PubSmear

3.2K posts

PubSmear banner
PubSmear

PubSmear

@PubPeer

@Thatsregrettab1 Kevin Patrick = Actinopolyspora Biskrensis @SmutClyde David Bimler = Hoya camphorifolia @MicrobiomDigest Bik EX: uBiome Retractions = 📉💵😉

In the gutter Katılım Temmuz 2023
79 Takip Edilen267 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
PubSmear
PubSmear@PubPeer·
Currently recruiting anonymous reviewers. Don't understand the science you're looking at, not even interested in it ? Divorced, at a loose end ?Understand financial markets in pharma industry and how to make money shorting stocks ? We want to hear from you. 1>
PubSmear tweet media
English
3
5
24
4.8K
PubSmear
PubSmear@PubPeer·
Please welcome Thomas Stephens AKA Rubus Acuminatus to our team.
PubSmear tweet media
English
1
0
0
84
PubSmear
PubSmear@PubPeer·
Currently recruiting anonymous reviewers. Don't understand the science you're looking at, not even interested in it ? Divorced, at a loose end ?Understand financial markets in pharma industry and how to make money shorting stocks ? We want to hear from you. 1>
PubSmear tweet media
English
3
5
24
4.8K
PubSmear
PubSmear@PubPeer·
@BrokenTruthTV Our team prides itself on the highest ethical standards. I kindly ask you to refrain from casting these aspersions upon us.
PubSmear tweet mediaPubSmear tweet mediaPubSmear tweet media
English
0
0
2
40
Broken Truth
Broken Truth@BrokenTruthTV·
This is a tech variation of what is going on with the @PubPeer smear campaign designed to erase unflattering medical research. Bik and her pals are trying to erase history. That's why the FBI investigation into ARCHIVE.IS is concerning. Stalk. Shame. Silence.
English
1
1
7
713
Broken Truth
Broken Truth@BrokenTruthTV·
Rigging social media databases is a trick evil admins use to keep you limited. It's the only explanation I can come up with for being stuck at 66k followers for over a year, despite gaining new followers each day. It's not about attention, it's about rigging. Data manipulation.
Broken Truth tweet media
English
2
4
21
2.2K
IntegralAnswers
IntegralAnswers@IntegralAnswers·
@Naava_Shoshan Do you have a link for that study? Did they control for potential causes for the fevers? (Viral infections, which I believe is a known confounder for in utero association with altered neurodevelopment)?
English
4
0
12
1K
IntegralAnswers
IntegralAnswers@IntegralAnswers·
🚨 Reports suggest RFK Jr. may soon claim Tylenol causes autism. Here’s what the science actually shows about acetaminophen (paracetamol) use in pregnancy & infancy—and why causation is far from proven. 🧵
IntegralAnswers tweet media
English
22
70
257
125.6K
PubSmear
PubSmear@PubPeer·
@JaxsonTadje @TcameronTodd @simonmaechling Thanks Guys. For all the support for the satanists within the CDC it is appreciated. Dr Demetre needs to be reinstated, previous his team was able to withhold safety data when a drug was being approved for use with children. We don't want people like him having to resign.
PubSmear tweet mediaPubSmear tweet media
English
0
0
1
34
Simon Maechling
Simon Maechling@simonmaechling·
“We need to stop trusting the experts.”That’s not critical thinking. That’s how society collapses. When RFK Jr says this, he isn’t encouraging thoughtful skepticism. He’s replacing evidence with ideology - and science with suspicion. Here’s the reality: ✅ We trust engineers to build bridges. ✅ We trust pilots to fly planes. ✅ We trust doctors to treat illness. Not because they’re infallible - but because they’re trained, tested, and accountable. That’s how expertise works. Science doesn’t demand blind faith. It invites scrutiny, replication, and debate. It evolves. It self-corrects. But what happens when we stop trusting experts? ❌ Public health collapses. ❌ Conspiracies thrive. ❌ People suffer. Trust in science is not a weakness. It’s one of our greatest strengths. Let’s stop pretending that every influencer with a microphone knows better than someone with decades of evidence-based work. 🎯 Support scientists. 🎯 Teach critical thinking. 🎯 Don’t confuse contrarianism with courage. We don’t need fewer experts. We need better understanding of how science actually works.
Republicans against Trump@RpsAgainstTrump

RFK Jr: We need to stop trusting the experts... Trusting the experts is not a feature of science or democracy, it's a feature of religion and totalitarianism.

