Ortaiηe Ðeviaη

@PSwal807 @PauWitkowski @GilbertWanda @1NJConservative @fookcu_f @DaveSchreiber3 @texasrecks @Rammie24 @magasicilian @Jules5570 @Dretchy @realEricJTracy @smrose29 @RighterThanRigh @Teddy2741 @Tweeklives @Doot2471 @PecanC8 @45KAG1 @sep16000 @courage04ever "Furthermore, we need illegal aliens to accept the benefits packages Americans just won't accept! If elected, I promise to get rid of those benefits for all Americans!!"

@ColonelTowner @AAGDhillon "A '303 hearing' refers to an extended emergency involuntary mental health treatment proceeding." Ewen Cameron of MK-ULTRA fame becomes first official president of the World Psychiatric Assn. in 1961, get it? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Psy… He gave a false diagnosis @ Nuremberg.

🚨CAUGHT THEM !!! Listen carefully, because this matters. A man was taken under a psychiatric hold — what’s called a 302 in Pennsylvania. That law allows the government to take your liberty immediately, but only under one condition: There must be a documented, factual basis that you are a clear and present danger. Now here’s what the actual record shows. The original 302 — the one used to take him — was blank where it matters. It literally says: “Unknown at this time.” No facts. No threat. No explanation. That means at the moment they took him, there was no documented justification. Then something else happens. When they move to extend his detention under a 303 petition, suddenly there’s a different version of that same document — now filled in, now checked off, now attempting to justify what already happened. Those two documents do not match. That is not a clerical error. That is a timeline problem. Because the law does not allow you to detain someone first and build the justification later. That’s backwards. That’s a due process violation. And if proven, it means the entire detention was unlawful from the start. Now add this: He was not properly notified of the 303 hearing. He was placed in a room on Zoom. He objected on constitutional grounds. And the order was signed anyway. This is exactly why due process exists. Not for perfect cases — but for cases like this. This is not about politics. This is not about opinions. This is about one question: Did the government have a lawful basis to take someone’s liberty at the time they did it? Because if the answer is no — nothing that comes after fixes it. This is not just civil rights violations this is criminal spoliation, and false imprisonment @HHSGov @CivilRights @UHS_Inc @DOJCrimDiv Disclosures will be provided to law enforcement #FREESEANCONNOLLY