Julie Hull retweetledi
Julie Hull
72.7K posts

Julie Hull
@rivier
a prophet is without honour in her own country
Katılım Mayıs 2007
59 Takip Edilen2.4K Takipçiler
Julie Hull retweetledi
Julie Hull retweetledi

@AnneBevan1 @surreyspinster @ZARA He’s not there to buy, or even try on. He’s there to take various items of lingerie into the ‘women’s’ changing room, wank himself off into them, then put the semen-stained items back on the sales display. Sorry to be so gross, but that’s what these perverts get off on.
English

@surreyspinster @ZARA I'd love to know what he finds to buy. You can rarely find a size 16 in there. Nothing above size 16.
English

@ZARA - I just queried the presence of a hulking great man in the ladies changing room in your Kingston branch and staff told me it’s policy to let them in. Can you confirm?
English

@nikkinovaks @BBCNews Our entire public sector, body by body, does seem to have taken complete leave of its senses. And while some individuals undoubtedly still try to work with honour and decency, most follow the corporate lead and demonstrate utter contempt for the public they supposedly serve.
English

This morning, @BBCNews eulogising their ‘beloved’ colleague Jenni Murray, while slyly insinuating she left Women’s Hour in 2020 for health reasons. Here’s Jenni in her own words, exposing the truth those misogynist bastards refuse to admit.
dailymail.co.uk/debate/article…




English
Julie Hull retweetledi

Yet the BBC are still churning out one-sided affirmative lived experience non stories, drag queens and shoehorning trans IDing men and the occasional woman into any programme they can.
This is ideological capture.
Fair representation, accurate reporting and balance have gone.
SEEN in Journalism@JournalismSEEN
‘Dame Jenni claimed the BBC then “banned” her from speaking further on the debate on air, while issuing her with an official warning’
English
Julie Hull retweetledi

After all those years she had worked at the BBC, this must have felt like a massive betrayal to her. I bet it broke her heart.
SEEN in Journalism@JournalismSEEN
‘Dame Jenni claimed the BBC then “banned” her from speaking further on the debate on air, while issuing her with an official warning’
English

@StanFastic @BBCNews It is - thank you! BBCWH behaved disgracefully then, and BBC News now is running them a close second with its performative sorrow at the death of a superb and gifted colleague who they booted out without a blush when she was alive.
English
Julie Hull retweetledi

@rivier @BBCNews Worth revisiting this thread which shows BBC Woman’s Hour at its despicable worst. Murray was treated very badly.
x.com/journalismseen…
SEEN in Journalism@JournalismSEEN
‘Dame Jenni claimed the BBC then “banned” her from speaking further on the debate on air, while issuing her with an official warning’
English

@rivier @WingsScotland @BBCNews I’ve been searching for the right words to describe the BBC for little while now. Thanks for helping!
English
Julie Hull retweetledi

Screaming at @BBCr4today. Harriet Harman suggests Jenni Murray's stance on trans might be thought to 'take away' from her feminist track record. The absolute opposite - it's a core part of it.
English
Julie Hull retweetledi

You wouldn't see it in a video from Riyadh, Amman or Aleppo because it doesn't occur there. I lived in one of those cities for years and spent time in the other two on multiple occasions. Muslims don't do that in their own countries - ever. The only place I've ever seen it is in Western countries.
English
Julie Hull retweetledi

I just spoke to one of my family members in Iran for the first time in over 20 days. I still haven’t heard from the others yet, but this was one of the best Nowruz presents I could have possibly received and I am so overwhelmed with joy that they are safe!
Notably, they CONFIRMED to me that Iranians within Iran absolutely support this war, and view it as a rescue operation to free our homeland from this demonic theocratic dictatorship. They told me that voices from the outside saying otherwise are all propaganda, which we all know already. As we’ve all said, bombs are scary, but living even another day with the Islamic Republic is even scarier. The worst possible thing would be for the U.S. to back out of Iran and leave the Islamic Republic there. That is the scariest scenario. Should that happen, there would be a massacre of innocent Iranian souls of unprecedented levels. Iran would become the next North Korea.
That is why this war CANNOT END without the COMPLETE AND ABSOLUTE surrender of the Islamic Republic to the Iranian people.
However, what my relative did say is that they’ve never felt more hopeful for the freedom and future of Iran than they do now. They are filled with so much positive morale and excitement. And when I told them about the activist work I and many other people that I’ve met are doing to amplify the voices of Iran, they were so proud and commended us.
Let this be motivation to you all! Keep being LOUD, keep AMPLIFYING Iranian voices, and keep FIGHTING for a free Iran!
Payande Iran! Nowruz Pirooz!!
#FreeIran #IranRevolution2026
English
Julie Hull retweetledi