English
60
211
785
31.2K
Brian Deer 布莱恩-迪尔
Brian Deer 布莱恩-迪尔@deerbrian·
Watch Robert Kennedy either so grotesquely incompetent he can't even read a page, or he is lying. The CDC does NOT claim on its website that abortion is one of the ten greatest advances of medical science as he claims.
English
27
48
198
24.5K
PubSmear
PubSmear@PubPeer·
@DrPaulOffit Thank you Paul. Here @pubpeer we also support satanists like Dr Demetre within the CDC. Your advocating of their reinstatement is highly valued. Like you we agree that his team should be able to conceal safety data when a new drug is being approved.
PubSmear tweet mediaPubSmear tweet media
English
0
2
1
73
PubSmear retweetledi
ScienceGuardians
ScienceGuardians@SciGuardians·
Who Watches the Watchers? Anonymous “academic integrity watchdogs” are mounting coordinated online attacks on scientists of all stripes – with real and lasting consequences A must-read article by @J_Strachan_Edit and Frank van Geel, published in The Analytical Scientist (@tAnaSci) on July 21, 2025. Elias Verum contributed on behalf of ScienceGuardians™ Let`s sink in. 🧵 THREAD
ScienceGuardians tweet media
English
7
60
136
48.1K
PubSmear
PubSmear@PubPeer·
@jsm2334 @Kevin_McKernan With the billions of dollars from governmental & Pharmaceutical company funding that your institution receives, it will easy for you to enroll equal numbers in the cohorts and show if the results are replicated or not.
English
0
0
14
182
Prof Jeffrey S Morris
Prof Jeffrey S Morris@jsm2334·
@Kevin_McKernan Is this paper comparing gene expression of 3 sick people, 7 with cancer, and 803 healthy controls that makes claims of concluding something about vaccine effects?
English
8
1
7
1.1K
Kevin McKernan
Kevin McKernan@Kevin_McKernan·
The PubSmear harassment mob is hyper filing comments minutes apart on this preprint. Help them Streisand effect the paper. Read their comments and decide for yourself if they appear organic or a coordinated Pharma reaction. Kevin Patrick is Chesire on X and claims to be an investor not a researcher. He won’t disclose his investments @SECGov @SciGuardians
Kevin McKernan tweet media
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH@NicHulscher

🚨Our new study showing severe gene disruption after mRNA shots just became the #1 most-read and downloaded preprint on Earth this month. 70% of the global population took these shots. Now the world wants answers.

English
11
135
403
59K
Jikkyleaks 🐭
Jikkyleaks 🐭@Jikkyleaks·
If you want to see the appalling level of faux outrage directed at @weldeiry by the DARPA-affiliated Pubpeer just take any of the images that they are claiming are "too similar" and investigate them. I did. These images are over 20 years old and so can't be regenerated from the original experiments, but are clearly not similar. They have shared artefacts that you see when using the same image capture or software. Elisabeth Bik and the pubpeer mob use a black box AI "image comparison" tool that tortures images until they confess, and no you can't see what algorithm is used. Here is a fantastic example of how much "similarity" you can create just by manipulating brightness levels, which is exactly what the pubpeer complainant did here. Unfortunately neither Dr El-Deiry nor any of the other senior researchers targeted en masse by Pubpeer - in order to silence criticism of pharma products - has the time or resources to go through the thousands of fabricated claims from this network and show how each one has been manipulated. This one image should be enough to show that #pubpeergate has nothing to do with science and everything to do with threatening doctors into shutting up so that pharma companies can make billions of dollars on drugs that don't work and cause death and disability. Original pubpeer comment: #1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">pubpeer.com/publications/5… River valley technologies (company used to "corroborate" the claims registered in pubpeer) rivervalley.io/about/our-peop… @Kevin_McKernan @JesslovesMJK @SciGuardians @MaryanneDemasi @TonyNikolic10 @DrJulieSladden @chrismartenson
Jikkyleaks 🐭 tweet media
ScienceGuardians@SciGuardians

