraged, and never allow that to happen in the first place. The most blatant and obvious way that non-Chinese are excluded is that Chinese primarily speak Mandarin at work. I'm not talking about one-off conversations, I'm talking about every single conversation. Loudly and brazenly with no respect for others. 10+ teammates and leaders having a group conversation in Mandarin while the 2 non-Chinese don't understand and feel excluded from the team. Although everyone at least has the decency to speak English during formal meetings with a non-speaker present, it was common that right after the meeting ended everyone would immediately switch to Mandarin. Funny I'm in Korea right now and was just on a double date with 3 other Koreans, and I was shocked that when the conversation would split into two, the other couple would speak to each other in English in my presence just out of respect. A Korean couple on a double-date had the courtesy to speak to each other in English in front of me even though I'd never expect that from them, but my Chinese coworkers did not. Lunch was another place where non-Chinese were blatantly excluded. Recall that the team I joined was an all Chinese team with only one other non-Chinese person. The Chinese would always get lunch together and never invite us (except for one of them who occasionally would, though at some point stopped). Me and the non-Chinese person would invite them, they'd always refuse, and then shortly after they'd disappear and get lunch together. As a result, it was usually just the two of us getting lunch. (caveat, some of the newer Chinese who joined afterwards also experienced similar treatment. So it's moreso a clique thing than a Chinese vs. non-Chinese thing, though 100% of the clique was Chinese) On Wednesdays and Fridays I'd often be the only non-Chinese person on my team in the office, and they'd all get lunch together without inviting me. It was depressing, and made me not want to come into the office on those days. One team dinner we went to a Korean BBQ. I arrived with a non-Chinese coworker and the first table was full, so we sat at one end of the next empty table. Shortly after one of the Tech Leads walked in, and sat at the complete opposite end of our table, alone and not in talking distance to anyone. We invited her over, and she declined. Later another Tech Lead came in and sat across from her. Non-Chinese and Chinese at opposite ends of a long table at a team dinner, and they refused to sit with us. Eventually more people came and the TLs joined our side because I guess maybe it was too obviously anti-social, and they spent the entire dinner speaking speaking Chinese to each other. These were our tech leads. I could not understand how Meta could have "Tech Leads" that so blatantly excluded teammates. I thought Tech Leads were supposed to uplift the team, and that Meta would hold tech leads to a higher standard. Now someone might say that it's just lunch or a one-off team dinner, who cares? To that I vehemently disagree. Lunch is extremely important for team bonding, and so much information is transferred through informal socializing. I'm not saying that everyone needs to get lunch together everyday, but if a minority of people are excluded from getting lunch with the rest of the team, and especially the most tenured and senior employees, then naturally that minority is going to feel alienated, disadvantaged, and excluded from opportunities. And the very fact that they're excluded from lunch is reflective of being excluded in general. When 90% of an org and the entire leadership chain is dominated by one ethnicity, naturally their work culture is going to spill through. Chinese culture is completely different from American work culture, and learning to navigate that was a huge obstacle for me. For example I'm the type that tends to question everything and isn't afraid to challenge a "superior", but I quickly realized that my TL seemed to take offense to that, and would punish/retaliate me for it. I want to make it clear - I have nothing against Chinese people. Most of them are very kind (strong correlation between kindness and not engaging in the kind of exclusionary behavior I mentioned above), and I have many good friends who are Chinese. I get that some barely speak English (though I question how they got hired). I do genuinely believe that most are good people, and not deliberately trying to exclude others. But regardless of intent, the result is that non-Chinese get excluded. The fact that 6 of the 7 layoffs I observed were not Chinese in a 80-90% Chinese dominated org is testament to this. The fact that 90% Chinese dominated orgs even exist in the first place is testament to this. I might not even be posting about this given the sensitivity of the topic if not for the fact that I've seen and/or heard stories of some very toxic people who I do not believe would otherwise survive if not for their ability to exclude others, throwing others under the bus for the next layoff. The same people do this over and over again, and get away with it because they're part of the "clique" that essentially has immunity. I think the company needs to take this more seriously. Some ideas would be enforcing English at the office (I've heard of other teams that do this), raising leaders to a higher bar when it comes to team inclusivity (eg. under the "People" axis), investigating potential discrimination cases (eg. layoffs and/or mistreatment disproportionally affecting certain groups) and having a zero tolerance policy around that, having a zero tolerance policy around injustice in general (eg. lying or deliberately throwing somebody under the bus), ensuring more diverse teams, etc. But to be honest, I don't have faith that much would change so long as the entire leadership chain up to the VP level is dominated by the same ethnicity, language, and culture. Nor does it seem that leadership even remotely cares given that this has been happening in the HQ for probably at least the last decade, and is obvious to anyone who's stepped foot in the office.

