Unicorn Sniper

1.5K posts

Unicorn Sniper banner
Unicorn Sniper

Unicorn Sniper

@roaringwisdom

Tech, finance, other random fun stuff

Planet Earth Katılım Kasım 2010
375 Takip Edilen248 Takipçiler
Chris Ray
Chris Ray@itschrisray·
Been buying $RKLB since late 2021. Crazy to see the gains on some of my lowest cost purchases!
English
23
7
381
44.2K
Planetary Capital
Planetary Capital@lanetarycapital·
$RKLB built this position from 2021-2023. Basically sold everything in 2023 and put in this Rocket Lab account. Last summer sold enough in other accounts to retire young and travel. This account I kept enough shares to have some fun. Today was alot of fun. No plans to sell the rest. In fact, I dont know if I can spend all my space money! May as well ride it into the cosmos.
Planetary Capital tweet media
English
15
4
224
15.7K
Paper Bozz
Paper Bozz@PaperBozz·
$RKLB Today is a special day. My Rocket Lab position just delivered its biggest single-day gain ever — -$3 million in one day. It still hasn’t fully sunk in. Years ago, if someone had told me I’d ever see gains like this in a single day, I would’ve laughed at them. What a ride.
Paper Bozz tweet mediaPaper Bozz tweet media
English
105
38
1.2K
99.5K
Shay Boloor
Shay Boloor@StockSavvyShay·
Two years ago I had enough conviction that $RKLB could become the next generational compounder in my growth portfolio that I sized it at nearly 20% while it was still under $4. It looks obvious now after a 25x move but back then it was a polarizing position since most people viewed Rocket Lab as “just another launch provider” with no chance against SpaceX while I saw the path toward becoming a full-spectrum space prime. That is what conviction looks like when you do the work before the narrative catches up to the price.
Shay Boloor tweet mediaShay Boloor tweet media
English
85
67
1.3K
229.9K
Unicorn Sniper retweetledi
Glitch
Glitch@Glitch_Trades·
Most people on FinX think that wealth is about making money. Truth is, it's actually about time. I'm sharing my 10 truths below that changed how I see success, and I hope this can become a wake-up call for you as well. 🧵
English
12
9
124
12K
Whole Mars Catalog
Whole Mars Catalog@wholemars·
Tesla needs to continue to evolve their Self-Driving pricing model to increase adoption. With a product this good, sales should be going vertical. It's time to ask some hard questions about what's not working. What do you all think?
English
1.1K
132
2K
273.4K
Unicorn Sniper
Unicorn Sniper@roaringwisdom·
@davidasinclair This is bullshit, not possible to have enough sample size and long term tracking to make any accurate conclusion. The error bar on the 2 year number should be at least +/2 years. Highly respect your work, but don't peddle pseudo science
English
0
0
0
41
David Sinclair
David Sinclair@davidasinclair·
Adding regular physical activity alone associates with nearly 2 extra years of life
English
46
42
806
51.1K
Unicorn Sniper
Unicorn Sniper@roaringwisdom·
Long COVID Foundation@LongCFoundation

“Finding an accepted Long COVID biomarker will be complicated. This blood test could give us answers.” @mileswgriffis @thesicktimes Last year, immunologist Johan Van Weyenbergh published a study in The Lancet: Microbe that identified a potential blood-based biomarker for Long COVID with 94% sensitivity. Van Weyenbergh’s team discovered SARS-CoV-2 RNA transcripts in the blood cells of people with Long COVID. They also found a specific type of RNA, called ORF1ab RNA, which suggested there could also be ongoing viral replication of SARS-C0V-2 in people with the disease. “I can see a number of ways where this [potential biomarker] might be useful and warrants further investigation,” said Annie Antar, an assistant professor of medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine who researches HIV and Long COVID.  “A more full characterization of the biomarker will be really important,” said Antar, who is not affiliated with Van Weyenbergh’s research. For a biomarker to be widely accepted, it must undergo an extensive process in which scientists validate their findings with larger groups of patients. Then, other scientists replicate those results in their own independent cohorts. Even when validated through this process, biomarkers can exclude some people who may have a disease. For example, if the biomarker from Van Weyenbergh’s study continues to have 94% sensitivity, that means it will correctly identify Long COVID in 94% of people with the disease — but will miss the other 6%. Despite Van Weyenbergh’s promising research, his team ran out of funding to validate the finding in a larger cohort last fall. His encouraging study could lead to a biomarker for a disabling disease affecting over 400 million people globally, but he couldn’t find support from European governments, many of which have notoriously underfunded research into Long COVID.  “A lot of long haulers are going overlooked or being misdiagnosed because we don’t have tests [for Long COVID],” said Devin Russell, the CEO of Long COVID Foundation. When Russell came across Van Weyenbergh’s study last year, he knew it was something he wanted his non-profit to support. Together with activist group Long COVID Action Project (@LongCovidAP), they raised over $34,000, primarily from people with the disease. Van Weyenbergh’s research also caught the attention of the leading Long COVID research group the Polybio Research Foundation, which he said further supported his research with a $159,000 grant.* Now, Van Weyenbergh is working with his team at the Rega Institute for Medical Research in Leuva, Belgium on confirming their original findings.  “To get a biomarker, we have to validate it in [an] independent cohort,” he said. — More in the link below ⬇️ —