🚨 BREAKING: Exposing Legal and Ethical Violations by PubPeer Network Mob Member REESE RICHARDSON 🔱 Through a carefully planned operation, ScienceGuardians has successfully entrapped Reese Richardson, a Postdoctoral Fellow at @AmaralLab @NorthwesternU and active member of the PubPeer Network Mob. His public confessions and self-admissions have implicated him in multiple legal and ethical violations, including: 1️⃣ Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) Violation 2️⃣ Wire Fraud 3️⃣ Identity Misrepresentation 4️⃣ University Policy Violations These findings were uncovered through exchanges with Perpetrator 2 and Richardson’s own Bluesky posts. Perpetrator 5 , who has played a key role in masking the malicious activities of the PubPeer Network Mob is also implicated in this sequence of events. 📸 Evidence images included throughout ⬇️ 🕵️‍♂️ Entrapment: The Operation Richardson attempted to register on ScienceGuardians’ Post-Publication Peer Review Platform using: • lawrence.richardson@u.northwestern.edu (alias) • reeserichardson2019@u.northwestern.edu (his actual account) 🔱 Following the advice of our legal and investigative team, we approved the registration knowingly, allowing the sequence of events to unfold. 💬 Richardson’s Confessions and Self-Implication Shortly after registering, Richardson publicly boasted on Bluesky that he had registered using a fake identity and an alias email address under the name "Larry Richardson", created under the legitimate u.northwestern.edu domain. This was later retweeted by Perpetrator 5, further amplifying their involvement. 📸 Image 1: Richardson’s Bluesky confession and Perpetrator 5’s retweet. In private exchanges with Perpetrator 2, Richardson openly confessed to using Northwestern University’s legitimate domain to create a fraudulent email address for the purpose of impersonation, and admitted to "cheating" by exploiting his legitimate edu access to fabricate the alias. 📸 Images 2: Richardson’s self-implication in email fraud, identity misrepresentation, and other violations. ⚖️ Summary of Legal and Ethical Violations Richardson’s self-admissions implicate him in the following: 1️⃣ CFAA Violation: Misuse of Northwestern University’s email system to create a deceptive alias for fraudulent purposes. 2️⃣ Wire Fraud: Use of electronic communications to deceive ScienceGuardians’ verification process. 3️⃣ Identity Misrepresentation: Creation of a fictitious persona to bypass verification protocols. 4️⃣ Violation of University Policies: Breach of Northwestern’s IT and academic integrity policies through unauthorized use of university resources. 🔍 Past Confessions of System Manipulation In a blog post dated July 18, 2024, Richardson confessed to manipulating academic metrics 📸 Image 3: • Generated 12 fake papers via Mathgen under Larry Richardson. • Created 12 additional fake papers citing the first set, fabricating an h-index of 12 (144 citations). • Uploaded these to ResearchGate using the northwestern.edu alias. • Bypassed verification systems at ResearchGate and Google Scholar. 🧩 Context: PubPeer Network Mob’s Manipulation of Academic Systems Richardson’s deceptive actions are not isolated incidents but part of a broader pattern of manipulation and harassment perpetrated by the PubPeer Network Mob. Their tactics extend far beyond critique — they exploit and weaponize academic platforms and systems to overwhelm, discredit, and pressure researchers. A key example is Professor Jörg Rinklebe of @Uni_Wuppertal, who faced: • 500+ publications targeted through PubPeer. • 100+ entries in a single month by Perpetrator 2 (Desmococcus antarctica) — reflecting a calculated attempt to saturate academic platforms and manipulate perception. 🔗 Documented harassment against Rinklebe: x.com/SciGuardians/s… ⚠️ Connection to Perpetrator 5 📸 Image 4: After registering, Richardson acknowledged Perpetrator 5’s influence , which Perpetrator 5 then retweeted, amplifying the connection. 🔱 ScienceGuardians’ Mission Remains Clear We have exposed Reese Richardson, now designated Perpetrator 6 in our investigation. With 1,056 PubPeer entries, he is an active figure in the PubPeer Network Mob. 🔒 The fraudulent account associated with Richardson has been permanently blocked from ScienceGuardians’ Post-Publication Peer Review Platform. However, the records and comments they created will be preserved in full as evidence — serving as a testament to the tactics employed and as part of the broader documentation of this investigation. More disturbing revelations are coming. 📢 Stay with us. The next pieces of the puzzle will be revealed soon. #ResearchIntegrity #ExposeFraud #AcademicIntegrity #ScienceGuardians #PubPeerMob #CFAA #WireFraud @HHS_ORI @NIH @C0PE @UKRIO @EneriProject @EnrioAssoc @EmbassySci @ClarivateAG @timeshighered @ElsevierConnect @WileyGlobal @SpringerNature @WeAreTandF @PLOS @APSphysics @AIP_Publishing @CellCellPress @aaas @ScienceMagazine @TheLancet @Nature @RoySocChem @ACSPublications @Sage_Publishing @FrontiersIn @PhD_Genie @ThePhDPlace @PhDVoice @AcademicChatter @WCRIFoundation @hapyresearchers @OpenAcademics @thephdstory @Scholarshipps @AIRSAIndia @phdhardtalk @TressAcademic

English
22
195
418
88.9K
Jay Baxter
Jay Baxter@jaybaxter·
First off: we are pro free-speech. Community Notes never censors any posts -- notes provide context only (we don't directly affect visibility or ranking of the original post). Thank you for reporting possible inauthentic coordination across accounts and death threats (which would both be terms of service violations). We take both of those very seriously and have been investigating since even before you called this out. For background info: we've rolled out multiple anti-manipulation improvements recently e.g. x.com/CommunityNotes…, x.com/CommunityNotes…, x.com/CommunityNotes…, and another improvement last year to cap note writing limits for low-quality authors directly in response to feedback like this x.com/CommunityNotes…. Just to clarify: 1) I am not the overall lead for Community Notes 2) I am not "Enterprising Desert Raven", nor do I know them, or any of the other accounts that may be coordinating together with "EDR" I've now unblocked you and others to try to have a productive conversation here. Why did I originally block you and others yesterday? I had replied to a post saying that obviously death threats are not ok, which got twisted into accusations that I tolerate death threats. I don't tolerate them! I checked, and the death threat in question seems to not exist (if it was real and not a fake screenshot, please share the noteId or tweetId in question if you have any info about it).
English
394
90
1.1K
506.9K
PubSmear
PubSmear@PubPeer·
Meet Markus Zlabinger
PubSmear tweet media
Nederlands
0
0
2
687
PubSmear
PubSmear@PubPeer·
Meet David Bimler Hoya camphorifolia
PubSmear tweet mediaPubSmear tweet media
Deutsch
0
0
3
612