How about telling Muslims to love Jewish & Christian neighbours?
How about telling Muslim men they should respect women & respect our way of life?
@MayorofLondon
HJB News@HJB_News__
Sadiq Khan: “British Christians should love their Muslim neighbours”
English
Julie Hull retweetledi

@uniteandserve @BBCNews @Emmabarnett @BBCWomansHour @BBCr4today This is a post about Jenni Murray, the BBC’s treatment of her, and their hypocrisy now in pretending to mourn the loss of someone they threw away when she failed to service the trewn agenda. Not sure what you’re up to, but kindly grind whatever axe you’re touting elsewhere.
English

@rivier @BBCNews Never mind eh? The splendid @Emmabarnett with her gritty background story spearheads @BBCWomansHour and is the face (perfect for radio as Steve Wright would have put it) of @BBCr4today brokenbottleboy.substack.com/p/the-sins-of-…
English
Julie Hull retweetledi

🚨 Labour’s Grooming Gang Inquiry Has Been Deliberately Delayed Until After The Next Election 🚨
I took the time to read through the latest details of this so called national inquiry properly, not headlines, not spin, the actual substance, and here is the reality.
On 8 January 2025, the Government rejected calls for a new national grooming gang inquiry, arguing the focus should instead be on implementing previous recommendations.
Then on 14 June 2025, Keir Starmer stood there and announced a National Grooming Gang Inquiry.
Six months later, on 9 December 2025, Anne Longfield was appointed to lead it.
And now, months on from that announcement, this is where we actually are.
The Terms of Reference are still not finalised. Still being drafted. Still being negotiated.
Anne Longfield herself has admitted the draft is not strong enough and not detailed enough, and she did not even write it. If the person leading the inquiry is telling you it is weak, then it is weak.
Even now the wording around one of the most critical issues, ethnicity, race and religion, only says the inquiry “should” look at it. Not will. Not must. That is not a technicality, that is a loophole. It means it can still be watered down.
This is being sold as a national inquiry, yet only a single digit number of areas will actually receive full local investigations. The rest of the country, dozens of affected towns and thousands of victims, will be pushed into a general call for evidence. That is not full exposure, that is containment.
There is currently no advisory panel in place. The previous one has been disbanded. The legal team is still being hired. This is not a system ready to deliver justice, it is a system still being built behind closed doors.
They have also made it clear the Terms of Reference will define what the inquiry does, and only after that will survivors be brought in to shape how it is done. That is completely backwards. Victims should be shaping the scope, not just the process.
We are told there will be no no go zones, but there is no explanation of how that is enforced, who decides it, or what happens when it is challenged. Without that, it is just words.
And here is the part they do not want you focusing on.
The inquiry will start in April 2026, run for three years, and the final report will not be published until after the next General Election.
That is not a coincidence. That is a political decision.
Labour has structured this so the consequences land after the public have already voted. That is not about justice, that is about control.
This inquiry has potential, but right now it is too slow, too limited, too vague, and far too politically convenient to deliver the accountability victims deserve.
I am not interested in what they promise. I am interested in what they deliver.
Right now, this is not good enough!

English
Julie Hull retweetledi

Medieval city planners built streets that curved, narrowed, and wound without logic
Le Corbusier called them donkey paths and spent his career trying to replace them with straight lines
Those streets survived a thousand years of war, plague, and fire
His buildings are already being demolished



English
Julie Hull retweetledi

You do not honor other cultures by weakening your own. You honor them by standing firmly in what is yours.
Shakespeare is not a symbol of domination. He is one of the clearest expressions of what human language can reach at its highest level.
His work survived because generation after generation, across cultures, found truth in it.
What they are calling decolonising is diluting something rooted, tested, and refined over centuries. This is what happens when a civilization loses confidence in its own inheritance.
The idea that Shakespeare being universal is harmful reveals something deeper. It suggests that greatness itself has become suspect. That if something endures across time and place, it must be explained away, not studied. That instinct erases standards.
Tradition is not exclusion. It is memory. It is the record of what a civilization discovered was worth preserving. Once you start apologizing for that, you create a vacuum where nothing holds.
A culture that cannot defend Shakespeare will not be able to defend anything else that made it.

English