QME
0
0
2
39
Dogan Ural
Dogan Ural@doganuraldesign·
This CAN'T be serious!? You do realize there are global content types beyond politics, right? This is a mistake that will ruin the nature of X. Please revert it before it’s too late.
Dogan Ural tweet media
English
529
142
2.9K
374.6K
Mark Minervini
Mark Minervini@markminervini·
I haven’t had a serious drawdown since the 1980s—just a few single-digit down years in over three decades. How? A deep respect for risk and unconditional patience. A few key rules: 1. Always cut losses short - no big losses. no exceptions! 2. Only trade large on the heels of smaller trades working 3. Always trade progressively smaller when trades aren't working 4. Never average down 5. Never let a good-size gain turn into a loss 6. No forced trades - no style drift
Ivo@IvayloPashov

@gfc4 curious to hear what @markminervini has to say, i would assume he is one of those

English
68
391
3.1K
337.2K
Jesse Peltan
Jesse Peltan@JessePeltan·
2.9 TW of solar globally, half in China. 1.3 TW of wind globally, half in China. The majority of all new capacity is built China.
Jesse Peltan tweet media
English
43
153
1K
77.4K
Unicorn Sniper
Unicorn Sniper@roaringwisdom·
@ZhibeiM The video generated gave a person 3 legs. It needs to have a sanity check from an independent agent.
English
0
0
0
3
Zhibei Ma
Zhibei Ma@ZhibeiM·
Being ranked #1 doesn’t mean we’re good enough. It only means we're more *reasonable* than others. There’s still a lot of work to do. If we’re not solving users’ problems, then we’re not good enough. If you have any feedbacks on Video Editing, feel free to leave it in the comments. Thank you!
Grok@grok

Grok Imagine ranked 1st on Video Editing on Design Arena. Edit cool scenes, add, remove, swap objects or characters, and more! Try it now on x.ai/api/imagine

English
470
530
2.7K
1.3M
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
lol. No. China is no global center of gravity. China is on the decline even as they cling onto their cultural supremacy and harbor grand delusions of returning to the tribute system. Interesting watching that the Communist axis is finally revealing its true colors now that Trump is flushing out the global order they'd been hiding within, though. It's impossible for a global military hegemon to persist. That's not the same thing as saying that the world is necessarily multipolar. The United States is still the global Harrison Bergeron trying to shrug off his shackles.
English
98
335
3.8K
55.2K
James Lindsay, anti-Communist
James Lindsay, anti-Communist@ConceptualJames·
Tucker Carlson on the "multipolar world," that is, pushing Russian and/or Chinese propaganda.
James Lindsay, anti-Communist tweet mediaJames Lindsay, anti-Communist tweet media
English
42
69
603
59.9K
Iran Updates🚨
Iran Updates🚨@IranUpdatesNow·
🚨🚨Live from TelAvive ... Iran is attacking on Isreal Again
English
28
127
1.1K
48.1K
Tesla Yoda
Tesla Yoda@teslayoda·
.@elonmusk Elon, in 2022 you sold about $22B of Tesla stock to fund the Twitter acquisition. Twitter later became X, which was folded into xAI, and xAI has since merged with SpaceX. With a potential $1.75T IPO ahead, would you consider using proceeds from your personal SpaceX stake to buy back Tesla shares? It could be a meaningful way to return some positive karma to long term investors who held through the transition. Tesla Yoda
English
64
25
653
54.6K
CarolingianSon
CarolingianSon@CarolingianSon·
@grok @XFreeze Based on historical trends, known military doctrine, and the events of the past 24-36 hours, do you predict a quick war or prolonged war?
English
10
6
102
49.5K
X Freeze
X Freeze@XFreeze·
Grok predicted the future accurately 🤯 On Feb 28 - the exact date Grok predicted - Israel & the US struck Iran This wasn't a lucky guess. When pushed to predict, Grok analyzed geopolitical signals, Geneva talk outcomes, and real-time data to pinpoint the day Grok knows what the world thinks
X Freeze tweet media
English
2.1K
2.3K
13.9K
32.8M
Unicorn Sniper
Unicorn Sniper@roaringwisdom·
@LauraMiers can I send you dm? Really want to discuss covid with you. I am really struggling with it. Thank you!
English
0
0
0
11
Laura Miers
Laura Miers@LauraMiers·
We are dutiful little hostages. Everything is for THEM. 2023: “Four very powerful billionaires—Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and Marc Andreessen—are creating a world where ‘nothing is true & all is spectacle.’” vanityfair.com/news/2023/08/m…
Laura Miers tweet media
English
2
8
33
611
Laura Miers
Laura Miers@LauraMiers·
Having a lot of these conversations lately. “You’re wrong. I’ve never heard of that, so I asked ChatGPT. ChatGPT said you, a soul who has NEVER used ChatGPT, are wrong. The 6 years of science you are directly citing from medical journals? Also wrong. Not true. Never true.”
English
7
12
91
1.6K