English
63
60
475
54.7K
New York Post
New York Post@nypost·
Lefty Senate candidate Graham Platner reportedly sexted numerous women on hookup app Kik - and wife flagged it to campaign trib.al/pUVfEra
New York Post tweet media
English
358
715
2.6K
1.6M
Stephen King
Stephen King@StephenKing·
I predicted someone like Trump many years ago, in THE DEAD ZONE. So now I'm saying this--in the next 12-16 months, we're going to find out if the two machines for the removal of a man unable to fulfill his duties actually work. They are impeachment and the 25th amendment. He is deeply unwell .
English
6.1K
18.2K
87.1K
2.3M
Senator Jeff Merkley
Senator Jeff Merkley@SenJeffMerkley·
President Trump's profanity-laden Easter threat to attack Iran's civilian infrastructure—power plants and bridges—are the words of a frustrated and immoral madman. Many experts agree that such attacks would be war crimes under international law. To our military leaders, remember this: You are legally required to refuse orders to commit war crimes.
English
3.4K
1.5K
4.2K
143.2K
The White House
The White House@WhiteHouse·
🚨“WE GOT HIM! My fellow Americans, over the past several hours, the United States Military pulled off one of the most daring Search and Rescue Operations in U.S. History, for one of our incredible Crew Office Members, who also happens to be a highly respected Colonel, and who I am thrilled to let you know is SAFE and SOUND!” - President Donald J. Trump 🇺🇸
The White House tweet media
English
11.6K
43K
232.1K
14.3M
Eric Jay
Eric Jay@EricinAmericaX·
Are you seriously turning this into a political stunt? Trump is that f-cking desperate huh? Captain "Bone Spurs" has never cared about our troops. "Sadly, there will likely be more before it ends. That’s the way it is. Likely be more.” This was Trump's response to service members being killed in action as a consequence of his war of CHOICE. And as the death toll rises, there are big indications that Trump plans to put boots on the ground as he sends more troops to the region and as he demands more funding. What's SAD is that Trump's groveling supporters will continue to implicitly defend him and his needless foreign war. But Trump does not care about the cost, casualties and repercussions of this war outside of how it impacts HIS ratings and unpopularity. Trump has no sympathy for our troops and their families. He's even insulted our fallen soldiers on multiple occasions. HIS POLICIES HAVE MADE LIFE MORE CHALLENGING FOR VETERANS AT HOME: Let's start with the Trump administration deporting veterans and the massive VA workforce reductions, funding gaps, and operational disruptions that have led to things like cancelled contracts, program slowdowns and delayed delivery of care/claims. Trump and house Republicans also backed a CR that zeroed out funding for the Toxic Exposure Fund (TEF), which covers healthcare costs for troops exposed to toxic substances like burn pits. The VA was one of many agencies hit hard by Trump's layoffs. Employees received this cruel notice: "You have not demonstrated that your further employment at the Agency would be in the public interest." Thousands of veterans/VA staff members lost their jobs. VA layoffs included nurses, doctors, mental health professionals and claims processors; meaning longer wait times for Veterans, significantly reduced outreach, processing backlogs, less access to benefits, and even interruptions in medical screenings. These cuts also put veterans' medical care at risk by interrupting life saving cancer trials; by limiting their access to care, and by ending treatment oversight. Cuts/hiring freezes have also disrupted mental health services for veterans; including lay offs of Crisis Line staff who offer suicide‑prevention resources to them. Trump has also canceled contracts supporting homeless veterans. He ended the mortgage assistance program that helped save tens of thousands of their homes. Then there's his "warrior dividend" check in the amount of $1776. Another obvious publicity gimmick. These funds came from an already‑approved housing allowance supplement for veterans. The money was just redirected and rebranded for political purposes. TRUMP HAS REPEATEDLY DISRESPECTED OUR VETERANS: He referred to veterans killed in action as "suckers" and "losers" and refused to visit a cemetery where American soldiers are buried because it was "filled with losers." He insulted POWs and John Mccain when he said, "I prefer people who weren't captured." He downplayed traumatic brain injuries that dozens of military personnel suffered from in Iraq as a result of his provocations in the Middle East. He minimized the significance of the Medal of Honor. He's repeatedly insulted our distinguished military leaders. Trump's "Department of War" fired high ranking, black and female military officials with illustrious careers, only to replace them with far less qualified (white) loyalists. So much for "merit." His behavior at the Arlington National cemetery during his election campaign was extremely disrespectful. Trump was so desperate for a photo op that him and his staff violated long standing rules meant to honor and respect fallen soldiers and their families. They even got into a physical altercation with cemetery staff, and all for the sake of politicizing a national shrine. Trump doesn't care about veterans. He cares about demonstrating his strength through his unbridled use of themilitary. He cares far more about his ratings than the lives of our soldiers.
English
344
8
78
17.6K
❤️CharliesMantle
❤️CharliesMantle@prof_SJGreene·
@LynwoodTalks @WhiteHouse The picture of a real president. Compare that against Joe Biden. Not even close. Christ Democrats are a complete and total waste of political currency.
English
0
1
1
41
=Orange=
=Orange=@LynwoodTalks·
@WhiteHouse Thanks for working late, Mr. President! Happy Easter to you and yours. Now you can relax a bit...
=Orange= tweet media
English
11
40
460
7.5K
❤️CharliesMantle
❤️CharliesMantle@prof_SJGreene·
@TigerWoods Learn from it my friend. I've been there quite a few times. I learned, you can too. And you will be much the better for it, I promise!
English
0
0
0
15
Texas Red
Texas Red@TexasBred817·
@TigerWoods You should be jailed! Any person that’s not rich nor named tiger woods would be jailed! YOU SHOULD BE IN JAIL!
English
142
1
247
123.8K
❤️CharliesMantle
❤️CharliesMantle@prof_SJGreene·
How about you James? You do have to go outside you know. Republicans can play the same game. See how you like it! We're done! Fafo! Carville: Dems Will Go After Trump‘s ‘Stupid Jackass Kids and their Spouses‘ after Midterms breitbart.com/clips/2026/04/… via @BreitbartNews
English
0
0
0
5
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick@ReichlinMelnick·
Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi are already detention black holes. Release will be more difficult than ever. As more people are locked up, ICE will increase the pressure on those who are detained to give up. The goal is an assembly line of coercion with no day in court.
English
64
77
285
30.2K
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick@ReichlinMelnick·
AWFUL news for due process. This decision will wipe out the availability of release through bond for tens of thousands of people detained in or transported to Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi by ICE. This decision overturns 30 years of interpretation of a law passed in 1996.
Kyle Cheney@kyledcheney

BREAKING: A 5th Circuit panel has backed ICE's mass detention policy, a decision that clears the way for the administration to lock up thousands of people who are in immigration proceedings. It's a 2-1 ruling. Majority: Jones (Reagan), Duncan (Trump) Minority: Douglas (Biden) s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2688…

English
571
1.1K
2.9K
368.4K
❤️CharliesMantle
❤️CharliesMantle@prof_SJGreene·
@ReichlinMelnick Thank God by this time they've already been in front of the courts. How much do process do you really want? You're so full of s***
English
0
0
0
1